c****s
发帖数: 5892 | 1 CBC报道：安大略省警方表示，星期一他们将公布针对省级政府部门和外部供应商的“非正规金融交易”的调查的信息。
来自OPP的警察在周四调查了几个部门，这是他们调查活动的一部分。警方对调查结果守口如瓶，没有透漏是否要起诉。
一名OPP发言人说，警方需要很多时间以便弄清该调查的范围。
“如果有证据证明我们可以起诉了，我们就会起诉。但是现在，我们真的不知道发生了什么，”总监Angie Howe说
上周六，一名政府高级消息人士表示，调查没有涉及刚当选的官员和政务工作人员。
“没有涉及政治家或政务工作人员，” 参与调查的政府消息人士说。该消息人士还表示，警方在调查多个部委。
OPP媒体的官员说， 该部门的分支小组正在进行反非法交易的调查。
这次调查活动在多伦多市中心皇后公园附近Macdonald Block的政府行政楼的区域进行。Macdonald Block有安大略省的能源和基础设施，教育，消费服务等多个政府部门和办事处。
安大略省的房地产公司在这里也有办事处。 |
|
c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 2 unusual vs unusual is popular.
suppose your partner opens 1H, your RHO bids 2NT,
now your double shows that you want to penalize opponents in at least
one suit. your 3C shows a good hand with hearts, at least invitational.
3D: shows good hands with spades. 3H: competitive.
3S: construcative, nonforcing.
The basic principle is that:
cuebidding opp's lower suit shows a good hand with the lower rank
unbid suit;
cuebidding opp's higher suit shows a good hand with the higher rank
unbid suit.
With you |
|
m****9
发帖数: 128 | 3 我好像记得以前有人发帖子，说了用ecb买的，opp很低，做rebate就被拒了，说没花那
么多钱。
做了被拒岂不是赔了？ |
|
c**a
发帖数: 65 | 4 【 以下文字转载自 Actuary 讨论区 】
发信人: caia (luvvie), 信区: Actuary
标 题: Job Opp - Pension,ASA+5y, Boston
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sat Oct 19 13:57:55 2013, 美东)
Focus on liability valuation and modeling. I'm the hiring manager. If
interested you can send resume to me. Here's the job posted on one of the
website -
http://jobs.efinancialcareers.com/job-4000000001280302.htm |
|
j*******e
发帖数: 2168 | 5 I am seeking some gadget after opps' unusual 2NT. Can anyone recommend one?
Thanks!
e.g. First seat, you have
S: K9x
H: Jx
D: Axx
C: A9xxx
and open 1c, LHO bids 2NT showing 2 lowest;
Pd has
S: Axxx
H: AQxx
D: -
C: KQxxx
What should he bid? |
|
f*****x
发帖数: 545 | 6 I like this treatment, but Marshall miles recommend a way to distinguish the
case you can dbl opp's both suits and the case u can dbl only one suit. So
pass then dbl shows you can dbl both suits. direct dbl shows u can dbl one
suit. others are same as u said here.【 在 cozofu (但为君故) 的大作中提到: 】
one? |
|
g******a
发帖数: 667 | 7 This author seems simply to forget there is one parameter of Opp's Opp in the
calculation of SOS. If as he said SEC inflated their schedule by playing
weaker opponents, then we may see the Opp's Opp parameter is much lower,
that's certainly not true. LSU has Opp's Opp as 970-792, while USC has
912-768.
http://usc.rivals.com/showmsg.asp?fid=521&mid=28583004&sid=&tid=28582701&style |
|
f******g
发帖数: 1697 | 8 ☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
stoneblack (opps) 于 (Fri Jul 1 09:07:25 2011, 美东) 提到:
RT
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
stoneblack (opps) 于 (Fri Jul 1 09:09:15 2011, 美东) 提到:
委屈了，抱一下，亲一个。
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
liulinglll (liuliu) 于 (Fri Jul 1 09:15:07 2011, 美东) 提到:
what is 活动置顶?
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
goldenegg (要戴就戴三个表) 于 (Fri Jul 1 09:16:02 2011, 美东) 提到:
本来，也没必要置顶的吧
当然置顶了也好
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
daj... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 9 bergen raise may backfire in many ways.
1
1S 3C: opps can double 3C as take out for free.
2, 1S p 2S, you've shown only 3 card support, so opps might not like to balance
it when it's marginal.
3, 1S 3S, opps are more likely to bid when he knows you have 9 card fit and
weak hand.
4, 1S 3D: opps can double 3D as lead directing for free.
5, when the hand is defensive oriented, 1S 3C may let you go down one
when 2S is just high enough and opps wouldn't bid or if they bid
they may go down |
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 10 Well, not exactly a game theory problem. For game theory problems, you
usually mix your plays and your opps have no way to figure out which holding
you have. For problems like this, if you don't play HK, you are always
hopeless to induce declarer to play a dummy reversal if partner doesn't
return S. So it is a forced false card which shouldn't really work if your
opp knows you well. For most bridge players, this analysis to play the
forced false card is actually good enough to help them win a lo... 阅读全帖 |
|
i****e
发帖数: 642 | 11 Win the lead in hand (good play), then SK. Opps can't duck otherwise a H
ruff will be enough. The best opps can do is to return a trump. Then we
play SJ.
Now opps may have several play. (1) If a trump is played, we clear
trump, and enter dummy via club, so we end up 2S+1H+5D+1C. (2) If opps
play a heart, we need to duck a round so we have control on the suit. If
there is no spade or club ruff now, we are safe. (3) If opps play two
rounds of clubs to remove dummy entry before trumps are cleared... 阅读全帖 |
|
p****r
发帖数: 9164 | 12 I only shove with 22-55 there against opp who raise over 80%. that guy has
been raising 100% on button during the match.
for 25 BB, I usually call with hands like QTs since it plays so well
post flop heads up. by shoving ,most opp will fold hand like Q5o that got
dominated by us and calling with better hand.
for 15BB , calling or shoving depends on opp ,game dynamics etc.Against
a majority opp,I still prefer to call.
for small SCs, to make shoving profitable play, FE is re... 阅读全帖 |
|
s****a
发帖数: 6521 | 13
SP BlkRk Hlth Scnc Oppr Inv A % 1795 MC LeggM Oppr Tr Inst % 1528
SP Invsco RealEst A % 576 LC AmFds Gr Fd Am R3 % 662
SP Opp Gold Spec Mnrls A % 374 LC Davis Oppr A % 473
SP Prudntl Jnisn Natrl Rsrc A % 383 LC Drey Strat Val A % 722
SP RydexSGI Bio Adv % 516 LC LeggM ClrBrdg Aggr Gr A % 397
IS AmFds CapWld Gr Inc R3 % 388 LC LeggM ClrBrdg Val Tr I % 1144
IS FnklnTmp Devl Mkt Tr A % 981 LC NeuBer LgCp Val Tr % 410
IS Opp Devl Mkt A % 844 LC Op... 阅读全帖 |
|
s****a
发帖数: 6521 | 14
SP BlkRk Hlth Scnc Oppr Inv A % 1795 MC LeggM Oppr Tr Inst % 1528
SP Invsco RealEst A % 576 LC AmFds Gr Fd Am R3 % 662
SP Opp Gold Spec Mnrls A % 374 LC Davis Oppr A % 473
SP Prudntl Jnisn Natrl Rsrc A % 383 LC Drey Strat Val A % 722
SP RydexSGI Bio Adv % 516 LC LeggM ClrBrdg Aggr Gr A % 397
IS AmFds CapWld Gr Inc R3 % 388 LC LeggM ClrBrdg Val Tr I % 1144
IS FnklnTmp Devl Mkt Tr A % 981 LC NeuBer LgCp Val Tr % 410
IS Opp Devl Mkt A % 844 LC Op... 阅读全帖 |
|
p*********e
发帖数: 32207 | 15 稍微解释一下这组数据吧,原始的google doc地址:
https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=
0Ag4HONGh36KcdHRaelFqbldETWdfNXhhc2h2R2xQd0E#gid=1
首先是HH VH HV VV B2B
我猜分别代表连续两场主场,先客后主,先主后客,及连续两客的b2b
之后anyb2b指的是任何自己b2b(不管对手是否b2b)的场次的总和
Only b2b指的是只有自己是b2b而对手不是的场次的总和
Opp b2b指的是任何对手b2b(不管自己是不是b2b)场次的总和
OppOnly b2b指的是自己不是而对手是b2b的场次的总和
Both b2b指的是双方都b2b的场次的总和
作为验证,按照上面的定义,
any b2b+opp b2b-both b2b=only b2b+opponly b2b +both b2b
应该成立.实际上也成立.
那么如何解读这个统计呢.双方都b2b的场次说不上谁更吃亏,都是打过一场硬仗的
有利的,是opp only b2b,不利的,是only b2b
表格里面有一项b2b marg... 阅读全帖 |
|
c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 16 hehe, if you are not going to sell, why do you want to make such claim
that you do have defence or you don't have a lot of defensive values?
Namyats sucks in many ways: first, it takes up the natural preemptive
4C/D which are very useful, second, it makes opps easier to defend
against, opps can double 4C to show take out which can hardly be penalized,
opps can pass 4C then double 4S to show strong balanced hands and tend to
penalize you. opps can cuebid 4H directly to show 5 spades and 5 minors. |
|
c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 17 actually for this hand, you really don't want to bid 6D, the reason is
simple,
as long as you bid 5D, it's already a great result for team games.
Your opps will be very likely bidding 3nt, which isn't a good one, if
you can't make 3nt, you still can make 5D, so you really don't want to
see that you bid 6D and your opps bid 3nt, both go down. Bridge is
never a simple game of simple percentage. It's a game of playing your
opps, for this one, you opps will very unlikely find 6D, and they may
often |
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 18 Well, I don't think you really understand what I am saying. Of course you
can go on playing what you like. Transfer advances are actually rather bad
in many ways.
One key problem is that transfer advances make it very difficult to bid
clubs. For this hand, transfer advances also won't solve the problem. Also,
transfer advances can be rather difficult to play because it also covers a
very wide range of hands, from constructive hands with a 6 card suit to gf
hand with a 4 card suit.
So a lot of di... 阅读全帖 |
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 19 Well, the key to decide whether or not to get involved is usually the shape.
For example, with AJ9xx xxx Qxxx x, it is usually a good idea to show your
spade when white. For AQJTx xxx xx xxx, it is actually not clear at all
whether you should show your spade. With more distributions, you have more
chances to get to a top spade spot and don't go down too much when they have
a game or you may eventually make it. For example, facing Kxxxx x KJxx xxx
, the formal hand usually goes down about 1 tric... 阅读全帖 |
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 20 Well, I just pointed out some possible theoretical directions on handling
the competitive situations when opps found a 8 card fit. It also points to
some theoretical problems of modern bidding theory. For example, what is a
takeout double, can this takeout double be converted and when it should be
converted. These are very basic problems and should be studied carefully.
Basically, if a system forbids the player to double with a void when opps
have found a claimed 8 card fit, the double can only ... 阅读全帖 |
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 21 This is simply the wrong bidding philosophy. Bridge is a partnership game.
What 4S achieves is just that I think I have an offensive oriented hand, if
they can make 4H, our 4S shouldn't be too expensive. It doesn't show your
shape, which can be very important for partner to get involved at high
levels. 4D shows a respectable hand, so partner can double their 5H with
suitable hands and 4S can be bid based on 7 spades, only 11 HCPs, like
KQxxxxx x KQJ xx. Here, no matter what they make, you know y... 阅读全帖 |
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 22 RHO generally shows about 12-16, could be one point off somewhere depending
on opps' agreement.
In IMPs, the basic goal is to defeat the contract. Therefore, you hope to
find partner holding something useful. Either SJ or a defensive trick in
side suit would probably be enough if you lead ST or S9. SA can be bad when
declarer holds SKJx, which is not uncommon. H9 is quite a remote choice.
This lead may not cost you too much and may not help you much either. So you
lead H9 and hope that opps may ... 阅读全帖 |
|
B******r
发帖数: 612 | 23 一万种可能你只说出两个：
1.QB直接被按地上了，own 35 yard vs opp 20 yard;
2.QB有时间出手，wr也神速进入所谓opp 5 yard 区域，结果woops, nobody caught
the ball... own 35 yard vs opp 20 yard;
3.开球QB没接住，被按在了< 35 yard;被按在了td区+2;被opp抢到+6....
4......
反正结果就是QB被骂，教练被炒，球迷说脑残，只有bia来删帖。。。 |
|
p*********e
发帖数: 32207 | 24 【 以下文字转载自 Basketball 讨论区 】
发信人: pandamalone (0000~史前圣灵猫熊), 信区: Basketball
标 题: Re: 从背靠背的场次可以看出谁是干儿子 (转载)
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Mar 8 12:48:34 2011, 美东)
稍微解释一下这组数据吧,原始的google doc地址:
https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=
0Ag4HONGh36KcdHRaelFqbldETWdfNXhhc2h2R2xQd0E#gid=1
首先是HH VH HV VV B2B
我猜分别代表连续两场主场,先客后主,先主后客,及连续两客的b2b
之后anyb2b指的是任何自己b2b(不管对手是否b2b)的场次的总和
Only b2b指的是只有自己是b2b而对手不是的场次的总和
Opp b2b指的是任何对手b2b(不管自己是不是b2b)场次的总和
OppOnly b2b指的是自己不是而对手是b2b的场次的总和
Both b2b指的是双方都b2b的场次的总和
作为验证,按照上面的定义,
any... 阅读全帖 |
|
c****s
发帖数: 5892 | 25 日前，安省省级警察(OPP)破获特大儿童色情案，共逮捕35人，包括多伦多人。
周三，OPP总长范天奴(Julian Fantino)称，目前2名受害者的身份已经被确认。其中一名儿童还在安省，而另一名已经不在加拿大。
“每张色情图片都代表了一名受害者儿童，而图片的每次被交易或传播都意味着儿童再次受伤害。我们会坚决查处那些儿童奴役者，保护我们社区的安全”，Fantino称。
在此调查行动中，警方共下发44张通缉令，最后35名嫌疑人被捕(指控罪名达122项)，他们来自萨德伯里(Sudbury)，渥太华(Ottawa)，伦敦(London)，Collingwood和多伦多。
当局称，随着调查的继续，将有更多人被捕。
自从OPP的“保护儿童免受性侵犯和性剥削全省战略”(Provincial Strategy to Protect Children from Sexual Abuse and Exploitation)于2006年发起以来，共有1,130人受到指控。 |
|
y*********o
发帖数: 34 | 26 Opp opp opp
: 如果不能盈利，一龙的话就彻底不能信了。
|
|
s*********h
发帖数: 6288 | 27 【联合工地】通过Sport VU，来了解詹姆斯新赛季的表现 由 黑泡教父 发表在虎扑篮
球·热火专区
当一名球员变得很强很强的时候，我们就会对他的表现产生一种“他肯定还是打的那样
子啊、他还是那么牛X”的习惯性思维定式，比如在说之前说科比得高分就是一件习以
为常的事情，而现在看詹姆斯打球，随便一个人可能都知道他是全能的存在，得分、篮
板、助攻、抢断、盖帽什么的，似乎都能在联盟榜上有名，但到了本赛季，这种大包大
揽的现象还是如此吗？下面就通过对Sport VU的数据整理和分析，带大家了解下詹姆斯
新赛季的表现和一些变化。
因为Sport VU是对全联盟所有球员的统计，所以会出现一些奇葩的排名，打个比方，就
像三分球命中率，一些龙套只投了一个，而且进了，所以这个排名他以100%命中率排第
一一样。因此在接下来的Sport VU数据统计中，我在搜索之前设置了球员参赛场次至少
为20场，从而规避个别奇怪的统计。
速度和距离（Speed and Distance）
在总跑动距离（Distance Traveled）上，爵士的海沃德以80.3英里排名全联盟第1，帕
森斯以79英里排名第2，汤普森... 阅读全帖 |
|
c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 28 you probably can double it. however, the field can sometimes play 4S x -1,
so 4C without double can still be reasonable. Anyway, I believe you can double
it if you like. it's rather marginal. However, 4C is also a big
call for opps when vul at MP, since they know opps may double it.
So it's often upto judgement and opps' bidding strength. |
|
f*****x
发帖数: 545 | 29 1stly, there is only 12 cards in ur hand, so there should be one more, ideally
in s suit:
2ndly, i think you should win with ha, opp certainly has 7 tricks, assuming pd
has one heart honour. And C suit breaks well for opp. If you dont tak ha, opp
may simply finesse c and clm 7 tricks.
thirdly, you should cash s honour. pd lead from k(u must assume it is k not
q)xxx of heart suit, his s is sth like xxx. If it is xx, he may consider lead
it, hoping to find ur suit, or lead c suit, which we assume |
|
f*****x
发帖数: 545 | 30 This is pretty much my thinking. I choosed 4H at the table and it worked very
well. LHO has minor 2065 and bid 4N but his pd passed.
Of course this is not the point of the hand. The point of the hand is to make
a bid to preempt opp while keep our chance.
I think 4H does this job while 2H doesnot. Why? It is very likely pd will pass
2H bid while holding so many hands that would make 4H.
Second, if opps bid 4S. You face same question of to bid or not when you bid 4
H and forced opps to bid 4S. 2H |
|
b****s
发帖数: 472 | 31 no. that's the simplified version, proposed by bergen?
according to the LOT, I think you need to take into
account how many cards opp have in their longest suit.
if opp have X in their longest, and you have Y in yours,
then, it's safe to bid
(X+Y) - 12 - opp current bid + 1
in your suit. |
|
f******e
发帖数: 465 | 32 我看不出要叫4H的理由。牌不是已经基本描述清楚了吗？
bucky说左手先pass再叫3NT奇怪，为什么呢？我觉得他/她如果持成局牌力，但不知道
opps到底是哪门低花，好像pass很正常啊。opps几乎不可能打2s? 另外也留着将来惩罚
oppsH定约的可能性。这个叫牌过程说明opps各持两套，所以这个时候做判断叫3NT信息
非常清楚。比如如果左手只有H和一门较长低花，那么他几乎可以断定同伴持剩下一门
低花或有止。不知我的想法对不对。 |
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 33 2-4-3-4 is certainly a possible shape. Also, the key in bridge defense is
not opp's possible misleading bidding, but partner's defensive signals.
There is just no point to assume that partner would make a wrong signal and
trust opp's bidding. This is a good lesson to all the bridge players that in
defense, one gotta be careful with his signals and trust partner's signals.
That's the only way to get out of the maze your opps set.
when
but
this
but |
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 34 The failure of gib is due to the wrong constraints. GIB thinks that I have
18-19 HCPs, so LHO can't hold both DKQ. Therefore, it's safe to cash all the
H tricks to avoid over tricks. The basic design of gib has many problems,
one of the key problems is that it assumes human opp always plays its system
. No any human players would always assume that opp has their bids and human
players know that opps may sometimes upgrade or downgrade their hands. |
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 35 There could be another stronger line if you take HK on the first trick. When
you cash CA and opp drops C9, you can suspect that it could be a singleton.
So you just play back H right away to cut opp's connections.
If opps cash 4 hearts, you just come back to the squeeze position.
If LHO wins HT and shoot back D, you just play DA, back to CK to check the C
position. When the bad news comes (assume LHO discards a D), you just play
another H and play LHO for 4-3-5-1. If RHO cashes all his hearts, y... 阅读全帖 |
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 36 That's not the right thinking of bridge. The right way is to spot the
weakness of your opps system (here, the "main stream" system), improve them
and try to take advantage when opps refuse to improve. The money shouldn't
be made from the unfamiliarity of opps to your partnership agreement. |
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 37 That's actually right. Sometimes bad bids or defense may induce bad bids or
defense from opps in the future. In that sense, it is very profitable to
make small mistakes to induce large mistakes from opps, which can be more
profitable than the strategy that is mistake free, but also quite
predictable. This kind of philosophy is applied in no limit holdem a lot.
Many very good players just make a lot of small mistakes and try to induce a
huge one from their inexperienced opps. Still, against such ... 阅读全帖 |
|
b***y
发帖数: 2804 | 38 4D puts partner into the picture when there is more bidding. When bidding is
at high-level, it is very important to assess the degree of fit (in side
suits). It should not be regarded as slam try. The problem is that many
partnerships play 4D as splinter, so they have to start with 3D, which gives
opps too much room. Still, you have the boss suit, it is usually not a very
big issue.
4S is not without merit though. It blocks 4H and puts more pressure to the
opps. But be aware that it doesn't guar... 阅读全帖 |
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 39 He had something like Jx T9xxx Kxxx Jx. The point here is that 4S doesn't
show much of a hand, so it's relatively easy to bid 5H over 4S, which is
very difficult to get penalized, especially for somebody like the Italian
guys, who don't have a crazy bidder image. Also when white vs. red, opps
often like to take some insurance to bid 5S back.
If you think deep, you would really appreciate such kind of bids. This kind
of bids actually happen everyday at the table. I remember once Weishu
confident... 阅读全帖 |
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 40 Against decent opps, taking finesse right away shouldn't work well because
dummy is quite exposed and opps is likely to know that the key to this hand
is to induce a misguess in S. Also, against decent opps, I don't think you
can gather a lot of information on the spade position.
Anyway, you can certainly draw trumps (assuming it is 2-2) and cash H, D. In
that case you may make it when RHO holds stiff S honor.
If there is no much information, you should probably finesse SJ, because
with SA, many... 阅读全帖 |
|
p*********6
发帖数: 679 | 41 我试一下。已有9墩，只需发展1墩。先清将；拔H AK; 再C出手。若opp继续出C，则手
上垫H，逼opp再出牌。opp 无论出什么，你总能发展1墩：C或者D,明显；H,若西家出的
，则明手J或者第4张变大；若西家出的，是Q则将，是小则垫D，明手J或者第4张伊兰变
大。 |
|
p******e
发帖数: 1151 | 42 The analysis on forcing pass sounds good in general. I will take a look of
forcing pass on high levels.
1. This kind of hand looks suspicious though.
--/KQXXX/KQXXXX/XX
It could be double game swing and you definitely have zero interest to
defend 4s. But clearly this is not the final call (you have plenty time to
express your will not defending 4s, just want to seek a possible game at 5
level). As a comparison however, an accurate slam bid at high level is
really crucial for many cases.
I am not... 阅读全帖 |
|
i****e
发帖数: 642 | 43 It seems D lead is a popular choice. Do you worry opps discard D on C, so
you try to attack D?
Given that you have such a long C suit, it seems to me the chance for them
to discard D on C is not high. Given the fact pd bid 3H at red, I won't
expect opps can set up heart trick(s) for discard. A heart lead will be my
automatic lead. In other words, I like to defend this passively, although
that should not be the strategy for most slams. In the rare case we have a
heart trick, it is more likely for... 阅读全帖 |
|
N******y
发帖数: 71 | 44 I found it is a good idea to keep the eye on the ball for baseline rallies.
I do not have the ability to read the bounce of the balls precisely. By
watching the ball my consistency improved a lot. You can still catch a
glimse of your opp if you keep the ball in front of you.
On volleys, though, it is togher to watch the ball and your opp at the same
short time. I just saw a picture of Tommy Haas volleying with his eye on his
opp when he hit the volley.
Or maybe I should develop a 6th sense to kn |
|
c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 45 He should push all in cause most likely his QQ is still the best
now. Suppose you call, when overcards appear and opp pushes all in,
you may get bluffed out of pot. Another case is when the flop misses opp,
he may fold. So it's really the best to push him all in early.
QQ is a huge favorate against low pairs and plays very well against Ax.
If I know my opp may hold AA or KK for a very low percentage, and would
call my all in with Ax or low pairs, I'd certainly push him all in.
However, against d |
|
f*f
发帖数: 121 | 46 I got AKo the other day 200bb deep at 5/10,
Opp raise --- I am happy
3bet to 110
opp 4bet to 220 --- I am v happy
I 5bet to 480
opp 6bet allin for 1600 more
now I am a little worried, click option, reload 2k, call
opponent show AJo and didn't suck out. :) |
|
p****r
发帖数: 9164 | 47 Very nice post.
I think pot control can go either way. Whey you hand is marginal, you
wanna get value from one street or two, like when you have AA on KTT
rainbow board. But you do not even have go all the way, since you can just
let it go against lot of opp when you get strong resistance based on betting
size/tell etc. Against lot of opp, you can easily fold AA when you got
raised any time on KTT board. Lots of time you may need a plan with your
hand.
On the other side, even mo... 阅读全帖 |
|
p****r
发帖数: 9164 | 48 http://www.pokerstars.tv/poker-video-9836-the-big-game-2-week-3-episode-4.html?channel_id=221
Really like how she played the 35o hand on button. She 3 bet preflop
and got cold called by one of the blind. She put the opp on the exact hand
based on how the hand was played and she knew that her opp knew her read.
Checking on the turn made look like pot control, then she made a decent
size bet on the river looking like a value bet, representing a big pair. She
can only do this by ... 阅读全帖 |
|
p****r
发帖数: 9164 | 49 I certainly do not fold tptk often. But based on the playing style of two
opp and the board structure, it is quite risky to proceed with this hand.
My AQ on Q T 7 two spade board is so much weaker than Q 7 2 rainbow board.
If both opp are on a draw, I could be still a huge under dog. That is
thy it is mathematical correct to fold nuts straight on the flop a lot of
time when playing PLO. Here I only invest 20$, I have to put additional 430
$ into risk wih such low EV situation if... 阅读全帖 |
|
c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 50 He should push all in cause most likely his QQ is still the best
now. Suppose you call, when overcards appear and opp pushes all in,
you may get bluffed out of pot. Another case is when the flop misses opp,
he may fold. So it's really the best to push him all in early.
QQ is a huge favorate against low pairs and plays very well against Ax.
If I know my opp may hold AA or KK for a very low percentage, and would
call my all in with Ax or low pairs, I'd certainly push him all in.
However, against d |
|
