i**t 发帖数: 3556 | 1 From an outright libertarian, the headline seems contrary; but Ron Paul's
affirmation that "pure democracy is dangerous" critically confirms what
Romney accidentally admitted: that enabling the majority to dictate the
minority is a problem when the majority are receiving a [government] check.
Bloomberg TV's Betty Liu looks a little shocked when the thoughtful Paul
confirms bluntly that the reelection of Obama is driven simply by 'the
people' being on the 'receiving end' of government benefits and that the US
is "so far gone; we're over the cliff already." From the lack of credibility
in Washington to GOP's 'acceptance' of higher taxes and why he quit
Congress, Ron Paul succinctly reminds many of the true state of the union in
which we live... "As long as you think we have to please the world and run
this welfare state, all we will argue about is who will get the loot." |
d*********2 发帖数: 48111 | 2 yes, but credit to GW Bush. He made 40% to 47%
US
credibility
in
【在 i**t 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : From an outright libertarian, the headline seems contrary; but Ron Paul's : affirmation that "pure democracy is dangerous" critically confirms what : Romney accidentally admitted: that enabling the majority to dictate the : minority is a problem when the majority are receiving a [government] check. : Bloomberg TV's Betty Liu looks a little shocked when the thoughtful Paul : confirms bluntly that the reelection of Obama is driven simply by 'the : people' being on the 'receiving end' of government benefits and that the US : is "so far gone; we're over the cliff already." From the lack of credibility : in Washington to GOP's 'acceptance' of higher taxes and why he quit : Congress, Ron Paul succinctly reminds many of the true state of the union in
|
m********g 发帖数: 10469 | |
e*******e 发帖数: 9616 | 4 Uncle Paul: democracy =/= democrat party. They look the same though.
US
credibility
in
【在 i**t 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : From an outright libertarian, the headline seems contrary; but Ron Paul's : affirmation that "pure democracy is dangerous" critically confirms what : Romney accidentally admitted: that enabling the majority to dictate the : minority is a problem when the majority are receiving a [government] check. : Bloomberg TV's Betty Liu looks a little shocked when the thoughtful Paul : confirms bluntly that the reelection of Obama is driven simply by 'the : people' being on the 'receiving end' of government benefits and that the US : is "so far gone; we're over the cliff already." From the lack of credibility : in Washington to GOP's 'acceptance' of higher taxes and why he quit : Congress, Ron Paul succinctly reminds many of the true state of the union in
|
O*****g 发帖数: 1257 | 5 这是W最糟糕的地方
【在 d*********2 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : yes, but credit to GW Bush. He made 40% to 47% : : US : credibility : in
|
bp 发帖数: 46 | 6 I live in a swing state and I think Midwest voted for Obama not because of
the issues Ron Paul raised, but because Obama's community organization- his
election team is one of the most efficient, passionate and strategic teams
in history.
I supported both Hillary Clinton and Romney in 2008 within each of their own
parties. But I think both lost to Obama not because they are less smart or
capable than Obama- in fact, they are probably both smarter, more capable
and work harder. But Obama knows how to make people working for him best. He
won me over this way. I look forward to the next four years. |
b********e 发帖数: 162 | 7 There was an interesting article on TIME talking about how team-O mines
massive voter data.Very impressive but a little creepy.
I think Obama's base may be smaller,but their GOTV effort made the key
difference.
I wonder why GOP did not adopt that approach since 2008.
his
own
or
He
【在 bp 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : I live in a swing state and I think Midwest voted for Obama not because of : the issues Ron Paul raised, but because Obama's community organization- his : election team is one of the most efficient, passionate and strategic teams : in history. : I supported both Hillary Clinton and Romney in 2008 within each of their own : parties. But I think both lost to Obama not because they are less smart or : capable than Obama- in fact, they are probably both smarter, more capable : and work harder. But Obama knows how to make people working for him best. He : won me over this way. I look forward to the next four years.
|
d*********2 发帖数: 48111 | 8 too few old guys using fb
【在 b********e 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : There was an interesting article on TIME talking about how team-O mines : massive voter data.Very impressive but a little creepy. : I think Obama's base may be smaller,but their GOTV effort made the key : difference. : I wonder why GOP did not adopt that approach since 2008. : : his : own : or : He
|
N********n 发帖数: 8363 | |
m******O 发帖数: 596 | 10 这是因为,现在的GOP,虽然仍然人才济济,但是它的领导层缺乏前瞻性的眼光。譬如
在这次选战中,我注意到GOP仍然把大量的资金和人力投入到电视广告的地毯式轰炸中
- 这可是上一代和上上代的宣传技术手段。
还有一个例子是不重视提前投票的动员,仍然迷信选举日的turn out。而提前投票的好
处是不言而寓的:
1. 免得夜长梦多,让倾向于自己的选民没有跳票的可能。
2. 可以集中火力对付更少的未下决心的选民群,而自己的对手还只能没有重点地撒大
网。
3. 在宣传上先声夺人。
4. 让投了票的选民有一种上了贼船就要挺到底的感觉,能更投入地为自己助选拉票。
5. 减小选民因为大选日的不确定因素(天气、突发事故、拥挤的投票点,等等)而无
法投票的风险。
总之,这一次失败,GOP的竞选团队不光从战略上,在战术上也有很多需要反省的地方。
【在 b********e 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : There was an interesting article on TIME talking about how team-O mines : massive voter data.Very impressive but a little creepy. : I think Obama's base may be smaller,but their GOTV effort made the key : difference. : I wonder why GOP did not adopt that approach since 2008. : : his : own : or : He
|
|
|
O*****g 发帖数: 1257 | 11 嗯,的确,
dem是vote early vote often 的
【在 m******O 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 这是因为,现在的GOP,虽然仍然人才济济,但是它的领导层缺乏前瞻性的眼光。譬如 : 在这次选战中,我注意到GOP仍然把大量的资金和人力投入到电视广告的地毯式轰炸中 : - 这可是上一代和上上代的宣传技术手段。 : 还有一个例子是不重视提前投票的动员,仍然迷信选举日的turn out。而提前投票的好 : 处是不言而寓的: : 1. 免得夜长梦多,让倾向于自己的选民没有跳票的可能。 : 2. 可以集中火力对付更少的未下决心的选民群,而自己的对手还只能没有重点地撒大 : 网。 : 3. 在宣传上先声夺人。 : 4. 让投了票的选民有一种上了贼船就要挺到底的感觉,能更投入地为自己助选拉票。
|
d********f 发帖数: 43471 | 12 en,民猪党就会对acorn这种大规模的voter fraud机构投入重金,gop应该大规模投入资
金组织红脖对voter fraud进行稽查
中
【在 m******O 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 这是因为,现在的GOP,虽然仍然人才济济,但是它的领导层缺乏前瞻性的眼光。譬如 : 在这次选战中,我注意到GOP仍然把大量的资金和人力投入到电视广告的地毯式轰炸中 : - 这可是上一代和上上代的宣传技术手段。 : 还有一个例子是不重视提前投票的动员,仍然迷信选举日的turn out。而提前投票的好 : 处是不言而寓的: : 1. 免得夜长梦多,让倾向于自己的选民没有跳票的可能。 : 2. 可以集中火力对付更少的未下决心的选民群,而自己的对手还只能没有重点地撒大 : 网。 : 3. 在宣传上先声夺人。 : 4. 让投了票的选民有一种上了贼船就要挺到底的感觉,能更投入地为自己助选拉票。
|
e*******e 发帖数: 9616 | 13 gop已经承认voter id是得罪人的臭招了。
越查,泥哥和啊米哥的turn out率反而越高。
人家可不象你gop老中想当然,
你操我我就操回去,谁怕谁
【在 d********f 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : en,民猪党就会对acorn这种大规模的voter fraud机构投入重金,gop应该大规模投入资 : 金组织红脖对voter fraud进行稽查 : : 中
|
b********e 发帖数: 162 | 14 个人认为,博导是mitbbs上水平最高的人之一。
【在 d********f 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : en,民猪党就会对acorn这种大规模的voter fraud机构投入重金,gop应该大规模投入资 : 金组织红脖对voter fraud进行稽查 : : 中
|
d********f 发帖数: 43471 | 15 是么,那民猪党的法官在PA block个球啊,费城那多出的60万票都怎么来的?为什么黑
党卫军要把gop的监督员赶出去?
【在 e*******e 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : gop已经承认voter id是得罪人的臭招了。 : 越查,泥哥和啊米哥的turn out率反而越高。 : 人家可不象你gop老中想当然, : 你操我我就操回去,谁怕谁
|
e*******e 发帖数: 9616 | 16 哈哈,那里有压迫那里就有反抗。
你共还是专心craft好自己的政策笼络人心吧
我一独立人事看你们不识人间烟火的样子都觉得可笑。美国的本来优秀的红脖文化都被
你们糟蹋得没点知识含量了
【在 d********f 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 是么,那民猪党的法官在PA block个球啊,费城那多出的60万票都怎么来的?为什么黑 : 党卫军要把gop的监督员赶出去?
|
m********o 发帖数: 2088 | 17
This is a lie too.
【在 N********n 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
|
m********g 发帖数: 10469 | 18 为什么中国军阀打不过老蒋,因为老蒋的国民党比军阀团体更有组织性服从性。但老蒋
的国民党打不过共产党,因为共产党比国民党还有组织性服从性。
你现在光从选举组织发动群众的能力指望GOP更新,本来这就不是美国和政党传统,当
个党员就是注册一下,不要入党申请人也不写入党申请书,选举4年才开次党代会,还
和开PARTY一样。这是非常松散的政党组织,强调个人作用。
TG开个党代会,动员群众能力,还不只是军警,就能把北京封个密不透风。奥八马熟读
毛选只不过学了一点样。如果你觉得GOP为了选举,把自己改造成高度有组织性服从性
有群众动员能力的政党,你觉得这是吸引你来的美国?你放心这样的政党执政?
这种政党怎么可能保持小政府,低税率,砍福利,维护个人自由的主张?
那是美丽坚苏维埃共和国.
中
【在 m******O 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 这是因为,现在的GOP,虽然仍然人才济济,但是它的领导层缺乏前瞻性的眼光。譬如 : 在这次选战中,我注意到GOP仍然把大量的资金和人力投入到电视广告的地毯式轰炸中 : - 这可是上一代和上上代的宣传技术手段。 : 还有一个例子是不重视提前投票的动员,仍然迷信选举日的turn out。而提前投票的好 : 处是不言而寓的: : 1. 免得夜长梦多,让倾向于自己的选民没有跳票的可能。 : 2. 可以集中火力对付更少的未下决心的选民群,而自己的对手还只能没有重点地撒大 : 网。 : 3. 在宣传上先声夺人。 : 4. 让投了票的选民有一种上了贼船就要挺到底的感觉,能更投入地为自己助选拉票。
|