S******8 发帖数: 24594 | 1 谢小编注:一张相同的考卷,大家答对了相同的题目,可是,按照新的标准,你的得分
,可是跟你永世无法改变的血统息息相关。如果你是华人一员,他们默认你太会读书,
你可能只能拿到2分;如果你是不大会读书的别的种族一员,那太恭喜了,你可以拿到3
.5分,如果你答对了更多题目,怒赞,也许你会拿到4分甚至更多。这么神奇的故事,
在今天的纽约居然有官方要强力推行。虽然这个比直接赤裸的高考加分或者公务员加分
要更加巧妙,但,依然神奇。还有朋友要问,为什么要反对亚裔细分?大哥,再仔细思
考考虑。
金属质感分割线
以下来自世界日报,原标题为《按學生族裔給不同標準 州教育廳評分系統惹議》,记
者金春香纽约报道。
州教育廳日前推出的評分系統因將各族裔學生細分、並提出不同打分標準,引發維權人
士不滿,認為家長無法了解子女在校真實表現,也不公平。
州教育廳提出「每個學生成功法案」(Every Student Succeeds Act)草案計畫,對各族
裔學生的表現打分,分數為一至四分,來與全國同族裔學生比較。雖然過去的「有教無
類法案」(No Child Left Behind Act)就是將數據按族裔畫分,希望確保各族裔學生都
能進大學,但此計畫首次要求將數據轉成評分和學校成績單。
仍使用一貫的亞太裔、非洲裔、西語裔、多種族、白人和印地安人畫分,學生還可被歸
類為英語學習者、低收入和殘疾學生。州教育廳發言人表示,此評分系統很大程度建立
於考試成績,能清晰看出每所學校各組學生的表現距州目標有多遠,可依此改進。但不
少教育人士認為,系統有很大缺陷。教育維權組織「The Education Trust-New York」
執行總監Ian Rosenblum指出,這種評分機制會引發針對學生表現期待的不公平性,如
同樣的學生考試成績在全體中只能獲得2分,但放在非洲裔或低收入組別卻能得4分,並
不公平。「家長看到的4分並非真正極佳表現,只代表這一組別中的學生,表現比其他
學校同一組別學生稍好而已。」很多移民家長英語水平有限,看到這份報告時無法真正
了解孩子在學校的表現。
家長可查閱http://www.p12.nysed.gov/accountability/documents/draft-ny-essa-plan-may-2017.pdf了解這一評分系統。面對質疑,州教育廳表示正對評分系統進行完善,會在7月下旬修改計畫,9月推出最終版。
金属质感分割线
陆网友评论: 幸亏加州的细分没有被允许用到教育上,不然就会和纽约一样。
觉得细分无所谓的人该醒醒了,有了细分数据,打着AA的名义,啥都搞得出来的。 |
r**********8 发帖数: 249 | 2 美新黄左畜牲们都尿遁了,几个最会替档妈AA洗地的黄左不过来替党妈洗地。 |
h*****s 发帖数: 1654 | |
h*****s 发帖数: 1654 | |
h*****s 发帖数: 1654 | |
S******8 发帖数: 24594 | 6 我去年还在这里发帖子开玩笑说,大学不仅招生要AA, 考试成绩也要AA, 没想到这么快
就实现了。
【在 h*****s 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 请把此帖速速置顶!!!
|
D*******o 发帖数: 3229 | 7 这个措施的理论依据是不同种族的学生即使在相同环境下学术表现也有明显差别。这个
事实倒是有统计数据支持。 |
h********8 发帖数: 761 | |
r******g 发帖数: 4002 | 9 放心,80%以上的纽约华人投票给民主党政客。有句话,不作不死! |
g****n 发帖数: 7494 | 10 牛逼死了
以后华人的孩子sat考1600分算800分,黑墨考了200分,算400分
华人孩子要比黑墨高300分才能享有一样的录取'资格',这只是录取资格哦,学校录取不
录取还要看你是不是单亲家庭,爸妈有没有吸毒或者坐牢的 LoL |
|
|
f*******e 发帖数: 3433 | 11 打不开里面的pdf。 能打开summary. 里面只看到要按种族向州立报告分数(一直都要
报告的),没看到要按种族給考试成绩。按种族报告和安种族給考试成绩不同。把相关
的英文段贴出来看看才知道到底想干什么。
http://www.p12.nysed.gov/accountability/documents/draft-ny-essa-plan-summary-may-2017.pdf
到3
【在 S******8 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 谢小编注:一张相同的考卷,大家答对了相同的题目,可是,按照新的标准,你的得分 : ,可是跟你永世无法改变的血统息息相关。如果你是华人一员,他们默认你太会读书, : 你可能只能拿到2分;如果你是不大会读书的别的种族一员,那太恭喜了,你可以拿到3 : .5分,如果你答对了更多题目,怒赞,也许你会拿到4分甚至更多。这么神奇的故事, : 在今天的纽约居然有官方要强力推行。虽然这个比直接赤裸的高考加分或者公务员加分 : 要更加巧妙,但,依然神奇。还有朋友要问,为什么要反对亚裔细分?大哥,再仔细思 : 考考虑。 : 金属质感分割线 : 以下来自世界日报,原标题为《按學生族裔給不同標準 州教育廳評分系統惹議》,记 : 者金春香纽约报道。
|
f*******e 发帖数: 3433 | 12 应该是下面的英文新闻了,但也没看到考试成绩要按种族給。
New York unveiled a blueprint Monday for education policy under a new
federal law, which officials said will help launch the state beyond a narrow
focus on test scores when it comes to evaluating schools.
The Every Student Succeeds Act is designed to provide more flexibility for
states to decide what makes a school successful and to support schools that
don’t meet that bar. New York education officials have said they hope to
capitalize on the extra wiggle room – and framed that choice as a statement
of values.
“This is a vision plan for New York state,” said Chancellor Betty Rosa at
a Board of Regents meeting Monday, where the draft plan was announced. Still
, she cautioned, it’s a work in progress. “The road to success is always
under construction.”
There are practical constraints that make aspects of this plan similar to
its predecessor, No Child Left Behind — most importantly that student
achievement is still a prominent feature. But there are also key differences
that state officials argue mark a real shift, including a stronger emphasis
on student growth and college, career and civic readiness.
New York officials also say the draft plan advances equity by asking schools
to report on their resources. That gets at a broader philosophical shift, a
statement that accountability involves inputs — or access to resources,
qualified teachers, and advanced coursework — rather than just student
outcomes.
Welcome to Chalkbeat
Chalkbeat is an independent nonprofit news organization telling the story of
education in America. Learn more.
Rating schools: A dashboard approach, not letter grades
Rather than using one summative rating to indicate school success — like
creating an A-F rating system — the draft plan opts for a dashboard
approach that will include a number of different metrics.
It’s unclear exactly what the dashboard will look like, but a local example
exists in New York City’s online dashboard, where leaders have moved
sharply away from an A-F approach and toward providing multiple measures in
the form of numbers, charts and graphs.
To add transparency, the state plan would report information about
accountability measures on a 1-4 scale. Schools will also be put into one of
four broad buckets from most to least successful: Recognition Schools,
Schools in Good Standing, Targeted Support and Improvement Schools, or
Comprehensive Support and Improvement Schools.
The dashboard approach is part of the Regents’ equity agenda, since it
requires reporting information beyond accountability metrics, such as per-
pupil spending. The hope is that making that type of information prominent
will help diagnose why schools are struggling and encourage the state and
schools to address those problems.
Education news. In your inbox. Sign up for our email newsletter
“You want high-quality accountability, and part of that accountability is
also knowing what you need to do to fix things,” Linda Darling-Hammond, an
education expert who advised the state on its plan, said earlier this year.
“Because otherwise you’re not being accountable to parents and to children
.”
But some believe providing a dashboard, without a more concrete rating
system, could be confusing to parents.
“Parents should be able to see a clear rating for the school and for each
indicator, along with a dashboard of deeper data,” said Ian Rosenblum,
executive director of EdTrust-NY. “But SED’s draft plan appears to reject
the transparency of school and indicator ratings altogether in favor of
potentially dozens of individual ratings that, on their own, could cause
confusion rather than provide clarity.”
State tests: Experimenting with new models and addressing opt-out
New York wants to apply for a federal program that allows a handful of
states to pilot innovative assessments, according to state materials.
That signals New York is interested in revamping standardized tests, but
cost will likely remain a major hurdle. State officials expressed concerns
about expenses last year, when they learned that the federal pilot program
came with no additional funding. This year, the state asked for $8 million
from the legislature to pilot project-based assessments this year, but did
not get the funding.
The federal law also requires that 95 percent of students participate in
state tests, a major sticking point in New York state, where more than 20
percent of families opted out of state tests last year.
The state draft plan says it will require districts and schools with a
history of low participation rates to create plans to address the problem,
while “recognizing the rights of parents and students.” That will start
with a self-assessment for schools that have pattern of frequent opt-outs,
but may escalate to more state involvement.
Test scores: Greater emphasis on growth, science, social studies
Unlike No Child Left Behind, which focused on whether all students could
reach a certain bar, like a third-grade reading level, this plan is designed
to place a stronger emphasis on whether students make progress compared to
where they started.
A narrow focus on proficiency leads schools to pay more attention to
students close to attaining proficiency and ignore those far behind or far
ahead, critics have argued. It can also be unfair for schools that serve
high-needs students, since those populations of students often start well
below grade-level.
Donate 5 minutes of your time to help improve our journalism.
Take our annual reader survey here.
In elementary and middle school, this plan would use one rating for
achievement and one for growth. Schools could be targeted for improvement if
they fall in the bottom 10 percent of schools on those two metrics combined
. (That would avoid identifying schools that have either a lot of high-
performing students but a poor growth score, or those that do an excellent
job helping students improve over time.) For high schools, graduation rates
replace the growth metric.
Also in this plan, the state plans to include social studies, with an
emphasis on civics and democracy, at the high school level, along with
science scores for elementary, middle and high schools.
Other metrics: Moving beyond test scores
Under ESSA, states get to experiment with a way to judge schools beyond
academic achievement and test scores.
New York state, like many others, plans to use chronic absenteeism, defined
as missing more than 10 percent or more of enrolled school days, at the
elementary and middle school level. Research shows that absenteeism is
associated with poor academic outcomes and addressing it can help change a
student’s trajectory.
For high schools, the state wants to create a metric for college, career and
civic readiness. That new metric would provide more information than a
simple graduation rate. It could help distinguish, for instance, between
students who graduate, and those who earn a more advanced diploma, or
complete career training.
These metrics would come into play if a school is identified as in the
bottom 10 percent based on its combined growth and achievement scores. Among
those schools, these extra measures would help determine if a school should
be targeted for improvement. If a school scores a Level 1 on any category,
the school and district must investigate.
Schools would also be judged based on whether they make progress toward long
-term goals.
Certain metrics that groups have urged the state to include, like suspension
data, were not included in the draft plan as accountability measures. In
fact, there is a whole tier of indicators, including school safety and
teacher turnover data, that would not be used initially for accountability
under this draft plan, either because the state does not currently collect
the data or officials thought they could result in misleading conclusions
about school success. But state officials said “Tier 2” indicators could
be used to rate schools in the future.
Boosting diversity: A new stab at an old problem
At the last meeting, officials suggested they may leverage ESSA to tackle
the state’s problem with school segregation.
State materials on Monday indicated the draft plan allows the use Title I
School Improvement Funds to increase diversity and address socioeconomic and
racial isolation in schools. But it remains unclear what exactly that might
look like.
When asked about how schools could use those funds to support diversity,
State Commissioner MaryEllen Elia said the state will not get a sum of money
specifically for integration efforts, but that it may be part of a broader
approach to school improvement.
Intervention: Moving from consequences to support
State officials emphasized that they want to move from a culture of
consequences toward one of support. They hope to provide technical
assistance and evidence-based interventions to schools. If those schools
continue to underperform, they would be folded into the state’s
receivership program, officials said. That program, however, has been
significantly scaled back since it was launched in 2015, and so far, has
yielded only one school slated for receivership.
到3
【在 S******8 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 谢小编注:一张相同的考卷,大家答对了相同的题目,可是,按照新的标准,你的得分 : ,可是跟你永世无法改变的血统息息相关。如果你是华人一员,他们默认你太会读书, : 你可能只能拿到2分;如果你是不大会读书的别的种族一员,那太恭喜了,你可以拿到3 : .5分,如果你答对了更多题目,怒赞,也许你会拿到4分甚至更多。这么神奇的故事, : 在今天的纽约居然有官方要强力推行。虽然这个比直接赤裸的高考加分或者公务员加分 : 要更加巧妙,但,依然神奇。还有朋友要问,为什么要反对亚裔细分?大哥,再仔细思 : 考考虑。 : 金属质感分割线 : 以下来自世界日报,原标题为《按學生族裔給不同標準 州教育廳評分系統惹議》,记 : 者金春香纽约报道。
|
h*****s 发帖数: 1654 | 13 你觉得老师能给华人2分差学生学好推荐信而给黑人4分好学生学坏推荐信?
narrow
that
statement
at
【在 f*******e 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 应该是下面的英文新闻了,但也没看到考试成绩要按种族給。 : New York unveiled a blueprint Monday for education policy under a new : federal law, which officials said will help launch the state beyond a narrow : focus on test scores when it comes to evaluating schools. : The Every Student Succeeds Act is designed to provide more flexibility for : states to decide what makes a school successful and to support schools that : don’t meet that bar. New York education officials have said they hope to : capitalize on the extra wiggle room – and framed that choice as a statement : of values. : “This is a vision plan for New York state,” said Chancellor Betty Rosa at
|
l*********e 发帖数: 244 | 14 操!
到3
【在 S******8 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 谢小编注:一张相同的考卷,大家答对了相同的题目,可是,按照新的标准,你的得分 : ,可是跟你永世无法改变的血统息息相关。如果你是华人一员,他们默认你太会读书, : 你可能只能拿到2分;如果你是不大会读书的别的种族一员,那太恭喜了,你可以拿到3 : .5分,如果你答对了更多题目,怒赞,也许你会拿到4分甚至更多。这么神奇的故事, : 在今天的纽约居然有官方要强力推行。虽然这个比直接赤裸的高考加分或者公务员加分 : 要更加巧妙,但,依然神奇。还有朋友要问,为什么要反对亚裔细分?大哥,再仔细思 : 考考虑。 : 金属质感分割线 : 以下来自世界日报,原标题为《按學生族裔給不同標準 州教育廳評分系統惹議》,记 : 者金春香纽约报道。
|
r*********t 发帖数: 4911 | |
h*****s 发帖数: 1654 | 16 请拿出大学录取不看这种评定的原文!
知道高中老师要写推荐信的么?有了这种评定,大学录取还看什么成绩!
【在 r*********t 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 请贴出考试成绩也按种族来的原文。
|
f*******e 发帖数: 3433 | 17 看不懂你的逻辑。上面的相关英文新闻和summary都没说成绩要按种族給,只说了每年
上报
成绩时要按族裔给出平均。一直都有的。网上每个纽约的学校都有:白人,黑人,西人,
亚裔等达到3分或以上的百分比。并没有按族裔給成绩,比如好的亚裔得2分或查的黑衣
的4分。
【在 h*****s 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 你觉得老师能给华人2分差学生学好推荐信而给黑人4分好学生学坏推荐信? : : narrow : that : statement : at
|
C*********n 发帖数: 1032 | 18 卧槽尼玛,文化大革命还没有打住啊。以为把猪党从白宫赶出去就可以拨乱反正了,看
来还是天真啊。 |
n****g 发帖数: 14743 | 19 中文的通稿以讹传讹,当笑话和八卦看还行。如果是有必要相信的,就去查英文原稿。
得分
书,
事,
加分
细思
,记
【在 f*******e 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 打不开里面的pdf。 能打开summary. 里面只看到要按种族向州立报告分数(一直都要 : 报告的),没看到要按种族給考试成绩。按种族报告和安种族給考试成绩不同。把相关 : 的英文段贴出来看看才知道到底想干什么。 : http://www.p12.nysed.gov/accountability/documents/draft-ny-essa-plan-summary-may-2017.pdf : : 到3
|
r***i 发帖数: 9780 | 20 左渣没有最low,只有更low
【在 S******8 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 我去年还在这里发帖子开玩笑说,大学不仅招生要AA, 考试成绩也要AA, 没想到这么快 : 就实现了。
|
|
|
h*****s 发帖数: 1654 | 21 CNN的英文原稿能相信么?
【在 n****g 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 中文的通稿以讹传讹,当笑话和八卦看还行。如果是有必要相信的,就去查英文原稿。 : : 得分 : 书, : 事, : 加分 : 细思 : ,记
|
f****t 发帖数: 15913 | 22 +1 左逼猪狗不如
【在 h********8 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 左逼猪狗不如
|
r*********t 发帖数: 4911 | 23 在我看到原文之前,我既不相信一个人说考试成绩按种族来,也不相信一个人说考试成
绩不按照种族来。我不会因为我自己反对亚裔细分,就相信一个我自己未经核实的亚裔
细分的新闻。你的题目是考试成绩按照种族来,所以我只说清楚是你的证据英文原文。
我没提过大学录取看不看评定,为什么要我拿出原文?你的题目是考试成绩按照种族来
,如果我看不到英文原文,我只能当作你和我一样是反对aa和细分的人。但是我不会盲
信你说的话。仅此而已。
【在 h*****s 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 请拿出大学录取不看这种评定的原文! : 知道高中老师要写推荐信的么?有了这种评定,大学录取还看什么成绩!
|
h*****s 发帖数: 1654 | 24 链接里面拷贝过来的:
Students’ test scores are converted to performance levels:
人,
【在 f*******e 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 看不懂你的逻辑。上面的相关英文新闻和summary都没说成绩要按种族給,只说了每年 : 上报 : 成绩时要按族裔给出平均。一直都有的。网上每个纽约的学校都有:白人,黑人,西人, : 亚裔等达到3分或以上的百分比。并没有按族裔給成绩,比如好的亚裔得2分或查的黑衣 : 的4分。
|
h*****s 发帖数: 1654 | 25 第25页
看到成绩转变了么?
对,你可以说现在只适用于内部评估,以后呢?亚裔细分也是只用于内部评估
【在 r*********t 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 在我看到原文之前,我既不相信一个人说考试成绩按种族来,也不相信一个人说考试成 : 绩不按照种族来。我不会因为我自己反对亚裔细分,就相信一个我自己未经核实的亚裔 : 细分的新闻。你的题目是考试成绩按照种族来,所以我只说清楚是你的证据英文原文。 : 我没提过大学录取看不看评定,为什么要我拿出原文?你的题目是考试成绩按照种族来 : ,如果我看不到英文原文,我只能当作你和我一样是反对aa和细分的人。但是我不会盲 : 信你说的话。仅此而已。
|
h*****s 发帖数: 1654 | 26 New York State also measures “progress” in addition to growth. Progress is
a measure of how a subgroup performed in English language arts and
mathematics in relation to the long-term goals and measure of interim
progress (MIP).
"subgroup"是什么意思?
不要告诉我按家庭财产和收入分 |
f*******e 发帖数: 3433 | 27 现在纽约小学的report card也是用level1-4来评分的。3分算通过。州考也是把分数转
成1-4
报告給州立。初中和高中不清楚。 就小学来说,没看到任何区别。而且这个和族裔有
什么
关系?
【在 h*****s 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 链接里面拷贝过来的: : Students’ test scores are converted to performance levels: : : 人,
|
f*******e 发帖数: 3433 | 28 学校給纽约州每年的report一直都要subgroup的数据, 按族裔分。这个数据是公开的,
greatschool
可以查到。比如下面是纽约一个小学的 数据:
https://www.greatschools.org/florida/apopka/2160-Lakeville-Elementary-School
/
his shows results across different races/ethnicities on Math test given to
students once a year. Big differences may suggest that some student groups
are not getting the support they need to succeed.
All students
(451 students)
59%
State avg: 58%
Details
Black
(37% of students )
52%
State avg: 42%
Details
Hispanic
(32% of students )
59%
State avg: 56%
Details
White
(26% of students )
69%
State avg: 69%
is
【在 h*****s 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : New York State also measures “progress” in addition to growth. Progress is : a measure of how a subgroup performed in English language arts and : mathematics in relation to the long-term goals and measure of interim : progress (MIP). : "subgroup"是什么意思? : 不要告诉我按家庭财产和收入分
|
h*****s 发帖数: 1654 | 29 你这是现在
文章里说的是将来要施行的 按组别给分
你也可以硬掰说亚裔细分也只是收集数据 没看到要有什么区别
【在 f*******e 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 现在纽约小学的report card也是用level1-4来评分的。3分算通过。州考也是把分数转 : 成1-4 : 报告給州立。初中和高中不清楚。 就小学来说,没看到任何区别。而且这个和族裔有 : 什么 : 关系?
|
f*******e 发帖数: 3433 | 30 里面有一些是现有得,有一些是有改变的 (只要有改变,就得把整个政策重写)。
按组别分一直有。 亚裔细分是纽约市通过的,非纽约市的纽约州其他地方不亚裔
细分。我觉得不管州教育厅有没有这个文件,既然纽约市通过了亚裔细分,可能
以后纽约市学校往上报成绩都要按亚裔细分来报(因为按族裔往上报一直有而且
纽约市又重新定义了族裔)。不知道纽约市是否强制家长写小孩族裔。
所以我个人不觉得这个教育厅的文件本身有多大影响。有影响的是纽约市
通过的那个亚裔细分法案。纽约的市长是我最讨厌的政客之一,还有那些纽约
市的作弊议员。希望纽约市今年能把这个市长选下去。
【在 h*****s 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 你这是现在 : 文章里说的是将来要施行的 按组别给分 : 你也可以硬掰说亚裔细分也只是收集数据 没看到要有什么区别
|
|
|
f*********1 发帖数: 2518 | 31 话说这是大学和职场AA的配套措施,不实行考分的族裔细化,怎么能保证到了大学录取
的时候有足够的各色人种供大学选择,怎么能保证职场招人的时候有足够的各色毕业生
?这样的措施不出台才奇怪。
破解这个政策的办法只有两个,相信美国的把官司打到高院,没有战争发生的情况下一
纸否决判决可以管后面50年。不相信美国的回国干活,有一天商场上得美帝满地找牙,
这条路比较漫长,而且不确定因素太多,按照中国今天的人心败坏,指望中国强盛成功
几率不大,然而算上美帝自戕心切,看它自我阉割的节奏,我以为这也没有什么不可实
现的。只不过要看到效果,得等孙辈了。 |
k*******g 发帖数: 7321 | 32 核导弹旅也得按种族来,至少得招几个木木,赶快的,要不就是歧视。
到3
【在 S******8 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 谢小编注:一张相同的考卷,大家答对了相同的题目,可是,按照新的标准,你的得分 : ,可是跟你永世无法改变的血统息息相关。如果你是华人一员,他们默认你太会读书, : 你可能只能拿到2分;如果你是不大会读书的别的种族一员,那太恭喜了,你可以拿到3 : .5分,如果你答对了更多题目,怒赞,也许你会拿到4分甚至更多。这么神奇的故事, : 在今天的纽约居然有官方要强力推行。虽然这个比直接赤裸的高考加分或者公务员加分 : 要更加巧妙,但,依然神奇。还有朋友要问,为什么要反对亚裔细分?大哥,再仔细思 : 考考虑。 : 金属质感分割线 : 以下来自世界日报,原标题为《按學生族裔給不同標準 州教育廳評分系統惹議》,记 : 者金春香纽约报道。
|
f*******e 发帖数: 3433 | |
u***n 发帖数: 21026 | |
O******o 发帖数: 765 | 35 正解啊。
【在 u***n 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 支持,太会读书不好,学会上街闹事才行
|
z*****l 发帖数: 3472 | 36 这才是真正的民主。那么多学生,按照一个非选票选出来的标准给分,这是专制洗脑做
法,只有邪恶中国才干得出的事。 |
z*****l 发帖数: 3472 | 37 还有监狱 AA(equal justice for all),高等种族杀人,判个三、五年,因为人家从小
生活在不良环境中,这是可期望的 “正常行为”,劣等中国人超速驾驶,也要判个三
、五年,因为这严重威胁公共安全。
【在 S******8 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 我去年还在这里发帖子开玩笑说,大学不仅招生要AA, 考试成绩也要AA, 没想到这么快 : 就实现了。
|
j*******g 发帖数: 291 | 38 丧心病狂啊。新的教育部长呢?
到3
【在 S******8 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 谢小编注:一张相同的考卷,大家答对了相同的题目,可是,按照新的标准,你的得分 : ,可是跟你永世无法改变的血统息息相关。如果你是华人一员,他们默认你太会读书, : 你可能只能拿到2分;如果你是不大会读书的别的种族一员,那太恭喜了,你可以拿到3 : .5分,如果你答对了更多题目,怒赞,也许你会拿到4分甚至更多。这么神奇的故事, : 在今天的纽约居然有官方要强力推行。虽然这个比直接赤裸的高考加分或者公务员加分 : 要更加巧妙,但,依然神奇。还有朋友要问,为什么要反对亚裔细分?大哥,再仔细思 : 考考虑。 : 金属质感分割线 : 以下来自世界日报,原标题为《按學生族裔給不同標準 州教育廳評分系統惹議》,记 : 者金春香纽约报道。
|