c**********e
发帖数: 32 | 1 今年6月的时候给父母申请了B签证的延期extension, 但是11月份初就买到机票回国了
，最近我收到了移民局让他们打指纹的信，现在我该怎么办？是写一封信要求withdraw
application还是就这么不管？
我问了USCIS的客服，他们说如果写信withdraw，就算是withdraw application,如果不
写信不打指纹，就算abandon application,不管怎样，超过原来B签证有效时间的都算
是over staying！
uscis跟我发的原话是：We can not make that determination, again whether you
withdrew or left is as abandon you were not granted an extension. Its up to
DOS or CBP to make that decision based on your last travel. You were not
granted an extension therefore any time you stayed after your I-94 expired
will be considered over staying.
所以请问一下 我还需要写信withdraw吗 | f*******n
发帖数: 12623 | 2 overstaying没有明确定义。他们在申请决定前离开1）没有积累任何unlawful
presence、2）不会导致签证自动作废 | h****g
发帖数: 40 | 3 我记得没有批准的延期，就算是unlawful presence | c****c
发帖数: 95 | 4 但记得拒信之前应该是被豁免的，不影响已有签证
【在 h****g 的大作中提到】
: 我记得没有批准的延期，就算是unlawful presence
| f*******n
发帖数: 12623 | 5 如果在身份过期前申请了延期，在延期pending期间都不算unlawful presence。如果在
决定前离境，没有unlawful presence。就算被拒而且被拒的时候还在美国，unlawful
presence也只从被拒那天后开始算。
【在 h****g 的大作中提到】
: 我记得没有批准的延期，就算是unlawful presence
| T******o
发帖数: 136 | | r*x
发帖数: 411 | 7 是
【在 T******o 的大作中提到】
: 申请延期需要打指纹？ 是这两年才开始的规矩吗？
| u**********t
发帖数: 401 | 8 我父母一样的情况，他们走了之后我就申请了withdraw，我妈的已经批下来了，我爸的
还在pending。客服说如果要求打指纹没打会自动悲剧。 | h****g
发帖数: 40 | 9 能否给个链接？多谢！
unlawful
【在 f*******n 的大作中提到】
: 如果在身份过期前申请了延期，在延期pending期间都不算unlawful presence。如果在
: 决定前离境，没有unlawful presence。就算被拒而且被拒的时候还在美国，unlawful
: presence也只从被拒那天后开始算。
| f*******n
发帖数: 12623 | 10 USCIS的unlawful presence政策在AFM chapter 40.9.2。现在在这里：
https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/document/policy-manual-afm/afm40-
external.pdf
但是pdf不方便看。最好看之前网页的档案。
AFM chapter 40.9.2(b)(3)(B)
https://web.archive.org/web/20200507080142/https://www.uscis.gov/ilink/
docView/AFM/HTML/AFM/0-0-0-1/0-0-0-17138/0-0-0-18383.html#0-0-0-1911
However, according to USCIS policy, an alien does not accrue unlawful
presence (the accrual of unlawful presence is tolled), and is considered in
a period of stay authorized for purposes of sections 212(a)(9)(B)(i)(I), (B)
(i)(II), and (C)(i)(I) of the Act during the entire period a properly filed
EOS or COS application is pending, if the EOS or COS application meets the
following requirements:
· the non-frivolous request for EOS or COS was filed timely. To be
considered timely, the application must have been filed with USCIS, i.e. be
physically received (unless specified otherwise, such as mailing or posting
date) before the previously authorized stay expired. [...] and
· the alien did not work without authorization before the application for
EOS or COS was filed or while the application is pending; and
· the alien has not failed to maintain his or her status prior to the
filing of the request for EOS or COS.
AFM chapter 40.9.2(b)(3)(C)
https://web.archive.org/web/20200507080142/https://www.uscis.gov/ilink/
docView/AFM/HTML/AFM/0-0-0-1/0-0-0-17138/0-0-0-18383.html#0-0-0-1909
Departure from the United States while a request for EOS or COS is pending,
does not subject an alien to the 3-year, 10-year, or permanent bar, if he or
she departs after the expiration of Form I-94 , Arrival/Departure Record
unless the application was frivolous, untimely, or the individual had worked
without authorization.
AFM chapter 40.9.2(b)(3)(D)(iv)
https://web.archive.org/web/20200507080142/https://www.uscis.gov/ilink/
docView/AFM/HTML/AFM/0-0-0-1/0-0-0-17138/0-0-0-18383.html#0-0-0-1921
If a timely filed, non-frivolous request for EOS or COS is denied for cause,
unlawful presence begins to accrue the day after the request is denied.
DOS的9 FAM 302.11-3(B)(1)(b)(4)
https://fam.state.gov/FAM/09FAM/09FAM030211.html#M302_11_3_B_1
For aliens who have applied for extension of stay or change of nonimmigrant
classification and who have remained in the United States after expiration
of the From I-94 while awaiting DHS's decision, the entire period of the
pendency of the application, provided that:
(a) the alien does not work unlawfully while the application is pending and
did not work unlawfully prior to filing the application; and
(b) the alien did not otherwise fail to maintain his or her status prior to
the filing of the application (unless the application is approved at the
discretion of USCIS and the failure to maintain status is solely a result of
the expiration of the Form I-94), and further provided either:
(i) that the application was subsequently approved; or
(ii) if the application was denied or the alien departed while the
application was still pending, that the application was timely filed and
nonfrivolous.
【在 h****g 的大作中提到】
: 能否给个链接？多谢！
:
: unlawful
| t*******2
发帖数: 384 | 11 感谢，我有同样的情况，我的理解是这种情形下withdrawal反而没有必要，因为事实上
stay是被extended，申请不管批准还是被据其实都没不好的影响
in
B)
【在 f*******n 的大作中提到】
: USCIS的unlawful presence政策在AFM chapter 40.9.2。现在在这里：
: https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/document/policy-manual-afm/afm40-
: external.pdf
: 但是pdf不方便看。最好看之前网页的档案。
: AFM chapter 40.9.2(b)(3)(B)
: https://web.archive.org/web/20200507080142/https://www.uscis.gov/ilink/
: docView/AFM/HTML/AFM/0-0-0-1/0-0-0-17138/0-0-0-18383.html#0-0-0-1911
: However, according to USCIS policy, an alien does not accrue unlawful
: presence (the accrual of unlawful presence is tolled), and is considered in
: a period of stay authorized for purposes of sections 212(a)(9)(B)(i)(I), (B)
|
|
