f*****n
发帖数: 12752 | 1 美国法律是case law，相似案件按以前案件的判决来判决（大体上的原则）。现在的情
况是类似案件一般都判言论自由，我们缺乏前例支持。不过这是显然的，否则abc怎么
敢这么嚣张？我们要做的，就是研究案例判决和法条，找出支持我们的arguement，同
时坚持经济政治上不断抗议发声，推动法律改变。这是五年甚至五十年的工作，美国黑
人的抗争史就是前事之师。不去做就永远不可能。 |
|
A**i
发帖数: 4328 | 2 比如发个包子~
这双子的大段ARGUEMENT我还没PO哦～ |
|
i********e
发帖数: 4 | 3 I need help. It is not arguement. My trip is On 11/20 to 11/24. I plan to
play 2 or 3 days in Disney (Magic Kindom, Empot or ...). Please email me
l**[email protected] if you could help me buy discount tickets. My cell phone is
615-715-0501. call me leave me the message in day time.
Thanks. |
|
M***e
发帖数: 5360 | 4 你写这么一arguement给个包子代表我个人的敬佩之情,是真心的... |
|
T******e
发帖数: 18290 | 5 宠物猫是用来养/爱的，动物实验的猫是用来实验的
本来就没有“猫猫平等”“基本猫权”
所以你这个arguement不成立 |
|
c******n
发帖数: 5697 | 6 这还不简单
上庭就是了
先跟地区法庭的昏官吵架，和警察吵架，赢不了就上洛杉矶县高级法院上诉，写
opening brief，proof of service, 然后上庭在三个法官面前做oral arguement，你
这情况一般应该可以reverse judgement
我开车做过多少坏事，没有一次警察打赢过我，我本来想免费帮你上庭的，但是看楼主
一直这么鄙视和憎恨我，又那么有骨气，肯定是不会受这胯下之辱来要我帮忙的 |
|
|
m*******e
发帖数: 1280 | 8 gay people are not normal
=> they should stay away from the main society
=> a holiday to remember a politian who has been remembered to come out
openly?
=> to celebrate such evil life choice in front of our kids?
=> no fvcking way!
I can see the reasoning like this.
So the real arguements here are:
Should we truely treat gay people equally?
Are gays normal people just like you and me, even though they have made a
non-mainstream life choice?
Should everyone in the society, including minorities, h |
|
m*******e
发帖数: 1280 | 9 I think I saw the arguement that they should have just go ahead to live
their gay life and don't ever bother majority people (the normal people)
你也是考过GRE的人，咋逻辑这么查捏？
第一个推论就不对
为啥不normal的就要远离主流社会捏？ |
|
m*******e
发帖数: 1280 | 10 it's not my arguement, I just tried to summarize what I saw today.
I am a social liberal.
In fact, I think we chinese people should always favor civil right movement
since, in reality, we are a minority group, too.
If this society becomes majority-ruled, we will become victim one day.
你要定义什么是bother
还有，给出证据，majority的是非同性恋 （包括异性恋和其他别的恋） |
|
m*******e
发帖数: 1280 | 11 end of the arguement, you can choose to ignore my posts, I have absolutely
no problem with it. |
|
c**********g
发帖数: 1607 | 12 【 以下文字转载自 NewYork 讨论区 】
发信人: Vesper8 (天使在人间), 信区: NewYork
标 题: 每天读一遍，坚持27天，你的英语水平就可以达到跟美国人交流的(转载)
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Feb 22 16:22:15 2011, 美东)
发信人: jameslili (jamesli), 信区: Heart
标 题: 每天读一遍，坚持27天，你的英语水平就可以达到跟美国人交流的(转载)
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Feb 22 15:46:33 2011, 美东)
发信人: ruomu (ruomu), 信区: WaterWorld
标 题: 每天读一遍，坚持27天，你的英语水平就可以达到跟美国人交流的水平啦！
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Feb 22 11:33:27 2011, 美东)
What are you trying to say?（你到底想说什么？）
Don't be silly.（别胡闹了。）
How strong are your glasses?（你近视多少度？）
Just becaus... 阅读全帖 |
|
b**********0
发帖数: 1447 | 13 if u want some pointed arguement, then go read a book... |
|
V*****8
发帖数: 33122 | 14 【 以下文字转载自 Heart 讨论区 】
发信人: jameslili (jamesli), 信区: Heart
标 题: 每天读一遍，坚持27天，你的英语水平就可以达到跟美国人交流的(转载)
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Feb 22 15:46:33 2011, 美东)
发信人: ruomu (ruomu), 信区: WaterWorld
标 题: 每天读一遍，坚持27天，你的英语水平就可以达到跟美国人交流的水平啦！
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Feb 22 11:33:27 2011, 美东)
What are you trying to say?（你到底想说什么？）
Don't be silly.（别胡闹了。）
How strong are your glasses?（你近视多少度？）
Just because.（没有别的原因。）
It isn't the way I hoped it would be.（这不是我所盼望的。）
You will never guess.（你永远猜不到。）
No one could do anything about ... 阅读全帖 |
|
c*****l
发帖数: 5203 | 15 boldeagle, i know you are trying vely hard to copy beef. but you aint no
beef, you dont have her sense of humor. you are the kind of groupie make the
star would say, geez whos that fugly． you argue for the sake of arguement
and you bore me. your 包袱is too old. ＷＦ topic is so out now. If you
think people talk about things that you do not have is BSO and start talking
about their private life, that's low. i can talk profane all i want and i
can go even dirtier. that wont change the fact that people... 阅读全帖 |
|
b*******e
发帖数: 554 | 16 copy my ass. You are a piece of crap. Whenever I see you BSO, I will
continue my comment. You disclose your private life by yourself by your
BSOing, I just return it to you as a reminder that you are full of shit. So
please put yourself together and enjoy your miserable life
the
arguement
talking |
|
n********0
发帖数: 815 | 17 man, u like me, u really really like me!
the
arguement
talking |
|
R*s
发帖数: 2041 | 18 not good for east coast since all their branches in west coast.
It takes too long for the mailing process, and they limited the
number of DVDs you can have at any time (3 maximum?).
I used it for a while. My feeling is you can get 7-8 DVDs per month
at most (plus lots of delay, lost, phone call, arguement....). Without
discount, the price close to blockerbuster. Hope Philly is better.
The only good thing is we got to keep a Six sense since it appeared
to be lost in the mail but came back after w |
|
O***n
发帖数: 13127 | 19 a good scientist knows how to make good arguements. this is a must, |
|
T*********s
发帖数: 2987 | 20 I understand your concern but you cannot use this as arguement in court.
you have a choice on where you live but you don't have a choice of your race.
This is teh fundamental difference. |
|
O****e
发帖数: 5061 | 21 我觉得如果你遇到好的agent，从第一次和你打交道开始起9就给你展现他的value 和
诚意，也许今天的想法会不一样
一个简单的arguement就是，1个房子叫100w 你自己出价 102 不一定拿得到，agent出
102.1 拿得到，而且你还不知道为什么当时不能给你说一声让你102.2拿到。时间长了
你就发现这里有游戏规则
很多人就是被一个无能或者 无聊的agent坑了，然后就开始抱怨社会。 |
|
L***B
发帖数: 141 | 22 个人口味不同吧 也没必要太鄙视小熊了 不过这个讨论就是很典型的中国人arguement
不然批评外国人老自己人堆里品来品去的 |
|
G**********e
发帖数: 11693 | 23 这文章写法有误导性，前面说当街逮捕，这很正常，后面又接着说脱衣搜身，搞得好像
这也是当街一样。任何人进jail时都是要任何东西不能带进去的，换上jail的衣服，所
以会有jail里的同性别工作人员看着把衣服脱到精光，让你看着把你带进去的每一个物
品做详细记录并收起来，包括钱包里的每一张纸币硬币，哪怕兜里有个回形针一张小纸
片，那也是属于你的东西，都会列在记录里，出jail的时候要原封不动还给你的，其中
一个原因包括防止你在jail里自杀。而女的是可以藏东西在vagina里的，所以连那里也
要确保没有东西，一般情况是脱光了咳嗽，里面有东西的话就能被挤出来。
印度人抠到这种程度简直令人发指，堂堂外交官缺这点钱，估计脑子里的想法是她在领
事馆内的房子里聘用的人不在美国法律管制范围内，可是人家还是要在美国地界生活啊
，印度派她到美国来难道没有因为这边的生活水平给income adjustment吗，她心存侥
幸觉得能以此作为arguement吧 |
|
A***o
发帖数: 2783 | 24 估计绿卡的影响可以有，最大的影响应该是信用纪录，清理起来还是挺麻烦地。。。
$200如果证据确凿不该付，当然该去争，问题这么模糊的情况，花费时间精力折腾
纯属不值。。。
实在想省钱，还有一个办法，等Collector要帐的时候就拖着，一年半载之后他们会
打个大折扣，比如50%啥的，反正他们是花10%甚至更少的钱买的，收多少都是赚。。。
但是也表指望跟Collector讲道理，Put it simple，they don't want to listen
to your arguement, for them, time is $$。。。 |
|
m****r
发帖数: 6639 | 25 I am glad you brought up the search tree, I think it is the example I am
looking for.
In the search tree example, to gain a new level, we have to put in extra
resources that is not linear to the number of levels.
So, I want to change the terminology here. we will have tree level, and
strength (and discontinue the use of "level" because it will now be
confusing).
the question is, is the tree level is good mapping of the the strength of
the program. Obviously, yes. The more levels you can searc... 阅读全帖 |
|
h*****p
发帖数: 2638 | 26 No more first basement arguement in Chicago. |
|
k***n
发帖数: 3158 | 27 one can argue that he raised his legs in order to clear the way for Craig.
if you watch the replay, he indeed cleared the chalk line after raising
his legs so if Craig ran along the chalk line, it was clear. Of course
the rule is that runners establish their own baseline as long as it is
within 3 feet of the chalk line so it was not a problem of Craig.
I don't think MLB will change the rule, if they bring in the "intention"
arguement, it would be a mess for judgement. |
|
W********m
发帖数: 7793 | 28 i can elaborate. but what is the point to you. I have backed up my claim
with examples and logic. all you do is pick up small pieces 咬文嚼字。 you
have not given me any example that could deny my claim. sometimes, i don't
even follow your logic for arguement. 文科男吧? |
|
c******g
发帖数: 19294 | 29 now we need plainmonkey to clarify his arguement.... |
|
|
u********r
发帖数: 2525 | 31 这就彰显了我华人的地位
我也觉得他打不了主力
一人得道，基友升天 |
|
|
H******4
发帖数: 161 | 33 Fields, hehe, still not worthy even with the correct spelling |
|
r***k
发帖数: 13586 | 34 妃子的好处是听话，可以被教练吼。教练恐怕不敢吼jr之流。 |
|
x***e
发帖数: 2449 | 35 so basically, with from 7 tricks and 9 tricks you all bid 4s?
then how will your' PD's react?
4S should be limited to 2-3 rule, as I understand correctly.
also with a side A and a trump A, you can't say you deny def value.
seriously, I guess you need to learn to evalue your hand and see the logic
through the bidding.
Obviously, your arguement is correct but your result is strange, I have to
say.
to
than
a
3s |
|
|
c*******s
发帖数: 5839 | 37 你想说什么？自己先看看你这三点都通么？
我跟KV观点经常不同，因为我们都有很强烈的个人想法，都是书生意气之争。
你根本不懂，看见有争论就赶紧补课？
你自己的见解是啥？
就挑拨一下玩？
很好玩吗？
你要真感兴趣好好看两天书，参加讨论我欢迎。别那么不踏实，翻两眼google就来起哄。
第一，你可以提出你的论点，再给点论据支持，足矣。可惜，一来就先给人“扣顶大帽
子”。先吹捧一下，再“针扎一下”，什么“带着主观态度讲问题时，误导效果更强大
”。 这，是你针对人的“opinion”，而不是针对这个问题的“Arguement”。
第二，关于“第二修正案”的一些解读，你讲得太粗，我帮你顺顺看：
（都是理工WSN，外行，考证不来专业文献，简单点，就维基百科，算是马马虎虎过得
去了）
1，先用中文的，哈哈; 链接如下：
http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E7%BE%8E%E5%9C%8B%E6%86%B2%E6%B3%
比较简单，提到该法案的历史线索。这大概就是KV提到的“中文”来源。这个，看来还
是“和中文媒体有几毛钱的关系”吧？
2，再看 Wikipedia “Seco... 阅读全帖 |
|
o*****4
发帖数: 1245 | 38 这不闲的无聊，来思考人生了么。
本文非C&R arguement文。 |
|
M******k
发帖数: 27573 | 39 Just for arguement's sake:
人都有第一次。。。 |
|
M******k
发帖数: 27573 | 40 My point would be: Woodson lost his eligibility after switching teams.
anyway, just for arguement's sake. |
|
P*******e
发帖数: 39399 | 41 ☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
BigBlue (#15) 于 (Tue Feb 26 19:23:34 2013, 美东) 提到:
发信人: BigBlue (#15), 信区: USANews
标 题: 49ers和29ers: 奥巴马全民保险两个立竿见影的影响
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Feb 26 19:14:22 2013, 美东)
法案其中有个规定, 凡是雇佣50个或更多全职员工的企业,
如果不给每一个人都提供医疗保险, 就从第30个开始, 每人每年罚$2000.
而"全职"的定义, 是一个人每周工作30个小时. 注意是30, 不是40.
更荒谬的是, 如果有两个人各工作15小时, 那也算一个"全职".
法案是2014年生效, 但是采集数据 --
公司总共有多少个员工, , 其中多少个算全职, 等等 -- 现在已经开始了.
所以, 那些为全民保险高声欢呼的自由派左棍们,
你们要是还有一点现实感的,
要还不是完全沉浸在理想化的自由主义世界里痴人梦呓的,
也应该猜得到在现实世界里, 正在发生什么事情了罢:... 阅读全帖 |
|
G****s
发帖数: 3523 | 42 bring knife to china seems to be a related topic.
however that discussion was already over, there was no need to transfer the
post.
that said, we all know why kz80 hates coldsteel. we've seen all their
arguements. one pro-ccp, on anti-ccp.
My word is, you guys need to understand, politics is a bitch.
you can f*ck it, don't fall in love with it. |
|
b*******x
发帖数: 778 | 43 这个好像可以做一个GRE Arguement的题目了…… |
|
B******1
发帖数: 9094 | 44 My point is: As BAD as I have been on this and other boards, I have not been
banned!
So the notion that simply arguing about stuffs on this board would lead to a
ban does not work, at least in my case.
Making well-organized arguement is fun and should be promoted among members since
it sharpens your mind and improves your debating and analytical skills. Although it might
force you to sit in front of a computer instead of stand on a treadmill, the calories burnt in your brain during the thinking ... 阅读全帖 |
|
s****t
发帖数: 461 | 45 go to scUM? lol
You think RR will develop TP into NFL type QB?
If old carr was still the coach of scUM,
you may have an arguement here. |
|
j**y
发帖数: 7014 | 46 same arguement for PC with ML |
|
Y******e
发帖数: 20256 | 47 你这个arguement明显就是错的，只有部分top recruit的唯一目标是NFL，大部分都是
两手准备。
to |
|
R*****s
发帖数: 41236 | 48 my last post to whx:
我说过每个人不一样， 不要总用自己的想法去衡量别人。。
I dont want to win anybody, win any arguement.
你喜欢compitition， 喜欢win, it's fine.
我不喜欢争论， 不喜欢吵架， 所以我只是摆明我的看法， 别人
能接受就接受， 不能接受， 我也无所谓。。我只是说
每个人都有发表不同意见的权利， that's my only point..
多嘴一句， 我以前觉得你对跑步很投入很执着， 对你有respect.
now you totally lost it。。不要以为自己很tough， 就以为自己是GOD，
就可以对别人指手画脚。。。我够不够tough我自己心里知道，不会
像你这样整天喊。。。
多少破3的跑版的人也没像你一样整天喊自己tough. 真正不secure,
希望获得别人承认的人恐怕不是我， 是你自己吧。。。 |
|
