x*****7
发帖数: 1 | 1 https://www.democracydocket.com/cases/michigan-certification-challenge/
The right to vote is among the most sacred rights of our democracy and, in
turn, uniquely defines us as Americans. The struggle to achieve the right
to vote is one that has been both hard fought and cherished throughout our
country’s history. Local, state, and federal elections give voice to this
right through the ballot. And elections that count each vote celebrate and
secure this cherished right.
These principles are the bedrock of American democracy and are widely
revered as being woven into the fabric of this country. In Michigan, more
than 5.5 million citizens exercised the franchise either in person or by
absentee ballot during the 2020 General Election. Those votes were counted
and, as of November 23, 2020, certified by the Michigan Board of State
Canvassers (also “State Board”). The Governor has sent the slate of
Presidential Electors to the Archivist of the United States to confirm the
votes for the successful candidate.
Against this backdrop, Plaintiffs filed this lawsuit, bringing forth claims
of widespread voter irregularities and fraud in the processing and
tabulation of votes and absentee ballots. They seek relief that is stunning
in its scope and breathtaking in its reach. If granted, the relief would
disenfranchise the votes of the more than 5.5 million Michigan citizens who,
with dignity, hope, and a promise of a voice, participated in the 2020
General Election. The Court declines to grant Plaintiffs this relief.
...
Conclusion
For these reasons, the Court finds that Plaintiffs are far from likely to
succeed in this matter. In fact, this lawsuit seems to be less about
achieving the relief Plaintiffs seek—as much of that relief is beyond the
power of this Court—and more about the impact of their allegations on
People’s faith in the democratic process and their trust in our government
. Plaintiffs ask this Court to ignore the orderly statutory scheme
established to challenge elections and to ignore the will of millions of
voters. This, the Court cannot, and will not, do.
The People have spoken.
The Court, therefore, DENIES Plaintiffs’ “
Emergency Motion for Declaratory, Emergency, and Permanent Injunctive Relief
” (ECF No. 7.) |
d****z
发帖数: 75 | |
o******1
发帖数: 12177 | |
e*****e
发帖数: 2791 | 4 "In fact, this lawsuit seems to be less about achieving the relief
Plaintiffs seek—as much of that relief is beyond the power of this
Court—and more about the impact of their allegations on
People’s faith in the democratic process and their trust in our
government."
這一句說得太好了！！！根本不是什麼為了民主、為了正義，從頭到尾就是在打擊人民
對政府與民主的信心！
所以我說，一個川普勝過百個賓拉登，中國俄國 ISIS 做夢都達不到的傷害，川普一個
人做到了。 |
d****z
发帖数: 75 | |
S**********t
发帖数: 1 | |
n*****5
发帖数: 1 | |
b*********3
发帖数: 1709 | 8 Who says black women are powerless and marginalized? A few of them in
places like Detroit, Philadelphia and Atlanta are directly picking the
President of the USA. |
d****z
发帖数: 75 | 9 一掌被扇回。 舅公缕长须，冷眼川粉屈，百年国家业， 容你造谣毁？
【在 n*****5 的大作中提到】
: 顺利进高院。
|
j****l
发帖数: 3356 | 10 你这样喜欢脑补的，看到这个法官说seems to be是不是觉得臭味相投？
【在 e*****e 的大作中提到】
: "In fact, this lawsuit seems to be less about achieving the relief
: Plaintiffs seek—as much of that relief is beyond the power of this
: Court—and more about the impact of their allegations on
: People’s faith in the democratic process and their trust in our
: government."
: 這一句說得太好了！！！根本不是什麼為了民主、為了正義，從頭到尾就是在打擊人民
: 對政府與民主的信心！
: 所以我說，一個川普勝過百個賓拉登，中國俄國 ISIS 做夢都達不到的傷害，川普一個
: 人做到了。
|
|
|
d****z
发帖数: 75 | 11 推特用处广，统领号令强；
一呼有百应，川粉传单忙；
前有三硬盘，后有投票机；
各州皆舞弊，证物海怪级；
律师来头大，扬言官司通；
日收两万金，气势也凶凶； |
d****z
发帖数: 75 | 12 开个招待会，律师齐发威；
"主党问题大，舞弊还通共"；
统领连任危，和党不甘坠；
党义抛脑后，底线已不见；
舞弊齐声喊，搅个天地乱；
高呼重数票，三遍也不了；
票数无差数，和党心不甘；
信封也要查，法规也不对；
幸有地方官，办事守规矩；
不随和党乌，不惧统领胁； |
d****z
发帖数: 75 | 13 更有众法官，秉公执法案；
三权两已危，唯有法独醒；
嗡嗡苍蝇案，一拍一个死；
律师嘿嘿笑，“高院见舅公”；
和党乌烟重，川粉瘴气高；
传言要内战，持枪街头站；
统领心中急，搞事需升级；
参院和众院，党徒又盘算；
川粉群振奋，筹钱更不怠；
腰缠十万贯，提鞋上高院； |
d****z
发帖数: 75 | 14 滨州打头阵，德州也发难；
高声喊舅公，挤眉泪水飞；
舅公缕长须，冷眼川粉屈；
谎言一大堆，证据没一点；
牵强附会说，扰得世道乱；
川粉如得逞，此后无法规；
混乱纷争起，国将救不及；
百年国家业，容你毁一旦？
三权分立制，法纪高于党；
法律和次序，两者非儿戏！
立斩滨州案，德州也不远；
川粉若危国，王侯皆可诛！ |
d****z
发帖数: 75 | 15 “If the facts are on your side, pound the facts into the table. If the law
is on your side, pound the law into the table. If neither the facts nor the
law are on your side, pound the table.”
川粉就是在 pounding the table.. |
