h********J
发帖数: 563 | 1 一天到晚夸赞民主党有多好，美国有多自由的人居然反对吹哨者。
吹哨者是独立新闻的榜样，像CNN这样纯粹是自己编造新闻，已经不能算新闻工作者了。
更像是好莱坞编剧。
有wikileaks这样的独立新闻网站才能监督美国民主。
搞不懂居然有人反对。
感叹每个人脑袋都不一样呀。 |
m******k
发帖数: 447 | 2 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/wikileaks/8171269/Sarah-Palin-hunt-WikiLeaks-founder-like-al-Qaeda-and-Taliban-leaders.html
Sarah Palin: hunt WikiLeaks founder like al-Qaeda and Taliban leaders
The founder of WikiLeaks should be hunted down just like al-Qaeda and
Taliban leaders, according to Sarah Palin.
Sarah Palin addresses the Republican National Convention Photo: AFP/GETTY
Martin Beckford By Martin Beckford7:00PM GMT 30 Nov 2010 CommentsComment
Julian Assange was branded “an anti-American operative with blood on his
hands” by the prominent Republican, who asked why he has not yet been
caught by the authorities.
She accused the Obama administration of “incompetence” and a “strange
lack of urgency” in not stopping the release of 250,000 leaked diplomatic
cables by WikiLeaks, given that it had already published sensitive
information about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The former Governor of Alaska and vice-presidential nominee suggested that
“cyber tools” should be used to shut down the whistle-blowing website
permanently. It has twice been the subject of targeted attacks by hackers to
bring it offline this week.
Mr Assange, a 39 year-old Australian former computer hacker who set up
WikiLeaks in 2006, has kept out of public view since the release of the
first leaked American diplomatic cables on Sunday. He has denied he has
blood on his hands. Mr Assange is the subject of an international arrest
warrant over allegations of rape in Sweden.
Writing on her Facebook page on Monday, Mrs Palin questioned why the US
authorities were not looking for him in the same way that it had hunted
suspected terrorists.
“The latest round of publications of leaked classified U.S. documents
through the shady organization called Wikileaks raises serious questions
about the Obama administration’s incompetent handling of this whole fiasco.
“First and foremost, what steps were taken to stop Wikileaks director
Julian Assange from distributing this highly sensitive classified material
especially after he had already published material not once but twice in the
previous months?
“He is an anti-American operative with blood on his hands. His past posting
of classified documents revealed the identity of more than 100 Afghan
sources to the Taliban. Why was he not pursued with the same urgency we
pursue al-Qaeda and Taliban leaders?”
She went on: “What if any diplomatic pressure was brought to bear on NATO,
EU, and other allies to disrupt Wikileaks’ technical infrastructure? Did we
use all the cyber tools at our disposal to permanently dismantle Wikileaks?
Were individuals working for Wikileaks on these document leaks investigated
? Shouldn’t they at least have had their financial assets frozen just as we
do to individuals who provide material support for terrorist organizations?”
Mrs Palin, who is tipped to run for President in 2012, also said that “
serious questions” had to be asked about how the “highly sensitive” memos
from diplomats and intelligence officers could have been uploaded onto a
computer memory stick and given to WikiLeaks from a supposedly secure US
defence department network known as Siprnet. The prime suspect is Bradley
Manning, a young private in the US Army who is now being held ahead of a
court-martial.
Mrs Palin asked why the White House had not issued orders to tighten
security back in July, when WikiLeaks released thousands of classified
military documents on Afghanistan.
“What explains this strange lack of urgency on their part?”
Mrs Palin concluded: “We are at war. American soldiers are in Afghanistan
fighting to protect our freedoms. They are serious about keeping America
safe. It would be great if they could count on their government being
equally serious about that vital task.”
Rick Santorum, another prominent conservative, agreed with her, saying: “We
haven't gone after this guy, we haven't tried to prosecute him, we haven't
gotten our allies to go out and lock this guy up and bring him up on
terrorism charges.”
The Obama administration has said that it “deeply regrets” the leaking of
the embarrassing cables that have disclosed exactly what American diplomats
think of foreign leaders and promised to take “aggressive steps” against
those who “stole” them. |
a****0
发帖数: 548 | 3 鍚屼笉鎳傦紒寰堝宸﹀乏鐨勬櫤鍟嗘槸琚煇峰厷鍗栦簡杩樺府鐫暟閽辩殑锛丄
ssange鏄嫳闆勶紒鏀寔鑻遍泟锛屾垜缁橶ikileak鎹愪簡濂藉嚑鐧惧垁锛岃繕鎵撶
畻缁х画鎹愩娌＄敤杩欎簺鑻遍泟锛岀編鍥界殑姘戜富灏辨槸joke锛br /> |
g*****w
发帖数: 1413 | 4 作弊才害怕
了。
【在 h********J 的大作中提到】
: 一天到晚夸赞民主党有多好，美国有多自由的人居然反对吹哨者。
: 吹哨者是独立新闻的榜样，像CNN这样纯粹是自己编造新闻，已经不能算新闻工作者了。
: 更像是好莱坞编剧。
: 有wikileaks这样的独立新闻网站才能监督美国民主。
: 搞不懂居然有人反对。
: 感叹每个人脑袋都不一样呀。
|
w******s
发帖数: 16209 | 5 wikileaks 现在力量太大而且少有制约。一旦被邪恶利用会有很多伤害。wikileaks 追
求的很多透明是牺牲了很多个体的隐私和个体利益。现在看是功远远大于过，但不完备
也很多风险。
了。
【在 h********J 的大作中提到】
: 一天到晚夸赞民主党有多好，美国有多自由的人居然反对吹哨者。
: 吹哨者是独立新闻的榜样，像CNN这样纯粹是自己编造新闻，已经不能算新闻工作者了。
: 更像是好莱坞编剧。
: 有wikileaks这样的独立新闻网站才能监督美国民主。
: 搞不懂居然有人反对。
: 感叹每个人脑袋都不一样呀。
|
k*******g
发帖数: 7321 | 6 反对wikileaks的人，一旦没有利用价值，不久屁眼就会被当权者插上尖刀 |
a***r
发帖数: 594 | 7 如果其他渠道的investigative journalism还存在，那当然不需要这么依赖wikileak.
wilileak和政客一样，是necessary evil。
【在 w******s 的大作中提到】
: wikileaks 现在力量太大而且少有制约。一旦被邪恶利用会有很多伤害。wikileaks 追
: 求的很多透明是牺牲了很多个体的隐私和个体利益。现在看是功远远大于过，但不完备
: 也很多风险。
:
: 了。
|
h********J
发帖数: 563 | 8 evil啥， 对当权者的罪恶揭露永远都是正义的。 不做亏心事，不怕鬼敲门。
这本身就是权力制约的一种方法。 |
G*******h
发帖数: 4091 | 9 wikileaks是现代罗宾汉，是体制的真正监督者。
由于它本身没有强大的国家机器为依靠，一旦如果越过了某条红线（比如有些人说的隐
私），也容易被民众所抛弃，所以它自己会控制尺度。
所以，它或许违背了某些法律，但绝对不是evil。 |
h********J
发帖数: 563 | 10 既然米国自称是世界民主的灯塔，专制的救星。 就应该接受世界人民的监督。
维基泄密，斯诺等 都是世界人民监督米国的工具。
否则米国就为所欲为。 |
