由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
USANews版 - The Cost of Washington's War on Coal
相关主题
EPA的规定遭到15个州法庭上的挑战加州允许石油公司排放生产废水到河里
EPA想对你淋浴淋多少时间作出规定,以节约用水的名义Obamanomics In Action: Green Kills Jobs
Obama’s War on Coal Is Driving up Energy Costs,NY同学赶紧去买彩票阿 500million阿
EPA moves to repeal Obama’s Clean Power Plan coal regs美国会选个“疯子”当总统吗?
clean coalYoung generations sick of boomers
"BEAUTIFUL clean coal..."There Are too Many Bureaucrats and They Are Paid too Much
喘气被罚的日子快到了吧奥巴马只能是个一期总统 (转载)
Crushing New Wave of Obama’s Regulations ‘Spell Doom for Jobs and Economic Growth’Beating the Racism Card
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: coal话题: energy话题: plants话题: epa
进入USANews版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
l****z
发帖数: 29846
1
It may still be a little outside the box thinking, but you need to start
educating yourself about alternative energy sources for your home. I do
believe that at some point the country will get its energy act together –
but for the foreseeable future Washington's war against market-driven energy
options suggests significant disruptions ahead.
Energy is nature's currency – that's what a friend and colleague with a
physics degree said that to me the other day. I gave the notion some thought
, and it makes perfect sense. It's no wonder that politicians and
bureaucrats go to such lengths to control our energy resources.
Their latest target? Coal.
Messing Around with the Energy Sector's Workhorse
When it comes to energy resources, coal isn't hip. It's one of our oldest,
most abundant energy resources. And since coal mining started long before
modern safety and environmental protections were ever conceived of, many
people still think of coal as dirty, dangerous to mine, and hopelessly
behind the times. Anti-energy bureaucrats exploit these fears to gain
political cover for increasingly draconian regulations.
But coal is not the energy of the past. In fact, coal produces more of the
electricity we use today than any other energy resource. A full 42% of the
electricity used every year in the United States comes from coal.
Not only does coal play a crucial role in our own energy production, it also
plays a vital role in our economy. The U.S. mines so much coal every year,
that we're able to export it to other nations. Think about that – while we
pay through the nose for OPEC oil, the U.S. is a major coal exporter!
Without coal, we'd put a bigger strain on our other resources, making them
more expensive. Electric bills have already spiked higher in recent years,
but imagine seeing them go up as sharply as gasoline prices have.
Any attack on the coal industry is also a raid on your wallet.
Shutting Down Coal Production
In West Virginia, one of the nation's top coal-producing states, the economy
of entire regions is based almost completely on coal production. But,
recently enacted regulations by the EPA are forcing coal-fired power plants
and coal-mining operations to close.
It's become nearly impossible for those in the coal industry to get permits
to mine or burn coal. Many of those with existing permits have had them
revoked.
The result? In the last four months, unemployment in some West Virginia
counties has jumped five percent! Five percent in four months... can you
imagine?
EPA Regulations Hamstring the Coal Industry
The EPA's attack on the coal industry is two-pronged.
First, the EPA has passed regulations that change the way coal-fired power
plants have to handle mercury. The regulations require "Maximum Achievable
Control Technology" to reduce the amount of mercury released from these
plants.
The regulations actually require levels of mercury emissions so low that
they are not achievable. In addition, the economics don't make sense. The
cost of the modifications needed to meet the new regulations will drive the
price of energy produced by the plants past the point where people would be
willing to pay for it. Yet the plants have three years to comply. Their only
other option is retooling for natural gas.
This single measure is expected to cost the coal industry $21 billion per
year and will likely destroy 183,000 jobs annually, while making the U.S.
even more dependent on energy imports.
In addition to the new mercury regulations, the EPA is also requiring coal
plants to reduce so-called greenhouse gas emissions. New emission standards
are so stringent that technology does not yet exist to make the required
modifications, at least not in any sort of cost effective way. Coal-fired
plants must meet the new standards or shut down.
If these regulations are enforced, you can expect your monthly power bill to
go up by at least 10 percent – if not 20 – no matter where you live in
the nation. Your bills will go up even more if you live in a state that
relies heavily on electricity produced from coal. Non-coal-burning states
will also feel the pinch as competition and demand increase for other forms
of energy.
Clean Air and Clean Water
People like me who dare to notice the energy mess that Washington has
created are all painted by the political class as "pro-pollution." But never
have I met a real person who is "against" clean air or clean water.
But, I'm also not against abundant, affordable power – something that makes
our lives infinitely better. And the truth is our coal-fired power plants
are cleaner and more efficient than ever.
The bottom line is that a responsible energy policy would recognize the
desirability of both and work toward balance. Encouraging power plants to
produce power as efficiently and cleanly as possible is a laudable goal. So
requiring them to produce power more efficiently and cleanly than what is
possible based on existing technologies is ludicrous. Forcing them to
shutter their doors if they fail to meet such ridiculous goals... it goes
beyond reason.
These mandates have extraordinary costs – especially when it comes to
sparking job losses and higher energy prices.
And not only do such policies raise your power bills now, cost hundreds of
thousands of jobs, and wreck entire communities... they also ensure that the
technological advances needed to further improve coal-fired power
production will never happen. Without a thriving coal industry, the risks of
exploring such technologies just become too high.
What You Should Expect
The United States has enough coal resources to secure our energy
independence for the next 250 years. But, bureaucrats will continue to use
coal production as a political bargaining chip.
If everyone who gets an electric bill would tell their Congressman to rein
in the EPA and work for energy policies that make good use of our resources
while balancing a commitment to sensible environmental concerns, we could
turn this issue around very quickly.
On a personal level, recognize that becoming more self-reliant can help you
weather the fluctuations in energy prices that you can expect to continue
for the foreseeable future.
Keep a close eye on this space – in coming months, I expect to have a lot
more to say (and offer) in helping you declare your personal energy
independence. Look for a major announcement from me before the end of this
year.
Yours in Freedom and Prosperity,
Lee Bellinger
1 (共1页)
进入USANews版参与讨论
相关主题
Beating the Racism Cardclean coal
In Praise of a Do-nothing Congress"BEAUTIFUL clean coal..."
Everybody’s a target in the American surveillance state喘气被罚的日子快到了吧
Random thoughts by Thomas SowellCrushing New Wave of Obama’s Regulations ‘Spell Doom for Jobs and Economic Growth’
EPA的规定遭到15个州法庭上的挑战加州允许石油公司排放生产废水到河里
EPA想对你淋浴淋多少时间作出规定,以节约用水的名义Obamanomics In Action: Green Kills Jobs
Obama’s War on Coal Is Driving up Energy Costs,NY同学赶紧去买彩票阿 500million阿
EPA moves to repeal Obama’s Clean Power Plan coal regs美国会选个“疯子”当总统吗?
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: coal话题: energy话题: plants话题: epa