S******s
发帖数: 92 | 1 在美国，国男有智商优势，国女有生理优势 中国人目前就应该团结在一起，为提高华
人在美国的地位一起努力
就像一位前辈说的那样，
有能力的，改变国家
没能力的，改变国籍 |
g******i
发帖数: 1942 | 2 Don't assume anything which does not exist at all!!!!!!!!
【在 S******s 的大作中提到】
: 在美国，国男有智商优势，国女有生理优势 中国人目前就应该团结在一起，为提高华
: 人在美国的地位一起努力
: 就像一位前辈说的那样，
: 有能力的，改变国家
: 没能力的，改变国籍
|
d****n
发帖数: 278 | 3 这有啥assume的。
国男国女智商都大大高于米国平均，得是啥眼神儿才看不见啊。
国女的其它优势我就不说了， 啊 ~~~~。
【在 g******i 的大作中提到】
: Don't assume anything which does not exist at all!!!!!!!!
|
g******i
发帖数: 1942 | 4 Only above average is not advantage!
Advantage means better than best!
【在 d****n 的大作中提到】
: 这有啥assume的。
: 国男国女智商都大大高于米国平均，得是啥眼神儿才看不见啊。
: 国女的其它优势我就不说了， 啊 ~~~~。
|
d****n
发帖数: 278 | 5 That's your own fvking definition,everywhere else "above average" means
advantage.
【在 g******i 的大作中提到】
: Only above average is not advantage!
: Advantage means better than best!
|
g******i
发帖数: 1942 | 6 Dare you compare smart Chinese to smart Americans?
Which group will win? it is obvious..........
【在 d****n 的大作中提到】
: That's your own fvking definition,everywhere else "above average" means
: advantage.
|
d****n
发帖数: 278 | 7 An average Chinese in America is far smarter than an average American in
America.
It's obviously stupid to compare otherwise, and it takes the courage of a
nutjob and the wisdom of an imbecile to deny this.
【在 g******i 的大作中提到】
: Dare you compare smart Chinese to smart Americans?
: Which group will win? it is obvious..........
|
g******i
发帖数: 1942 | 8 只有一个种族比另一个种族优秀， 才能让别人认为种族是优秀的， 而决定种族优秀的
是那个种族中优秀的某一小一群人， 而不是平均。
也就是说华人要让老美认为优秀， 不是靠平均， 而是华人精英要比老美精英优秀。
决定社会的是精英， 普通人的贡献能够他消费的而已， 是零。
一个民族的脊梁是精英， 而不是平均
【在 d****n 的大作中提到】
: An average Chinese in America is far smarter than an average American in
: America.
: It's obviously stupid to compare otherwise, and it takes the courage of a
: nutjob and the wisdom of an imbecile to deny this.
|
d****n
发帖数: 278 | 9 That's like saying it doesn't matter if YOU are stupid, as long as there are
other people in your race that are smart.
But guess what, it DOES matter to you. If you're stupid, you are stupid,
period, doesn't matter your mom or dad or anybody else isn't.
Yaoming is tall, does it mean all Chinese are tall?! What retard cannot
see such a fallacy of yours, huh.
【在 g******i 的大作中提到】
: 只有一个种族比另一个种族优秀， 才能让别人认为种族是优秀的， 而决定种族优秀的
: 是那个种族中优秀的某一小一群人， 而不是平均。
: 也就是说华人要让老美认为优秀， 不是靠平均， 而是华人精英要比老美精英优秀。
: 决定社会的是精英， 普通人的贡献能够他消费的而已， 是零。
: 一个民族的脊梁是精英， 而不是平均
|
j*********a
发帖数: 232 | 10 神马生理优势？
【在 S******s 的大作中提到】
: 在美国，国男有智商优势，国女有生理优势 中国人目前就应该团结在一起，为提高华
: 人在美国的地位一起努力
: 就像一位前辈说的那样，
: 有能力的，改变国家
: 没能力的，改变国籍
|
|
|
j*********a
发帖数: 232 | 11 神马生理优势？
【在 S******s 的大作中提到】
: 在美国，国男有智商优势，国女有生理优势 中国人目前就应该团结在一起，为提高华
: 人在美国的地位一起努力
: 就像一位前辈说的那样，
: 有能力的，改变国家
: 没能力的，改变国籍
|
S******s
发帖数: 92 | 12 tighter ?
【在 j*********a 的大作中提到】
: 神马生理优势？
|
m*********x
发帖数: 400 | 13 please check your original argument before gushing up. you were talking
about the social status of an ethinic group. i too believe it is upheld by
the elites instead of average folks. chinese secondray school graduates can
scorn the math level of american peers, but as long as the propotion of
chinese in the national acedemy of science remains miniscule, the status of
chinese researchers in the acedemic community is definetly low.
are
【在 d****n 的大作中提到】
: That's like saying it doesn't matter if YOU are stupid, as long as there are
: other people in your race that are smart.
: But guess what, it DOES matter to you. If you're stupid, you are stupid,
: period, doesn't matter your mom or dad or anybody else isn't.
: Yaoming is tall, does it mean all Chinese are tall?! What retard cannot
: see such a fallacy of yours, huh.
|
m*********x
发帖数: 400 | 14 this is so true. the trend of a country is indeed maneuvered by the elites.
if you wanna voice your opinion, you gotta be at the top level of a building
; if you yearn for the reverence from the group, you ought to expend the
territory in the circle of the best.
【在 g******i 的大作中提到】
: 只有一个种族比另一个种族优秀， 才能让别人认为种族是优秀的， 而决定种族优秀的
: 是那个种族中优秀的某一小一群人， 而不是平均。
: 也就是说华人要让老美认为优秀， 不是靠平均， 而是华人精英要比老美精英优秀。
: 决定社会的是精英， 普通人的贡献能够他消费的而已， 是零。
: 一个民族的脊梁是精英， 而不是平均
|
d****n
发帖数: 278 | 15 Your blabbering is irrelevant trash talk.
I said the average Chinese in America is far smarter than the average
American in America, what's wrong?
What you believe is what YOU believe and it isn't worth a dime to ME. If you believe Obama makes a white trash's bald head shiny like the Pope's halo, I believe you are a nutjob.
can
of
【在 m*********x 的大作中提到】
: please check your original argument before gushing up. you were talking
: about the social status of an ethinic group. i too believe it is upheld by
: the elites instead of average folks. chinese secondray school graduates can
: scorn the math level of american peers, but as long as the propotion of
: chinese in the national acedemy of science remains miniscule, the status of
: chinese researchers in the acedemic community is definetly low.
:
: are
|
h*****n
发帖数: 1630 | 16 Obvious my ass. Where is the evidence that smart Americans have higher IQ
than smart Chinese?
You must have been fxxked over by the westerners and now you are admitting
your defeat at genetic level...pathetic.
Anyone who looks down upon his own bloodline is a disgrace to his own
existence. If being what you are is an embarrassment to you, you should just
kill yourself.
【在 g******i 的大作中提到】
: Dare you compare smart Chinese to smart Americans?
: Which group will win? it is obvious..........
|
m*********x
发帖数: 400 | 17 nohing wrong about that. just donnt label it as an advantage. who cares if
you are smarter than average american students?
【在 d****n 的大作中提到】
: Your blabbering is irrelevant trash talk.
: I said the average Chinese in America is far smarter than the average
: American in America, what's wrong?
: What you believe is what YOU believe and it isn't worth a dime to ME. If you believe Obama makes a white trash's bald head shiny like the Pope's halo, I believe you are a nutjob.
:
: can
: of
|
m*********x
发帖数: 400 | 18 if you question the authenticity of intellegence measurement, i may as well
ask you the source of your claims: who said average chinese are smarter than
american?
and actually iq, as a popular notion among lay people, has not yet widely
accepted by the scientific community: your premise is based upon a
disputable concept. hence it's aftter all futile to try to reac a reliable
conclusion.
just
【在 h*****n 的大作中提到】
: Obvious my ass. Where is the evidence that smart Americans have higher IQ
: than smart Chinese?
: You must have been fxxked over by the westerners and now you are admitting
: your defeat at genetic level...pathetic.
: Anyone who looks down upon his own bloodline is a disgrace to his own
: existence. If being what you are is an embarrassment to you, you should just
: kill yourself.
|
d****n
发帖数: 278 | 19 That IS an advantage, do not try to label that as NOT being one. Who cares if
YOU care anyway, so long as others care, and they do. What's wrong with
having better grades and getting better jobs ?
【在 m*********x 的大作中提到】
: nohing wrong about that. just donnt label it as an advantage. who cares if
: you are smarter than average american students?
|
m*********x
发帖数: 400 | 20 if chinese have managed to get better grades and jobs, what are you whining
about here?
if
【在 d****n 的大作中提到】
: That IS an advantage, do not try to label that as NOT being one. Who cares if
: YOU care anyway, so long as others care, and they do. What's wrong with
: having better grades and getting better jobs ?
|
|
|
d****n
发帖数: 278 | 21 Now why are YOU so upset about smarter Chinese male having an advantage over
Americans, and blabbering that it's "NOT an advantage"? What's wrong with
YOU?
whining
【在 m*********x 的大作中提到】
: if chinese have managed to get better grades and jobs, what are you whining
: about here?
:
: if
|
d****n
发帖数: 278 | 22 You know... Stupid F-faces like you guys are evidently devoid of logic.
OP said male Chinese in America have IQ advantage over Americans, a true
statement.
Mr. guichidai the idiota/ignoramus first rejected the statement as "
assumption", practically denying the measuring standards behind this "
assumption".
When pointed out such absurdity, mr. guichidai, or shall we say chidai,
backed off to denouncing this IQ superiority as a non-advantage, trying to
sell everyone his own version of "advantage". Which is -- "better than the
best". Well how about you having no advantage over anybody, only because you
did not win Nobel or play NBA? Does that make the slightest sense at all?
Now, when this "non-advantage" assertion did not hold, mr.chidai shifted and
elevated the level of comparison from between individuals to between races,
introducing this "elites-elevate-entire-ethnicity" theory.
Well first of all, that's not the original argument. The original argument
is whether Chinese in America have IQ advantage over Americans. That is
undoubtedly true.
In addition, "elites-elevate-entire-ethnicity" theory is garbage to
individuals within the same confine, because though it could mean that an
intellectually challenged Joe in the US may get a couple of extra crumbs
than a poor African, it does NOT mean that Joe gets more crumbs than his
fellow Americans. Speaking about comparing oranges to apples, this is what
fools like you do.
Face it, F-faces, Chinese men in America are far smarter than the average
Americans, and that is an advantage, like it or not.
.
building
【在 m*********x 的大作中提到】
: this is so true. the trend of a country is indeed maneuvered by the elites.
: if you wanna voice your opinion, you gotta be at the top level of a building
: ; if you yearn for the reverence from the group, you ought to expend the
: territory in the circle of the best.
|
m*********x
发帖数: 400 | 23 is there any element of truth in your claim? prove it first. dont forget you
brought it up.
over
with
【在 d****n 的大作中提到】
: Now why are YOU so upset about smarter Chinese male having an advantage over
: Americans, and blabbering that it's "NOT an advantage"? What's wrong with
: YOU?
:
: whining
|
d****n
发帖数: 278 | 24 Well tell me you have a PhD in retardity, would you?
you
【在 m*********x 的大作中提到】
: is there any element of truth in your claim? prove it first. dont forget you
: brought it up.
:
: over
: with
|
m*********x
发帖数: 400 | 25 a valid and good argument is inevitably comprised of a vali premise. now
before you proceed to deal with logic issues, let's work out the validility
of a vital concept, iq, first. or simply, if you will, present any reliable
publication supporting the claim that average chinese are smater than
americans.
you
【在 d****n 的大作中提到】
: You know... Stupid F-faces like you guys are evidently devoid of logic.
: OP said male Chinese in America have IQ advantage over Americans, a true
: statement.
: Mr. guichidai the idiota/ignoramus first rejected the statement as "
: assumption", practically denying the measuring standards behind this "
: assumption".
: When pointed out such absurdity, mr. guichidai, or shall we say chidai,
: backed off to denouncing this IQ superiority as a non-advantage, trying to
: sell everyone his own version of "advantage". Which is -- "better than the
: best". Well how about you having no advantage over anybody, only because you
|
m*********x
发帖数: 400 | 26 i knew you lay people willturn to wiki. reread my post.
【在 d****n 的大作中提到】
: Well tell me you have a PhD in retardity, would you?
:
: you
|
d****n
发帖数: 278 | 27 YOU are in NO position elevating MY standard of proof.
I showed you an average Chinese is smarter than an average American. Which supports "Chinese in America are smarter than Americans".
Therefore, the burden now falls upon YOU to disprove this.
BTW, your English sucks.
validility
reliable
【在 m*********x 的大作中提到】
: a valid and good argument is inevitably comprised of a vali premise. now
: before you proceed to deal with logic issues, let's work out the validility
: of a vital concept, iq, first. or simply, if you will, present any reliable
: publication supporting the claim that average chinese are smater than
: americans.
:
: you
|
d****n
发帖数: 278 | 28 Yeah you un-laid person will NOT use wiki. I read your stuff, mostly garbage.
【在 m*********x 的大作中提到】
: i knew you lay people willturn to wiki. reread my post.
|
m*********x
发帖数: 400 | 29 Even an average American student knows to quote the source of information.
Putting up a garbage can by no means support your argument.
【在 d****n 的大作中提到】
: YOU are in NO position elevating MY standard of proof.
: I showed you an average Chinese is smarter than an average American. Which supports "Chinese in America are smarter than Americans".
: Therefore, the burden now falls upon YOU to disprove this.
: BTW, your English sucks.
:
: validility
: reliable
|
d****n
发帖数: 278 | 30 It's not my fault that you don't know how to use right-click on the pic to
find the source.Stupid.
And any source, and I'll repeat, any source, is more creditworthy than the
garbage stuff you un-laid duo posted so far.
Besides, you are still at the stage of discrediting MY source with a bunch
of whining and moaning and not a scintilla of evidence to the contrary.
I call you bluff. You don't meet the burden of proof, you fail.
I am going to bed now. When I come back tomorrow, I hope you come up within some substantive rebuttal, and not some whining and bitching, just so you can make up for your crappy fresh-off-the-boat English.
【在 m*********x 的大作中提到】
: Even an average American student knows to quote the source of information.
: Putting up a garbage can by no means support your argument.
|
|
|
m*********x
发帖数: 400 | 31 just cut the crap. name the journal that published the map.
within some substantive rebuttal, and not some whining and bitching, just so
you can make up for your crappy fresh-off-the-boat English.
【在 d****n 的大作中提到】
: It's not my fault that you don't know how to use right-click on the pic to
: find the source.Stupid.
: And any source, and I'll repeat, any source, is more creditworthy than the
: garbage stuff you un-laid duo posted so far.
: Besides, you are still at the stage of discrediting MY source with a bunch
: of whining and moaning and not a scintilla of evidence to the contrary.
: I call you bluff. You don't meet the burden of proof, you fail.
: I am going to bed now. When I come back tomorrow, I hope you come up within some substantive rebuttal, and not some whining and bitching, just so you can make up for your crappy fresh-off-the-boat English.
|
d****n
发帖数: 278 | 32 Fvck your journal. You got nothing. I won.
so
【在 m*********x 的大作中提到】
: just cut the crap. name the journal that published the map.
:
: within some substantive rebuttal, and not some whining and bitching, just so
: you can make up for your crappy fresh-off-the-boat English.
|
m*********x
发帖数: 400 | 33 I have not yet outdone you before I exhibit confirmation of my claims.
But you obsolutely have lost the game when you failed to present any
reliable evidence to support your arguments.
【在 d****n 的大作中提到】
: Fvck your journal. You got nothing. I won.
:
: so
|
C******e
发帖数: 750 | |
l****z
发帖数: 29846 | 35 不错, 这张图哪里来的?要保存收藏打印散发啊．
【在 d****n 的大作中提到】
: Fvck your journal. You got nothing. I won.
:
: so
|
T*********0
发帖数: 4816 | 36 你看这几位闲的蛋疼的又自己鄙视自己民族的家伙，在这里瞎叫个啥呀。 |
m*******g
发帖数: 383 | 37 中国奥运金牌拿的多不多？
世界上有人认为中国人身体好吗？
lol
【在 g******i 的大作中提到】
: 只有一个种族比另一个种族优秀， 才能让别人认为种族是优秀的， 而决定种族优秀的
: 是那个种族中优秀的某一小一群人， 而不是平均。
: 也就是说华人要让老美认为优秀， 不是靠平均， 而是华人精英要比老美精英优秀。
: 决定社会的是精英， 普通人的贡献能够他消费的而已， 是零。
: 一个民族的脊梁是精英， 而不是平均
|
m*********x
发帖数: 400 | 38 It's from Lynn's Race Differences in Intelligence, a widely critized
publication. no serious scientist cares to give a damn.
Leon Kamin, former chair of princeton university's department of psychology,
commented on Lynn's loads of crap:
"Lynn's distortions and misrepresentations of the data constitute a truly
venomous racism, combined with scandalous disregard for scientific
objectivity. Lynn is widely known among academics to be an associate editor
of the racist journal "Mankind Quarterly" and a major recipient of financial
support from the nativist, eugenically oriented Pioneer Fund.".
【在 l****z 的大作中提到】
: 不错, 这张图哪里来的?要保存收藏打印散发啊．
|
f*****c
发帖数: 3257 | 39 哈哈，看到这句话我心里的自豪感油然而生！
小朋友，洗洗睡吧，别在拿新东方老师的语录来自娱自乐了 |
f*********d
发帖数: 3358 | 40 哈哈
【在 S******s 的大作中提到】
: 在美国，国男有智商优势，国女有生理优势 中国人目前就应该团结在一起，为提高华
: 人在美国的地位一起努力
: 就像一位前辈说的那样，
: 有能力的，改变国家
: 没能力的，改变国籍
|
|
|
v***s
发帖数: 1237 | |
b********n
发帖数: 5997 | |
m*********x
发帖数: 400 | 43 I didn't mean to smack that retard. I was here to goof around. The funny
thing is the moron took his delusion quite serious and began to throw up
terms like 'logic' and 'evidence'. Bringing shit to the table is fine to me.
Just don't trick it out in fancy dresses.
I was extremely positive he couldn't find any definitive conclusions from
academia to back up his argument, coz race and intelligence has been a
dreadfully controversial topic for decades. We did find race gap in IQ tests
, but only untrained laymen and race fanatics would then jump to the
assertion that certain ethnic groups are smarter than the other ones.
Steps in the adademic world are, however, made in an unconditionally prudent
manner: the reliability of IQ tests as a measurement to assess intellegence
has been questioned: "There are many cognitive abilities—a single general
factor of intelligence is inadequate to account for current knowledge in
psychological measurement or cognitive science." (Fish, Jefferson M., RACE
AND INTELLIGENCE Separating Science From Myth);
Investigation in the causal relations between intelligent differences and
social, environmental and biological factors has not yet been launched so
far (Earl Hunt, Considerations Relating to the Study of Group Differences in
Intelligence);
Even race, a cultural intervention, is rejected by scientific community.
Up to this point, "Anthropometric measurements did not provide any direct
data to prove group superiority or inferiority." Here is a quote from "the
American Anthropological Association Statement on "Race" and Intelligence":
"WHEREAS all human beings are members of one species, Homo sapiens, and
WHEREAS, differentiating species into biologically defined "races" has
proven meaningless and unscientific as a way of explaining variation (
whether in intelligence or other traits),
THEREFORE, the American Anthropological Association urges the academy, our
political leaders and our communities to affirm, without distraction by
mistaken claims of racially determined intelligence, the common stake in
assuring equal opportunity, in respecting diversity and in securing a
harmonious quality of life for all people. "
http://www.aaanet.org/stmts/race.htm
【在 v***s 的大作中提到】
: 真看不出来能说出这种话的能有什么智商优势
|
d****n
发帖数: 278 | 44 You just posted more garbage,beating the bushes without any concrete
evidence to disprove this. So yeah, you did bring lots of "sh*t to the table
". Isn't that something to be proud of.
Chinese in America are smarter than Americans in America. It's common sense.
It's severe retardation not to see this. It's incorrigible retardation simply quoting white people's criticism and a bunch of empty talks without proving this statement wrong.
If all your PhD's works are to quote some other people's quotes of yet other people's quotes, then yeah you guys just Pile the garbage Higher and Deeper.
me.
tests
prudent
【在 m*********x 的大作中提到】
: I didn't mean to smack that retard. I was here to goof around. The funny
: thing is the moron took his delusion quite serious and began to throw up
: terms like 'logic' and 'evidence'. Bringing shit to the table is fine to me.
: Just don't trick it out in fancy dresses.
: I was extremely positive he couldn't find any definitive conclusions from
: academia to back up his argument, coz race and intelligence has been a
: dreadfully controversial topic for decades. We did find race gap in IQ tests
: , but only untrained laymen and race fanatics would then jump to the
: assertion that certain ethnic groups are smarter than the other ones.
: Steps in the adademic world are, however, made in an unconditionally prudent
|
g********s
发帖数: 530 | |
M*******s
发帖数: 763 | |
