l****z
发帖数: 29846 | 1 by Jammie
Rand Paul is the first Washington politician since Paul Ryan to seize an
opportunity on a controversial issue that cuts across partisan lines — in
this case, the Obama administration’s use of unmanned aircraft to target
and kill terrorists — and run with it. Like Ryan, he did it with supreme
competence.
I watched six hours of his 13-hour marathon filibuster, and the clarity,
calm and sangfroid with which he spoke was so literally exceptional it was
a sad demonstration of just how bad most politicians are when it comes to
making an elementary case about anything.
You could see, on Twitter and elsewhere, how instantly galvanizing Paul
’s stunt was — so much so that as the day passed, more and more members of
his party showed up to show support and ask him questions so that he could
relax for a moment.
And yet, while Paul’s brilliant advocacy and command of the public
stage were remarkable, in the end it is his opinions that matter. And they
are highly problematic at best and genuinely worrisome at worst. | j*****v
发帖数: 7717 | 2 Rand Paul这段话讲得好。
民主不能保证像希特勒这号人不会被选上。所以要坚持捍卫“rule of laws", 让这类
人即使被选上也不能abuse他们手中的权力。
宪法是mother of all laws, 谁违反宪法，谁就是在破坏“rule of laws"，不分种族
，不分左右，坚决予以反击，绝不妥协。 |
|
