|
y*********e
发帖数: 7269 | 2 K10D是老了，而且18-55在室内不够用。
大光圈的话，最好用的是DA55/1.4。
不如卖了换2,300刀，再贴个600刀 换E-PL5套机+45/1.8了 |
|
y*********e
发帖数: 7269 | 3 手上现在什么相机？如果是EM-5的话
我选择12-50，40-150，17/1.8, 45/1.8
250+100+500(-150)+400(-150)=$950，覆盖24-300，和人文大光圈，人像大光圈。
而且有个三防镜头出游使用。
如果是E-PL5的话，留一个缩头的镜头的14-45II挺好的，很小巧。
是： |
|
|
|
d******a
发帖数: 32122 | 6 其实E-PL5并不比EM5差
E-PM2更是穷人的EM5
除了价格，这两款比EM5有巨大的优势：可以开启松下镜头的镜头防抖 |
|
p*********r
发帖数: 4593 | 7 Picture quality is not that impressive. Compare to E-PL5 is far behind.
Its continuous AF is also not good too. Nikon 1 system is better than GH3 in
continuous AF because it has the same AF system as it's on DSLRs.
The only good part is its video performance. |
|
e**n
发帖数: 5876 | 8 sensor和EM5, EPL5一样. 怎么可能"Compare to E-PL5 is far behind"????
in |
|
p*********r
发帖数: 4593 | 9
The RAW at high ISO actually is also worse than E-PL5.
Keep in mind that not everyone wants to use computer software to do extra
process. Most of people just want to get the pictures from camera and use it
as is. |
|
p*********r
发帖数: 4593 | 10 如果有 Mirrorless with
* GH3 Video
* E-PL5 Picture Quality at high ISO
* Nikon 1 system AF system.
Then, it will be a really hot one. So far, there is no perfect one. |
|
|
|
s******t
发帖数: 186 | 13 同推荐EPL5或者EPM2。
好处主要有：
新一代索尼Sensor ISO和DR给力，与APS-C差别不大，比Canon的老Sensor好；
防抖好用；
直出JPEG颜色好，很多时候不需要用raw；
对焦准且快；
人脸识别好用；
相对轻巧，比入门单反加个长套头好带；
PL5带翻转屏，自拍方便；
价格便宜，500到600搞定套机，还有预算根据需要再加个17mm或者45mm。 |
|
d****n
发帖数: 12461 | 14 这和E-PL5和EM5比啥区别啊？是不是中间？ |
|
|
|
x*****d
发帖数: 704 | 17 rt.现在就考虑入标题中的一款(都是套件). 我主要是拿来拍自然风光,野生动物之类的
. 人像暂时不考虑. 预算$600以内. 求指点迷津. |
|
|
|
J********o
发帖数: 17447 | 20 nex6, 没触屏的, 暂时还没nex6r 6n |
|
e**n
发帖数: 5876 | 21 预算$600以内, 那就只有性价比超高的G5了. 套机+长焦头45-200 |
|
|
N*****e
发帖数: 2573 | 23 X-E1,
lens of NEX system is not good,unless you want 转接.
Or you can try E-PL5 |
|
y*********e
发帖数: 7269 | 24 这个budget可以上E-P5了，或者E-PL5 |
|
T****i
发帖数: 15191 | 25 Sony Monster：
I think it’s awesome that photographers are starting to concentrate more on
the photo quality and less on the brand. It’s my opinion that Canon is
simply an overpriced package delivering old sensors and legacy glass that is
no longer worth half its asking price.
My Nex 7 blows my old 5dII’s away. The Canon L lenses? Way, way, way
overhyped. My Sigma primes and Sony tele blow all the Canons I used to shoot.
Brock：
Let me qualify myself. I am a pro with a successful photo business th... 阅读全帖 |
|
m********l
发帖数: 6748 | 26
E-M5不支持OIS，用E-PM2和E-PL5可以开启OIS。 |
|
|
|
|
|
s*******s
发帖数: 1250 | 31 waiting for the dropping of "L" |
|
d******a
发帖数: 32122 | 32 不支持touch screen的革命机都是太监机
Sony至少需要 5N |
|
c******s
发帖数: 1994 | 33 if you need to buy multiple lenses & accessories
go for epl5
if camera and kit lens only
nex3n is slightly better |
|
|
p*********r
发帖数: 4593 | 35
That's true. Olympus E-PL5 and Nikon 1 system has the fastest AF.
EOS M auto focus probably is 1/2 speed of NEX, and NEX is 1/2 of
Olympus and Nikon mirrorless.
Take a look at the interest review here.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wwZDStFUixQ |
|
m********l
发帖数: 6748 | 36
你说的这些还确实都可以实现蹂躏了，哈哈哈哈哈
E-PM2现在是350吧，不算贵啊，画质干躺EOS-M没有问题啊，所以我根本都没有提画质
。E-PM2, E-PL5, E-M5, E-P5都是用SONY的那块sensor，比EOS-M用的那块千年老
sensor强。 |
|
|
|
|
J********o
发帖数: 17447 | 40 之前cameta有439的套机, refurb带1年保 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
d******a
发帖数: 32122 | 46
三项指标，每一项EOS-M都被E-PL5打倒 |
|
e**n
发帖数: 5876 | 47 EPL5比EOSM好是全方位的阿
论画质: 不论高感还是宽容度
论镜头: 不论是数量还是质量
论功能: 机身防抖, 翻转屏....
所以你这个问题问法不对, EPL5比EOSM好的地方写阿写阿写不完...
应该这样问: EOSM比PL5好在哪里?
这个答案就简单了. 一句话: 价钱便宜一点. |
|
p*********r
发帖数: 4593 | 48
E-MD5/E-PL5 追焦也不行. 查一下旧贴看一下. |
|
|
w*********g
发帖数: 10097 | 50 挺好的，之前newegg出过300多的body only好像，我记不清了，其他的兄弟说说 |
|
