由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
USANews版 - George Mason大学研究发现,美国保守的州更自由,吸引更多人迁入
相关主题
关于兰州和红州--逃离蓝州的美国人[转载译文]1986年移民大赦为何失败
Killing A Meme At BirthEdward Snowden’s Email Provider Shuts Down Amid Secret Court Battle
Nearly 1 Million Workers Vanished Under Obama强烈支持Trump来拯救美国
奥巴马医疗法案的负面影响瑞典接受大量穆斯林移民, 愚蠢至极
人往低处流应该修宪了
一千万亚裔移民美国 华人成第二大移民群体大统领可能要任命个印裔大法官 (转载)
More Illegal Aliens Returning to Mexico For GoodMassive Legal Migration Is Eroding Middle Class
我给共和党提一个以后稳赢的秘密计划这么多生物发考题, 为什么没人做印第安研究?
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: states话题: new话题: freedom话题: study话题: found
进入USANews版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
l****z
发帖数: 29846
1
Americans Are Migrating To More Free Republican States
By JOHN MERLINE, INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY
Americans are migrating from less-free liberal states to more-free
conservative states, where they are doing better economically, according to
a new study published Thursday by George Mason University's Mercatus Center.
The "Freedom in the 50 States" study measured economic and personal freedom
using a wide range of criteria, including tax rates, government spending and
debt, regulatory burdens, and state laws covering land use, union
organizing, gun control, education choice and more.
It found that the freest states tended to be conservative "red" states,
while the least free were liberal "blue" states.
The freest state overall, the researchers concluded, was North Dakota,
followed by South Dakota, Tennessee, New Hampshire and Oklahoma. The least
free state by far was New York, followed by California, New Jersey, Hawaii
and Rhode Island.
The study also compared its measures of economic and personal freedom to
population shifts and income growth, and found that freer states tend to do
better on both scores than those less free.
For example, it found a strong correlation between a state's freedom ranking
and migration, which means that Americans are gravitating toward states
that have less-intrusive governments.
Escape From New York, L.A.
New York, for example, saw a net migration of -9.2% between 2000 and 2011,
and California's was -4.2%. In contrast, Tennessee gained 4.4%, and Oklahoma
gained 1.3%.
An IBD analysis of the data found that "red" states — those voting for
Republican presidential candidates in the past two elections — saw an
overall net migration of 2.2%, while "blue" states saw an overall average
net migration of -0.3%.
"People are voting for places with greater freedom," said William Ruger, a
political scientist at Texas State University and one of the co-authors of
the study. That was true, he said, even after controlling for things like
weather and amenities that might attract people to states independent of
these freedom measures.
The study also found that states with more freedom tended to see stronger
income growth. This was particularly true in states with more regulatory
freedom.
"Adam Smith was right," Ruger said. "If you have economic freedom, you will
have economic growth."
IBD has previously reported that red states saw stronger job growth, lower
unemployment and bigger gains in per capita income than blue states during
the economic recovery. For example, IBD found that in the first three years
of the recovery, red states saw 1.9% job growth compared with 1.2% for blue
states.
The Mercatus study also found that blue states have generally become less
free over the past decade, while red states have tended to gain additional
levels of freedom. The states with the biggest declines in freedom were
Wyoming, Illinois, New Jersey, New York and Kansas. Those with the biggest
gains were Oklahoma, North Dakota, Idaho, Utah and New Mexico.
And contrary to conventional wisdom, the researchers found that conservative
states are just as likely as liberal ones to score well on measures of
personal freedom, which looked at laws covering marijuana use, gambling,
marriage rights, alcohol and tobacco use, gun control, victimless crimes and
the like.
"Personal freedom does not relate straightforwardly to the left-right
spectrum at all," the study noted.
The study's findings also call into question claims made repeatedly by
President Obama during last year's campaign that tax cuts and deregulation
won't produce growth and prosperity.
"They tell us," he said in one speech, that "if we just cut more regulations
and cut more taxes — especially for the wealthy — our economy will grow
stronger."
"Here's the problem," he said. "It doesn't work. It has never worked."
But if anything, the data show precisely the opposite.
1 (共1页)
进入USANews版参与讨论
相关主题
这么多生物发考题, 为什么没人做印第安研究?人往低处流
半年抓了7百中國人  墨西哥偷渡美國一千万亚裔移民美国 华人成第二大移民群体
川普就是要make America white againMore Illegal Aliens Returning to Mexico For Good
新黑豹党号召黑人在南方五州建立“国中国”我给共和党提一个以后稳赢的秘密计划
关于兰州和红州--逃离蓝州的美国人[转载译文]1986年移民大赦为何失败
Killing A Meme At BirthEdward Snowden’s Email Provider Shuts Down Amid Secret Court Battle
Nearly 1 Million Workers Vanished Under Obama强烈支持Trump来拯救美国
奥巴马医疗法案的负面影响瑞典接受大量穆斯林移民, 愚蠢至极
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: states话题: new话题: freedom话题: study话题: found