S*******h
发帖数: 7021 | 1 Former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales says Donald Trump is right to
challenge the fairness a judge overseeing lawsuits against him.
“An independent judiciary is extremely important. But that value is not the
only one in play here,” Gonzales wrote in a Saturday op-ed for The
Washington Post.
"Equally important, if not more important from my perspective as a former
judge and U.S. attorney general, is a litigant’s right to a fair trial,”
he continued.
ADVERTISEMENT
“The protection of that right is a primary reason why our Constitution
provides for an independent judiciary. If judges and the trials over which
they preside are not perceived as impartial, the public will quickly lose
interest in the rule of law upon which our nation is based.”
Trump on Thursday said U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel’s Hispanic
ethnicity is “an absolute conflict” in three civil fraud lawsuits against
the billionaire.
He said Curiel’s “Mexican heritage” makes him partial because of Trump’s
calls for a wall along America’s southern border with Mexico.
Gonzales on Saturday said Trump has reason beyond just race to doubt Curiel,
who is American, will treat him fairly.
“As someone whose own ancestors came to the United States from Mexico, I
know ethnicity alone cannot pose a conflict of interests. But there may be
other factors to consider in determining whether Trump’s concerns about
getting an impartial trial are reasonable.”
Gonzales said Curiel is a member of La Raza Lawyers of San Diego, which
Trump aides say is affiliated with a national group vociferously opposing
Trump, National Council of La Raza (NCLR).
The Washington Post on Saturday reported that NCLR is unaffiliated with La
Raza Lawyers of San Diego. It added Curiel is not a member of NCLR.
Curiel has also appointed the Robbins Geller law firm to plaintiffs, he
added, noting Geller is a donor to Democratic presidential front-runner
Hillary Clinton.
“These circumstances, while not necessarily conclusive, at least raise a
legitimate question to be considered,” said Gonzales, who was attorney
general for former President George W. Bush.
“If [Trump’s] criticism is solely based on Curiel’s race, that is
something voters will take into account in deciding whether he is fit to be
president. If, however, Trump is acting from a sincere motivation to protect
his constitutional right to fair trial, his willingness to exercise his
rights as an American citizen and raising the issue even in the face of
severe criticism is surely also something for voters to consider.”
Curiel is overseeing three lawsuits which allege Trump University defrauded
students and saddled them with debt.
Trump has repeatedly touted positive reviews from other participants, saying
courts will ultimately vindicate the for-profit real estate program.
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/282222-former-bush-ag-trump-right-to-challenge-judges-fairness |
i**********k
发帖数: 5274 | |
t*******d
发帖数: 12895 | 3 Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump 33 minutes ago
Thank you Attorney General Gonzales, so many people feel this way. |
t*******d
发帖数: 12895 | |
g********2
发帖数: 6571 | 5 不管这个法官到底该不该回避，川普提出要他回避都没有什么不合法的，更不是种族歧
视。 |
a*********a
发帖数: 3656 | 6 Alberto Gonzales也是西裔，但是他就能把被告人faire trial放在种族偏见之上。
法官＋律师＋检察官出来说话了，要不时薪700的大法师出来给个rebutal？以Wachtell
, Lipton, Rosen，Katz里的哪一个的名义来？
the
【在 S*******h 的大作中提到】
: Former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales says Donald Trump is right to
: challenge the fairness a judge overseeing lawsuits against him.
: “An independent judiciary is extremely important. But that value is not the
: only one in play here,” Gonzales wrote in a Saturday op-ed for The
: Washington Post.
: "Equally important, if not more important from my perspective as a former
: judge and U.S. attorney general, is a litigant’s right to a fair trial,”
: he continued.
: ADVERTISEMENT
: “The protection of that right is a primary reason why our Constitution
|
g********2
发帖数: 6571 | 7
Wachtell
我怀疑大法师不是那个公司几个华人中的任何一个，那几个好歹也是哈佛什么毕业的，
怎么可能说出“撕下种族歧视的面具”这种话来？
而且他为自己identity theft的辩护是：那个是公司名字，四个founding partners已
经都死了，只剩一个了。
【在 a*********a 的大作中提到】
: Alberto Gonzales也是西裔，但是他就能把被告人faire trial放在种族偏见之上。
: 法官＋律师＋检察官出来说话了，要不时薪700的大法师出来给个rebutal？以Wachtell
: , Lipton, Rosen，Katz里的哪一个的名义来？
:
: the
|
a*********a
发帖数: 3656 | 8 不要小看哈佛。奥统领是哈佛捞校的吧？离开了提词器，就if if if if if if
律师们拥护民主党是发自内心的。光一个Dodd Frank就养活多少律师啊！
【在 g********2 的大作中提到】
:
: Wachtell
: 我怀疑大法师不是那个公司几个华人中的任何一个，那几个好歹也是哈佛什么毕业的，
: 怎么可能说出“撕下种族歧视的面具”这种话来？
: 而且他为自己identity theft的辩护是：那个是公司名字，四个founding partners已
: 经都死了，只剩一个了。
|
c*******o
发帖数: 8869 | 9 "All things are lawful, but not all things are beneficial"
【在 g********2 的大作中提到】
: 不管这个法官到底该不该回避，川普提出要他回避都没有什么不合法的，更不是种族歧
: 视。
|
q*c
发帖数: 9453 | 10 beneficial to whom? 打砸抢分子？票蛆？ 还是正常人？
【在 c*******o 的大作中提到】
: "All things are lawful, but not all things are beneficial"
|
|
|
c*******o
发帖数: 8869 | 11 这句话的意思是trump让“墨西哥”法官回避是“合法”的，但是也是错误的，有种族
主义倾向
【在 q*c 的大作中提到】
: beneficial to whom? 打砸抢分子？票蛆？ 还是正常人？
|
t*****9
发帖数: 10416 | |
c*******o
发帖数: 8869 | 13 ”Equally important，is a litigant’s right to a fair trial”
说的好，不愧是司法部长，值得版上有些人好好学习。
the
【在 t*******d 的大作中提到】
: 坐等律师楼扫地的那个来喷
|
j*********r
发帖数: 24733 | 14 那个号称时薪700块冥币的律师法官二合一呢？
the
【在 S*******h 的大作中提到】
: Former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales says Donald Trump is right to
: challenge the fairness a judge overseeing lawsuits against him.
: “An independent judiciary is extremely important. But that value is not the
: only one in play here,” Gonzales wrote in a Saturday op-ed for The
: Washington Post.
: "Equally important, if not more important from my perspective as a former
: judge and U.S. attorney general, is a litigant’s right to a fair trial,”
: he continued.
: ADVERTISEMENT
: “The protection of that right is a primary reason why our Constitution
|
g********2
发帖数: 6571 | 15
beneficial是种族主义？
种族主义是lawful?
【在 c*******o 的大作中提到】
: 这句话的意思是trump让“墨西哥”法官回避是“合法”的，但是也是错误的，有种族
: 主义倾向
|
c*******o
发帖数: 8869 | 16 是，宪法第一修正案保护种族主义言论。
【在 g********2 的大作中提到】
:
: beneficial是种族主义？
: 种族主义是lawful?
|
g********2
发帖数: 6571 | 17
宪法第几修正案说beneficial是种族主义？
【在 c*******o 的大作中提到】
: 是，宪法第一修正案保护种族主义言论。
|
c*******o
发帖数: 8869 | 18 算了，你不懂英文，不费劲了， 呵呵。
【在 g********2 的大作中提到】
:
: 宪法第几修正案说beneficial是种族主义？
|
g********2
发帖数: 6571 | 19
保护言论自由和保护某主义是一回事？
【在 c*******o 的大作中提到】
: 是，宪法第一修正案保护种族主义言论。
|
g********2
发帖数: 6571 | 20
不用费劲啊，你就说说宪法第一修正案哪一句保护种族主义就行了。
再顺便说说为什么不beneficial就是种族主义倾向。
你连“言论”和“主义”的区别都没搞清楚，装什么英语专家？
【在 c*******o 的大作中提到】
: 算了，你不懂英文，不费劲了， 呵呵。
|
|
|
g********2
发帖数: 6571 | 21
这句话是你自己从bible篡改来的吧？你还拿来当格言警句总结这件事？
这句话只能表达“都合法，但不一定都有益”，哪里是“都合法，但有种族主义倾向”
的意思？
你这破英语也拿来卖弄，跟那个“法师”一路货色。
对你这种装逼的傻逼，绝对死磕。
【在 c*******o 的大作中提到】
: "All things are lawful, but not all things are beneficial"
|
c*******o
发帖数: 8869 | 22 我本来就说的是种族主义言论啊
"The First Amendment really was designed to protect a debate at the fringes.
You don't need the courts to protect speech that everybody agrees with,
because that speech will be tolerated. You need a First Amendment to protect
speech that people regard as intolerable or outrageous or offensive —
because that is when the majority will wield its power to censor or suppress
, and we have a First Amendment to prevent the government from doing that.”
——— ACLU
【在 g********2 的大作中提到】
:
: 这句话是你自己从bible篡改来的吧？你还拿来当格言警句总结这件事？
: 这句话只能表达“都合法，但不一定都有益”，哪里是“都合法，但有种族主义倾向”
: 的意思？
: 你这破英语也拿来卖弄，跟那个“法师”一路货色。
: 对你这种装逼的傻逼，绝对死磕。
|
b********n
发帖数: 38600 | 23 Judges hate this kind of publicity. Trump is going after him to show the
kind of bigot corrupt cockroach he is. Trump will win this handily. |
c*******o
发帖数: 8869 | 24 看你这么较真，就再解释一下。
Trump要求还法官是“合法”的，但是有种族主义倾向，疏离了合法西医移民，分裂了
社会，于人于自己都没有好处，not beneficial。
【在 g********2 的大作中提到】
:
: 这句话是你自己从bible篡改来的吧？你还拿来当格言警句总结这件事？
: 这句话只能表达“都合法，但不一定都有益”，哪里是“都合法，但有种族主义倾向”
: 的意思？
: 你这破英语也拿来卖弄，跟那个“法师”一路货色。
: 对你这种装逼的傻逼，绝对死磕。
|
b********n
发帖数: 38600 | 25 The judge is a racist. He is a member of La Raza. He has to be exposed for
exactly what he is. He could have only been appointed by a racist democrat
which he was because Obama appointed him.
【在 c*******o 的大作中提到】
: 看你这么较真，就再解释一下。
: Trump要求还法官是“合法”的，但是有种族主义倾向，疏离了合法西医移民，分裂了
: 社会，于人于自己都没有好处，not beneficial。
|
