b****r
发帖数: 1272 | 1 thanks 对申请肯定没啥帮助 如果不想考SAT的话英爱就是社区大学一条路了
南湾有什么COMMU COLLEGE推荐的麽？
master |
|
|
c**s
发帖数: 23 | 3 包子给了，也写写community+commue的情况好么？ |
|
|
i********m
发帖数: 934 | 5 exactly what i want to say.
but $55 x2 for commu everyday will be too expensive for most people. |
|
|
k**n
发帖数: 3989 | 7 贴个全的
Communix - 概述
Communix是流行操作系统的一种。曾经与Windows并称世界两大主流操作系统。版本、
分支众多。采用单一内核模式和集中式系统资源管理模式。但目前装机数量已经大不如
前。
Communix - 早期发展
Communix操作系统最早是两个德国人Marx和Engles开发的（称为Communix基础版，或
Communix 1.0和2.0），遵守GPL，它的早期支持者曾经先后组织过两个国际讨论区。
当时少数先进的国家都使用微软的Windows，其他的绝大多数国家要么用DOS，要么作为
受Windows主机控制的远程终端，相比之下， Communix支持的机子很少，但移植
Communix的努力一直就没停止过。最早是以法国为主的一些人在巴黎、里昂等地移植过
，但失败了。
Communix - 俄版Communix
此后Communix分成两条路发展，一条是删除一些不兼容的代码，把Communix移植到
Windows运行；反对微软的另一批人在俄国著名程序员 Lenin的领导下，在俄国移植
Communix获得成功（第一次发行时称为俄版Communi... 阅读全帖 |
|
t*n
发帖数: 14458 | 8 看不动
累
贴个全的
Communix - 概述
Communix是流行操作系统的一种。曾经与Windows并称世界两大主流操作系统。版本、
分支众多。采用单一内核模式和集中式系统资源管理模式。但目前装机数量已经大不如
前。
Communix - 早期发展
Communix操作系统最早是两个德国人Marx和Engles开发的（称为Communix基础版，或
Communix 1.0和2.0），遵守GPL，它的早期支持者曾经先后组织过两个国际讨论区。
当时少数先进的国家都使用微软的Windows，其他的绝大多数国家要么用DOS，要么作为
受Windows主机控制的远程终端，相比之下， Communix支持的机子很少，但移植
Communix的努力一直就没停止过。最早是以法国为主的一些人在巴黎、里昂等地移植过
，但失败了。
Communix - 俄版Communix
此后Communix分成两条路发展，一条是删除一些不兼容的代码，把Communix移植到
Windows运行；反对微软的另一批人在俄国著名程序员 Lenin的领导下，在俄国移植
Communix获得成功（第一次发行时称为俄版... 阅读全帖 |
|
c*****e
发帖数: 436 | 9 来自主题: PsychoAnalysis版 - 住宿影响学习 搜了一篇文章
The daily grind: How 'commuting' is bad for the soul
Commuting does seem to have its downsides. The type of commuting I am
refering to is commuting done by millions of college students each and every
day. As a student who has always lived on campus or within a block or two,
I can say it has been worth every extra penny spent.
I have commuted a day or two at a time with my girlfriend and some friends
who choose to commute every day and to me it is a main factor as to why many
college commu |
|
a****b
发帖数: 489 | 10 There are some questions you should ask yourself first. I think these
questions will help you to find a way to improve you situation a little bit?
1.Do you often/always feel nervous?
2.Do you like to say some jokes during the conversation with others?
3.Do you like to watch movies? In the latest 2 months, was there some movies
/TV plays can make you devote yourself into it and make you feel very happy
, excited and satisfied?
4.Do you often take part in some activities in which you need to commu |
|
C*****e
发帖数: 367 | 11 【 以下文字转载自 Church 俱乐部 】
发信人: CCBible (神同在圣经), 信区: Church
标 题: Glossary to the Westminster Confession
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Apr 24 21:16:33 2012, 美东)
Glossary to the Westminster Confession
Explanations of all archaic and uncommon words, usages, and expressions, in
the order in which they occur.
Title Confession. n. Public statement of religious beliefs.
1.1 Providence. n. Divine care. Manifest. v. Show. Are they. idiom. T
hey are. Unto. prep. With regard to. Sundry. adj. Separate. D... 阅读全帖 |
|
P***u
发帖数: 36 | 12 【 以下文字转载自 EE 讨论区 】
【 原文由 Plusu 所发表 】
什么级别的，录用容易吗？
另外，ieee Trans.commu 的审稿周期大概是多少时间？
就怕审稿一下来个一年，又不敢投别的期刊 |
|
b******m
发帖数: 551 | 13 health comm top 10
University School/Department "Scholarly Quality of
Program Faculty"
Pennsylvania, University of Annenberg School for Communication 1.
71
Pennsylvania State University Department of Comm Arts and Sciences
1.71
Michigan State University College of Communication Arts & Sciences
1.73
Illinois, University of-Urbana-Champaign Department of Speech
Communication 2.04
Georgia, University of Department of Speech Commu |
|
r****r
发帖数: 9 | 14 heihei,
let's see how many Xidianese here:
Name Class Email
RRRRRR 29912 x***[email protected] |
|
w********g
发帖数: 121 | 15 有个idea适合写综述或者概念文章，打算投IEEE computer 或者Comm. of ACM，那个声誉
要好些？还有SIGMod Record如何？这些magazine文章有没有什么分量?
这两个都是月刊，是不是审稿周期也短些？其他很多IEEE transactions都要半年以上。 |
|
f*****p
发帖数: 235 | 16 Not everybody can write survey or idea paper. |
|
S*********r
发帖数: 4729 | 17 IEEE computer是偏硬件，系统设计的文章。
如果你的是概念性的东西，还是comm of ACM对口。
但是这个杂志更像是交流性质的，不是被邀请的或者大牛的文章，
一般很难收吧。
声誉
上。 |
|
s*****o
发帖数: 1540 | 18
个
I think you have no idea of what is Comm of ACM
CACM is the best magazine in the field. There is no way to publish a idea of
survey paper if you are not a bull. You may have read some papers from CACM,
saying "ha, this paper is simple, I can write the same one". You are totally
wrong.
Can you publish a idea or survey on "Science" or "Nature"?
Bull can but we can not.
以 |
|
s*****o
发帖数: 1540 | 19
那
年
In term of reputation, CACM is better than IEEE computer.
CACM is better than most IEEE Trans or ACM trans. Believe me.
IEEE computer is okey, no better than Trans. |
|
w********g
发帖数: 121 | 20 I saw a student in out dept wrote 2 CACM papers before, all 4-page papers
on a relatively narrow field maybe he was invited to a special issue of CACM,
not sure....
this guy also watered some papers on IEEE Computer, but his boss once told
me he is good at building fancy things without abstraction and generalization.
maybe his field is too narrow, not many competitions, other fields are much
tougher |
|
f*****p
发帖数: 235 | 21 Maybe he's the son of AE or EoC; maybe his professor is a super bull/cow...
Anyway, it doesn't hurt to try. Just go ahead and good luck. |
|
w***f
发帖数: 75 | 22 I read almost every issues of CACM in the recent three years. Not all the
articles (I can not use the word "paper" here) in CACM are written by
bulls, some of them are written by students and the contents really suck
sometimes, maybe the topic of the article fits the main theme of a specific
issue quite well. For example, there is one issue of CACM this year about
high technology/outsourcing in China. A couple of papers there were written
by some novice students, the contents really suck, not to |
|
f*****p
发帖数: 235 | 23 The the EoC should be blamed. |
|
w***f
发帖数: 75 | 24 The problem is "All the articles in CACM are not peer reviewed".
It's beyond the capability of the EoC to determine the quality of a
submission. |
|
s*****o
发帖数: 1540 | 25 hey, man, I read every issue of CACM for last 5 years and beyond.
What I am talking about is the RESEARCH PAPER in CACM, not letter, not
news, not editional articles. Do you count News in "Science" as a research
paper?
high technology/outsourcing in China is categoried as "news" or something else
rather than research paper. of course, you may want to use "article" instead
of "paper", because CACM is limited by the page and details. however,
articles in CACM can also be classified as "research or |
|
w***f
发帖数: 75 | 26 Hey man. Don't lie in your reply.
1. Just look at April 2005 volume 48, No 4. There are 7 articles totaling
almost 40 pages about China hypes there. Do you call them news? Read those
articles(or research papers according to your standard) before you reply,
I highly doubt your claim.
2. Read my post again before you argue. My main point is - "You can not
call those CACM articles "research paper" because they are not peer-reviewed. |
|
r*****y
发帖数: 507 | 27 The famous RSA algorithm is published as a non peer-reviewed article too.
Because it is orignally published in CACM.
peer-reviewed.
else
instead
the
specific
about
written
many
you
of
Chinese
CACM
was |
|
s*****o
发帖数: 1540 | 28 you are right, 老鳄鱼...
I read every issue, but I forgot most of them.
haha...
peer-reviewed.
else
instead
the
specific
about
written
many
you
of
Chinese
CACM
was |
|
b**g
发帖数: 335 | 29 今日的 CACM哪能跟十多年前的比啊,早就变成PC Magazine之类的杂志,无聊至极
真要看点学术的东西应该是Journal of ACM |
|
m*******n
发帖数: 154 | 30 papers in Journal of ACM are generally theoretical, ACM trans are of very high
quality too and specilize in sub-areas of CS. |
|
m*****r
发帖数: 9 | 31 其实Journal of ACM 原则上讲并不都是理论文章.但是它有一个要求,须have
fundamental significance.这样一来,能入选的大底就是理论性很强的了,因为一般的文
章看起来都不太难,没太大深度.其实SIAM J.OF COMPUTING 也很不错.今日的 CACM是远远
不能跟十,二十多年前的比了.很多东西毫无学术价值.
high
too. |
|
b********l
发帖数: 27 | 32 其实CACM灌水也是不难的，俺就灌过一篇，也是research paper
那个paper按自己都没看过一遍。 |
|
m******t
发帖数: 805 | 33 我原来发帖在ee，后来感觉可能发错地方，所以重新换个地方发一下，多谢啦！
大家好，我有个亲戚申请美国的MS拿到了以下offer 想请教一下哪个比较好
现在收到的有
publishing：digital and print media @NYU
tech commu &media arts @Michigan StateU
以及New Media Management @ Syracuse Univ
后面两个以人机交互为方向，也是他比较喜欢的。
我这个亲戚主要想以美国就业为目的。
想请问各位大侠哪个比较好一点。
因为我不是这个专业，所以也不懂。如果发错版面，请告知。
多谢 |
|
m******t
发帖数: 805 | 34 我原来发帖在ee，后来感觉可能发错地方，所以重新换个地方发一下，多谢啦！
大家好，我有个亲戚申请美国的MS拿到了以下offer 想请教一下哪个比较好
现在收到的有
publishing：digital and print media @NYU
tech commu &media arts @Michigan StateU
以及New Media Management @ Syracuse Univ
后面两个以人机交互为方向，也是他比较喜欢的。
我这个亲戚主要想以美国就业为目的。
想请问各位大侠哪个比较好一点。
因为我不是这个专业，所以也不懂。如果发错版面，请告知。
多谢 |
|
B*****e
发帖数: 1005 | 35 当时有人说Nat Commu 比science translational medicine. |
|
s******l
发帖数: 125 | 36 1 Nature系列
Nature系列是赢家，Nature发表文章数逐年减少，又猛发cancer genomics papers，
会继续升。Nature Communications创刊以来争议不断，但第一个IF达到7，想知未来须
看历史，很多Nature子刊第一个都在6左右，包括Nature Methods, Nature Nano,
Nature Chem, Nat Physics，现在Nature Methods已达20，大多子刊在十几或20以上。
Nature Communications会继续升。因其发表数量多，但主攻小领域， 可能会抢很多
二线杂志 (在本专业内Top)papers， 因此未来几年可能下降的杂志有：PNAS, PLoS
Biol, Plant Cell, Gene Dev, Dev Cell, Curr Biol 等。Nature 搞了个类似 PLoS
One 的杂志叫 Scientific Reports。因没有在杂志加Nature，估计不能于PLoS One抗
衡。因PLoS系列曾被看好，PLoS One沾了大光，有些好paper被忽悠进去了。其IF不... 阅读全帖 |
|
s******l
发帖数: 125 | 37 1 Nature系列
Nature系列是赢家，Nature发表文章数逐年减少，又猛发cancer genomics papers，
会继续升。Nature Communications创刊以来争议不断，但第一个IF达到7，想知未来须
看历史，很多Nature子刊第一个都在6左右，包括Nature Methods, Nature Nano,
Nature Chem, Nat Physics，现在Nature Methods已达20，大多子刊在十几或20以上。
Nature Communications会继续升。因其发表数量多，但主攻小领域， 可能会抢很多
二线杂志 (在本专业内Top)papers， 因此未来几年可能下降的杂志有：PNAS, PLoS
Biol, Plant Cell, Gene Dev, Dev Cell, Curr Biol 等。Nature 搞了个类似 PLoS
One 的杂志叫 Scientific Reports。因没有在杂志加Nature，估计不能于PLoS One抗
衡。因PLoS系列曾被看好，PLoS One沾了大光，有些好paper被忽悠进去了。其IF不... 阅读全帖 |
|
j***s
发帖数: 42 | 38 one page commu. paper might not be enough to land faculty job
nevertheless it's a Science paper |
|
p*****c
发帖数: 20445 | 39 应该是标准据信，想当年我们投nature被拒，编辑也是建议投nat commu，话说当时根
本没听说过这个东东，没考虑。。。
我觉得cell report应该不错，我们Journal club做过一篇它的paper |
|
p*****c
发帖数: 20445 | 40 应该是标准据信，想当年我们投nature被拒，编辑也是建议投nat commu，话说当时根
本没听说过这个东东，没考虑。。。
我觉得cell report应该不错，我们Journal club做过一篇它的paper |
|
o**4
发帖数: 35028 | 41 nature commu主要是个跨领域的杂志，
跟PNAS一样，在圈外影响力也很大； |
|
x****6
发帖数: 4339 | 42 看了一下，首先祝贺发了nat commu的一作。
类似approach的文章读了很多，用微分方程来研究细胞/组织内动态的人越来越多，q-
bio这个新领域基本都是干这个的。我个人很欣赏这种生物定量化的尝试！
三个疑问？
1. 你们用了9个微分方程来描述这个系统，涉及20+个参数，这些参数的取值都是实验
测出来的吗？系统的行为对这些参数，特别是估测的，敏感吗？
2. 你们的模型除了fit观测数据以后，有没有做出预测，并且指导实验去验证？
3. 有没有考虑过噪音可能对系统造成的影响？文章开头提了异质性细胞群体，但是模
型里没有噪音项？
谢谢。 |
|
x****6
发帖数: 4339 | 43 话糙理不糙，你说的这点区别和我上面讲的建模的dilemma是相通的。实用性并不是科
学一定追求的；科学追求的是对客观世界的理解。所以一般物理学家倾向于用最简单的
模型因为简单才能够被人脑理解；而用简单来描述复杂往往伴随着“美”。
建模也有实用的那一部分，其实就是工程了。比如药物代谢、发酵罐控制，这些模型直
接指导医学和工业的实践，参数肯定是要很详细的。
上面Nat commu作者的工作，我认为属于前面一种。 |
|
G*P
发帖数: 214 | 44 审稿一个多月了，从投稿算起40多天了，还没动静。。。
大家也都是这么慢吗？要不要问问editor？ |
|
j******i
发帖数: 939 | 45 Genome Research审了两个半月的飘过 这要是据了 novelty都被毁了 |
|
|
|
l******a
发帖数: 3339 | 48 为啥commumication？全文去哪儿？
我菜鸟，只发全文，没发过commu，不明白这是怎么work的？
拨云见日～ |
|
r********r
发帖数: 11248 | 49 polynomial time means anything like n^k, where n in the input size of the
problem and k is a CONSTANT. So for example, if algorithms run in
O(n^2), O(n^100), O(n^100000), they are all polynomial time algorithms.
Exponential time, like 2^n is not a polynomial time, and anything bigger
than polynomial time is not practical in reality (actually when k > 3,
polynomail time algorithms isnot very useful already).
P is set of problems (not algorithms) that can be solved (rigous word is
decided) in poly |
|
