x******i 发帖数: 14369 | 1 中国最好喝的水:农夫山泉,有点甜。
美国喝过最好的就是FIJI.很纯很纯,没有有些矿泉水那种怪味,依云的水也不错,但
还是FIJI最好。
最不好喝的水是:ARROWHEAD。还不如CVS的水好。
斐濟水(英語:FIJI Water),是一個源自斐濟群島瓶裝水的品牌。礦泉水是來源地是
Viti Lenu 島上的Nakauvadra山的地下水。
公司於1996年成立,直至1997年尾,開始托運到美國發售。品牌現提供330毫升、0.5公
升、1公升以及1.5公升的包裝出售。
斐濟水品牌的礦泉水由太平洋往來的信風淨化。而且取水的地點位於Viti Levu 山谷,
受到當地火山岩層覆蓋,是經火山岩過濾的天然雨水。亦由於斐濟群島遠離已發展國家
,故此該泉水無水源污染和人造成份。 |
p****y 发帖数: 23737 | 2 据说矿泉水可以用来做保湿面膜。:)
【在 x******i 的大作中提到】 : 中国最好喝的水:农夫山泉,有点甜。 : 美国喝过最好的就是FIJI.很纯很纯,没有有些矿泉水那种怪味,依云的水也不错,但 : 还是FIJI最好。 : 最不好喝的水是:ARROWHEAD。还不如CVS的水好。 : 斐濟水(英語:FIJI Water),是一個源自斐濟群島瓶裝水的品牌。礦泉水是來源地是 : Viti Lenu 島上的Nakauvadra山的地下水。 : 公司於1996年成立,直至1997年尾,開始托運到美國發售。品牌現提供330毫升、0.5公 : 升、1公升以及1.5公升的包裝出售。 : 斐濟水品牌的礦泉水由太平洋往來的信風淨化。而且取水的地點位於Viti Levu 山谷, : 受到當地火山岩層覆蓋,是經火山岩過濾的天然雨水。亦由於斐濟群島遠離已發展國家
|
yo 发帖数: 2534 | 3 请mm有空看看这个小电影“瓶装水的故事”吧,首先(至少在美国)瓶装水的质量跟自
来水没有任何区别,其次所有瓶装水/饮料产生的塑料垃圾现在已经是个让人头疼的环
境问题了,即使全部拿去回收也会消耗大量资源,另外这些从远方运过来的矿泉水更是
在运输过程中消耗无谓的能源。对于饮料厂商来说瓶装水是个一本万利的生意,可是我
们作为消费者完全有能力减少这样的浪费。
http://storyofstuff.org/bottledwater/ |
p****y 发帖数: 23737 | 4 支持!我在家里从来都是烧开水喝,出门在外才会买矿泉水,
不过,我出门经常尽量少喝水,因为干净的公厕不是那么多。:P
【在 yo 的大作中提到】 : 请mm有空看看这个小电影“瓶装水的故事”吧,首先(至少在美国)瓶装水的质量跟自 : 来水没有任何区别,其次所有瓶装水/饮料产生的塑料垃圾现在已经是个让人头疼的环 : 境问题了,即使全部拿去回收也会消耗大量资源,另外这些从远方运过来的矿泉水更是 : 在运输过程中消耗无谓的能源。对于饮料厂商来说瓶装水是个一本万利的生意,可是我 : 们作为消费者完全有能力减少这样的浪费。 : http://storyofstuff.org/bottledwater/
|
x******i 发帖数: 14369 | 5 哦 我也是有时买来泡茶的,减少塑料污染是对的。
【在 yo 的大作中提到】 : 请mm有空看看这个小电影“瓶装水的故事”吧,首先(至少在美国)瓶装水的质量跟自 : 来水没有任何区别,其次所有瓶装水/饮料产生的塑料垃圾现在已经是个让人头疼的环 : 境问题了,即使全部拿去回收也会消耗大量资源,另外这些从远方运过来的矿泉水更是 : 在运输过程中消耗无谓的能源。对于饮料厂商来说瓶装水是个一本万利的生意,可是我 : 们作为消费者完全有能力减少这样的浪费。 : http://storyofstuff.org/bottledwater/
|
s********1 发帖数: 211 | 6 论口味,对FIJI 情有独钟。论含菌量,化工品和重金属含量,
请测水样。看公众报导,鹿苑尚可,农夫山泉,有点甜,加什么啦?:)
还是打一口无污染的后院深水井吧。:) |
p****y 发帖数: 23737 | 7 后院深水井的水很难找啊,比超市的矿泉水还难找到。:)
【在 s********1 的大作中提到】 : 论口味,对FIJI 情有独钟。论含菌量,化工品和重金属含量, : 请测水样。看公众报导,鹿苑尚可,农夫山泉,有点甜,加什么啦?:) : 还是打一口无污染的后院深水井吧。:)
|
s********1 发帖数: 211 | 8 http://www.ehso.com/ehshome/DrWater/drinkingwater.php
SELECTED WATERS TO WATCH
Water, State of Purchase & Comments WATERS TESTING CLEAN
Water, State of Purchase & Comments
Alhambra Mountain Spring Water (CA)
Heterotrophic-plate-count bacteria in some bottles over 500 colony forming
units/milliliter (cfu/ml) guideline
Deer Park (DC, NY)
No contaminants of concern found in four tests
Appollinaris (CA)
Arsenic above California warning level
Naya (CA, NY)
No contaminants of concern found in four tests
Black Mountain Fluoridated Water (CA)
Heterotrophic-plate-count bacteria over 500 cfu/ml guideline in some bottles
; fluoride levels exceed FDA and California standards for warm weather areas
Rocky Mountain Drinking Water (CA)
No contaminants of concern found in two tests
Crystal Geyser Alpine Spring Water (CA)
Arsenic in excess of California warning level and World Health Organization
and European Union standards
San Pelligrino (CA)
No contaminants of concern found in two tests
Lady Lee Drinking Water (CA)
Trihalomethanes in excess of California and industry standards
Vons Drinking Water (CA)
No contaminants of concern found in two tests
Lucky Seltzer Water (CA)
Trihalomethanes in excess of California standards (and over industry
standards, which don’t apply to seltzer)
Vons Natural Spring Water (CA)
No contaminants of concern found in two tests
Master Choice (NY)
Heterotrophic-plate-count bacteria over 500 cfu/ml in some bottles
Odwalla Geothermal Natural Spring Water (CA)
Fluoride level in excess of California and FDA standard for warm weather
areas
Poland Spring (DC)
Heterotrophic-plate-count bacteria over 500 cfu/ml guideline in some bottles
; 1996 excess chlorine recall
Private Selection Drinking & Purified Waters (CA)
Trihalomethane levels above California and industry standards
Publix Drinking Water (FL)
Trihalomethanes above industry standard
Safeway Drinking Water & Purified Water & Club Soda & Select Seltzer &
Spring Water (all CA)
Trihalomethanes above California and industry standards
Vittel Mineral Water (CA)
Arsenic in excess of California, World Health Organization, and European
Union standards
Volvic Natural Spring Water (CA)
Arsenic in excess of California, World Health Organization, and European
Union standards
Note: This list is intended to be read with the NRDC Petition to FDA
Regarding Bottled Water and the attached report Bottled Water: Pure Drink or
Pure Hype. Conclusions about individual waters should not be made from this
list alone. These results are provided for information only to assist in
deciding what further research is needed, and should not be used as a sole
basis for choosing a brand of water or reaching conclusions about the
overall quality of the water. As noted in the text of the reports, the NRDC
"snapshot" testing was not complete and not necessarily statistically
representative of the quality of all bottles of the waters tested. For
further information, review the full report, including Table 2: Selected
Contaminants of Potential Concern for Bottled Water, and the summary of test
results in Appendix A. |