t***h 发帖数: 5601 | 1 奥巴马罗姆尼烧钱 美国最贵总统选举耗资60亿美元
2012-11-03 苹果日报
进入美国总统选举最后冲刺,各种偏见、煽动仇恨无底线的竞选广告蜂拥而出,背
后是大烧钞票,美国传媒指广告费已逾10亿美元(78亿港元)!两位总统选人的竞选开
支高达60亿美元(468亿港元),非常惊人,是美国历史上最贵的一次总统选举。
根据联邦选举委员会数据,总统及各自阵营州议员、国会议员选举将花费近60亿美
元。似乎还未计这些第三方卖广告的「暗黑经费」。而两名总统候选人向委员会上报选
举使费分别近10亿美元,奥巴马来自个人小额及大学、互联网业捐款较多。罗姆尼的头
五名最大捐助者全是投资银行金融巨企,并得用金钱影响选情的政治行动委员会(PAC
)的一面倒资助,PAC也另投广告撑他。 | f*********g 发帖数: 1637 | 2 Since SCOTUS's rule, US politics is more like plutocracy. "Money talks" get
glorious and legal endorsement from SCOTUS! | h*****w 发帖数: 8561 | | a*********a 发帖数: 3656 | 4 unions can contribute equally as corporations to candidates and superpacts.
in addition, unions do not shy away from telling their members how to vote.
just go lookat uaw.org : "solidarity Obama". and http://www.utla.net/ (united teachers LA) : "Yes on 30, No on 32". These are on the front page of these union websites.
public unions have the additional tool like strikes to influnce govt
administration decisions. And they vote for govt officials who they then
collectively bargain with.
So if corporations are people, then unions are super people. Public unions
are like one person, two votes.
get
【在 f*********g 的大作中提到】 : Since SCOTUS's rule, US politics is more like plutocracy. "Money talks" get : glorious and legal endorsement from SCOTUS!
| t***h 发帖数: 5601 | | t***h 发帖数: 5601 | 6 哈哈哈, 这是美联储的“功劳”
【在 h*****w 的大作中提到】 : 这主要也是因为美元越来越象废纸了。。。
|
|