b****y
发帖数: 81 | 1 strongly sp!
well done
http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-2237-598917.html
致《自然》杂志总编的信：有关叶诗文的新闻报道 精选
英文原信附后，大意如下：
斐尔,
你可能因Ewen Callaway对叶诗文的报道而被email狂炸，过去二十小时，给你
email的人里面小部分也给我来信。
如果你奇怪《自然》非本质部分一篇报道为何带来这么大的反应，你应该高兴
中文读者比世界其他读者更看重你们的新闻报道，与科学相关的（即使关系很小）也可
能重于《纽约时报》，中文媒体报道用你们的新闻也远多于一般西方媒体用你们的新闻。
Callaway报道最好也是草率、最差是种族偏见：1)最初的副标题暗示叶可能舞
弊; 2)Callaway用了两件事实说明叶惊人地异常，而两件都错了; 3)Callaway没咨询意
见不同的专家，导致报道不平衡，低于公平报道的最低标准。所以，Callaway至少不负
责任，可能太快就暗示中国运动员容易舞弊。他肯定没有达到新闻报道的通常标准。
我很高兴看到在... 阅读全帖 |
|
p*****m
发帖数: 7030 | 2 目前两天内收集到1100多签名，远远出乎我最早的预料（本来就是个人行动，后来有
Mitbbs网友愿意支持，我想有几十个支持就很好了）。计划明天伦敦工作日内发出。
抗议信也吸收了许多许多支持者的建议，尽量避免情绪化。但是我们还是不会拘泥于文章
的事实/逻辑问题，而会明白说出文章隐含的偏见色彩。我现在认为抗议本身也许能够
延伸出如何定义我们这个群体的public image,以及如何消除西方媒体民众对我们群体
image的stereotype的问题。当然这个不是小小一个抗议能起效的，明天我会写一个长
贴和大家讨论讨论
下面是抗议正式版:) 很多人的意见非常好，但是我没能力找出名字一一感谢了。。这
三天收了至少2000封email，回了1000封，还得给女儿喂奶哄睡，手快要断了:)
Dear Philip Campbell, Ph.D. and Editor-in-Chief of Nature,
We are a group of contributors, subscribers, and readers of Nature residing
in more than 20 countr... 阅读全帖 |
|
s*****j
发帖数: 6435 | 3 "MIT’s investigation also found that Dr. Thyagarajan was solely
responsible for the scientific misconduct that resulted in the falsified or
fabricated data. "
professor |
|
a********h
发帖数: 245 | 4 The sad and sobering tale of how allegedly fabricated results of research
led by a Johns Hopkins University lab led to the suicide of a scientist in
Taiwan,and the dismissal of the man who blew the whistle, are the focus of a
feature in yesterday's Washington Post.
The story is the tale of Daniel Yuan, formerly a genetics researcher in Jeff
Boeke's lab at Hopkins. For years, Yuan suggested that data being generated
in the lab's studies of gene interactions in yeast were suspicious.
Yuan was dism... 阅读全帖 |
|
a********h
发帖数: 245 | 5 The sad and sobering tale of how allegedly fabricated results of research
led by a Johns Hopkins University lab led to the suicide of a scientist in
Taiwan,and the dismissal of the man who blew the whistle, are the focus of a
feature in yesterday's Washington Post.
The story is the tale of Daniel Yuan, formerly a genetics researcher in Jeff
Boeke's lab at Hopkins. For years, Yuan suggested that data being generated
in the lab's studies of gene interactions in yeast were suspicious.
Yuan was dism... 阅读全帖 |
|
s**i
发帖数: 4448 | 6 You can keep deluding yourself.
Evolution is a fact, the majority of biologists without ideological agenda
accepts that. Evolution theory was proposed as a hypothesis to explain the
origin of species and that hypothesis has withstood most rigorous scrutiny
and never proven wrong.Therefore, it is accepted by biologists as a proven
theory just as theory of relativity, gravity...
Religious zealots don't accept it for ideological motives. That's all.
Some non religious people don't accept it due to... 阅读全帖 |
|
D***s
发帖数: 5613 | 7 The recent outbreak of measles originating at Disneyland has brought to
light a False Claims Act complaint in 2010 against vaccine manufacturer
Merck & Co. (MRK).
Two virologists who worked at Merck, Stephen Krahling and Joan Wlochowski,
filed a suit that was unsealed in 2010 accusing the company of falsifying
its mumps vaccine test results to hit an efficacy rate of 95 percent.
According to the scientists, Merck added animal antibodies to a blood sample
to give the impression of increased antib... 阅读全帖 |
|
i***9
发帖数: 106 | 8 The University of Alabama at Birmingham has requested that the Research
Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank remove certain
protein structure files deposited by a former UAB employee. UAB also has
identified nine publications related to the same protein structures that
should be retracted from various scientific journals, and is making those
journals aware of this matter.
Allegations of data fabrication and/or falsification were made concerning
certain protein structures... 阅读全帖 |
|
a*****c
发帖数: 53 | 9 Rise to prominence[edit]
Schön's field of research was condensed matter physics and
nanotechnology.[3] He received his Ph.D. from the University of Konstanz in
1997. In late 1997 he was hired by Bell Labs, located in New Jersey, United
States. There, he worked on electronics in which conventional semiconducting
elements (such as silicon) were replaced by crystalline organic materials.
Specific organic materials can conduct electrical currents, and in a so-
called field-effect transistor (a ... 阅读全帖 |
|
发帖数: 1 | 10 撰文 | 刘爱生（浙江师范大学田家炳教育科学研究院）
责编 | 李晓明
摘要
美国高校相对较低的学术不端发生率，与其健全的调查程序和严厉的处罚机制是紧密相
联的。埃里克·玻尔曼案是美国高等教育学术不端史上最具影响力的一个案例。在此案
调查的过程中，各个相关部门严格遵照美国联邦政府颁布的关于学术不端处置的文件，
有条不紊地向前推进；针对玻尔曼的处罚，涉及到民事赔偿、行政处罚以及刑事责任。
本案的特殊之处是：行为人是美国历史上第一个因学术不端而被判重罪入狱之人。
此案带来的启示是：在预防和处理学术不端的过程中，高校与政府机构等部门需密切合
作、完善法律法规、坚持程序正当原则、发挥“吹哨人”的关键作用，并辅以严厉的处
罚。而这一切的背后，都需要大学自身坚守很高的道德准则。
● ● ●
在美国高校，学术不端发生的概率相对较低。马丁森（Martinson）等人2005年的一项
针对美国中青年科学研究人员的大规模、匿名调查发现，过去三年内，自我报告有伪造
、篡改和剽窃等学术不端行为的不足2%。[1]其他的调查研究基本上也坚持这个结论。
例如，法那林（Fanelli）2009年的一项调查发现，平均有... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
|
c******n
发帖数: 16403 | 13 兄弟我给你说， 要摆平这事情不是这么搞的。 要举事实讲道理， 光贴大字报大喊大叫
只能适得其反。 |
|
|
|
c******n
发帖数: 16403 | 16 具体的指控我得看文章才知道。 不过你这说话的文风让人想起了文革大字报。 你自己
觉得铿锵有力， 外人却觉得这是很粗鲁的叫嚣和恫吓。 不是学术讨论应有的风格。
把你下的定性的词语删掉，列出你认为可疑的几点提出让stang要求作者解释就可以了。
一上来就下通牒似的指责造假剽窃要求杂志方撤搞上CEN， stang那样回你信已经很斯
文了。 |
|
d****2
发帖数: 26 | 17 Lee Re: Lu ja9037017 / further information needed / 25-Aug-2009
From: j**[email protected]
Sent: Tue 8/25/09 10:46 PM
To: peterhplee
Cc: j**[email protected]
25-Aug-2009
RE: Journal of the American Chemical SocietyManuscript
ID: ja-2009-037017.R1Manuscript
Type: CommunicationManuscript
Title: Hydrogen-Bonding Recognition-Induced Color Change of Gold
Nanoparticles for Visual Detection of Melamine in Raw Milk and Infant
Formula
Author(s): Ai, Kelong; Liu, Yanlan; Lu, Lehui
Dear Dr. Lee:
We ar |
|
c******n
发帖数: 16403 | 18 洋人说得很有道理， 你有啥证据证明这作者偷了你的东西？ 口说无凭， 人家还可
以说你败坏他名誉
没证据那你就是无理取闹。 |
|
|
|
d****2
发帖数: 26 | 21 朱大明：学术论文发表意味着什么
学术论文写作与发表是科研工作的重要组成部分，在基础理论研究领域更是如此。将发
表论文的数量和质量作为科研绩效考核或学术能力评定的重要指标，并与学位申请、职
称评定以及课题申报等直接挂钩本无可厚非。对科研人员而言，追求学术创新，发表高
水平有价值的科学论文，得到学术界和社会的承认，进而获得相应的学术地位应该说是
自然而然的事。但时下在一些人心目中，第一要义不是学术，而是学位或职称；发表论
文即意味着获取职称、学位、荣誉、奖金或经费——总之是“名利双收”，可谓梦寐以
求。然而，当看到学界某些人包括硕士博士研究生、教授博导以至院长、校长和院士的
论文经检举、查实系抄袭剽窃或弄虚作假等，纷纷被媒体曝光、接受调查，或被通告批
评、行政处分，或被撤销学位或职务时，则不能不令人反思——论文发表究竟意味着什
么？
论文写作最直接的目的应该是，对自己科研成果或学术创见的真实记录、整理和规范化
的书面表达，发表则是为了确认科学发现或发明的优先权，是为了学术交流和科研成果
的推广应用。如果说“写作”无论出于什么动机，采取什么手段，还属于作者个人的事
情，那么，“发表”——通过 |
|
|
|
e****2
发帖数: 2723 | 24 这种大鸣大放解决不了问题
我这里有ACS有机会员EMAIL地址共计30000个, 直接群发是最好的学术上的行刑.从学术
上能达到彻底消灭的目的.
有意者联系我.价格大概1000刀.
了。 |
|
S********o
发帖数: 368 | 25
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 哥们，到底想说啥啊。 |
|
|
|
l*****n
发帖数: 1352 | 28 兰方人啊，普通话不利索，多包涵。
这位的1，2都是主观意见，3更是搞笑，呵呵。 |
|
|
|
b*******g
发帖数: 1309 | 31 3点 一点都不在理，我如果是stang，估计快疯了。。。
说人剽窃就要拿出证据，从哪里剽窃的，怎么剽窃，证据是什么。哪些是证据，哪些是你的个人猜测，这才是科学的态度。
“I deeply believe ”这种话就是废话，我还deeply believe你是作者的死对头，有意要搞臭作者呢。别整天臆想。没有证据就是Stang相信你说的，他也不敢随便撤paper
你真的想要搞掉这篇paper，你就必须：
1.拿出人家剽窃的证据，没有证据最多是有剽窃嫌疑，嫌疑永远是嫌疑，Stang 永远不会撤paper。
2. 针对文章的问题，你应该要求作者提供新的实验数据和解释。比如，为什么NMR跟文献不符，提供高分辨的ESI-MS，等等，而不是像你这么个说法：
(2) The reported compound MTT was not fully characterized and the provided proton NMR is inconsistent with the literature (Ma, M. et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 14456-1 |
|
d****2
发帖数: 26 | 32 Any expert can give Mass Spectroscopy lesson here?
"这个ESI-MS spectrum不清楚，你既不能断定是melamine，也不能断定不是。你怎么知
道ESI不是Melamine，这个是你的猜测，你又把你的猜测当成你的证据了，这个太可怕
，你要是能猜对所有事情，可以不做试验直接在家写paper了。有些ESI没调好，分辨率
搞得差，导致broad peak 完全有可能的，你应该是要求提供high resolution 的ESI-
MS spectrum， 然后再说这个是不是melamine" I am sure that the Chemistry Major
undergraduate students will not write these sentences.
The claims can be found in
http://www.mscience.org/bbs/showpost.aspx?id=61891
(1) Using the solution stabilized with 1 micro M melamin |
|
b*******g
发帖数: 1309 | 33 我就是做MS的，所以估计不用你来教育我MS的知识
至少我看来，MS数据不严谨，但是你也不可能从一个不严谨的数据得到不是melamine的
结论？
你要完全确认这个结构至少要高分辨MS，加MS/MS，否则你不能说不是melamine
Malamine 的第一个isotope峰只有5%，如果是分辨率不好的ESI，确实就是这样的峰
另外你就不用教育我了，没有确凿证据，你就是在这里喊一万遍，也没屁用，
我是周末闲着没事才无聊回复你的。
Major |
|
d****2
发帖数: 26 | 34
I wish that you were not the so-called MS expert who ran the ESI-MS. I
can tell you that these are not real ESI-MS spectroscopic data but some
graphs made-up by some one.
In addition, I have solid evidences to prove that all data in ja9037017 were fictionalized. I will try all my ways to have the paper be withdrawn and to have these unethical authors be punished.
|
|
|
v*****s
发帖数: 20290 | 36 ☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
langzixin (浪子无恨) 于 (Tue Dec 22 15:29:04 2009, 美东) 提到:
◇◇新语丝(www.xys.org)(xys4.dxiong.com)(www.xysforum.org)(xys2.dropin.org)
◇◇
井冈山大学的70篇论文被一次性撤销
井冈山大学H. Zhong的41篇论文和T. Liu的29篇论文被Acta
Crystallographica Sections E or C撤销，同时井冈山大学被放入黑名单。
http://journals.iucr.org/e/issues/2010/01/00/me0406/
The initial set of falsified structures arises from two groups.
The correspondence authors are Dr H. Zhong and Professor T. Liu, both
from Jinggangshan University, Jia |
|
q***l
发帖数: 177 | 37 Former Pennsylvania State University electrical engineering professor Craig
Grimes, considered a world leader in materials science, has been charged
with misusing $3 million in federal research grants.
The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Pennsylvania accused
Grimes on Jan. 31 of misusing $1.2 million in grants from the National
Institutes of Health and of falsifying information when applying for a $1.9
million grant through the American Recovery & Reinvestment Act. If convicted... 阅读全帖 |
|
c******r
发帖数: 889 | 38 One can never falsify something that doesn't really exist. Can you prove
that God doesn't exist? Can you prove that dragons don't exist? If you
cannot, is it valid proof that they do exist?
Another example: can you prove you don't owe me a million? If you cannot,
then you must owe me a million.
A basic rule of a valid discussion is that the burden of proof rests on whom
making propositions. Not the other way around. |
|
c****n
发帖数: 21367 | 39 你说的这句话我没有翻到，但肯定有包括“but”的后半截。
就是Kuhn也不能随便出噱头啊。:) 你看看是不是吧。
我理解Kuhn的夸张表达是为了强调科学总会在基础假设层面发现不足，
遇到新问题，然后falsify一些假设，扩张新的进来。own destruction，
太夸张了，什么时候源于实践的科学被毁灭过，除了失传。
现在实践中用的，基本都是经验模型。可以说理论远远不能指导
或者替代经验模型的作用。当然你可以说这是什么pre-paradigm phase。 |
|
m*****n
发帖数: 3575 | 40 牛顿的这句话没有falsibility
任何物体在不受外力作用时，总保持静止状态或匀速直线运动状态
你try to falsify 一个？ |
|
w*********s
发帖数: 2136 | 41 【 以下文字转载自 Parenting 讨论区 】
发信人: whiteclouds (/ 参考消息 /), 信区: Parenting
标 题: CDC被指伪造报告--隐瞒3587宗N1H1疫苗引起的流产
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Sep 17 05:27:02 2010, 美东)
CDC allegedly falsifies reports--ignoring up to 3,587 Miscarriages from H1N1
Vaccine
A shocking report http://preventdisease.com/news/pdf/FinalAug18Capture-RecaptureEstmtdMiscrrgs.pdf from the National Coalition of Organized Women (NCOW) presented data from two different sources demonstrating that the 2009/10 H1N1 vaccines contributed to an esti |
|
l******r
发帖数: 3472 | 42 文科生就不要看了，看了也看不懂。
各位看完了，看懂了，写个读后感吧。
A Brief History of Time 第一章中的一段。
In order to talk about the nature of the universe and to discuss questions such as whether it has a beginning or an end, you have to be clear about what a scientific theory is. I shall take the simpleminded view that a theory is just a model of the universe, or a restricted part of it, and a set of rules that relate quantities in the model to observations that we make. It exists only in our minds and does not have any other real... 阅读全帖 |
|
p****e
发帖数: 183 | 43 这篇讲得透彻，多谢。最关键是这句：
Any physical theory is always provisional, in the sense that it is only a
hypothesis: you can never prove it. No matter how many times the results of
experiments agree with some theory, you can never be sure that the next time
the result will not contradict the theory. On the other hand, you can
disprove a theory by finding even a single observation that disagrees with
the predictions of the theory.
就是说某人非要给物理、医学理论做什么“数学证明”，那他基本上是民科。
such as whether it has a beginning or an en... 阅读全帖 |
|
C*S
发帖数: 1658 | 44 【 以下文字转载自 Military 讨论区 】
发信人: vPro (沉默杀手), 信区: Military
标 题: 华盛顿州又有个老中faculty被FBI抓了，骗了八百万
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Feb 25 19:52:56 2016, 美东)
谁来八一八
http://www.the-leader.com/article/20160224/NEWS/160229840
By Derrick Ek
[email protected]/* */
Posted Feb. 24, 2016 at 7:28 PM
A former Horseheads couple have been charged with illegally receiving $8
million in research grants from federal agencies.
According to a news release Wednesday from U.S. Attorney William J. Hochul
Jr., three people have bee... 阅读全帖 |
|
S***x
发帖数: 2382 | 45 我很感兴趣profit maximization经常被啥assumption取代?
by the way,你这句话我很喜欢,"有意义的是换了假定，结论会有什么不同。"
也许这就是编辑想让我写的东西，也是我不愿意写的东西，因为用我的替换profit maximization之后不是有什么结论会不同，而是所有结论都会不同。I mean: EVERYTHING
我就不想高调说 it falsifies neo-classical marginal analysis and all research built up on it. 我希望藏起来说,就像跟某人老婆说他老公有外遇，你会直说么，当然是绕着弯子说你老公是不是经常回家很晚呀，有空去看看他呀之类的。这就是为啥editor问我scope，显然他没明白，嗯 |
|
z***c
发帖数: 2959 | 46
你不会连这个都不知道吧？我记得MWG有一节专门讨论这个。不是MWG就是另外一本
微观教材。最常用的一个替代是市场占有最大化。还有其他。
maximization之后不是有什么结论会不同，而是所有结论都会不同。I mean:
EVERYTHING
你举个例子看，profit maximization最简单的一个推论价格上涨，其他条件不变，
供应增加，这个你的结论难道是供应不变或者下降？
research built up on it. 我希望藏起来说。这就是为啥editor问我scope，嗯
你这藏着捂着说话真累，profit maximization和maginal analysis根本不是一个场面上
的事，某种意义上说，前者只是后者的一个子集。前者不完美，你不能下结论falsify后
者。 |
|
j********n
发帖数: 2 | 47 Someone has written the falsification in Jiubin Tan’s Ph.D. thesis before,
and I will state it again.
テー ツユ ピー
谭久彬さんのデータ偽造問題
Jiubin Tan falsified research data
Dr. Jiubin Tan, Professor& Director of ultra-precision measurement lab at
Harbin Institute of Technology (HIT), is a worldwide known scientist in the
special research area of ultra-precision roundness measurement and
cylindrical measurement. However, in the last seven years, serious doubts
are being expressed over the accuracy of data in |
|
L***z
发帖数: 454 | 48 Recently I met with a friend who had trouble in getting the proof for his work
experience back in China. This kind of documents seem to be necessary for bar
admission. The problem for him is not that he falsified his background but
that it's close to impossibility for him to ask for such work proof due to
various reasons: he left quite a long time ago; the government unit he worked
for said that there was no such precedent to issue such proof; he had to make
all the contacts here in United State |
|
J****n
发帖数: 937 | 49 This is quite simple, people who doesn't have a employer sponsored DCA or
doesn't have a kid, please don't give misleading information.
The account is called DCA (dependent care acount, not FSA, or Flexible
Spending Account), DCA money can only be used for child care, FSA can be
used for other things, for example, medical expenses.
DCA money is use-or-lose it, the deadline to file claim is usually 4/1, to
file claim, you need valid receipt from a care giver with their tax id.
Receipt from foreig... 阅读全帖 |
|
J****n
发帖数: 937 | 50 This is quite simple, people who doesn't have a employer sponsored DCA or
doesn't have a kid, please don't give misleading information.
The account is called DCA (dependent care acount, not FSA, or Flexible
Spending Account), DCA money can only be used for child care, FSA can be
used for other things, for example, medical expenses.
DCA money is use-or-lose it, the deadline to file claim is usually 4/1, to
file claim, you need valid receipt from a care giver with their tax id.
Receipt from foreig... 阅读全帖 |
|
