t*c
发帖数: 6929 | 1 标题是： 人口变化，不是hacking，造成的投票结果
Demographics, Not Hacking, Explain The Election Results
According to a report Tuesday in New York Magazine, a group of computer
scientists and election lawyers have approached the Hillary Clinton campaign
with evidence they believe suggests the election might have been hacked to
make it appear that Donald Trump won the Electoral College when Clinton
really did. The hacking claim appears to be based on concerns about
tampering with electronic voting machines. We’ve looked into the claim —
or at least, our best guess of what’s being claimed based on what has been
reported — and statistically, it doesn’t check out.
There’s no clear evidence that the voting method used in a county — by
machine or by paper — had an effect on the vote. Anyone making allegations
of a possible massive electoral hack should provide proof, and we can’t
find any. But it’s not even clear the group of computer scientists and
election lawyers are making these claims. (More on this in a moment.)
The New York article reports that a group that includes voting-rights
attorney John Bonifaz and computer scientist J. Alex Halderman presented
findings last week about Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania to top Clinton
campaign officials to try to persuade them to call for a recount. Exactly
what those findings were isn’t clear. The New York article includes just
one example, a finding that Clinton did worse in counties in Wisconsin that
used electronic voting machines instead of paper ballots.1 It’s not clear
what data the group was using to call for a recount in Michigan and
Pennsylvania, or if it was looking at data at all: It could have chosen
those states because they were the ones besides Wisconsin that Trump won
with the smallest margins. Bonifaz, Halderman and the Clinton campaign
officials mentioned in the article didn’t respond to requests for comment
or more detail about the study. | t*c
发帖数: 6929 | 2 这个所谓的group 已经不回应几个新闻机构的要求，
不知道stern发申请的时候如何请人来做
必须的substantial evidence report？
连民主党全国委员会都拒绝评论。
campaign
to
been
【在 t*c 的大作中提到】
: 标题是： 人口变化，不是hacking，造成的投票结果
: Demographics, Not Hacking, Explain The Election Results
: According to a report Tuesday in New York Magazine, a group of computer
: scientists and election lawyers have approached the Hillary Clinton campaign
: with evidence they believe suggests the election might have been hacked to
: make it appear that Donald Trump won the Electoral College when Clinton
: really did. The hacking claim appears to be based on concerns about
: tampering with electronic voting machines. We’ve looked into the claim —
: or at least, our best guess of what’s being claimed based on what has been
: reported — and statistically, it doesn’t check out.
| R**********9
发帖数: 1487 | 3 她要这么骗钱的话不违法？
★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 13
【在 t*c 的大作中提到】
: 这个所谓的group 已经不回应几个新闻机构的要求，
: 不知道stern发申请的时候如何请人来做
: 必须的substantial evidence report？
: 连民主党全国委员会都拒绝评论。
:
: campaign
: to
: been
| t*c
发帖数: 6929 | 4 political donation是可以不还的，
她又没set up condition，比如
recount一定要做，否则退款。
估计她连情况
都没搞清楚就跳出来要钱。
也估计她欠了一屁股债。
: 她要这么骗钱的话不违法？
: ★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 13
【在 R**********9 的大作中提到】
: 她要这么骗钱的话不违法？
:
: ★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 13
| k*********4
发帖数: 1147 | 5 这部分钱包括伸请费和律师费，律师费估计就去了帮她竞选的朋友那里了。自们不用担
心，骗得又不是我们的钱，三得子骗得还少吗？ | t*c
发帖数: 6929 | 6 是的，所谓申请材料律师费估计她都可以报
几百万的帐。
: 这部分钱包括伸请费和律师费，律师费估计就去了帮她竞选的朋友那里了。自们
不用担
: 心，骗得又不是我们的钱，三得子骗得还少吗？
【在 k*********4 的大作中提到】
: 这部分钱包括伸请费和律师费，律师费估计就去了帮她竞选的朋友那里了。自们不用担
: 心，骗得又不是我们的钱，三得子骗得还少吗？
|
|
