d**x
发帖数: 1934 | |
E********t
发帖数: 2447 | |
d**g
发帖数: 1727 | 3 don't think so. clk63 is actually several pounds heavier.
the main difference here is clk63 was really tuned for track while m6 took t
oo much concern on drivability. it appears the active steering has become an
other example of 画蛇添足
【在 E********t 的大作中提到】
: agree。。
|
p*********e
发帖数: 32207 | 4 actually CLK63 AMG is still way from track ready,
However CLK63 AMG black series is.
t
an
【在 d**g 的大作中提到】
: don't think so. clk63 is actually several pounds heavier.
: the main difference here is clk63 was really tuned for track while m6 took t
: oo much concern on drivability. it appears the active steering has become an
: other example of 画蛇添足
|
p*********e
发帖数: 32207 | 5 finally opened the link...
this is not a normal CLK63 AMG, but a CLK63 AMG black series,
which is almost track-ready. Sure not fair to compare it with M6.
And, this car costs around 140kUSD...
【在 d**x 的大作中提到】
: http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Drives/Comparos/articleId=121263?tid=edmunds.il.home.photopanel..3.*
: Not fair comparision I think...
: M6 is way too heavy...
|
d**g
发帖数: 1727 | 6 the comparison in that test was between clk63 amg black and m6
【在 p*********e 的大作中提到】
: actually CLK63 AMG is still way from track ready,
: However CLK63 AMG black series is.
:
: t
: an
|
p*********e
发帖数: 32207 | 7 just opened the link and realized it..
【在 d**g 的大作中提到】
: the comparison in that test was between clk63 amg black and m6
|
