d********f
发帖数: 43471 | 1 "Courts are particularly ill-equipped to second-guess the President's
prospective judgment about future risks. Unlike the President, courts do not
have access to classified information about the threat posed by terrorist
organizations operating in particular nations, the efforts of those
organizations to infiltrate the United States, or gaps in the vetting
process," the filing said. |
B*******t
发帖数: 1623 | 2 哪里说错了？
not
【在 d********f 的大作中提到】
: "Courts are particularly ill-equipped to second-guess the President's
: prospective judgment about future risks. Unlike the President, courts do not
: have access to classified information about the threat posed by terrorist
: organizations operating in particular nations, the efforts of those
: organizations to infiltrate the United States, or gaps in the vetting
: process," the filing said.
|
b********e
发帖数: 1100 | 3 没说错啊，法院不能随意干涉行政
not
【在 d********f 的大作中提到】
: "Courts are particularly ill-equipped to second-guess the President's
: prospective judgment about future risks. Unlike the President, courts do not
: have access to classified information about the threat posed by terrorist
: organizations operating in particular nations, the efforts of those
: organizations to infiltrate the United States, or gaps in the vetting
: process," the filing said.
|
i*****9
发帖数: 3157 | 4 直译就是我啥也不懂，所以我想怎么判就怎么判。这是为后面可能引起的恐怖袭击撇清
责任呢。
not
【在 d********f 的大作中提到】
: "Courts are particularly ill-equipped to second-guess the President's
: prospective judgment about future risks. Unlike the President, courts do not
: have access to classified information about the threat posed by terrorist
: organizations operating in particular nations, the efforts of those
: organizations to infiltrate the United States, or gaps in the vetting
: process," the filing said.
|
C*******h
发帖数: 6095 | 5 啥都不知道那发个屁的法令？！还公布出来。。。这不是等于跟大家说我就是个闭着眼
睛反总统的货？
★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 1.0.6
【在 d********f 的大作中提到】
: "Courts are particularly ill-equipped to second-guess the President's
: prospective judgment about future risks. Unlike the President, courts do not
: have access to classified information about the threat posed by terrorist
: organizations operating in particular nations, the efforts of those
: organizations to infiltrate the United States, or gaps in the vetting
: process," the filing said.
|
G****t
发帖数: 1799 | 6 法官不受约束么？案子可以到最高法院但是法官上台了就可以想咋搞咋搞，除非本人犯
事？这没制衡的司法独立漏洞大大的啊。 |
t***s
发帖数: 4666 | 7 这个显然是DOJ的filing. 你们一帮法盲。法官可以说那你倒是提供证据啊。
【在 i*****9 的大作中提到】
: 直译就是我啥也不懂，所以我想怎么判就怎么判。这是为后面可能引起的恐怖袭击撇清
: 责任呢。
:
: not
|
i*****9
发帖数: 3157 | 8 他们没有足够的权限拿到证据，这也不是他们的业务范围。
根据程序，需要遵守法官的判决。相应的执行法官决议的后果当然也是法官去背。
【在 t***s 的大作中提到】
: 这个显然是DOJ的filing. 你们一帮法盲。法官可以说那你倒是提供证据啊。
|
