l**o
发帖数: 131 | 1 "Consequently, the story was updated a second time on Monday evening to take
account of the apparent mistake in the public record.
Our commitment at POLITICO is to journalism that gets its facts straight. We
regret we fell short in this case."
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/04/27/politicos-reporting-on-president-
trump-and-the-bank-of-china-214107
更正（两次！）必须悄悄藏好，自不待言。 | l**o
发帖数: 131 | 2 操他姥姥，麻痹作弊确实擅长藏好秘密，叔走马观花，居然漏了下面的“which had
not been contacted beforehand”
“On Friday evening, POLITICO received a statement from a representative for
Bank of China USA, which had not been contacted beforehand, that the bank
had sold off, or securitized, its debt shortly after the 2012 deal. ”
麻痹地写一篇关于Trump现在欠Bank of China钱的报道，居然没有联系Bank of China
。这尼玛已经不是Decency的问题了。 | j****y
发帖数: 597 | 3 造谣没成本。
等到CNN倒闭了，可能轮到这种小报被人打官司。
for
China
【在 l**o 的大作中提到】
: 操他姥姥，麻痹作弊确实擅长藏好秘密，叔走马观花，居然漏了下面的“which had
: not been contacted beforehand”
: “On Friday evening, POLITICO received a statement from a representative for
: Bank of China USA, which had not been contacted beforehand, that the bank
: had sold off, or securitized, its debt shortly after the 2012 deal. ”
: 麻痹地写一篇关于Trump现在欠Bank of China钱的报道，居然没有联系Bank of China
: 。这尼玛已经不是Decency的问题了。
| a****1
发帖数: 634 | 4 这种事情去问银行，当然不会承认或否认。不过的确该问一问，然后注明说：我们问了
，他们不回答。 | f**********n
发帖数: 29853 | 5 你连具体是查证什么事情都不知道。
番薯，读读新闻吧，the 不多不会分心太多。
【在 a****1 的大作中提到】
: 这种事情去问银行，当然不会承认或否认。不过的确该问一问，然后注明说：我们问了
: ，他们不回答。
|
|
