由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
USANews版 - 左逼下的加州:汽车商:别买我的车,因为我是亏本卖车
相关主题
Chrysler's Net Loss WidensU.S. Consumer Confidence Drops to Three-Decade Low Amid Economic Headwinds
加州准备禁combustion-engine vehicles从强制保险出发他们也辨不赢
左逼下一步是啥?麻省健保改革之真实血泪
$1.29 Billion in Disability Checks Sent to 36,000 Workers Still on the JobUnions Walk Out at Verizon
又开战了侯赛因被指出和希特勒斯大林毛泽东是同类
罗姆尼害怕俄亥俄失守已呈现出歇斯底里的状态,因此才铤而走险地祭出这种近乎下三滥的招数。Romney is outrageous lie:看看加利福尼亚人民共和国的民主党是怎么卡教育房顶的。
Romney win would be a victory4shameless cynicism大家对白茶袋子麦克维被判死刑怎么看?
Fiat to Cut Output in Poland黑八一离开辩论会就活了
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: california话题: automakers话题: he话题: publicity话题: 173
进入USANews版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
l****z
发帖数: 29846
1
Bad Deal Math: I have a Product, But Please Don't Buy It
updated on Mon Aug 03, 2015 15:48 by [email protected]
/* */
How often do you hear a car manufacturer (or any other manufacturer) tell
people to "not" buy their product because they lose money if you do?
I highly suspect this is nothing more than a purposely calculated publicity
stunt, but please consider California Has a Plan to End the Auto Industry as
We Know It.
Sergio Marchionne had a funny thing to say about the $32,500 battery-
powered Fiat 500e that his company markets in California as “eco-chic.” “
I hope you don’t buy it,” he told his audience at a think tank in
Washington in May 2014. He said he loses $14,000 on every 500e he sells and
only produces the cars because state rules re­quire it.
So who’s forcing Marchionne and all the other major automakers to sell
mostly money-losing electric vehicles? More than any other person, it’s
Mary Nichols. She’s run the California Air Resources Board since 2007,
championing the state’s zero-emission-vehicle quotas and backing Pres­
ident Barack Obama’s national mandate to double average fuel economy to 55
miles per gallon by 2025. She was chairman of the state air regulator once
before, a generation ago, and cleaning up the famously smoggy Los Angeles
skies is just one accomplish­ment in a four-decade career.
Spare Me the Sap
Automakers could just as easily price this crap at a point where they make a
profit. They don't, because they want the publicity.
Here's the bottom line: Companies don't beg consumers to "not buy" a line of
their products, unless they think favorable publicity will make up losses
elsewhere.
Moreover, I highly doubt companies (counting tax breaks) are losing what
they claim they are. Can we see full cost accounting, please?
Bad Deal Math
Even if this is a bad deal for the automakers, please don't assume it's a
good deal for consumers.
Government adds inefficiencies in everything it does. It's quite likely that
energy mandates are a lose-lose proposition for everyone involved.
Corporations Lose Money on Product Sold
Consumers Overpay vs. Gasoline Pump Savings
1 (共1页)
进入USANews版参与讨论
相关主题
黑八一离开辩论会就活了又开战了
我们在认识上的本质区别罗姆尼害怕俄亥俄失守已呈现出歇斯底里的状态,因此才铤而走险地祭出这种近乎下三滥的招数。Romney is outrageous lie:
美国现在最大的问题是什么?Romney win would be a victory4shameless cynicism
俄亥俄向票蛆开战Fiat to Cut Output in Poland
Chrysler's Net Loss WidensU.S. Consumer Confidence Drops to Three-Decade Low Amid Economic Headwinds
加州准备禁combustion-engine vehicles从强制保险出发他们也辨不赢
左逼下一步是啥?麻省健保改革之真实血泪
$1.29 Billion in Disability Checks Sent to 36,000 Workers Still on the JobUnions Walk Out at Verizon
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: california话题: automakers话题: he话题: publicity话题: 173