l****z
发帖数: 29846 | 1 【 以下文字转载自 SanFrancisco 讨论区 】
发信人: lczlcz (lcz), 信区: SanFrancisco
标 题: Reflections on "Moral Choice" and Definition of "Temporary"
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Nov 2 13:08:36 2012, 美东)
by n*****[email protected] (Mike Mish Shedlock)
California voters have some choices to make in the upcoming election. For
example, Governor Brown says Californians Face ‘Moral Choice’ in Tax Vote
California Governor Jerry Brown said voters face a “moral choice” on
his ballot measure to raise taxes to avoid deep cuts to schools.
“What we’re facing here is a very stark moral choice,” Brown, a 74-
year-old Democrat, said today at a conference of the National Association
for the Advancement of Colored People, or NAACP, in San Mateo, near San
Francisco. “Are we going to invest in our kids, in our schools, in our
colleges, in our universities, or not?”
Brown’s measure, Proposition 30 on the Nov. 6 ballot, would temporarily
boost the state sales tax to 7.5 percent from 7.25 percent and raise the
levy on income starting at $250,000. A rejection by voters would trigger $5.
5 billion in education cuts.
His plan is being challenged by a competing proposal offered by Los
Angeles lawyer Molly Munger, whose father Charles Munger is vice chairman of
Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK/A) Her initiative, Proposition 38, would
increase tax rates for 12 years on income of more than $7,316 by 0.4
percentage point for the lowest earners to 2.2 percentage points for those
making more than $2.5 million a year.
Reflections on "Moral Choice"
The moral choice was not to put ludicrous proposals in front of voters in
the first place. Was there nothing else but schools for Brown to cut?
Even if there was nothing else but schools to cut, pray tell, why can't
teachers make a "moral choice" of reduced benefits "for the sake of the kids
"?
Why is it overburdened taxpayers have to pony up so teachers and other
public unions get benefits most can only dream about?
The real "moral choice" is to tell Brown where to shove it and the same
thing can be said to Molly Munger who wants to "temporarily" hike taxes.
Definition of "Temporary"
Molly's definition of "temporary" is a "mere" 12 years. You are out of your
mind if you think that will be the end of it. As soon as taxes are hiked,
public unions will be demanding massive pay hikes, "for the kids" of course.
My friend Hugo Salinas Price discusses the meaning of "temporary" in his
excellent article Reflections on the effects of War as compared to the
effects of Fiat Money.
At Bretton Woods in 1944 Henry Morgenthau and Harry Dexter White
outmaneuvered John Maynard Keynes, the British Delegate to the Monetary
Conference, and the Conference ended by accepting the American “diktat”
for the post-war monetary structure of the world: the dollar was to be as
good as gold for purposes of international payments, and the US promised to
redeem for gold dollars held by other national central banks at the rate of
one ounce of gold for each $35 dollars tendered for redemption. ...
Came the fateful day, August 15, 1971, and the US had to default on its
promise to redeem dollars for gold – it was going to be only a “temporary
” suspension, Nixon assured the American people.
Alas, in politics nothing is more permanent than a temporary measure.
The dollar became the full-fledged fiat currency of the world.
Cut the Money to Special Interests
Ed Ring, Director of Finance, Yes on Proposition 32 writes ...
Hello Mish
Special interests who oppose the YES on the Prop. 32 political spending
reform initiative have raised nearly $70 million.
Virtually all of this money has come from public sector unions, who use
forced dues and fees, taken from government worker paychecks, to fund the
annihilation of any political rival who challenges them. How's that for your
tax dollars at work?
And apart from government union organizations, how many actual
individual donors from these alleged "middle class working families" are
reported on the California Secretary of State's website as having
voluntarily contributed to this massive warchest? Only 6 people. Seven, if
you include the hedge fund billionaire who donated $500,000.
Please join millions of Californians next week to vote YES on Prop. 32,
a campaign finance reform public sector unions have raised a massive war-
chest to defeat.
Proposition 32 prohibits union political contributions from being
automatically deducted from employee paychecks. This means that if public
sector unions want their members to contribute a portion of their paycheck
to a political campaign, first they have to ask permission. Is this so
unreasonable?
Without passage of Prop. 32, California will never fix the public
schools, reform the prison system, hold fair elections, balance government
budgets, streamline government agencies, or reduce the crippling tithe
demanded by the pension bankers. A YES vote on Prop. 32 is a vote for
freedom.
The dismal results of unionizing our state and local governments should
be clear to anyone, Republican or Democrat: Failing schools, bankrupt cities
, and no money left for anything apart from more pay and more benefits for
unionized public employees. And unlike private sector unions who must be
reasonable or they bankrupt the company, public sector unions simply elect
politicians who vote to raise taxes. No wonder California has the highest
taxes in the nation.
Public sector unions have been the most powerful political players in
California for decades. Prop. 32 doesn't break these unions, it merely
requires them to ask their members' permission before using their dues to
make political contributions. It is a necessary step towards restoring
balance to California politics.
Vote YES on November 6th for real campaign finance reform: Prop. 32, the
Stop Special Interest Money Act, is our best chance to take California back
. Here's how it will change the rules in Sacramento:
1) Prohibits direct corporate and union contributions to state and local
candidates,
2) Prohibits contributions by government contractors to the politicians
who control contracts awarded to them,
3) Prohibits automatic deductions by corporations, unions, and
government of employees’ wages to be used for politics.
Let's make our voice heard again. Vote YES on Prop 32 to Stop Special
Interest Money.
Please help us - donate now.
Please make a donation, I just did, and I do not even live in California.
And when time comes to vote ...
Vote Yes on 32
Note No on 30
Vote No on 38
Remember, when it comes to politics and especially tax hikes in California,
"nothing is more permanent than a temporary measure". |
|
