由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
USANews版 - “profoundly
相关主题
哈佛诉讼案: 法官判定哈佛必须公布录取数据 (转载)班加西事件后,巴马原来打算怪罪到另外一个反穆斯林视频上的
White House, IRS exchanged confidential taxpayer info'60分钟':911报告显示沙特阿拉伯官方在洛杉矶会过见劫机者 (转载)
亚裔被推荐信坑了白宫:都是司法部干的
Officials From Terror-Sponsoring State ‘Exempted From Enhanced Screening’ by TSA希拉里为啥就是不公布自己的基金细节呢????
Elena Kagan and Question 3希拉里的电邮,可能早被中国看了个够
耶鲁亚裔法学学生在公开信中痛骂同学的虚伪来给马桶再加一条legacy: 移民局加班处理公民入籍
凌晨熟睡中被脸部中弹,好人拿起枪重创入室杀人犯 (转载)又是周五了。Guccifer 2.0和FBI
不出所料,DOJ果然和IRS的targeting有牵连FBI: evidence tampering in Clinton email case
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: harvard话题: admissions话题: fair话题: students话题: documents
进入USANews版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
t**g
发帖数: 784
1
Thousands of pages of redacted Harvard admissions data—including applicants
’ files and internal correspondence between admissions officers—will
likely soon become public information after a judge’s ruling in a lawsuit
against Harvard Tuesday.
At an April 10 hearing at the U.S. District Court in Boston, Judge Allison D
. Burroughs ruled that, within the next two months, lawyers for Harvard
University and advocacy group Students for Fair Admissions must file two
near-identical sets of previously confidential Harvard admissions documents
—one unredacted set to be filed under seal and one redacted version of the
set to be filed publicly.
Judge Burroughs also moved up the tentative date for a trial in the lawsuit.
Instead of a previously proposed date in early January, the judge, Harvard,
and Students for Fair Admissions discussed holding a trial in mid-October.
Judge Burroughs determined that Harvard and Students for Fair Admissions
must work together over coming months to agree on redactions for the public
set of documents prior to filing. She said the two parties should redact
only information that threatens applicants’ privacy and instructed both
groups they should not redact the files to the point of being “
incomprehensible.”
Students for Fair Admissions, an anti-affirmative action group, first filed
the lawsuit against Harvard in 2014; the suit alleges Harvard discriminates
against Asian Americans in its admissions process. Harvard has repeatedly
denied this accusation.
Harvard and Students for Fair Admissions have previously battled over
whether College admissions data should become public. The judge’s Tuesday
decision appears to walk a middle line between proposals Harvard and
Students for Fair Admissions outlined in clashing briefs last week.
In those proposals, Harvard asked for the documents to “be filed
provisionally under seal,” while Students for Fair Admissions asked for the
documents to be filed publicly.
Harvard has repeatedly argued the documents should remain private, citing
concerns regarding student privacy and proprietary information. Students for
Fair Admissions has insisted the documents must become public to allow
external parties to participate in the case and to submit amicus briefs. The
group has further argued the public has a “profoundly important” interest
in the documents.
It is unclear exactly how many documents may become public under the judge’
s ruling. Harvard’s lawyers wrote in its briefing last week that the
University has given over 90,000 total pages of documents designated as
either “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” to Students for Fair
Admissions. But only a “small fraction” of these documents will be used as
“exhibits to summary judgment briefs or discussed in those briefs,”
according to the lawyers’ filing.
William F. Lee ’72, the senior fellow of the Harvard Corporation, numbered
among several lawyers representing Harvard at the hearing—acting only as an
attorney, not on behalf of the Corporation.
The Department of Justice has taken a strong interest in the lawsuit and in
the confidential status of Harvard’s admissions data, filing a brief Friday
as part of the lawsuit that argued Harvard should make the data public. Lee
sent a letter to Judge Burroughs Monday arguing the Department of Justice’
s intervention was “perplexing” and “entirely unnecessary.”
t**g
发帖数: 784
2
http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2018/4/10/thousands-pages-to-become-public/

applicants
D
documents
the

【在 t**g 的大作中提到】
: Thousands of pages of redacted Harvard admissions data—including applicants
: ’ files and internal correspondence between admissions officers—will
: likely soon become public information after a judge’s ruling in a lawsuit
: against Harvard Tuesday.
: At an April 10 hearing at the U.S. District Court in Boston, Judge Allison D
: . Burroughs ruled that, within the next two months, lawyers for Harvard
: University and advocacy group Students for Fair Admissions must file two
: near-identical sets of previously confidential Harvard admissions documents
: —one unredacted set to be filed under seal and one redacted version of the
: set to be filed publicly.

1 (共1页)
进入USANews版参与讨论
相关主题
FBI: evidence tampering in Clinton email caseElena Kagan and Question 3
FBI最新报告里的料够猛了,wikileaks可以放一两天假耶鲁亚裔法学学生在公开信中痛骂同学的虚伪
我差点儿摔地上了——一个希粉朋友的回信凌晨熟睡中被脸部中弹,好人拿起枪重创入室杀人犯 (转载)
FBI给克林顿使坏:公布Rich特赦档案不出所料,DOJ果然和IRS的targeting有牵连
哈佛诉讼案: 法官判定哈佛必须公布录取数据 (转载)班加西事件后,巴马原来打算怪罪到另外一个反穆斯林视频上的
White House, IRS exchanged confidential taxpayer info'60分钟':911报告显示沙特阿拉伯官方在洛杉矶会过见劫机者 (转载)
亚裔被推荐信坑了白宫:都是司法部干的
Officials From Terror-Sponsoring State ‘Exempted From Enhanced Screening’ by TSA希拉里为啥就是不公布自己的基金细节呢????
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: harvard话题: admissions话题: fair话题: students话题: documents