j***y
发帖数: 2074 | 1 vi is very inconvenient. and i have tried snavigator, nedit,
both are not good.
any other suggestion?
thanks, |
S****G
发帖数: 25 | 2
this is totally based on your personal perference. i like nedit,
but you could try vim, emacs...
【在 j***y 的大作中提到】
: vi is very inconvenient. and i have tried snavigator, nedit,
: both are not good.
: any other suggestion?
: thanks,
|
s****r
发帖数: 27 | 3 I like slickedit. It's very convenient to write programe. Who has the full
version of it? I just have demo version which cannot save file and project!
【在 j***y 的大作中提到】
: vi is very inconvenient. and i have tried snavigator, nedit,
: both are not good.
: any other suggestion?
: thanks,
|
a***l
发帖数: 2397 | 4 pine or emacs?
【在 s****r 的大作中提到】
: I like slickedit. It's very convenient to write programe. Who has the full
: version of it? I just have demo version which cannot save file and project!
|
f***r
发帖数: 93 | 5 I like vi a lot.
Right now, I am trying to use EMACS. it is very powerful.
【在 j***y 的大作中提到】
: vi is very inconvenient. and i have tried snavigator, nedit,
: both are not good.
: any other suggestion?
: thanks,
|
c********e
发帖数: 417 | 6 You can get the full version of it only after you pay your $250.
Why not nedit? It's so good!
【在 s****r 的大作中提到】
: I like slickedit. It's very convenient to write programe. Who has the full
: version of it? I just have demo version which cannot save file and project!
|
s****r
发帖数: 27 | 7 nedit? can i browse the subroutins like class view in VC?
【在 c********e 的大作中提到】
: You can get the full version of it only after you pay your $250.
: Why not nedit? It's so good!
|
s****r
发帖数: 27 | 8 yeh! vi and emacs are all quite good. But I don't know how I can browse the
fortran subroutines as class view in VC
【在 f***r 的大作中提到】
: I like vi a lot.
: Right now, I am trying to use EMACS. it is very powerful.
|
c**g
发帖数: 274 | 9 so far i think vi and emacs are the best.
【在 j***y 的大作中提到】
: vi is very inconvenient. and i have tried snavigator, nedit,
: both are not good.
: any other suggestion?
: thanks,
|
k*x
发帖数: 8 | 10 crisp is not bad, like UltraEdit on PC.
【在 s****r 的大作中提到】
: yeh! vi and emacs are all quite good. But I don't know how I can browse the
: fortran subroutines as class view in VC
|
w*t
发帖数: 9 | 11 Yeap, vi is a great edit tool. Just takes a while to learn and get use to it.
Pico is pretty convenient, don't have to know all the key board short cuts
for commands.
【在 s****r 的大作中提到】
: yeh! vi and emacs are all quite good. But I don't know how I can browse the
: fortran subroutines as class view in VC
|
w**w
发帖数: 5391 | 12 Emacs is the best; vi is ok if you have a lot of practice on it. Pico is easy, but bad.
Actually, current emacs is very like c++ editor in Windows.
【在 w*t 的大作中提到】
: Yeap, vi is a great edit tool. Just takes a while to learn and get use to it.
: Pico is pretty convenient, don't have to know all the key board short cuts
: for commands.
|
bz
发帖数: 1770 | 13 I think you are talking about IDE, not editor itself.
For Unix IDE, you have some choices, but availability limits to your
specific platform. (BTW, VC is limited to Windows, isnot it?)
【在 s****r 的大作中提到】
: yeh! vi and emacs are all quite good. But I don't know how I can browse the
: fortran subroutines as class view in VC
|
w*********n
发帖数: 84 | 14 VI is the most convinient one; but if you want to write long program,
xemacs is best.
【在 j***y 的大作中提到】
: vi is very inconvenient. and i have tried snavigator, nedit,
: both are not good.
: any other suggestion?
: thanks,
|
