i*****t
发帖数: 220 | 1 Do you guys think MS XML parser which is included inside IE is good/convenient
to use? How about its work compared with Xerces? Thanks. //Thank the two
brothers answering the previous question. |
a*****a
发帖数: 438 | 2 of course it's convenient. you can use few lines of javascript/vbscript
to do xml/xsl work.
i never heard of xerces (sorry for my ignorance). so no comment.
【在 i*****t 的大作中提到】
: Do you guys think MS XML parser which is included inside IE is good/convenient
: to use? How about its work compared with Xerces? Thanks. //Thank the two
: brothers answering the previous question.
|
j*****q
发帖数: 26 | 3 It depends on which level you want to use the parser.
If u use javascript and vbscript based on windows or use Visual Basic, you
can easily use the parser because the system hides the complicated
interaction.
If u want to use it on c++ level, you need to know COM.
If u are familiar with JAVA, xerces is a handy lib. It's easy to understand
and use.
good/convenient
two
【在 a*****a 的大作中提到】
: of course it's convenient. you can use few lines of javascript/vbscript
: to do xml/xsl work.
: i never heard of xerces (sorry for my ignorance). so no comment.
|
c*****t
发帖数: 198 | 4 I am using xerces now. Honestly, it is good in that it has everything and it
is free. It is not that good to me since it is too big, not cute at all (want
to compile, take half an hour). This parser coordinates with xml 1.0
standards. It will create a C++ library so that you can use.
I tried it in Linux.
Personally, I don't think an XML parser should be this complex. Even the XML
standard I don't like it: it is not so convinient for programming.
good/convenient
two
【在 a*****a 的大作中提到】
: of course it's convenient. you can use few lines of javascript/vbscript
: to do xml/xsl work.
: i never heard of xerces (sorry for my ignorance). so no comment.
|
