c**s 发帖数: 771 | 1 我有一个网络配置问题,
现在总共有四个有账户: 2个不同area code 的Googlevoic账户,一个Callcentric, 和
一个Smartvoip.
有5 个设备要连接到只有四个有线连接口的路由器: 1 台台式计算机, 2 个 Linksys
SPA1001 ATA, 1 个 Patriot PBO Multimedia Player, 和 一个安装有Asterisk 1.8
的 Dockstar. 所以缺一个连接口。
以前没有用Dockstar时,正好用完所有接口。现在 如果我想要保持这五个设备都用有
线连接的话,应该怎么做? 再增加一个switch? 或路由器?
BTW,我想保持两个SPA1001 和与它们想连的两个电话机。所以可以在同时,可以有二路
通话。 | D*********Z 发帖数: 415 | 2 solution 1: use PAP2
solution 2: add switch or anything that expands lan ports
solution 3: pbo wifi
Linksys
.8
【在 c**s 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 我有一个网络配置问题, : 现在总共有四个有账户: 2个不同area code 的Googlevoic账户,一个Callcentric, 和 : 一个Smartvoip. : 有5 个设备要连接到只有四个有线连接口的路由器: 1 台台式计算机, 2 个 Linksys : SPA1001 ATA, 1 个 Patriot PBO Multimedia Player, 和 一个安装有Asterisk 1.8 : 的 Dockstar. 所以缺一个连接口。 : 以前没有用Dockstar时,正好用完所有接口。现在 如果我想要保持这五个设备都用有 : 线连接的话,应该怎么做? 再增加一个switch? 或路由器? : BTW,我想保持两个SPA1001 和与它们想连的两个电话机。所以可以在同时,可以有二路 : 通话。
| c**s 发帖数: 771 | 3 Thank you, 睡神.
Solution #1 is good. I just need to flash the SPA1001 back to PAP2 again.
the problem is I am a brand newbie on Asterisk, I have no clue how to
configure 4 accounts and only use one ATA.
#2 I have a hub somewhere, I have a spare router, but do not have a switch.
Could I somehow utilize the hub or the router? I think it may cause
problems in VOIP by connecting another router to the LAN port of the 1st
router, like these nasty NAT stuff, but I am not sure. On the other hand,
will hub reduce the efficiency of the LAN? Again, I am not familiar with
networking, so my question might be naive or trivial. If that is the case, I
do apologize.
#3: I do not want use WIFI on PBO. From my reading, it does not work as good
as a wired connection. I do have several USB wifi adapters sitting around.
I won't try this route yet unless it is absolutely necessary,
【在 D*********Z 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : solution 1: use PAP2 : solution 2: add switch or anything that expands lan ports : solution 3: pbo wifi : : Linksys : .8
| D*********Z 发帖数: 415 | 4 Considering your case, I recommend #2.
#1 could be a workaround if you knew something about asterisk. Otherwise no
good at all. It does not really solve the problem. I mean, what will you do
if you have a new wired device in the future? What else are you going to cut
then?
#2 is a solution. If you don't have switch in hand, just remember that consu
mer router product is actually a router plus a switch. By Disabling the DHCP
function and abandoning the WAN port, a router is "castrated" to a switch.
NAT won't be a concern in such condition. It's like expanding the LAN ports
transparently.
You are right about the HUB. It can do the work, but inefficiently due to it
s shared bandwidth.
switch.
I
【在 c**s 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : Thank you, 睡神. : Solution #1 is good. I just need to flash the SPA1001 back to PAP2 again. : the problem is I am a brand newbie on Asterisk, I have no clue how to : configure 4 accounts and only use one ATA. : #2 I have a hub somewhere, I have a spare router, but do not have a switch. : Could I somehow utilize the hub or the router? I think it may cause : problems in VOIP by connecting another router to the LAN port of the 1st : router, like these nasty NAT stuff, but I am not sure. On the other hand, : will hub reduce the efficiency of the LAN? Again, I am not familiar with : networking, so my question might be naive or trivial. If that is the case, I
| c**s 发帖数: 771 | 5 Thanks a bunch. I really appreciate your help.
no
do
cut
consu
DHCP
.
ports
【在 D*********Z 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : Considering your case, I recommend #2. : #1 could be a workaround if you knew something about asterisk. Otherwise no : good at all. It does not really solve the problem. I mean, what will you do : if you have a new wired device in the future? What else are you going to cut : then? : #2 is a solution. If you don't have switch in hand, just remember that consu : mer router product is actually a router plus a switch. By Disabling the DHCP : function and abandoning the WAN port, a router is "castrated" to a switch. : NAT won't be a concern in such condition. It's like expanding the LAN ports : transparently.
|
|