由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
USANews版 - LEGAL AUTHORITIES—CONSTITUTIONAL BASIS OF MANDATORY VACCINATIO
相关主题
Arizona v. United States: Reading the Tea Leaves of Oral ArgumentTrump竞选的时候就反复说要退出伊朗核协议吧?
挑战完健康保险加州的“公投绑大选”
八马大师到底有没有出生证明,哪位藕粉催催?Great Article: Obama is selected, not elected.
民猪党老黑众议员说美国宪法有400年了Is Obama's candidacy constitutional?
Huge Legal Victory For The Constitution Over ObamacareObama: I’d like higher gas prices, just not so quickly
我支持全国公民每人免费发统一ID,就像中国的身份证Obama总统选举资格受到挑战
华人Trump轮活得蟑螂一样卑微,却又崇拜强权欺凌弱小者的人Palin在同性婚姻上的观点
加州厉害:暗渡陈仓,要害死非法移民粗略看了一下 AIP party的platform
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: court话题: health
进入USANews版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
s****7
发帖数: 2507
1
The first state law mandating vaccination was enacted in Massachusetts
in 1809; in 1855, Massachusetts became the first state to enact a
school vaccination re-quirement. The constitutional basis of vaccination
requirements rests in the po-lice power of the state. Nearly 100 years ago,
the U.S. Supreme Court issued its landmark ruling in Jacobson v.
Massachusetts, upholding the right of states to compel vaccination. The
Court held that a health regulation requiring small- pox vaccination was a
reasonable exercise of the state’s police power that did not violate the
liberty rights of individuals under the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S.
Constitution. The police power is the authority reserved to the states by
the Constitution and embraces “such reasonable regulations established di-
rectly by legislative enactment as will protect the public health and the
public safety”
In Jacobson, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts had enacted a statute that
authorized local boards of health to require vaccination. Jacobson
challenged his conviction for refusal to be vaccinated against smallpox as
required by reg-ulations of the Cambridge Board of Health. While
acknowledging the potential for vaccines to cause adverse events and the
inability to determine with absolute certainty whether a particular person
can be safely vaccinated, the Court spe-cifically rejected the idea of
an exemption based on personal choice.
To do otherwise “would practically strip the legislative department of its
function to [in its considered judgment] care for the public health and the
public safety when endangered by epidemics of disease” (197 U.S. at 37, 25
S.Ct. at 366). The Court elaborated on the tension between personal freedom
and public health inherent in liberty: “The liberty secured by the
Constitution of the United States to every person within its jurisdiction
does not import an absolute right in each person to be, at all times and in
all circumstances, wholly freed from restraint. There are manifold
restraints to which every person is necessarily subject for the common good.
On any other basis organized society could not exist with safety to its
members” (197 U.S. at 26, 25 S.Ct. at 361).
s****7
发帖数: 2507
2
The Court held that a health regulation requiring small- pox vaccination was
a reasonable exercise of the state’s police power that did not violate the
liberty rights of individuals under the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S.
Constitution. The police power is the authority reserved to the states by
the Constitution and embraces “such reasonable regulations established di-
rectly by legislative enactment as will protect the public health and the
public safety”
the Court spe-cifically rejected the idea of an exemption based on
personal choice. To do otherwise “would practically strip the legislative
department of its function to [in its considered judgment] care for the
public health and the public safety when endangered by epidemics of disease
m******n
发帖数: 6327
3
police power 治安保卫权
是州权,不是联邦权。所以这个 medical insurance mandate凭借的是commerce power。

Massachusetts
,

【在 s****7 的大作中提到】
: The first state law mandating vaccination was enacted in Massachusetts
: in 1809; in 1855, Massachusetts became the first state to enact a
: school vaccination re-quirement. The constitutional basis of vaccination
: requirements rests in the po-lice power of the state. Nearly 100 years ago,
: the U.S. Supreme Court issued its landmark ruling in Jacobson v.
: Massachusetts, upholding the right of states to compel vaccination. The
: Court held that a health regulation requiring small- pox vaccination was a
: reasonable exercise of the state’s police power that did not violate the
: liberty rights of individuals under the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S.
: Constitution. The police power is the authority reserved to the states by

1 (共1页)
进入USANews版参与讨论
相关主题
粗略看了一下 AIP party的platformHuge Legal Victory For The Constitution Over Obamacare
PETITION: 写信给国会要求Obama提供出生证明我支持全国公民每人免费发统一ID,就像中国的身份证
佛罗里达有投票权的明天请一定要去华人Trump轮活得蟑螂一样卑微,却又崇拜强权欺凌弱小者的人
$100,000,000,000的浪费和欺诈加州厉害:暗渡陈仓,要害死非法移民
Arizona v. United States: Reading the Tea Leaves of Oral ArgumentTrump竞选的时候就反复说要退出伊朗核协议吧?
挑战完健康保险加州的“公投绑大选”
八马大师到底有没有出生证明,哪位藕粉催催?Great Article: Obama is selected, not elected.
民猪党老黑众议员说美国宪法有400年了Is Obama's candidacy constitutional?
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: court话题: health