l****z
发帖数: 29846 | 1 by AWR Hawkins 5 Feb 2013, 3:37 AM PDT
As gun grabbers continue to push for a ban on magazines that hold more 10
rounds, one question begs to be answered--What are law abiding citizens with
10 rounds to do when attacked by criminals with 15, 20, or even 30 rounds?
Are they to lie down and say uncle?
Are they to hand over their wallet and their car keys and beg for mercy?
This is not hyperbole. Obama traveled to Minneapolis on Monday to say
magazines that hold more than 10 rounds ought to be banned. He stood in
front of row after row of police officers and described magazines that hold
more than 10 rounds as "weapons of war." But he did not bother explaining
how law abiding citizens with only 10 rounds are to survive in a 30 round
world.
Obama, and those who think like him, live a theoretical existence where 10
rounds looks sufficient on paper. Therefore, they presume it must be good in
reality. However, in the real world, the law abiding citizen who is limited
to 10 rounds is at least 5 rounds light, and may actually be 15 rounds
behind before gunfire is even exchanged.
Think about it this way--in the hands of a law abiding citizen, a magazine
of any capacity is a defensive tool. And because Obama's ban will only
affect law abiding citizens, any limitation he achieves will be a limitation
on the ability of law abiding citizens to defend themselves, period. |
|
