n***t 发帖数: 8357 | 1 又TM打。
They sure know how to spend tax payers' money, quickly. | T**********1 发帖数: 2406 | 2 it is actually not tax payers' money they are spending.
technically, the money being spend is printed, not taxed.
so all who have money are being diluted and are paying for it.
but of course that is not accruate either.it is the productive sectors/
people that are paying for the cost.
a significant portion of the tax payers are not engaging in true productive
work, or you can say bubble-induced jobs.
since US$ is global reserve currency, it is actually the whole world paying
for it, not just Americans.
【在 n***t 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 又TM打。 : They sure know how to spend tax payers' money, quickly.
| n***t 发帖数: 8357 | 3 OK,又TM不是TAX PAYERS' money 了。
那给我减税吧,什么税都是年年涨。
滚他妈的。 | z*****a 发帖数: 9790 | 4 欢迎“爱好和平”的左逼来给主党洗地,看这次还能不能赖到布什头上
【在 n***t 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : OK,又TM不是TAX PAYERS' money 了。 : 那给我减税吧,什么税都是年年涨。 : 滚他妈的。
| l******a 发帖数: 3803 | 5
luberals ran into a bad situation that they may end up having to prove
whether they are on the progressive part of the US economy/prosperity more
than anything else. That's where they relentlessly failed, over and over
again.
【在 z*****a 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 欢迎“爱好和平”的左逼来给主党洗地,看这次还能不能赖到布什头上
|
|