s*******1
发帖数: 16479 | 1 【 以下文字转载自 Military 讨论区 】
发信人: benja (benja), 信区: Military
标 题: 搞不好 trump 会因为这次大嘴事件走的更远？
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sat Oct 8 18:07:16 2016, 美东)
摘录某基督教家庭的一位家长的facebook 状态：
“
With Trump elected, we will have an immoral image of a president. But we can
still teach our children about sins, bible standards, and we can teach them
to pray for the president so that he may repent. Although it's up to God.
On the other hand, with Clinton elected, we will have a so called better
presidential image. But we will have immoral values rooted in people's
hearts through the judicial system. It will make it much more difficult to
discern the problem. Or to teach our children to pray, because president
Hillary seems to have a flawless look. That's just my opinion."
基督教选民这么多，他们如果用这套理论来说服自己也是可以的噢 。 | d********a
发帖数: 9567 | 2 本来就是。
圣经教义里没有完人一说，都是罪人，都没有资格拿石头打死人。
但是，罪人都需要悔改。
川西两相比较，高下立现。
这事真不算什么。跟维基出来的猛料不在一个级别。
关键是共党怎么处理与中东盟友的铁杆关系。 | w*****u
发帖数: 135 | 3 今年已经完全是体制内 vs 人民了。
Trump的满嘴胡说八道让我感到很亲切，有点像一个可以插科打浑的哥们。我知道他不
是一个完人，我也不求他是一个完人。
当然，左棍需要一个高大上的总统。 | b*********0
发帖数: 1441 | 4 so American people are not stupid after all.
can
them
【在 s*******1 的大作中提到】
: 【 以下文字转载自 Military 讨论区 】
: 发信人: benja (benja), 信区: Military
: 标 题: 搞不好 trump 会因为这次大嘴事件走的更远？
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sat Oct 8 18:07:16 2016, 美东)
: 摘录某基督教家庭的一位家长的facebook 状态：
: “
: With Trump elected, we will have an immoral image of a president. But we can
: still teach our children about sins, bible standards, and we can teach them
: to pray for the president so that he may repent. Although it's up to God.
: On the other hand, with Clinton elected, we will have a so called better
| j*********r
发帖数: 24733 | 5 左棍哪个总统高大上啊？比尔克林顿？
【在 w*****u 的大作中提到】
: 今年已经完全是体制内 vs 人民了。
: Trump的满嘴胡说八道让我感到很亲切，有点像一个可以插科打浑的哥们。我知道他不
: 是一个完人，我也不求他是一个完人。
: 当然，左棍需要一个高大上的总统。
| g********2
发帖数: 312 | 6 嗯，说得好，收藏了，下次再去基督教徒家里拉票，就把这个给他们看。 | B*******t
发帖数: 1623 | | t*******d
发帖数: 12895 | | a***p
发帖数: 1470 | 9 否极泰来！
can
them
【在 s*******1 的大作中提到】
: 【 以下文字转载自 Military 讨论区 】
: 发信人: benja (benja), 信区: Military
: 标 题: 搞不好 trump 会因为这次大嘴事件走的更远？
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sat Oct 8 18:07:16 2016, 美东)
: 摘录某基督教家庭的一位家长的facebook 状态：
: “
: With Trump elected, we will have an immoral image of a president. But we can
: still teach our children about sins, bible standards, and we can teach them
: to pray for the president so that he may repent. Although it's up to God.
: On the other hand, with Clinton elected, we will have a so called better
| s*******1
发帖数: 16479 | 10 所以他们推出了希拉里LOL
【在 w*****u 的大作中提到】
: 今年已经完全是体制内 vs 人民了。
: Trump的满嘴胡说八道让我感到很亲切，有点像一个可以插科打浑的哥们。我知道他不
: 是一个完人，我也不求他是一个完人。
: 当然，左棍需要一个高大上的总统。
| s*******1
发帖数: 16479 | 11 我转的。你可以去军版原贴问下
【在 B*******t 的大作中提到】
: link?
| T******g
发帖数: 21328 | 12 作弊要的是虚伪双重标准的总统，真是高大上我也支持了
【在 w*****u 的大作中提到】
: 今年已经完全是体制内 vs 人民了。
: Trump的满嘴胡说八道让我感到很亲切，有点像一个可以插科打浑的哥们。我知道他不
: 是一个完人，我也不求他是一个完人。
: 当然，左棍需要一个高大上的总统。
| C*******h
发帖数: 6095 | 13 我和我老公反正是很震惊生气建制派的不要脸。我们支持老川的心更坚定了。可能有点
反叛心理吧。但我们不是基督徒所以没代表性。
can
them
★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 1.0.6
【在 s*******1 的大作中提到】
: 我转的。你可以去军版原贴问下
| M******e
发帖数: 1193 | 14 As a traditional, Christian conservative, Donald Trump’s “hot-mic moment”
from 2005 — in which he was caught in some serious “locker-room banter”
making lewd comments about some females at the time, while also dropping a
few not-so-nice words — should probably come as a shock to me.
But it doesn’t — and frankly, I don’t care.
“Why?” you might ask. Two stupidly simple reasons:
First, the entertainment industry is a filthy, secular cesspool — and it
doesn’t surprise me one bit that Trump, who worked in the show business for
decades, would have engaged in raunchy conversations.
Also, any Hollywood actor or entertainment phenomenon who condemns Trump for
his hot-mic comments should be burned at the stake of hypocrisy.
Secondly, those comments from 10+ years ago do not personally affect me, nor
my family, friends, and co-workers. Heck, if he said them right now, it
still wouldn’t affect one single American.
You see, I don’t care about rhetoric, inflammatory statements, or prior
controversy. If you put aside every single scandal Donald Trump and Hillary
Clinton have been apart of, one thing remains standing — policy.
And for the record, I care about policy, and policy only. Clinton’s
political agenda has not and will not work — and the top 10 most
impoverished cities in America can attest to the failed policy found in the
Democrat platform.
Trump, on the other hand, represents the good, the bad, and the ugly — all
in one package. He’s got policy that works (strong borders, tax-cuts across
the board, and the political will to simply say “No”), but he comes with
the politically-incorrect downfalls of having led a career in the
entertainment industry.
Again, as a traditional Christian conservative/deplorable, I won’t lose an
ounce of sleep choosing good policy over inflammatory comments from 10+
years ago. |
|
