T*********I
发帖数: 10729 | 1 At 4:40 a.m. Oct. 10, Joshua Jermaine Davis walked into a North Charleston
Waffle House with a pistol and demanded money from employees.
What the 19-year-old didn’t know is he wasn’t the only one at the
Dorchester Road business with a gun.
Kenneth Rivers was waiting in his car for a to-go order of food, chatting
with his brother when he saw Davis rob the restaurant, according to police.
A concealed-weapons permit holder, Rivers took cover with his gun and
confronted Davis when he came out of the eatery, cash drawer in hand. The
two exchanged gunfire, and Davis was fatally wounded.
And it was legal.
The high-profile shootout has once again put a spotlight on the practice of
concealed carry in South Carolina. Advocates say it’s an example of why
more people should be trained to carry weapons while opponents note that a
policy of justifiable homicide in every citizen-stopped robbery could be a
dangerous precedent. ... |
c****p
发帖数: 6474 | |
j*****v
发帖数: 7717 | 3 那是左婢州
【在 c****p 的大作中提到】
: 不是说不能仅因为保护财产而使用致命武力么？
|
t***h
发帖数: 2924 | 4 luckily他不在左逼州,可以为民除害,免得以后更多的人被这个抢劫犯杀害.
【在 j*****v 的大作中提到】
: 那是左婢州
|
b****s
发帖数: 22 | 5 双方都开火了，对方携枪了，不只是保护财产了吧
不是说不能仅因为保护财产而使用致命武力么？
【在 c****p 的大作中提到】
: 不是说不能仅因为保护财产而使用致命武力么？
|
G******U
发帖数: 4211 | 6 他只是要求对方放下钱箱。放下枪，投降等警察。这在哪个州都沒错。
匪徒不从的时候就不是保护财产而是保护自己的命了。
匪徒被surprised，还要拿钱箱。而对方先有cover. 进可射击，退可藏身。匪徒没有什
么机会，开枪就是找死。
[在 chenpp (chenpp) 的大作中提到：]
：不是说不能仅因为保护财产而使用致命武力么？ |
T*********I
发帖数: 10729 | 7 同意楼上几位的意见。
你遭遇上手里有枪的匪徒，生命实际上随时是被威胁着的。 |
