m********g
发帖数: 10469 | 1 Strange omens on an overcast Monday morning in Hollywoodland, on the eve of
President-elect Donald Trump’s inauguration.
Judd Apatow is stress-eating Oreos by the sleeve and Joss Whedon is busy
fantasizing about a painful and humiliating end to House Speaker Paul Ryan;
Katy Perry and Cher are on the next flight out of LAX to join the Women’s
March on Washington, and all the big studios are nervous that Chinese checks
won’t clear after January 20.
In short, Hollywood is On Edge.
So it came as something of a surprise, if not just a pleasant change in
headlines, when Nicole Kidman said very matter-of-factly last week that
Americans should come together to support the president, whoever that might
be.
“[Trump is] now elected and we, as a country, need to support whoever is
the president,” the actress told the UK’s Victoria Derbyshire. “That is
what the country is based on. And however that happened, it happened, and
let’s go.”
Or not. A few days later, Kidman put out another statement to clarify her
previous comment.
“I was trying to stress that I believe in democracy and the American
Constitution, and it was that simple,” the actress told Access Hollywood.
She wouldn’t comment further, except to say: “I’m out of it now. That’s
what I said and it’s that simple.”
Well, so much for all that.
It is obvious what happened. Kidman said something that vaguely resembled an
endorsement of Trump, and Hollywood freaked out. After all, it was just
days ago that decorated veteran Meryl Streep — or, She Who Must Not Be
Called Overrated — delivered the stinging public rebuke of Trump that Mitt
Romney was trying for back in March. That was the good stuff. The Right
Message (and never mind that standing ovation for a convicted child rapist
thing).
What’s weird is that Nicole Kidman — an Oscar winner and by any measure a
successful actress — was forced to clarify a statement in which she said
she supported the president of the United States, and encouraged others to
do so.
Her publicist must have had a brutal couple of days; curled up in fetal
position with a white-knuckle grip on two cellphones, babbling something
about Vladimir Putin and the Great Red Menace.
It is clear now that the Enforcers are everywhere, at least for the time
being. People like the insufferable, thuggish Joss Whedon, the Avengers
director and self-described “feminist” who posted a meme mocking Kidman
for being a “puppet for Trump” and a “blunderturd” over her original
comments (and then went on to re-tweet an inspirational quote about “one
people, one family, one house” from Congressman John Lewis, with no hint of
irony or self-realization whatsoever).
Oh yes.
The Enforcers meet daily now, in the waning days of the Obama Era; in the
parlors of spectacular homes in Calabasas and the Hollywood Hills; over an
early dinner at Catch on Melrose; in between vaginal rejuvenation sessions
in Beverly Hills.
The conversations begin jovially enough, but then turn to protest,
revolution. Who said the Wrong Thing this week? Yes, I’ll have another
order of Salmon Belly Carpaccio, and hold the Yuzu.
But under the surface, the Big Fear pervades. A blind panic, the sense that
something has gone horribly wrong. And it has, for the Enforcers. After all,
all of their bleating, their political PSAs, their warnings, their
fetishization of doom over the last 18 months… it all amounted to nothing.
Hillary missed the mark; and now the Enforcers scramble, like rats in the
dark, to seize every last shred of whatever respectability and political
cachet they may have had before the walls of Jericho crash down around them.
And that is the point, I think, to be made in this now jumbling, incoherent
mess: the era of Enforcement is drawing to a close. Slowly, yes, but it is
ending nonetheless.
After the inauguration, and after the Women’s March, and after Lena Dunham
gets up from sitting shiva, Hollywood will go back to Doing What It Does
Best: the movies, the shows, the awards, the fake boobs and fake faces, the
parties, the hashtag activism. Nicole Kidman will appear in many more movies
, and maybe she’ll win another Oscar, or a Golden Globe, or a BAFTA, or any
of the other dozens of meaningless hunks of metal the elite console
themselves with.
But it won’t matter. Because the balance of power has shifted. The chickens
have come home to roost. And the Enforcers have been put on notice. | c*******1
发帖数: 14 | | S**H
发帖数: 1256 | | T**********e
发帖数: 29576 | | s*********r
发帖数: 9493 | | p****x
发帖数: 1376 | 6 人就是再老20岁也比你这种不男不女的政治动物有魅力一万倍
【在 s*********r 的大作中提到】
: 她早年拍的几部电影还是挺不错的。
| m********g
发帖数: 10469 | 7 婆子没点女人味到没啥，春哥不还是要嫁人。关键是舔婆子三观不正，一肚坏水，这就
不行了。找个坏水横流的搓衣板这过得叫啥日子.
【在 p****x 的大作中提到】
: 人就是再老20岁也比你这种不男不女的政治动物有魅力一万倍
| d*******p
发帖数: 2525 | 8 kidman保养得不错，不像有些女演员，老了完全不能看了 | a******5
发帖数: 2062 | 9 哈哈哈，川粉真的很妙，很 worshipy。那天史翠普的那楼，川粉一片骂声，从长相到
演技，什么都骂。今天这楼却是一片吹捧。
你们这些川轮是傻子还是怎么了？捧川普的明星就什么都好，黑川普的明星就什么都烂
，自己都看不出来有多可笑？
烦请楼上诸位一一报一下年龄性别？什么学历？好不好？ | j*********r
发帖数: 24733 | 10 这个搞电信诈骗为生的台独番仔evereve这个ID臭大街了，只好换个马甲 anda2015接着
来，大家一起来围观这些奇疤言论吧。
发信人: evereve (笑看眾生), 信区: USANews
标 题: 造勢大會的人數不能代表民意風向
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Oct 25 15:10:36 2016, 美东)
先教你們一個詞：造勢大會。什麼拉勵拉勵的，賽車也叫拉勵啊！中文強大的造詞功能
不用，不經大腦、不顧翻譯品質地亂翻譯，這是在戕害語言表意能力與豐富性。
川普粉的 “革命熱情” 比較高，因為基本上他們就是在革命。所以美新版版主以降的
網民們，個個熱火朝天，連下室瑣男都在捐款！這種情形下，川普的造勢大會能不火
？ 希粉相對淡然，當然參加人數少。被革命熱情動員的人數雖多，但實際民意如何？
這中 間不能劃上等號。
其二，候選人個個風格不一，對於群眾的魅力程度也不同。希特勒就是個很會演講、帶
動群眾的人，他的崛起就在於煽動戰敗國民的激情。川希相比，希拉里是個傳統政客
， 出言四平八穩，力求不出錯，而川普大嘴直言，專揀好聽的說，當然更吸引草根群
眾。 希拉里在川普旋風下，故而選擇不搞大型造勢大會，轉而走零售政治的小型聚會
，這是 候選人的選戰策略，與民意風向關係不大。
民進黨的造勢大會一向火熱，就是以上兩個原因的綜合：革命性、草根性。但成功的造
勢大會，實在與民意沒有很大關係。
（呵呵，中國人碰到三個字以上的名詞，就不會說了。所以共和黨變成和黨，民主黨變
成主黨，要你們說造勢大會，真為難你們了。算了，你們就說 "造大" 就行了 ）
发信人: evereve (笑看眾生), 信区: USANews
标 题: Re: 造勢大會的人數不能代表民意風向 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue
Oct 25 15:39:08 2016, 美东)
還有一個因素：危機意識。川普落後，一直不被看好，所以川粉的危機意識使得他們願
意站出來。如果希拉里今天各項民調落後，希粉也會全員出動挺她。
所以造勢大會人數多，只是因為粉絲們的革命熱情高、危機意識強、以及候選人的草根
性更吸引草根群眾，這與民意主流如何沒有關係，與普選結果更沒有很大關係。 | a******5
发帖数: 2062 | 11 哈哈哈，川粉真的很妙，很 worshipy。那天史翠普的那楼，川粉一片骂声，从长相到
演技，什么都骂。今天这楼却是一片吹捧。
你们这些川轮是傻子还是怎么了？捧川普的明星就什么都好，黑川普的明星就什么都烂
，自己都看不出来有多可笑？
烦请楼上诸位一一报一下年龄性别？什么学历？好不好？ | a******5
发帖数: 2062 | 12 而且妙的是：这种盲目崇拜，这种诛九族式的无限扩大化的崇拜，在英文网站上不太多
见，美新版的中国川粉咋舌一坨一坨的。 | p******r
发帖数: 1127 | 13 这有什么奇怪的。相由心生，猪党那个Debbie原本还中上之姿，dnc chair几年下来就
跟指环王里的格鲁姆一样被丑恶扭曲的吓死人。像你和Michelle Obama也是典型的由内
到外的丑逼。
【在 a******5 的大作中提到】
: 哈哈哈，川粉真的很妙，很 worshipy。那天史翠普的那楼，川粉一片骂声，从长相到
: 演技，什么都骂。今天这楼却是一片吹捧。
: 你们这些川轮是傻子还是怎么了？捧川普的明星就什么都好，黑川普的明星就什么都烂
: ，自己都看不出来有多可笑？
: 烦请楼上诸位一一报一下年龄性别？什么学历？好不好？
| h***e
发帖数: 2823 | 14 好的。
俺第一个来吧。
俺初二辍学。
对有良知的人要赞美，对亏良心的要歧视。不用初二，小学一年级俺就懂这个道理了。
俺算不算神童？
: 哈哈哈，川粉真的很妙，很 worshipy。那天史翠普的那楼，川粉一片骂声，从
长相到
: 演技，什么都骂。今天这楼却是一片吹捧。
: 你们这些川轮是傻子还是怎么了？捧川普的明星就什么都好，黑川普的明星就什
么都烂
: ，自己都看不出来有多可笑？
: 烦请楼上诸位一一报一下年龄性别？什么学历？好不好？
【在 a******5 的大作中提到】
: 而且妙的是：这种盲目崇拜，这种诛九族式的无限扩大化的崇拜，在英文网站上不太多
: 见，美新版的中国川粉咋舌一坨一坨的。
|
|
