l****z
发帖数: 29846 | 1 Gun Owners Hurt In Gun-Free Zones Could Sue Under New Bill
25 Jan, 2016 by Katie McGuire
A new law would allow gun owners to SUE if they are injured because they are
unarmed in a so-called ‘gun free zone’ This is probably the best news I
have heard all day, and I hope this passes:
Seagull-Free-Zones
If you’re going to put someone in danger, pay the price.
Via Tenessean:
If a Tennessee grocery store bans guns on its property and a black bear
or wild hog kills or injures a person who otherwise would be carrying his or
her gun, the gun owner would be allowed to sue the property owner if a
newly introduced bill became law.
Sponsored by Sen. Dolores Gresham, R-Somerville, Senate Bill 1736 has a
very specific purpose.
“It is the intent of this section to balance the right of a handgun
carry permit holder to carry a firearm in order to exercise the right of
self-defense and the ability of a property owner or entity in charge of the
property to exercise control over governmental or private property,” the
bill states.
To accomplish that goal, the legislation allows any Tennessean with a
valid gun permit to sue a property owner in the event of injury or death
provided the incident occurred while in a gun-free zone.
The legislation places responsibility on the business or property owner
of the gun-free area to protect the gun owner from any incidents that occur
with any “invitees,” trespassers and employees found on the property, as
well as vicious and wild animals and “defensible man-made and natural
hazards.”
The bill does not define defensible man-made and natural hazards.
A handgun carry permit holder who is injured by any of the
aforementioned would be able to file a lawsuit within two years of when the
event occurred, provided they meet the following requirements:
-the plaintiff had to be authorized to carry a gun at the time of the
incident
-the plaintiff was prohibited from carrying a firearm because of the gun
-free sign
-the property owner was not required to be posted by state or federal
law but was posted by choice of the defendant
According to the language of the bill, the right to sue the property
owner does not extend to individuals without gun permits.
This is the start of common sense again in America. If an idiot criminal can
sue for getting hurt on the homeowner’s property, I should be allowed to
sue if I get hurt without my peacemaker on me. It’s only fair. | r**********f
发帖数: 2808 | 2 Liberal把这个国家搞得乱乱的。搞Gun-Free Zones， 迫使对付Gun-Free Zones的法律
出台。 给非法移民发驾照，以后坐国内航班还得带护照，只驾照不行了。让恐怖分子
混在难民里进入美国，Disney雇用更多的保安和警犬，票价涨了，不准穿Costume进园
了。想拿federal funding？学校得给一个transgender在女更衣室里面开个房间，外
面不行。乱乱乱。 | C****7
发帖数: 614 | 3 这个要赞，你不能给别人提供保护，就不要剥夺别人自己保护自己的权利 | s*********r
发帖数: 2575 | 4 我们都盼望田纳西value战胜纽约value。
are
bear
or
【在 l****z 的大作中提到】
: Gun Owners Hurt In Gun-Free Zones Could Sue Under New Bill
: 25 Jan, 2016 by Katie McGuire
: A new law would allow gun owners to SUE if they are injured because they are
: unarmed in a so-called ‘gun free zone’ This is probably the best news I
: have heard all day, and I hope this passes:
: Seagull-Free-Zones
: If you’re going to put someone in danger, pay the price.
: Via Tenessean:
: If a Tennessee grocery store bans guns on its property and a black bear
: or wild hog kills or injures a person who otherwise would be carrying his or
|
|
