f**********n
发帖数: 29853 | 1 这垃圾二十七年前和太太分手，法院给了不得联系的命令，丫不管，打电话骚扰太太说
要不要玩玩，太太不同意。丫
开车去在太太和她姐姐上班的路上堵截，逼他们上车，残忍地杀了太太的姐姐，绑架和
强奸了太太。陪审团花了不到两小时就定罪了。二十七年后的今年总算轮到执行死刑了
。丫说，当年的陪审员有一个有种族偏见，说黑
人都没良心，所以要求重审。
高院五个大法官同意了，写了三页，三个保守派大法官托马斯，阿里拖，戈萨奇不同意
。托马斯写了不同意观点，十三页。
托马斯的充满哲理的一段
If bad facts make bad law, then “unusual facts” inspire
unusual decisions. Ante, at 3. In its brief per curiam
opinion, the Court misreads a lower court’s opinion to find
an error that is not there, and then refuses to entertain
alternative grounds for affirmance. The Court does this to
accomplish little more than a do-over in the Court of Appeals: As it
concedes, petitioner Keith Tharpe faces a “high bar” on remand to obtain
even a certificate of appealability
(COA). Ante, at 2.
这句话包含了托马斯对真正弱者的无尽同情
And its unusual disposition of
his case callously delays justice for Jaquelin Freeman, the
black woman who was brutally murdered by Tharpe 27
years ago. Because this Court should not be in the business of ceremonial
handwringing, I respectfully dissent.
http://www.scotusblog.com/2018/01/court-sends-case-georgia-death-row-inmate-back-lower-courts-thomas-dissent/ |
|
