l****z
发帖数: 29846 | 1 A Quick Reaction to Trump’s Speech
April 27, 2016
David Horowitz
If Mitt Romney had given the speech that Donald Trump did today, and if he
had followed its strategy during the third presidential debate with Obama on
foreign policy, he would have won the 2012 election. Trump’s themes were
straightforward: Make America strong again, put America’s interests first.
The Obama-Clinton-Kerry foreign policy has strengthened our enemies,
disparaged our allies, and earned us global disrespect. It has led to
disasters that include the rise of ISIS and the destabilization of the
Middle East. The theme of the Obama-Clinton-Kerry years has been the
weakening of America – point Trump with maximum bite: “If President Obama
’s goal had been to weaken America, he could not have done a better job.”
And of course the Jeremiah Wright-Billy-Ayers-radical-Barack Obama did set
out deliberately to do just that. Obama’s agenda is American weakness,
which leads to losing. Trump’s agenda: we must start winning.
There were specifics. First a rejection of the neo-conservative dream of
democratizing the world, and in its place old-fashioned conservatism:
limited foreign policy goals and stability, as the framework of peace: “We
are getting out of the nation-building business, and instead focusing on
creating stability in the world.” And second, a rejection of liberal
internationalism, and a defense of the nation state, in particular this
nation state with its unique political culture: “Under a Trump
Administration, no American citizen will ever again feel that their needs
come second to the citizens of foreign countries. I will view the world
through the clear lens of American interests. I will be America’s greatest
defender and most loyal champion. We will not apologize for becoming
successful again, but will instead embrace the unique heritage that makes us
who we are.” And the (accurate) justification for this nationalism: The
world is most peaceful, and most prosperous, when America is strongest.”
These were reassuring clarifications by Trump about his foreign policy views
and should be a step towards satisfying his conservative critics although
obviously a speech can also be only that – words to pacify critics. We’ll
have to wait and see how he elaborates it further in response to specific
event. But this was a very good beginning.
For me the most reassuring aspect of the speech was its political toughness,
an indication of what is waiting for Hillary in November should Trump win
the nomination:
“After Secretary Clinton’s failed intervention in Libya, Islamic
terrorists in Benghazi took down our consulate and killed our ambassador and
three brave Americans. Then, instead of taking charge that night, Hillary
Clinton decided to go home and sleep! Incredible. Clinton blames it all on a
video, an excuse that was a total lie…. And now ISIS is making millions of
dollars a week selling Libyan oil.”
Can’t wait for those Trump-Hillary debates. | p*********y
发帖数: 2741 | |
|
