f*******u
发帖数: 2018 | 1 觉得这个是一个比较好的路子，如果有好的idea，那么这个应当能走通。谁有经验给说
说？我是cmmi下面的 |
g******6
发帖数: 942 | 2 You need to submit to regular programs. If reviewers don't like it but the program director likes it, the director may fund it as EAGER, given that you don't have much ongoing NSF funding.
【在 f*******u 的大作中提到】
: 觉得这个是一个比较好的路子，如果有好的idea，那么这个应当能走通。谁有经验给说
: 说？我是cmmi下面的
|
a***9
发帖数: 1884 | 3 大家都觉得这个是条好路子, 那就说明这个不是什么"好路子". 谁都想试试, 结果谁都拿不到. 这个完全是PD说了算.有些PD明确说了不愿意fund EAGER, 可能是收到的骚扰信太多了. |
f*******u
发帖数: 2018 | 4 的确是这么回事，就看po喜欢不喜欢了，对吧？
program director likes it, the director may fund it as EAGER, given that
you don't have much ongoing NSF funding.
【在 g******6 的大作中提到】
: You need to submit to regular programs. If reviewers don't like it but the program director likes it, the director may fund it as EAGER, given that you don't have much ongoing NSF funding.
|
b*****d
发帖数: 61690 | 5 嗯。EAGER完全是program director说了算。
【在 f*******u 的大作中提到】
: 的确是这么回事，就看po喜欢不喜欢了，对吧？
:
: program director likes it, the director may fund it as EAGER, given that
: you don't have much ongoing NSF funding.
|
f*******u
发帖数: 2018 | 6 是program manager还是director?
【在 b*****d 的大作中提到】
: 嗯。EAGER完全是program director说了算。
|
