l*********o 发帖数: 3091 | 1 【 以下文字转载自 Military 讨论区 】
发信人: liangmaomao (Amy Bishop 拿不到tenure就杀人的生物AP), 信区: Military
标 题: 和美国相比,日本才是仁义之师,讲信用
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Sep 15 02:21:07 2014, 美东)
美国潜艇对日本商船无差别打击。比如对马丸。
日本潜艇放过美国商船,只打击军用船只。
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacific_War#Submarine_warfare
Allied submarines did not adopt a defensive posture and wait for the enemy
to attack. Within hours of Pearl Harbor, Roosevelt promulgated a new
doctrine: unrestricted submarine warfare against Japan. This meant sinking
any warship, commercial vessel, or passenger ship in Axis-controlled waters,
without warning and without help to survivors.[nb 9]
Allied surface fleets and aircraft gave good protection to Allied submarine
bases.
While Japan had a large number of submarines, they did not make a
significant impact on the war. In 1942, the Japanese fleet subs performed
well, knocking out or damaging many Allied warships. However, Imperial
Japanese Navy (and pre-war U.S.) doctrine stipulated that only fleet battles
, not guerre de course (commerce raiding) could win naval campaigns. So,
while the US had an unusually long supply-line between its west coast and
frontline areas, leaving it vulnerable to submarine attack, Japan used its
submarines primarily for long-range reconnaissance and only occasionally
attacked U.S. supply-lines. The Japanese submarine offensive against
Australia in 1942 and 1943 also achieved little.[71]
As the war turned against Japan, IJN submarines increasingly served to
resupply strongholds which had been cut off, such as Truk and Rabaul. In
addition, Japan honored its neutrality treaty with the Soviet Union and
ignored U.S. freighters shipping millions of tons of war-supplies from San
Francisco to Vladivostok,[72] much to the consternation of its German ally. |
g****n 发帖数: 1014 | 2 美国佬鱼雷多的是
日本军需供给不足 只能挑战略价值高的先打
Military
【在 l*********o 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 【 以下文字转载自 Military 讨论区 】 : 发信人: liangmaomao (Amy Bishop 拿不到tenure就杀人的生物AP), 信区: Military : 标 题: 和美国相比,日本才是仁义之师,讲信用 : 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Sep 15 02:21:07 2014, 美东) : 美国潜艇对日本商船无差别打击。比如对马丸。 : 日本潜艇放过美国商船,只打击军用船只。 : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacific_War#Submarine_warfare : Allied submarines did not adopt a defensive posture and wait for the enemy : to attack. Within hours of Pearl Harbor, Roosevelt promulgated a new : doctrine: unrestricted submarine warfare against Japan. This meant sinking
|
l*********o 发帖数: 3091 | 3 一枚鱼雷,一艘商船。那个贵?
【在 g****n 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 美国佬鱼雷多的是 : 日本军需供给不足 只能挑战略价值高的先打 : : Military
|
U**R 发帖数: 400 | 4 真为你的智商着急啊……
【在 l*********o 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 一枚鱼雷,一艘商船。那个贵?
|
c***e 发帖数: 2554 | 5 确实。鬼子用军刀砍平民的时候可不手软
【在 g****n 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 美国佬鱼雷多的是 : 日本军需供给不足 只能挑战略价值高的先打 : : Military
|
t*******y 发帖数: 2570 | 6 lz脑残吗?搞南京大屠杀是仁义之师,找个巴玛干儿子奸杀你们家所有女性算不算仁义?
Military
waters,
【在 l*********o 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 一枚鱼雷,一艘商船。那个贵?
|
Q***N 发帖数: 2972 | 7 绝对算仁义.那是多大牺牲才能有这样的SB.
义?
【在 t*******y 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : lz脑残吗?搞南京大屠杀是仁义之师,找个巴玛干儿子奸杀你们家所有女性算不算仁义? : : Military : waters,
|
f****p 发帖数: 18483 | 8 仁义之师培养外F,搞完屁眼,放生!
义?
【在 t*******y 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : lz脑残吗?搞南京大屠杀是仁义之师,找个巴玛干儿子奸杀你们家所有女性算不算仁义? : : Military : waters,
|
A*****i 发帖数: 3587 | 9 你又一次刷新了我对人类智商下限的认知
【在 l*********o 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 一枚鱼雷,一艘商船。那个贵?
|
h*h 发帖数: 18873 | 10 日本对美国讲仁义(讲了吗?有美国战俘死亡行军),对中国可没讲,屠杀战俘,平民
乃至妇孺不能免厄。两付面目,更是虚伪丑恶。 |
|
|
l*********o 发帖数: 3091 | 11 可能日本压根儿就没打算和美国打无限制战争,GDP一比十。日本当年和大清的有限战
争取得了巨大利益。想重复这一模式。
【在 h*h 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 日本对美国讲仁义(讲了吗?有美国战俘死亡行军),对中国可没讲,屠杀战俘,平民 : 乃至妇孺不能免厄。两付面目,更是虚伪丑恶。
|
l*********o 发帖数: 3091 | 12 【 以下文字转载自 Military 讨论区 】
发信人: liangmaomao (Amy Bishop 拿不到tenure就杀人的生物AP), 信区: Military
标 题: 和美国相比,日本才是仁义之师,讲信用
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Sep 15 02:21:07 2014, 美东)
美国潜艇对日本商船无差别打击。比如对马丸。
日本潜艇放过美国商船,只打击军用船只。
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacific_War#Submarine_warfare
Allied submarines did not adopt a defensive posture and wait for the enemy
to attack. Within hours of Pearl Harbor, Roosevelt promulgated a new
doctrine: unrestricted submarine warfare against Japan. This meant sinking
any warship, commercial vessel, or passenger ship in Axis-controlled waters,
without warning and without help to survivors.[nb 9]
Allied surface fleets and aircraft gave good protection to Allied submarine
bases.
While Japan had a large number of submarines, they did not make a
significant impact on the war. In 1942, the Japanese fleet subs performed
well, knocking out or damaging many Allied warships. However, Imperial
Japanese Navy (and pre-war U.S.) doctrine stipulated that only fleet battles
, not guerre de course (commerce raiding) could win naval campaigns. So,
while the US had an unusually long supply-line between its west coast and
frontline areas, leaving it vulnerable to submarine attack, Japan used its
submarines primarily for long-range reconnaissance and only occasionally
attacked U.S. supply-lines. The Japanese submarine offensive against
Australia in 1942 and 1943 also achieved little.[71]
As the war turned against Japan, IJN submarines increasingly served to
resupply strongholds which had been cut off, such as Truk and Rabaul. In
addition, Japan honored its neutrality treaty with the Soviet Union and
ignored U.S. freighters shipping millions of tons of war-supplies from San
Francisco to Vladivostok,[72] much to the consternation of its German ally. |
g****n 发帖数: 1014 | 13 美国佬鱼雷多的是
日本军需供给不足 只能挑战略价值高的先打
Military
【在 l*********o 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 【 以下文字转载自 Military 讨论区 】 : 发信人: liangmaomao (Amy Bishop 拿不到tenure就杀人的生物AP), 信区: Military : 标 题: 和美国相比,日本才是仁义之师,讲信用 : 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Sep 15 02:21:07 2014, 美东) : 美国潜艇对日本商船无差别打击。比如对马丸。 : 日本潜艇放过美国商船,只打击军用船只。 : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacific_War#Submarine_warfare : Allied submarines did not adopt a defensive posture and wait for the enemy : to attack. Within hours of Pearl Harbor, Roosevelt promulgated a new : doctrine: unrestricted submarine warfare against Japan. This meant sinking
|
l*********o 发帖数: 3091 | 14 一枚鱼雷,一艘商船。那个贵?
【在 g****n 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 美国佬鱼雷多的是 : 日本军需供给不足 只能挑战略价值高的先打 : : Military
|
U**R 发帖数: 400 | 15 真为你的智商着急啊……
【在 l*********o 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 一枚鱼雷,一艘商船。那个贵?
|
c***e 发帖数: 2554 | 16 确实。鬼子用军刀砍平民的时候可不手软
【在 g****n 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 美国佬鱼雷多的是 : 日本军需供给不足 只能挑战略价值高的先打 : : Military
|
t*******y 发帖数: 2570 | 17 lz脑残吗?搞南京大屠杀是仁义之师,找个巴玛干儿子奸杀你们家所有女性算不算仁义?
Military
waters,
【在 l*********o 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 一枚鱼雷,一艘商船。那个贵?
|
Q***N 发帖数: 2972 | 18 绝对算仁义.那是多大牺牲才能有这样的SB.
义?
【在 t*******y 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : lz脑残吗?搞南京大屠杀是仁义之师,找个巴玛干儿子奸杀你们家所有女性算不算仁义? : : Military : waters,
|
f****p 发帖数: 18483 | 19 仁义之师培养外F,搞完屁眼,放生!
义?
【在 t*******y 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : lz脑残吗?搞南京大屠杀是仁义之师,找个巴玛干儿子奸杀你们家所有女性算不算仁义? : : Military : waters,
|
A*****i 发帖数: 3587 | 20 你又一次刷新了我对人类智商下限的认知
【在 l*********o 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 一枚鱼雷,一艘商船。那个贵?
|
|
|
h*h 发帖数: 18873 | 21 日本对美国讲仁义(讲了吗?有美国战俘死亡行军),对中国可没讲,屠杀战俘,平民
乃至妇孺不能免厄。两付面目,更是虚伪丑恶。 |
l*********o 发帖数: 3091 | 22 可能日本压根儿就没打算和美国打无限制战争,GDP一比十。日本当年和大清的有限战
争取得了巨大利益。想重复这一模式。
【在 h*h 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 日本对美国讲仁义(讲了吗?有美国战俘死亡行军),对中国可没讲,屠杀战俘,平民 : 乃至妇孺不能免厄。两付面目,更是虚伪丑恶。
|
c***m 发帖数: 902 | 23 同意,日本人才不是什么仁慈讲信用的民族。
【在 g****n 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 美国佬鱼雷多的是 : 日本军需供给不足 只能挑战略价值高的先打 : : Military
|
b********i 发帖数: 192 | 24 找死啊……
Military
waters,
【在 l*********o 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 可能日本压根儿就没打算和美国打无限制战争,GDP一比十。日本当年和大清的有限战 : 争取得了巨大利益。想重复这一模式。
|