f*******e
发帖数: 3433 | 1 最高院部分block了夏威夷法官的判决，夏威夷的判决是refugees只要有接受的
organization就可以来，最高法院判不行除非9院说行。traveler还可以用extended
list， 给不给visa就看签证官的了。目前block了大约24000 refugees. 3个高院法官
说支持full travel ban. 10月份会就travel ban正式开庭。
不明白为什么高院还要加一句，除非9院说可以。如果9院同意了夏威夷法官的，
难道还要再appeal到高院？
The Supreme Court is granting the Trump administration's request to more
strictly enforce its ban on refugees, at least until a federal appeals court
weighs in.
But the justices are leaving in place a lower court order that makes it
easier for travelers from six mostly Muslim countries to enter the United
States.
The administration had appealed last week's ruling by U.S. District Judge
Derrick Watson that required the government to allow in refugees formally
working with a resettlement agency in the United States. Watson also vastly
expanded the family relations that refugees and visitors can use to get into
the country.
The high court on Wednesday blocked Watson's order as it applies to refugees
, but not the expanded list of relatives. The justices said the federal
appeals court in San Francisco should now consider the appeal. It's not
clear how quickly that will happen.
In the meantime, though, up to 24,000 refugees who already have been
assigned to a charity or religious organization in the U.S. will not be able
to use that connection to get into the country.
The Supreme Court also denied the administration's request to clarify its
ruling last month that allowed the administration to partially reinstate a
90-day ban on visitors from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen and
a 120-day ban on refugees from anywhere in the world.
The court's ruling exempted a large swath of refugees and travelers with a "
bona fide relationship" with a person or an entity in the U.S. The justices
did not define those relationships but said they could include a close
relative, a job offer or admission to a college or university.
Watson's order added grandparents, grandchildren, brothers-in-law, sisters-
in-law, aunts, uncles, nieces, nephews and cousins to a list that already
included a parent, spouse, fiance, son, daughter, son-in-law, daughter-in-
law or sibling already in the U.S. The expanded list of relatives remains in
effect.
Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas would have blocked
Watson's order in its entirety. Those same three justices said last month
they would have allowed the Trump travel ban to take full effect. | t*b
发帖数: 850 | 2 Supreme courts want 9th circuit to rule first
It wants to give 9th circuit a chance to make itself still legit |
|
