wh 发帖数: 141625 | 1 我也很喜欢这支。还有one more night. 上次看哪个动画片,好像是ice age, 里面也
是Phil collins唱歌。 |
|
r*********e 发帖数: 29495 | 2 可惜,
phil collins 给人猿泰山的几首歌真是好听,
you will be in my heart |
|
O******e 发帖数: 748 | 3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBdt2grd9Lc
Collin Raye
Love, me
I read a note my grandma wrote back in nineteen twenty-three.
Grandpa kept it in his coat, and he showed it once to me. He said,
"Boy, you might not understand, but a long, long time ago,
Grandma's daddy didn't like me none, but I loved your Grandma so."
We had this crazy plan to meet and run away together.
Get married in the first town we came to, and live forever.
But nailed to the tree where we were supposed to meet, instead
Of h... 阅读全帖 |
|
wh 发帖数: 141625 | 4 tarzan这个连环画我很喜欢,可惜图书馆没有dvd,我去推荐了,还没买到。
phil collins好像经常给动画片唱歌。上次我看了个brother bear,也是他唱的。还有
sting也经常唱。可怜他在bee movie里形象很滑稽,脸色苍白,性格软弱,警察去抓他
的时候,他还在地上打坐,像个邪教分子。不知道他是不是加入了什么非洲宗教组织。 |
|
|
j********z 发帖数: 3242 | 6 ☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
arsablue (唯一真神) 于 (Tue Oct 21 17:52:35 2008) 提到:
Dear Dr. Collins,
I thank God you can claim yourself a Christian. However, I'm so sorry that
your academic career polluted your faith! You may think your book is a good
testimony for God. But I want to tell you, it is totally opposite. Many
people don't believe there is a Creator after reading you book!!!
You admire your career and science research. But do you know what is
Biblical research? Do you know |
|
E*****m 发帖数: 25615 | 7 Collins 是個真正的科學家, 卻也是個福音派
的 religious nut。 這給所有人都出了個難題。
堅持政教分離的認為這樣公開鼓吹宗教的人不適合
當官, 大多數基本教義基督徒也受不了他鼓吹
進化論, 他要是要通過民選的話應該是沒戲。
不過 NIH 頭目不是民選的,又有Obama 支持,
機會不小。
板上不少人靠 NIH funding 吃飯的吧? |
|
e*****n 发帖数: 3129 | 8 Collins will be a fierce advocate for personalized medicine. Last year, he
left the NIH after 15 years to write a book that he was unable to publish
while still working for the government. He has been mum on the details, but
in talking to him over the years, I suspect that it will describe the need
to move more aggressively with validating genetic markers and other crucial
elements of personalized medicine, while calling for a broad plan to move
research and applications of medical discoveries t |
|
f**********c 发帖数: 651 | 9 某一个科学家的宗教信仰说实在的没有多大考量价值,因为经历这东西非常个人化的,
比如你所举的
collins的例子,他的父母过世之后把他从无神论变成了基督徒,但是他又完全不可能
违背进化论,所
以搞了这么一个东西。科学家除了他的专业训练,其他的思考其实跟常人没什么两样,
当他在其他方面
的思考跟他的专业有冲突的时候,这时候就看他愿意相信哪一个多一些了,但是大部分
科学家不喜欢绕
太多弯的解释 |
|
|
G******e 发帖数: 9567 | 11 FRANCIS COLLINS
Director, National Human Genome Research Institute
I see no conflict in what the Bible tells me about God and what science
tells me about nature. Like St. Augustine in A.D. 400, I do not find the
wording of Genesis 1 and 2 to suggest a scientific textbook but a powerful
and poetic description of God's intentions in creating the universe. The
mechanism of creation is left unspecified. If God, who is all powerful and
who is not limited by space and time, chose to use the mechanism ... 阅读全帖 |
|
G******e 发帖数: 9567 | 12 Francis Collins: My study of genetics certainly tells me, incontrovertibly
that Darwin was right about the nature of how living things have arrived on
the scene, by descent from a common ancestor under the influence of natural
selection over very long periods of time. Darwin was amazingly insightful
given how limited the molecular information he had was; essentially it didn
’t exist. And now with the digital code of the DNA, we have the best
possible proof of Darwin’s theory that he could have... 阅读全帖 |
|
s*y 发帖数: 933 | 13 So, do you support evolution now as Francis Collins said or are you still
against it? |
|
l**********t 发帖数: 5754 | 14
I support the posting of serious artiles on the subject of sciecne vs.
religion, from either non-believers or believers.
I agree with Francis Collins' view on science & religion in general --
Religion (Gensis in the Bible) explains the why and Science (whatever God
reveals to us thru scientific research) explains the how.
I am not convinced that "evolution" theory & theory on origin of life is
proven beyond reasonable doubts. If they were, there won't be funding for
research in these areas. Reg... 阅读全帖 |
|
G******e 发帖数: 9567 | 15 FRANCIS COLLINS
Director, National Human Genome Research Institute
I see no conflict in what the Bible tells me about God and what science
tells me about nature. Like St. Augustine in A.D. 400, I do not find the
wording of Genesis 1 and 2 to suggest a scientific textbook but a powerful
and poetic description of God's intentions in creating the universe. The
mechanism of creation is left unspecified. If God, who is all powerful and
who is not limited by space and time, chose to use the mechanism ... 阅读全帖 |
|
G******e 发帖数: 9567 | 16 Francis Collins: My study of genetics certainly tells me, incontrovertibly
that Darwin was right about the nature of how living things have arrived on
the scene, by descent from a common ancestor under the influence of natural
selection over very long periods of time. Darwin was amazingly insightful
given how limited the molecular information he had was; essentially it didn
’t exist. And now with the digital code of the DNA, we have the best
possible proof of Darwin’s theory that he could have... 阅读全帖 |
|
s*y 发帖数: 933 | 17 So, do you support evolution now as Francis Collins said or are you still
against it? |
|
l**********t 发帖数: 5754 | 18
I support the posting of serious artiles on the subject of sciecne vs.
religion, from either non-believers or believers.
I agree with Francis Collins' view on science & religion in general --
Religion (Gensis in the Bible) explains the why and Science (whatever God
reveals to us thru scientific research) explains the how.
I am not convinced that "evolution" theory & theory on origin of life is
proven beyond reasonable doubts. If they were, there won't be funding for
research in these areas. Reg... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
G******e 发帖数: 9567 | 20
humanoid 又贴了一遍Collins,这回肯定是支持了。 |
|
|
G******e 发帖数: 9567 | 22
humanoid 又贴了一遍Collins,这回肯定是支持了。 |
|
J*****3 发帖数: 4298 | 23 我的帖子写得很清楚,不是反对基督教的,是问--各位基督徒们,你们相信进化论吗?所以不用跟我争COLLINS他是不是基督徒的问题
永生呢 |
|
h******d 发帖数: 1891 | 24 我只知道神掌管一切。进化论没有很多研究,所以我还没有想好,呵呵。个人认为这个
其实不是很重要。
我早就说过你不是反击。
?所以不用跟我争COLLINS他是不是基督徒的问题 |
|
B********0 发帖数: 1153 | 25 我不接受仅仅是基因重组和突变通过自然选择产生新物种。
反对Dr.Collins的往往不是怀疑和否定他的基督徒信仰,而是攻击他歪曲和亵渎了进化
论科学。你认为他相信的是进化论吗?
is
at
where
of |
|
G******e 发帖数: 9567 | 26
okay,那你觉得永生反对Collins,是为了什么呢? |
|
B********0 发帖数: 1153 | 27 你很宽容。
基督徒作到Dr. Collins这份上,尚有人鄙视,指责他反科学反逻辑反理性。我们这些
人被骂又有什么难以接受呢? |
|
J*****3 发帖数: 4298 | 28 你举个例子,引用下这些讨论里,有谁鄙视指责Dr. Collins反科学反逻辑反理性了,
不带自己乱讲了,请找出LINK,谁说的,怎么说的 |
|
J*****3 发帖数: 4298 | 29 "基督徒作到Dr. Collins这份上,尚有人鄙视,指责他反科学反逻辑反理性。我们这些
人被骂又有什么难以接受呢?"
你还没搜到论据吗?
间地带找到自己的位置。他会得到双方的理解,但也会遭到双方的排斥,情理之中。无
论理解还是排斥,都不会动摇他相信神创造万物的信仰根本,也不会影响他在科研上取
得成就。 |
|
B********0 发帖数: 1153 | 30 还想让我回头?
早说过我不热衷搜,而是注重亲身体会。再说我敬佩Dr. Collins,为何要搜些对他不
尊的东西展示在这里?
只是回答姐姐的问题,没打算论。 |
|
J*****3 发帖数: 4298 | 31 那么你得承认这里的讨论里没有人认为COLLINS反科学反理性。 |
|
J*****3 发帖数: 4298 | 32 这里没有人或者这么说,真正理智的人,不会认为COLLINS信神导进化论是反科学反理
智。这里被拍的多的大部分是是极端教义者。 |
|
B********0 发帖数: 1153 | 33 你的回复我读了,我没问题,你的问题我到包子楼讨论。
你问我答,实话实说,这样还被拍,姐姐怎么忍心下手?
Dr. Collins对进化论的认识当然比我水平高,也比你支持的“进化论”档次高。谁说
他不承认遗传变异是事实了?谁说我不承认遗传变异是事实了?你认为遗传变异和进化
是什么关系?
恕我冒昧,你举的例子就说明你是信进化论。科学不是用来信的,但相信科学并不一定
是迷信。不是每个人都是科研人员,不是每个科研人员都涉及各个领域,不是每个涉及
某个领域的科研人员都是专家。相信科学有何不可?只是不要用自己相信的去否定他人
相信的。
学研究不可能不承认遗传/变异是事实。
------------------------------
还有什么叫我信的科学,科学是和宗教一样用来迷信的吗?我没让你迷信进化论,但是
你所说的那些你认为不是事实的东西,恰恰是事实,而且人类可以利用这个原则,进行
人工选择。 |
|
J*****3 发帖数: 4298 | 34 总结下,你是神创论的支持者,不过地球的年龄还是古老的,不是常常喊要以
COLLINS为榜样,那去科普下进化论 |
|
l****y 发帖数: 44 | 35 最近面试了他们家的software engineer. 感觉公司还不错,就是城市荒凉了些。有了
解 rockwell collins的童鞋们,能
share一下你们对此公司的看法吗?谢了先!
面试时遇见了很多arospace的,所以上此版来问问。 |
|
d*********e 发帖数: 3835 | 36 also, engineering staff at collins are expected to be working 50+ hour weeks
regularly |
|
|
h**********r 发帖数: 671 | 38 当然牛了,NAE member了吧。他那篇背靠背文章可是s b领域的扛鼎之作啊。引发一波
的genetic circuit和各种振荡啊(lingchou,liao的)。当年看一本混沌还是啥玩意儿
的书。一看到这两篇文章的微分方程,和混沌非线性都几乎一样的。当时就刺瞎了我的
鉿金硬化狗眼。心想MD玩得儿真酷。
你听听这一系列的podcast吧(NAE/NAS做的)
mp3 在线听和downlaod的连接来了。
http://www.keckfutures.org/conferences/synthetic-biology/Podcas
其中就有对James J. Collins的采访,挺科普的。很早以前我下载自己的mp3听了下,
就记得他说自己是物理/engineering背景。当然还有Ron Weiss, Arnold这些人的采访。
讨论完了,千老我又得鲁试管去了。 |
|
m**p 发帖数: 2471 | 39 哥,你谦虚啦!你的帖子很好,很长知识啊
世上总有超人出。我看人对SB感兴趣,高兴啊;看到有信心有雄心要去collins,
church,或者voigt,elowitz,weiss实验室的,更高兴了。
心生祝福,也想多说两句,可就怕影响了人家。呵呵
这个倒没必要晒了。很多也是机缘巧合。想前几天讨论的那位女士。很多这样的例子,
就不一一翻旧账了。也许LZ有别的特长吧,总的老说SB领域差不多已经沦为伪高帅富灌
水的乐土,一堆穷挫矮........ |
|
s********b 发帖数: 66 | 40 2004年毕业的好悲催,准备考药学院了,请问谁有Dr.Collins的复习资料么?谢谢啦 |
|
y*****a 发帖数: 210 | 41 Dr. Collins pcat study guide 不能公开转卖的,是侵权 |
|
V********m 发帖数: 50 | 42 借贴求Dr Collins PCAT 资料,有得童鞋请PM我,谢谢 |
|
s********y 发帖数: 48 | 43 I have Dr. Collins PCAT with January 2013 update and previous updates.
Email: [email protected]
/* */ |
|
D**********n 发帖数: 3753 | 44 RT
我打算报考7月份的考试
目前研究了一下
据说Dr. Collins的Self Study Course很有帮助
官网要卖300多
求share买这个材料
如果有人已经买了最新的2018版
我可以share费用
求一套扫描版和后续update即可
联系:
[email protected]
多谢多谢! |
|
D**********n 发帖数: 3753 | 45 RT
我打算报考7月份的考试
目前研究了一下
据说Dr. Collins的Self Study Course很有帮助
官网要卖300多
求share买这个材料
如果有人已经买了最新的2018版
我可以share费用
求一套扫描版和后续update即可
联系:
[email protected]
多谢多谢! |
|
k******y 发帖数: 236 | 46 本人所学专业和sociology相差甚远,平时读些相关的书纯属无聊消遣,近来读Randall
Collins的The discovery of
society,觉得实在是本很有意思的社会学理论的入门书,虽然不像雷蒙阿隆的书或者
Alexander的书那样出名,可是遣词
造句独具风格,逻辑框架也自成体系,特别是把Freud和Nietzsche纳入社会学理论发展
的考察,实在是其它各种对理论史
的讲述里少有的,所以觉得很应该推荐一下,特别是对只以消遣为目的或只为入门的读
者 |
|
n******g 发帖数: 17225 | 47 很佩服Randall Collins,他似乎精通社会学很多领域。
Randall |
|