l****z
发帖数: 29846 | 1 President George W. Bush wasn’t unintelligent. In fact, he was brilliant…
Joshua Riddle
March 25, 2014 11:08 pm
Keith Hennessey, professor at Stanford Business School, wanted to set the
record straight about President Bush’s intellect. He writes:
I teach a class at Stanford Business School titled “Financial Crises in the
U.S. and Europe.” During one class session while explaining the events of
September 2008, I kept referring to the efforts of the threesome of Hank
Paulson, Ben Bernanke, and Tim Geithner, who were joined at the hip in
dealing with firm-specific problems as they arose.
One of my students asked “How involved was President Bush with what was
going on?” I smiled and responded, “What you really mean is, ‘Was
President Bush smart enough to understand what was going on,’ right?”
The class went dead silent. Everyone knew that this was the true meaning of
the question. Kudos to that student for asking the hard question and for
framing it so politely. I had stripped away that decorum and exposed the raw
nerve.
I looked hard at the 60 MBA students and said “President Bush is smarter
than almost every one of you.”
More silence.
I could tell they were waiting for me to break the tension, laugh, and admit
I was joking.
I did not. A few shifted in their seats, then I launched into a longer
answer. While it was a while ago, here is an amalgam of that answer and
others I have given in similar contexts.
I am not kidding. You are quite an intelligent group. Don’t take it
personally, but President Bush is smarter than almost every one of you. Were
he a student here today, he would consistently get “HP” (High Pass)
grades without having to work hard, and he’d get an “H” (High, the top
grade) in any class where he wanted to put in the effort.
For more than six years it was my job to help educate President Bush
about complex economic policy issues and to get decisions from him on
impossibly hard policy choices. In meetings and in the briefing materials we
gave him in advance we covered issues in far more depth than I have been
discussing with you this quarter because we needed to do so for him to make
decisions.
President Bush is extremely smart by any traditional standard. He’s
highly analytical and was incredibly quick to be able to discern the core
question he needed to answer. It was occasionally a little embarrassing when
he would jump ahead of one of his Cabinet secretaries in a policy
discussion and the advisor would struggle to catch up. He would sometimes
force us to accelerate through policy presentations because he so quickly
grasped what we were presenting.
I use words like briefing and presentation to describe our policy
meetings with him, but those are inaccurate. Every meeting was a dialogue,
and you had to be ready at all times to be grilled by him and to defend both
your analysis and your recommendation. That was scary.
We treat Presidential speeches as if they are written by speechwriters,
then handed to the President for delivery. If I could show you one
experience from my time working for President Bush, it would be an editing
session in the Oval with him and his speechwriters. You think that me cold-
calling you is nerve-wracking? Try defending a sentence you inserted into a
draft speech, with President Bush pouncing on the slightest weakness in your
argument or your word choice.
In addition to his analytical speed, what most impressed me were his
memory and his substantive breadth. We would sometimes have to brief him on
an issue that we had last discussed with him weeks or even months before. He
would remember small facts and arguments from the prior briefing and get
impatient with us when we were rehashing things we had told him long ago.
And while my job involved juggling a lot of balls, I only had to worry
about economic issues. In addition to all of those, at any given point in
time he was making enormous decisions on Iraq and Afghanistan, on hunting al
Qaeda and keeping America safe. He was making choices not just on taxes and
spending and trade and energy and climate and health care and agriculture
and Social Security and Medicare, but also on education and immigration, on
crime and justice issues, on environmental policy and social policy and
politics. Being able to handle such substantive breadth and depth, on such
huge decisions, in parallel, requires not just enormous strength of
character but tremendous intellectual power. President Bush has both.
On one particularly thorny policy issue on which his advisors had strong and
deep disagreements, over the course of two weeks we (his senior advisors)
held a series of three 90-minute meetings with the President. Shortly after
the third meeting we asked for his OK to do a fourth. He said, “How about
rather than doing another meeting on this, I instead tell you now what each
person will say.” He then ran through half a dozen of his advisors by name
and precisely detailed each one’s arguments and pointed out their flaws. (
Needless to say there was no fourth meeting.)
Every prominent politician has a public caricature, one drawn initially by
late-night comedy joke writers and shaped heavily by the press and one’s
political opponents. The caricature of President Bush is that of a good ol’
boy from Texas who is principled and tough, but just not that bright.
That caricature was reinforced by several factors:
The press and his opponents highlighted President Bush’s occasional
stumbles when giving a speech. President Obama’s similar verbal miscues are
ignored. Ask yourself: if every public statement you made were recorded and
all your verbal fumbles were tweeted, how smart would you sound? Do you
ever use the wrong word or phrase, or just botch a sentence for no good
reason? I know I do.
President Bush intentionally aimed his public image at average Americans
rather than at Cambridge or Upper East Side elites. Mitt Romney’s campaign
was predicated on “I am smart enough to fix a broken economy,” while
George W. Bush’s campaigns stressed his values, character, and principles
rather than boasting about his intellect. He never talked about graduating
from Yale and Harvard Business School, and he liked to lower expectations by
pretending he was just an average guy. Example: “My National Security
Advisor Condi Rice is a Stanford professor, while I’m a C student. And look
who’s President. ”
There is a bias in much of the mainstream press and commentariat that
people from outside of NY-BOS-WAS-CHI-SEA-SF-LA are less intelligent, or at
least well educated. Many public commenters harbor an anti-Texas (and anti-
Southern, and anti-Midwestern) intellectual bias. They mistakenly treat John
Kerry as smarter than George Bush because John Kerry talks like an Ivy
League professor while George Bush talks like a Texan.
President Bush enjoys interacting with the men and women of our armed
forces and with elite athletes. He loves to clear brush on his ranch. He
loved interacting with the U.S. Olympic Team. He doesn’t windsurf off
Nantucket, he rides a 100K mountain bike ride outside of Waco with wounded
warriors. He is an intense, competitive athlete and a “guy’s guy.” His
hobbies and habits reinforce a caricature of a [dumb] jock, in contrast to
cultural sophisticates who enjoy antiquing and opera. This reinforces the
other biases against him.
I assume that some who read this will react automatically with disbelief and
sarcasm. They think they know that President Bush is unintelligent because,
after all, everyone knows that. They will assume that I am wrong, or
blinded by loyalty, or lying. They are certain that they are smarter than
George Bush.
I ask you simply to consider the possibility that I’m right, that he is
smarter than you.
If you can, find someone who has interacted directly with him outside the
public spotlight. Ask that person about President Bush’s intellect. I am
confident you will hear what I heard dozens of times from CEOs after they
met with him: “Gosh, I had no idea he was that smart.”
At a minimum I hope you will test your own assumptions and thinking about
our former President. I offer a few questions to help that process.
Upon what do you base your view of President Bush’s intellect? How much
is it shaped by the conventional wisdom about him? How much by verbal
miscues highlighted by the press?
Do you discount your estimate of his intellect because he’s from Texas
or because of his accent? Because he’s an athlete and a ranch owner?
Because he never advertises that he went to Yale and Harvard?
This is a hard one, for liberals only. Do you assume that he is
unintelligent because he made policy choices with which you disagree? If so,
your logic may be backwards. “I disagree with choice X that President Bush
made. No intelligent person could conclude X, therefore President Bush is
unintelligent.” Might it be possible that an intelligent, thoughtful
conservative with different values and priorities than your own might have
reached a different conclusion than you? Do you really think your policy
views derive only from your intellect?
And finally, if you base your view of President Bush’s intellect on a
public image and caricature shaped by late night comedians, op-ed writers,
TV pundits, and Twitter, is that a smart thing for you to do? | s********t
发帖数: 4150 | 2 The libtards would say Obama's sons have more potential. | S*********g
发帖数: 24893 | 3 2007-2008年不是证明了经济学教授（和布什以及他的经济顾问）都是傻逼吗？ | a*******1
发帖数: 1554 | 4 其实嘛，我只想指出几点：
1.如果我没有记错的话，这个Keith Hennessey，是个Lecturer，而不是Professor。
Lecturer当然就不是tenure,按中国的话说，就是“师资博后”，不是讲师哦，中国的
讲师对应美国的应该是助理教授；
2.如果我还没有记错的话，这个人，应该不是PhD，只是Master，在学校里混，那个
master学位，这意味着什么，不用我多说了吧。
其实嘛，一个人觉得另一个人聪明，往往并不是另一个人真的聪明，而是刚好他俩的观
点一致罢了；而且这个Keith，只读了个Master，本来就智商捉急啊，还在斯坦福这种
地方混，周围都是比他聪明的人，多少有点怀才不遇；好不容易遇到个弱智的小布什，
感觉这人咋跟我这么有共同语言哩，于是当然说小布什好话啦。
事实上是怎么样的已经很清楚了：其实他们都是互相利用。小布什想找一个名校的教授
为自己背书，可惜正经的教授都看不上他，好不容易找了个硕士混到斯坦福的师资博后
，于是如获至宝，两人一拍即合。政府出面把lectuer包装成professor，然后再让他为
小布什说几句好话。没想到这个Keith水平实在有限，本来短小精炼的就可以了，他却
写了这么一长串废话，唉，我都不知道说什么好了。
比如英国的学者评马克思是千年第一学者，爱因斯坦排第2，本版的小右右们肯定是无
法接受的。 | S*********g
发帖数: 24893 | 5 呵呵
版主要生气了
【在 a*******1 的大作中提到】
: 其实嘛，我只想指出几点：
: 1.如果我没有记错的话，这个Keith Hennessey，是个Lecturer，而不是Professor。
: Lecturer当然就不是tenure,按中国的话说，就是“师资博后”，不是讲师哦，中国的
: 讲师对应美国的应该是助理教授；
: 2.如果我还没有记错的话，这个人，应该不是PhD，只是Master，在学校里混，那个
: master学位，这意味着什么，不用我多说了吧。
: 其实嘛，一个人觉得另一个人聪明，往往并不是另一个人真的聪明，而是刚好他俩的观
: 点一致罢了；而且这个Keith，只读了个Master，本来就智商捉急啊，还在斯坦福这种
: 地方混，周围都是比他聪明的人，多少有点怀才不遇；好不容易遇到个弱智的小布什，
: 感觉这人咋跟我这么有共同语言哩，于是当然说小布什好话啦。
| k****g
发帖数: 1509 | 6 真𠕇闲暇来码字。福利不错吧
【在 a*******1 的大作中提到】
: 其实嘛，我只想指出几点：
: 1.如果我没有记错的话，这个Keith Hennessey，是个Lecturer，而不是Professor。
: Lecturer当然就不是tenure,按中国的话说，就是“师资博后”，不是讲师哦，中国的
: 讲师对应美国的应该是助理教授；
: 2.如果我还没有记错的话，这个人，应该不是PhD，只是Master，在学校里混，那个
: master学位，这意味着什么，不用我多说了吧。
: 其实嘛，一个人觉得另一个人聪明，往往并不是另一个人真的聪明，而是刚好他俩的观
: 点一致罢了；而且这个Keith，只读了个Master，本来就智商捉急啊，还在斯坦福这种
: 地方混，周围都是比他聪明的人，多少有点怀才不遇；好不容易遇到个弱智的小布什，
: 感觉这人咋跟我这么有共同语言哩，于是当然说小布什好话啦。
| c******i
发帖数: 4091 | 7 小布什street smart是没有问题，而且在侯赛因的衬托下显得不那么讨厌了，但是按照
学习成绩的聪明标准，和侯赛因难分轩轾。这个厮舔得相当难看，全文没有一点干货，
都是形容词赞颂。学习英文拍马屁倒是有用。
the
of
【在 l****z 的大作中提到】
: President George W. Bush wasn’t unintelligent. In fact, he was brilliant…
: Joshua Riddle
: March 25, 2014 11:08 pm
: Keith Hennessey, professor at Stanford Business School, wanted to set the
: record straight about President Bush’s intellect. He writes:
: I teach a class at Stanford Business School titled “Financial Crises in the
: U.S. and Europe.” During one class session while explaining the events of
: September 2008, I kept referring to the efforts of the threesome of Hank
: Paulson, Ben Bernanke, and Tim Geithner, who were joined at the hip in
: dealing with firm-specific problems as they arose.
| l****z
发帖数: 29846 | 8 呵呵， 你别长篇大论了． 光凭疤蟆连学校里面的成绩单都不敢公开这点，小布什就
比疤蟆强．
【在 a*******1 的大作中提到】
: 其实嘛，我只想指出几点：
: 1.如果我没有记错的话，这个Keith Hennessey，是个Lecturer，而不是Professor。
: Lecturer当然就不是tenure,按中国的话说，就是“师资博后”，不是讲师哦，中国的
: 讲师对应美国的应该是助理教授；
: 2.如果我还没有记错的话，这个人，应该不是PhD，只是Master，在学校里混，那个
: master学位，这意味着什么，不用我多说了吧。
: 其实嘛，一个人觉得另一个人聪明，往往并不是另一个人真的聪明，而是刚好他俩的观
: 点一致罢了；而且这个Keith，只读了个Master，本来就智商捉急啊，还在斯坦福这种
: 地方混，周围都是比他聪明的人，多少有点怀才不遇；好不容易遇到个弱智的小布什，
: 感觉这人咋跟我这么有共同语言哩，于是当然说小布什好话啦。
| m***y
发帖数: 14763 | 9 只是公平的说，现任大统领，巴马教授，也就是个Lecturer。这个讲师是跪舔的e了点
，虽然他说的是实话。
【在 a*******1 的大作中提到】
: 其实嘛，我只想指出几点：
: 1.如果我没有记错的话，这个Keith Hennessey，是个Lecturer，而不是Professor。
: Lecturer当然就不是tenure,按中国的话说，就是“师资博后”，不是讲师哦，中国的
: 讲师对应美国的应该是助理教授；
: 2.如果我还没有记错的话，这个人，应该不是PhD，只是Master，在学校里混，那个
: master学位，这意味着什么，不用我多说了吧。
: 其实嘛，一个人觉得另一个人聪明，往往并不是另一个人真的聪明，而是刚好他俩的观
: 点一致罢了；而且这个Keith，只读了个Master，本来就智商捉急啊，还在斯坦福这种
: 地方混，周围都是比他聪明的人，多少有点怀才不遇；好不容易遇到个弱智的小布什，
: 感觉这人咋跟我这么有共同语言哩，于是当然说小布什好话啦。
| r******t
发帖数: 8967 | 10 呵呵，那初中博士也没晒成绩单啊。
【在 l****z 的大作中提到】
: 呵呵， 你别长篇大论了． 光凭疤蟆连学校里面的成绩单都不敢公开这点，小布什就
: 比疤蟆强．
| | | c****i
发帖数: 7933 | 11 两个左逼互相插的很爽啊。
观海同志当然不错，这年头mitbbs都开始讨论回中国生孩子，最多只拿绿卡了。观海同
志能不是中国人民的老朋友吗？真心希望希拉里同志再干八年！
【在 S*********g 的大作中提到】
: 呵呵
: 版主要生气了
| w***a
发帖数: 644 | 12 硕士和博士不是衡量人的智商的标准吧。如果本科就可以找到工作，很多人就不会去读
博士。
【在 a*******1 的大作中提到】
: 其实嘛，我只想指出几点：
: 1.如果我没有记错的话，这个Keith Hennessey，是个Lecturer，而不是Professor。
: Lecturer当然就不是tenure,按中国的话说，就是“师资博后”，不是讲师哦，中国的
: 讲师对应美国的应该是助理教授；
: 2.如果我还没有记错的话，这个人，应该不是PhD，只是Master，在学校里混，那个
: master学位，这意味着什么，不用我多说了吧。
: 其实嘛，一个人觉得另一个人聪明，往往并不是另一个人真的聪明，而是刚好他俩的观
: 点一致罢了；而且这个Keith，只读了个Master，本来就智商捉急啊，还在斯坦福这种
: 地方混，周围都是比他聪明的人，多少有点怀才不遇；好不容易遇到个弱智的小布什，
: 感觉这人咋跟我这么有共同语言哩，于是当然说小布什好话啦。
| p*********e
发帖数: 32207 | 13 你最好弄明白两件事
首先stanford business school里面
lecturer和instructor是两类不同的title
如果你看一下他们lecturer的列表，基本上都是原本行业功成名就的人
然后parttime过来给讲讲课，而且基本上每个人也就教一门课，
是针对他们事业成就和专长相关的
随便从A打头的挨个数下来：
Douglas Abbey：
Douglas D. Abbey is a co-founder of AMB Property Corporation (predecessor to
Prologis) and IHP Capital Partners. Mr. Abbey has more than 35 years of
experience in commercial and residential real estate investment and
development.
他lecturer教的是地产相关的。
Matt Forrest Abrahams
Matt is also Co-Founder and Principal at Bold Echo Communications Solutions,
a presentation and communication skills company based in Silicon Valley
that helps people improve their presentation skills. Matt has worked with
executives to help prepare and present keynote addresses and IPO road shows,
conduct media interviews, and deliver TED talks.
他是教如何沟通的
Kay Kostopoulos Amarotico
Kay Kostopoulos directs and teaches acting, acting pedagogy, voice, speech,
and Shakespeare in the Drama Department and Continuing Studies Program at
Stanford University. She also teaches “Acting with Power” at Stanford’s
Graduate School of Business.
这个本专业是表演相关的，来教如何“acting with power”
Federico Antoni
Federico Antoni (MBA 2004) is a venture capital investor with extensive
international experience in strategic marketing and operations in the retail
industry. Antoni is co-founder and managing partner of Venture Partners,
Mexico, and co-founder of Venture Institute, a premier seed acceleration
program of service innovation, also in Mexico.
本身是VC cofounder，教的是发展中经济体中的创业机会
Laura Arrillaga-Andreessen
Laura Arrillaga-Andreessen is the Founder and President of the Laura
Arrillaga-Andreessen Foundation (LAAF), a private operating foundation with
a mission to inspire, educate and empower people to give in a way that
matters more. At its core, LAAF is a philanthropy education organization —
creating and providing free, high-quality, online resources and programs to
help all givers, no matter where they are, make higher impact gifts with
whatever they have to give.
慈善基金会创始人，教的课是"Strategic Phianthropy”
Rick Aubry
Rick Aubry, Ph.D., is the founder and CEO of Rubicon National Social
Innovation. Rick served as the President of Rubicon Programs Inc. one of
America’s pre-eminent non-profit organizations from 1986-2009 when he
founded Rubicon National.
某NPO创始人，教的课是“executive program for nonprofit leaders"
Steve Ballmer
Steve Ballmer is the owner of the Los Angeles Clippers NBA basketball team.
Ballmer retired as Chief Executive Officer of Microsoft on Feb. 4, 2014.
Before becoming CEO in 2000, his roles at Microsoft included senior vice
president of sales and support, senior vice president of systems software
and vice president of marketing.
这个不用介绍了，他教的课是"Leading Organization",跟他职业经理人的经历正好对
应。
Matthew Bannick
From 1999 to 2007, Matt was a member of eBay Inc.’s executive staff and
served in a number of senior executive roles. As the general manager and
later as president of eBay International, Matt was largely responsible for
building eBay’s global footprint and driving phenomenal revenue growth.
Under Matt’s leadership, eBay International expanded from five to 25
countries grew from about $20 million in annual revenue to more than $2
billion. After eBay acquired PayPal in 2002, Matt was selected to be PayPal
’s first post-acquisition president. With Matt at the helm, PayPal tripled
its revenue in less than two years and established a strong global presence.
eBay前高管，教的课是New business models in emerging markets
先列这么多。
像这个keith hennessey，本身也能是先在白宫当顾问
（实际上根据他简历，在做白宫经济顾问前他在给其他高级官员做顾问，
包括白宫的经历总长度14年）
之后10年开始才在stanford做lecturer，
最开始是商学院，之后11年开始加上法学院，13年开始又加上公共关系系
所以首先你把他类比成师资博后非常不恰当
其次他当经济顾问之前并没有在stanford，
因此也并不存在说bush去stanford找他来撑场面这种说法
最后，他目前的正职是stanford hoover institution的fellow，
lecturer跟前面说的它人一样，是兼职。
【在 a*******1 的大作中提到】
: 其实嘛，我只想指出几点：
: 1.如果我没有记错的话，这个Keith Hennessey，是个Lecturer，而不是Professor。
: Lecturer当然就不是tenure,按中国的话说，就是“师资博后”，不是讲师哦，中国的
: 讲师对应美国的应该是助理教授；
: 2.如果我还没有记错的话，这个人，应该不是PhD，只是Master，在学校里混，那个
: master学位，这意味着什么，不用我多说了吧。
: 其实嘛，一个人觉得另一个人聪明，往往并不是另一个人真的聪明，而是刚好他俩的观
: 点一致罢了；而且这个Keith，只读了个Master，本来就智商捉急啊，还在斯坦福这种
: 地方混，周围都是比他聪明的人，多少有点怀才不遇；好不容易遇到个弱智的小布什，
: 感觉这人咋跟我这么有共同语言哩，于是当然说小布什好话啦。
| j*****v
发帖数: 7717 | 14 贊
to
【在 p*********e 的大作中提到】
: 你最好弄明白两件事
: 首先stanford business school里面
: lecturer和instructor是两类不同的title
: 如果你看一下他们lecturer的列表，基本上都是原本行业功成名就的人
: 然后parttime过来给讲讲课，而且基本上每个人也就教一门课，
: 是针对他们事业成就和专长相关的
: 随便从A打头的挨个数下来：
: Douglas Abbey：
: Douglas D. Abbey is a co-founder of AMB Property Corporation (predecessor to
: Prologis) and IHP Capital Partners. Mr. Abbey has more than 35 years of
| a*******1
发帖数: 1554 | 15 小布什公布过成绩单吗？
奥巴马可以申请到研究生，说明他本科GPA至少3.0；他研究生可以毕业，说明他研究生
GPA也至少3.0；小布什在耶鲁几乎门门功课都是C，GPA也就2.0左右。
【在 l****z 的大作中提到】
: 呵呵， 你别长篇大论了． 光凭疤蟆连学校里面的成绩单都不敢公开这点，小布什就
: 比疤蟆强．
| a*******1
发帖数: 1554 | 16 或许你是斯坦福MBA毕业的，那你更应该批评版主，而不是我。
所以说LZ显然是误导，“斯坦福教授对他的学生说:小布什比你们都聪明”，无论文章
还是标题，让人觉得好像一个跟小布什毫无关系，公正客观的斯坦福大教授，跟小布什
交谈之后，发现这个人水平很高，很睿智，比斯坦福大多数MBA都聪明，甚至比他自己
水平都高。
但事实上这是对斯坦福，特别是斯坦福MBA极大的侮辱，因为这个人本来就是小不布什
的下属，为小布什卖命了十几年，他最大的资历就是小布什，靠这个资历进斯坦福和胡
佛研究所的。这种人为小布什说多少溢美之词都毫无可信度的。随便找个奥巴马的心腹
也会一个劲地赞美他的。我甚至还听过不少高官说“奥巴马是他见过的最有领导力的人
”。
版主全文本末倒置，误导成分极其严重，让人以为一个很有声望的、客观、独立的大教
授为小布什背书，但事实上只不过是一个小布什的马仔的一堆恶心谄媚罢了。
to
【在 p*********e 的大作中提到】
: 你最好弄明白两件事
: 首先stanford business school里面
: lecturer和instructor是两类不同的title
: 如果你看一下他们lecturer的列表，基本上都是原本行业功成名就的人
: 然后parttime过来给讲讲课，而且基本上每个人也就教一门课，
: 是针对他们事业成就和专长相关的
: 随便从A打头的挨个数下来：
: Douglas Abbey：
: Douglas D. Abbey is a co-founder of AMB Property Corporation (predecessor to
: Prologis) and IHP Capital Partners. Mr. Abbey has more than 35 years of
| d******a
发帖数: 32122 | 17 小布什和跟他竞选的John Kerry在Yale的平均成绩分别是77和76, John Kerry甚至一个
A都没拿到。这两个人"GPA也就2.0左右", 都申请到并拿到了研究生学位。
“奥巴马可以申请到研究生，说明他本科GPA至少3.0”
你不是自己打自己脸？
【在 a*******1 的大作中提到】
: 小布什公布过成绩单吗？
: 奥巴马可以申请到研究生，说明他本科GPA至少3.0；他研究生可以毕业，说明他研究生
: GPA也至少3.0；小布什在耶鲁几乎门门功课都是C，GPA也就2.0左右。
| a**t
发帖数: 3833 | 18 shabi.
bush was a C student. your daddy was not good as you thought.
【在 d******a 的大作中提到】
: 小布什和跟他竞选的John Kerry在Yale的平均成绩分别是77和76, John Kerry甚至一个
: A都没拿到。这两个人"GPA也就2.0左右", 都申请到并拿到了研究生学位。
: “奥巴马可以申请到研究生，说明他本科GPA至少3.0”
: 你不是自己打自己脸？
| j*m
发帖数: 833 | 19 其实能当总统的当然都有过人之处，没什么好讨论的，比你我强N倍。你和公司里面的
上层讨论也一样，都是很sharp很勤奋的人。说话看问题都比你强。 | a**t
发帖数: 3833 | 20 放屁
【在 j*m 的大作中提到】
: 其实能当总统的当然都有过人之处，没什么好讨论的，比你我强N倍。你和公司里面的
: 上层讨论也一样，都是很sharp很勤奋的人。说话看问题都比你强。
| | | f*******e
发帖数: 4531 | 21 Ugly truth. Some people won't get it during their entire life.
【在 j*m 的大作中提到】
: 其实能当总统的当然都有过人之处，没什么好讨论的，比你我强N倍。你和公司里面的
: 上层讨论也一样，都是很sharp很勤奋的人。说话看问题都比你强。
| u**o
发帖数: 174 | 22 没错。很多人三四十了还在用学校成绩来衡量智商，能力。任何行业做到顶级都需要很
高的智商情商，总统说从政行业的最顶级，没有之一。你自己的行业你能做到top多少？
【在 f*******e 的大作中提到】
: Ugly truth. Some people won't get it during their entire life.
| e*i
发帖数: 10288 | 23 no problem. 404 face not found
【在 d******a 的大作中提到】
: 小布什和跟他竞选的John Kerry在Yale的平均成绩分别是77和76, John Kerry甚至一个
: A都没拿到。这两个人"GPA也就2.0左右", 都申请到并拿到了研究生学位。
: “奥巴马可以申请到研究生，说明他本科GPA至少3.0”
: 你不是自己打自己脸？
| p********n
发帖数: 1707 | 24 Yes, George W. Bush Was a Terrible President, and No, He Wasn’t Smart.
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2013/04/bush-terrible-pres | g******l
发帖数: 5103 | 25 成绩不能说明任何问题。奥巴马这种黑白混血，家庭也不显赫，拼命学习是很正常的。
布什家有钱有势，要什么有什么，他自身性格也比较tough，根本不在乎拿多少分，照
样当州长当总统。
【在 a*******1 的大作中提到】
: 小布什公布过成绩单吗？
: 奥巴马可以申请到研究生，说明他本科GPA至少3.0；他研究生可以毕业，说明他研究生
: GPA也至少3.0；小布什在耶鲁几乎门门功课都是C，GPA也就2.0左右。
| s****u
发帖数: 1433 | 26 有人说了，能当美国政坛第一的美国总统，智商肯定高。
又有人说了，若不是他家世显赫，肯定当不上总统。
两种都有道理。但是综合一下看，难道不说明小布
至少在家世显赫的二代中间，是智商情商比较高的人么？
这样的人里美国起码得有几千吧。
那小布至少是千里挑一。
同时，到耶鲁里面拿个A，只要在4，5十人里面混个第一就
可以了，说实话，算个屁啊。呵呵。 | S****a
发帖数: 2568 | 27 你真以为布什GPA比奥黑低？那个鸟人的帖子你就当个笑话看看就完了
究生
【在 g******l 的大作中提到】
: 成绩不能说明任何问题。奥巴马这种黑白混血，家庭也不显赫，拼命学习是很正常的。
: 布什家有钱有势，要什么有什么，他自身性格也比较tough，根本不在乎拿多少分，照
: 样当州长当总统。
| l****z
发帖数: 29846 | | S******4
发帖数: 2865 | 29 Keith Hennessey
Political party: Republican
Appointed in November 2007 by President George W. Bush, and served until the
end of Bush's second term in office.
就是一个多年来给Bush添臀的看家狗，五毛这也好意思贴出来的？ | u**o
发帖数: 174 | 30 仔细看了，这是典型的左派文章，没有什么有说服力的证据说布什不够聪明。整篇文章
目的是想说巴马比布什强。巴马这样就不说啥了。
【在 p********n 的大作中提到】
: Yes, George W. Bush Was a Terrible President, and No, He Wasn’t Smart.
: http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2013/04/bush-terrible-pres
|
|
