f**********n 发帖数: 29853 | |
f**********n 发帖数: 29853 | |
f**********n 发帖数: 29853 | |
f**********n 发帖数: 29853 | |
f**********n 发帖数: 29853 | |
G******U 发帖数: 4211 | |
p******r 发帖数: 1127 | 7 那个逼真是辱没祖宗。十个字
: 鳞次栉比:
: 1
: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burnette_Chapel_shooting
: 装睡的人叫不醒。老兄要白费力了。只会招来几大段中式英文东拉西扯。
【在 G******U 的大作中提到】 : 鳞次栉比: : +1 : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burnette_Chapel_shooting : 装睡的人叫不醒。老兄要白费力了。只会招来几大段中式英文东拉西扯。
|
w**d 发帖数: 2334 | |
G******U 发帖数: 4211 | 9 :) 我特别喜欢看大段英文回帖。
【在 w**d 的大作中提到】 : 真觉得有些是职业发帖的,没必要浪费精力
|
l*******g 发帖数: 27064 | 10 麻痹的每年美国枪击案几千起到1万起
美国每年持枪保护自己的案例有几百万 |
|
|
f**********n 发帖数: 29853 | 11 还要算上美国民居的玻璃门窗这些隐形的安全感和低成本。
俺家如果要被迫装上防盗门窗,那价钱估计够买几十条普通毛腿嘴里的AR14了。
【在 l*******g 的大作中提到】 : 麻痹的每年美国枪击案几千起到1万起 : 美国每年持枪保护自己的案例有几百万
|
w**d 发帖数: 2334 | 12 写得又不好,我现在是直接跳过
【在 G******U 的大作中提到】 : :) 我特别喜欢看大段英文回帖。
|
t*****y 发帖数: 342 | |
p**********t 发帖数: 50 | 14 Niner get banned from this board. Got to use my MJ phoenixLight.
I never deny that there are guns used for self defense. I just say that
there are a lot more gun violence that guns used for self defense. |
p**********t 发帖数: 50 | 15 This guy is at least not a masochist.
【在 w**d 的大作中提到】 : 写得又不好,我现在是直接跳过
|
p**********t 发帖数: 50 | 16 This bet is for all of you. We can negotiate the terms. If you don't want
to kill ID, we can bet on WB$.
Each one of us choose a mid-size city with about 200k to 500k population.
We both comb through both cities' police reports for the year of 2015, or
any other year you like. To avoid pending cases, we need to go back at
least several years.
1. You look for the number of times guns were used for self defense, and I
look for the number of times guns were used by the criminals.
2. We can also compare lives lost and saved. I look for the number of
lives of victims lost to guns in crimes and accidents. (For this challenge,
I even don't count suicides since I am confident enough.) You look for the
number of shootings where the shooters used guns to kill someone but were
not charged or acquitted.
3. Same as 2, except that we are looking for number of wounded, in stead of
dead.
Of course, we compare the numbers per capita to account for the different
size of the two cities, then we take the average of the numbers of the two
cities. Whoever wins at least two of the above three is the winner. The
loser kills his/her ID on MITBBS.
So bet or not? We can discuss more details (names of cities and time frame)
if it is a go. |
p**********t 发帖数: 50 | 17 If you really are so sure, you are welcome to take my bet.
【在 l*******g 的大作中提到】 : 麻痹的每年美国枪击案几千起到1万起 : 美国每年持枪保护自己的案例有几百万
|
p**********t 发帖数: 50 | 18 YOu are right on yourself. You really know yourself well.
【在 p******r 的大作中提到】 : 那个逼真是辱没祖宗。十个字 : : : 鳞次栉比: : : 1 : : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burnette_Chapel_shooting : : 装睡的人叫不醒。老兄要白费力了。只会招来几大段中式英文东拉西扯。 :
|
p**********t 发帖数: 50 | 19 Oops! Didn't notice that this thread was posted several days ago. |
p**********t 发帖数: 50 | 20 You can show us your Chinglish crap to impress your trumpers. Except you
even don't have the guts. Show us your guts. Do it! Do it!
【在 G******U 的大作中提到】 : 鳞次栉比: : +1 : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burnette_Chapel_shooting : 装睡的人叫不醒。老兄要白费力了。只会招来几大段中式英文东拉西扯。
|
|
|
p**********t 发帖数: 50 | 21 Only six? In one day, there might be more than six shootings in the US. In
a typical weekend, there will be more than six shootings in Chicago. And
you guys searched for so long for them, trying to make a statement. Your
better argument is, gun used in self defense are just not reported by the
crooked media, and you should stick with that. Even for the mass shooting
that was stopped you gave, look at how many innocent lives were lost before
a good guy used his gun for self defense? That tells how EFFECTIVE using
gun for self defense can be. You next might say, "well, nonetheless a good
guy used a gun to stop the mass shooting, so gun is good." Well, why not
make it impossible for the shooter to have the guns at the first place? You
might say next, "bad guys still have guns anyway." Well do bad guys have
missiles or nukes anyway? Why do they have guns anyway but not missiles or
nukes? |
l****b 发帖数: 400 | 22 Ok you tell me, if you were the Chinese government, would you give up the
nukes? It only kills people right? Would it bring peace instead?
U idiot keeps asking for bets. I brought the bet first since you asked where
are the good gun owners. Now people bring data and you changed your
statement by saying you were asking for the comparison. If you know even a
little bit science, you would know any studies would need controls. What is
the control in this case
? Countries that ban guns, or don’t have nukes? Or the same countries
before they have guns or other weapons? Simple minded creatures like you
only knows to search for simple numbers, without even knowing what these
numbers prove or don’t prove
In
before
good
You
【在 p**********t 的大作中提到】 : Only six? In one day, there might be more than six shootings in the US. In : a typical weekend, there will be more than six shootings in Chicago. And : you guys searched for so long for them, trying to make a statement. Your : better argument is, gun used in self defense are just not reported by the : crooked media, and you should stick with that. Even for the mass shooting : that was stopped you gave, look at how many innocent lives were lost before : a good guy used his gun for self defense? That tells how EFFECTIVE using : gun for self defense can be. You next might say, "well, nonetheless a good : guy used a gun to stop the mass shooting, so gun is good." Well, why not : make it impossible for the shooter to have the guns at the first place? You
|
p**********t 发帖数: 50 | 23 The bet on the other thread? I was still waiting for you confirmation. Is
it a go or not?
I am not wasting time with you. Answer my question before we go. Look at
the other thread, look at my last post. Is it a go or not? I will see how
you idiotic coward spin it.
is
【在 l****b 的大作中提到】 : Ok you tell me, if you were the Chinese government, would you give up the : nukes? It only kills people right? Would it bring peace instead? : U idiot keeps asking for bets. I brought the bet first since you asked where : are the good gun owners. Now people bring data and you changed your : statement by saying you were asking for the comparison. If you know even a : little bit science, you would know any studies would need controls. What is : the control in this case : ? Countries that ban guns, or don’t have nukes? Or the same countries : before they have guns or other weapons? Simple minded creatures like you : only knows to search for simple numbers, without even knowing what these
|
p**********t 发帖数: 50 | 24 Just another shooting in NC, 3 dead and 4 injured. Don't know more details
yet. Let's see if it was stopped by a good guy with a gun. |
l****b 发帖数: 400 | 25 Post here. I don’t follow your stupid posts. Yeah you can keep avoiding my
above post and 过左右而言他
Is
how
【在 p**********t 的大作中提到】 : The bet on the other thread? I was still waiting for you confirmation. Is : it a go or not? : I am not wasting time with you. Answer my question before we go. Look at : the other thread, look at my last post. Is it a go or not? I will see how : you idiotic coward spin it. : : is
|
p**********t 发帖数: 50 | 26 Here is my second to the last post to you:
>>>In order to be fair, you must agree that when I say to you "I provide
data that is free online (no one is spending time), and if it is reasonable,
you kill your ID." Will you kill your ID when I provide data "that is free
online (no one is spending time), and if it is reasonable"? You think the
bet is fair when it applies to me, but not when applied to you? If you say
it is not fair when I say this to you, what makes you think it is a fair
betwhen you say it to me?
See? You are so stupid. You cannot even throw a fair bet.
Here is your last post:
>>>Sure I agree. In fact I have been asking for data from day 1. You know
what you provided? How many gun related death there is. Did you find out how
manydeath guns can prevent?
You know what, you are not paying shit for my time. Why am I wasting time
with you? I would just call out you idiot, when you show off your iq of 49.
Happy?
Then this is my last post that I am still waiting for your reply/
confirmation:
>>>So now we both agree a fair bet that if I answer these two questions, you
will kill your ID?
1. How many gun related death there is.
2. Did you find out how many death guns can prevent?
my
【在 l****b 的大作中提到】 : Post here. I don’t follow your stupid posts. Yeah you can keep avoiding my : above post and 过左右而言他 : : Is : how
|
p**********t 发帖数: 50 | 27 YOu idiot, you wasted me a lot of time. You don't follow? You agreed on a
bet, I replied to confirm with you, and you never replied to confirm. Of
course, you don't want to follow because you change your mind and want to
back down.
my
【在 l****b 的大作中提到】 : Post here. I don’t follow your stupid posts. Yeah you can keep avoiding my : above post and 过左右而言他 : : Is : how
|
l****b 发帖数: 400 | 28 Sure I am on. However, to have. Decent comparison, you need to have the
right control. in case you twist the interpretation, you would need to
answer this: “If you know even a little bit science, you would know any
studies would need controls. What is the control in this case
? Countries that ban guns, or don’t have nukes? Or the same countries
before they have guns or other weapons? Simple minded creatures like you
only know to search for simple numbers, without even knowing what these
numbers can or can not prove.”
【在 p**********t 的大作中提到】 : YOu idiot, you wasted me a lot of time. You don't follow? You agreed on a : bet, I replied to confirm with you, and you never replied to confirm. Of : course, you don't want to follow because you change your mind and want to : back down. : : my
|
p**********t 发帖数: 50 | 29 See, you are spinning it. Look at the other thread, we never talked about
the things you just put here. You are changing the terms after you agree on
it. The previous post where I re-posted the three posts from the other
thread are the exact words.
Look at the post here:
http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t1/USANews/34518611_0_8.html
The last four posts is good enough for the bet.
【在 l****b 的大作中提到】 : Sure I am on. However, to have. Decent comparison, you need to have the : right control. in case you twist the interpretation, you would need to : answer this: “If you know even a little bit science, you would know any : studies would need controls. What is the control in this case : ? Countries that ban guns, or don’t have nukes? Or the same countries : before they have guns or other weapons? Simple minded creatures like you : only know to search for simple numbers, without even knowing what these : numbers can or can not prove.”
|
l****b 发帖数: 400 | 30 I never brought up the control issue before? I actually did but you didn’t
understand. Here is what I said from day 1: “ Give you a hint, and see if
your iq of 49 can handle: you just showed us say how many car accidents we
have each year,but you have not shown us how cars can or cannot save lives.
Capiche?”
Do you understand what this means? It means the numbers you provided is not
an apple to apple comparison to how many lives guns can save. Do you know
how to make that comparison? You thought I never brought up the control
issue simply because you didn’t know that control is needed for an apple to
apple comparison. Now you know why your iq is only 49?
on
【在 p**********t 的大作中提到】 : See, you are spinning it. Look at the other thread, we never talked about : the things you just put here. You are changing the terms after you agree on : it. The previous post where I re-posted the three posts from the other : thread are the exact words. : Look at the post here: : http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t1/USANews/34518611_0_8.html : The last four posts is good enough for the bet.
|
|
|
p**********t 发帖数: 50 | 31 Let's go back to the other thread. Let's look at the bet we both agree on.
You might brought up something somewhere else, but when we mentioned the
bet. It was what I re-posted in this thread. The writing is very simply.
Now you are adding this and that.
t
.
not
to
【在 l****b 的大作中提到】 : I never brought up the control issue before? I actually did but you didn’t : understand. Here is what I said from day 1: “ Give you a hint, and see if : your iq of 49 can handle: you just showed us say how many car accidents we : have each year,but you have not shown us how cars can or cannot save lives. : Capiche?” : Do you understand what this means? It means the numbers you provided is not : an apple to apple comparison to how many lives guns can save. Do you know : how to make that comparison? You thought I never brought up the control : issue simply because you didn’t know that control is needed for an apple to : apple comparison. Now you know why your iq is only 49?
|
l****b 发帖数: 400 | 32 You made the term and I have agreed? Where did I agree to your terms. My bet
is on providing data to show fair
apple to apple comparison
.
【在 p**********t 的大作中提到】 : Let's go back to the other thread. Let's look at the bet we both agree on. : You might brought up something somewhere else, but when we mentioned the : bet. It was what I re-posted in this thread. The writing is very simply. : Now you are adding this and that. : : t : . : not : to
|
p**********t 发帖数: 50 | 33 On post 150, you said
>>>My bet is simple, I provide data that is free online (no one is spending
time), and if it is reasonable, you kill your I’d. But see your response
was not to negotiate.>>>
It is that simple. Then I said it is not a fair bet unless you agree that
we switch positions. You agreed. Then I confirmed with you, but you never
reply.
You can look at post 150 and after.
t
.
not
to
【在 l****b 的大作中提到】 : I never brought up the control issue before? I actually did but you didn’t : understand. Here is what I said from day 1: “ Give you a hint, and see if : your iq of 49 can handle: you just showed us say how many car accidents we : have each year,but you have not shown us how cars can or cannot save lives. : Capiche?” : Do you understand what this means? It means the numbers you provided is not : an apple to apple comparison to how many lives guns can save. Do you know : how to make that comparison? You thought I never brought up the control : issue simply because you didn’t know that control is needed for an apple to : apple comparison. Now you know why your iq is only 49?
|
l****b 发帖数: 400 | 34 Exactly my point. I didn’t agree to your final term. My offer is free data
online and you disagree. Your offer is to do extensive search and I
disagreed. It has to be data showing a fair comparison
spending
never
【在 p**********t 的大作中提到】 : On post 150, you said : >>>My bet is simple, I provide data that is free online (no one is spending : time), and if it is reasonable, you kill your I’d. But see your response : was not to negotiate.>>> : It is that simple. Then I said it is not a fair bet unless you agree that : we switch positions. You agreed. Then I confirmed with you, but you never : reply. : You can look at post 150 and after. : : t
|
p**********t 发帖数: 50 | 35 Look at post 151, I threw you terms back to you to make it fair, and in post
152 you agreed. Then in post 152 I wanted to confirm, but you never
replied.
You agreed in post 152. Here it is. No more other bs that you added before
or after.
>>>Sure I agree. In fact I have been asking for data from day 1. You know
what you provided? How many gun related death there is. Did you find out how
many death guns can prevent?
You know what, you are not paying shit for my time. Why am I wasting time
with you? I would just call out you idiot, when you show off your iq of 49.
Happy? >>>
bet
【在 l****b 的大作中提到】 : You made the term and I have agreed? Where did I agree to your terms. My bet : is on providing data to show fair : apple to apple comparison : : . :
|
p**********t 发帖数: 50 | 36 Who said I disagreed? YOu agreed in post 152, my post 153 is exactly the
same as your terms in post 152. I just wanted to confirm with you. Then
you backed down and did not agree?
data
【在 l****b 的大作中提到】 : Exactly my point. I didn’t agree to your final term. My offer is free data : online and you disagree. Your offer is to do extensive search and I : disagreed. It has to be data showing a fair comparison : : spending : never
|
l****b 发帖数: 400 | 37 I agreed if I provided fair data, you can kill your ID. Now tell me what Is
fair data? Did we agree on the definition of fair data?
post
before
how
.
【在 p**********t 的大作中提到】 : Look at post 151, I threw you terms back to you to make it fair, and in post : 152 you agreed. Then in post 152 I wanted to confirm, but you never : replied. : You agreed in post 152. Here it is. No more other bs that you added before : or after. : >>>Sure I agree. In fact I have been asking for data from day 1. You know : what you provided? How many gun related death there is. Did you find out how : many death guns can prevent? : You know what, you are not paying shit for my time. Why am I wasting time : with you? I would just call out you idiot, when you show off your iq of 49.
|
p**********t 发帖数: 50 | 38 Don't give me this bs. You agreed on a bet, then you backed down.
Is
【在 l****b 的大作中提到】 : I agreed if I provided fair data, you can kill your ID. Now tell me what Is : fair data? Did we agree on the definition of fair data? : : post : before : how : .
|
l****b 发帖数: 400 | 39 I agreed on a bet if you know what fair data is. You wanted to wast my time
and yet don’t want o kill your ID. So you are a cheater. You think it is
wise for me to bet with a cheater?
【在 p**********t 的大作中提到】 : Don't give me this bs. You agreed on a bet, then you backed down. : : Is
|
p**********t 发帖数: 50 | 40 Don't change the terms. Look at this screenshots.
time
【在 l****b 的大作中提到】 : I agreed on a bet if you know what fair data is. You wanted to wast my time : and yet don’t want o kill your ID. So you are a cheater. You think it is : wise for me to bet with a cheater?
|
|
|
p**********t 发帖数: 50 | 41 Look at the screenshots. I don't see "what fair data is". You added this
after.
time
【在 l****b 的大作中提到】 : I agreed on a bet if you know what fair data is. You wanted to wast my time : and yet don’t want o kill your ID. So you are a cheater. You think it is : wise for me to bet with a cheater?
|
t*****y 发帖数: 342 | 42 和职业发帖人较劲?人家有工资有职业操守有党性。 |
l****b 发帖数: 400 | 43 You type English all the time and don’t tell me you don’t know what “if
it is
reasonable” means....
【在 p**********t 的大作中提到】 : Look at the screenshots. I don't see "what fair data is". You added this : after. : : time
|
l****b 发帖数: 400 | 44 闲来无事嘛。虽然老鼠抓不尽,看到了还是要喊打的啦
【在 t*****y 的大作中提到】 : 和职业发帖人较劲?人家有工资有职业操守有党性。
|
p**********t 发帖数: 50 | 45 Post 152 where you "officially" put out your offer, there is no "reasonable"
that you are free to interpret, unfortunately.
【在 l****b 的大作中提到】 : You type English all the time and don’t tell me you don’t know what “if : it is : reasonable” means....
|
l****b 发帖数: 400 | 46 Read the entire thread idiot. You believe 152 is “official”. Yeah in your
dream maybe
reasonable"
【在 p**********t 的大作中提到】 : Post 152 where you "officially" put out your offer, there is no "reasonable" : that you are free to interpret, unfortunately.
|
p**********t 发帖数: 50 | 47 Luminb, you are an old ID. Show us some 赌品。 I just received WB$2000 the
last two days from Rembei for a bet she lost to me, not long time ago I
received WB$1000 from Volvo12. So far the only other WBs I win in bets but
have not received from is the WB$1000 from rubio200, "coincidentally"
another trumper. You trumpers are skunks with not even a gram of integrity.
your
【在 l****b 的大作中提到】 : Read the entire thread idiot. You believe 152 is “official”. Yeah in your : dream maybe : : reasonable"
|
l****b 发帖数: 400 | 48 Oh wait, you used to believe that I am new here. You now know that I am an
old ID? Man how many misbeliefs you have? Including this imaginary bet you
think you had?
the
but
integrity.
【在 p**********t 的大作中提到】 : Luminb, you are an old ID. Show us some 赌品。 I just received WB$2000 the : last two days from Rembei for a bet she lost to me, not long time ago I : received WB$1000 from Volvo12. So far the only other WBs I win in bets but : have not received from is the WB$1000 from rubio200, "coincidentally" : another trumper. You trumpers are skunks with not even a gram of integrity. : : : your
|
p**********t 发帖数: 50 | 49 When? In the same post I said I checked and saw you were not a newbie.
Imaginary bet? You are saying the four screenshots are fake? Like the fake
news your leader refers to?
【在 l****b 的大作中提到】 : Oh wait, you used to believe that I am new here. You now know that I am an : old ID? Man how many misbeliefs you have? Including this imaginary bet you : think you had? : : the : but : integrity.
|
l****b 发帖数: 400 | 50 You suffer from short term memory loss and hallucinations. Go have your
brained checked up. The four screen shots, like your other claims, prove
plenty of nothing.
fake
【在 p**********t 的大作中提到】 : When? In the same post I said I checked and saw you were not a newbie. : Imaginary bet? You are saying the four screenshots are fake? Like the fake : news your leader refers to?
|
|
|
p**********t 发帖数: 50 | 51 Your head must be crushed by trump when you lick him. It is beyond repair,
don't waste your time and money for a check up. You just spewed out
something without evidence, and I asked you when. You trumpers never bother
providing evidence, even in courts. So I don't expect you to be different
here. I 看死 you no 赌品.
【在 l****b 的大作中提到】 : You suffer from short term memory loss and hallucinations. Go have your : brained checked up. The four screen shots, like your other claims, prove : plenty of nothing. : : fake
|
l****b 发帖数: 400 | 52 Don’t believe me? (Btw, you really should have your brain checked up, cuz
you have way too many misbelief and false memory). Well well well, if I post
evidence here, would you kill your ID?
,
bother
different
【在 p**********t 的大作中提到】 : Your head must be crushed by trump when you lick him. It is beyond repair, : don't waste your time and money for a check up. You just spewed out : something without evidence, and I asked you when. You trumpers never bother : providing evidence, even in courts. So I don't expect you to be different : here. I 看死 you no 赌品.
|
p**********t 发帖数: 50 | 53 You fart again, and then I kill my ID? You have farted a lot, have I killed
my ID? TOld you, you are beyond repair.
post
【在 l****b 的大作中提到】 : Don’t believe me? (Btw, you really should have your brain checked up, cuz : you have way too many misbelief and false memory). Well well well, if I post : evidence here, would you kill your ID? : : , : bother : different
|
l****b 发帖数: 400 | 54 What a wuss. This is the exact same response when You saw my previous bet.
Then You put
a million conditions on it and try to dodge. At the end, you are a wuss
, who spins like a donkey
killed
【在 p**********t 的大作中提到】 : You fart again, and then I kill my ID? You have farted a lot, have I killed : my ID? TOld you, you are beyond repair. : : post
|
p**********t 发帖数: 50 | 55 Forget other craps. Let's focus on this active bet. Give everyone the
chance to enjoy the show of your ability to spin and distract.
【在 l****b 的大作中提到】 : What a wuss. This is the exact same response when You saw my previous bet. : Then You put : a million conditions on it and try to dodge. At the end, you are a wuss : , who spins like a donkey : : killed
|
p**********t 发帖数: 50 | 56 Let me help you out. Why don't you say you just had a typo?
【在 l****b 的大作中提到】 : What a wuss. This is the exact same response when You saw my previous bet. : Then You put : a million conditions on it and try to dodge. At the end, you are a wuss : , who spins like a donkey : : killed
|
j****y 发帖数: 597 | 57 苏丹来的缠头,到了美国不知感恩,还搞黑人至上
这个涉嫌种族和宗教仇杀,幸好自己给自己来了一枪
应该停止从苏丹索马里这种地方招难民,太多snake
【在 G******U 的大作中提到】 : 鳞次栉比: : +1 : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burnette_Chapel_shooting : 装睡的人叫不醒。老兄要白费力了。只会招来几大段中式英文东拉西扯。
|
p**********t 发帖数: 50 | 58 >>>幸好自己给自己来了一枪
That probably can be considered as "guns used to save innocent lives."
【在 j****y 的大作中提到】 : 苏丹来的缠头,到了美国不知感恩,还搞黑人至上 : 这个涉嫌种族和宗教仇杀,幸好自己给自己来了一枪 : 应该停止从苏丹索马里这种地方招难民,太多snake
|