z********r
发帖数: 24 | 1 your sample pool is way too limited, i know some.
There are lots of ppl value other ppl's life and freedom much more important
than your 意淫 |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 2 Because American officials do not have much power, they will have a hard
time
to be corrupted.
That is the choice of ppl la.
If you want to a strong government, the downside is that the government can
be easily corrupted.
If you don't want to a strong government. The officials are not easily
corrupted.
The downside is the government can not do many things either.
American ppl happen to believe in the weak government. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 3 Conficius also promote the ideat that the officials should treat ppl like
their own children ah.
The problem is that parents-kids relationship never happens between the
officals
and ppl. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 4 If the officials really treat ppl like their own children, that is fine too.
But in reality, the officials obviously treat their own children very
different
for their treatments of other ppl. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 5 Because ppl are afraid of the government abusing its power, the democracy
system is trying to protect ppl's basic rights. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 6 But it is enough la.
Old ppl do not have much spending either. Young ppl need go social ah. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 7 After 10 years, there will be a problem. Fewer ppl work, too many ppl
retire. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 8 Because it is just 4 years, you just elected them to the office ah.
At least ppl can wait for at most 4 years.
In Egypt and China, ppl can not see any hope to change the government. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 9 That need re-election la. It is not for sure. While the congress gets
elected
very two years.
Now you asked a very good question, if Egytian ppl hate their leader so much,
why he gets elected every time ah.
Because ppl can not ask to see the voting result. |
|
m**********e
发帖数: 1045 | 10 should be around 7 or more level
Tokyo is big city, those ppl 's lives is much more valuable
so still only few ppl can get good luck with quick run |
|
v***0
发帖数: 5096 | 11 毛子又躺着中枪了
those russian bitch... they thought they have white skin, and they are white
? LOL. only british and? french, germans and ppl from some west europe count
ries are white. in asian's point of view, russian, spanish, latio have no di
fference as black ppl.not so much lower or higher class than asian. |
|
j***h
发帖数: 4412 | 12 【 以下文字转载自 JobHunting 讨论区 】
发信人: Ginobili (潘帕斯雄鹰), 信区: JobHunting
标 题: [合集] 给作者: 报google nyc offer，并分享面经
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sat Mar 19 21:31:54 2011, 美东)
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
wolver (没有) 于 (Sat Mar 19 15:12:23 2011, 美东) 提到:
同学,
（这是关于你的置顶文章, 本来因该私人信件的，但是给后来者一个警告也好）
First, you should know that you have signed an NDA with Google at the
beginning of the on-site interview and things that were said and discussed
during the interview (particularly the interview questions) were cove... 阅读全帖 |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 13 Because ppl show no respect for the manual labor, they don't want others
to see them do the manual labors. They prefer to hire other ppl to do the
manual labor for them. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 14 The rich and the poor live seperately in US.
The poor and the rich live together in China ah.
Eventually, the rich and the poor will live seperately in China too.
The rich do not care street peddlers in the poor ppl area, they never
go there. The poor ppl need those street peddlers for their cheap
merchandise.
|
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 15 That is why the rich send out of Chengguan to drive those ppl out.
The best ways should that your rich ppl move out. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 16 Just comfuse the young ppl.
When I was in college, we just asked our politics teachers, Marx said,
the socialism will bury the capitalism. Why we saw the opposite ah.
In today's China, the capitalism is everywhere. How TG can teach
young ppl to overthrow the capitalism. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 17 In today's China, it is all ppl vs ppl. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 18 Put in another way,
those conflicts that can be resolved in money are ppl vs ppl. |
|
z**********0
发帖数: 224 | 19 多年以前，人们不愿忍耐乡村中机会与公平的匮乏，来到城市。而在城市中，机会被越
来越拥挤的人流稀释，公平也逐步触顶。人们却也无处可去。对美好生活的追求，让我
们成了大城市的“人质”。
有一天，一个朋友有点小激动地对我说：你还别说，快速公交一开通，上班用的时间果
然短多了！
我问：缩短了多少时间？
他说：半个小时。
我问：那你现在上班得多少时间？
他说：一个小时十分钟吧。
一时间，我有点恍惚。眼前这个活生生的人，正在为每天上下班路上耗时不到两个半小
时而兴高采烈。
我这朋友也是北方小城生人，家乡的县城逛个来回不过一个小时。大城市生活改变了我
们的时间观念和幸福感受。而这，正是我们想追求的美好生活的一部分。
吊诡的是，即使这样的快乐生活，也是建立在别人的痛苦之上。
朋友住在北京的通州区，北京最东部，过去叫通县。英法联军、八国联军打进北京时，
总是从此路过。现在，每天有大批白领从这里出发，进城上班。这里小区成片，房价相
对便宜，是北京有名的“睡城”。朋友上班，总是先乘坐公交车到达东三环的国贸，再
搭乘地铁。
前段时间，北京出台政策，在通州到市区的快速路上，划出公交专用道。朋友正是因此
节省了时... 阅读全帖 |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 20 Of course, it is a jungle. But ppl believe captitalists are better than
officials. The capitalists use its own money to make money. The officials
just collect money from ppl and make more money.
general |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 21 Ppl are very angry ah.
In a democarcy system, ppl are less angry. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 22 I don't think that is the truth.
Blaming government is the game of ppl in every country.
American ppl also blame almost everything on US government. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 23 But the system give the ppl choices ah.
If you are really angry about the government, go to vote.
After a while, ppl knows the issues are not all government' fault.
They don't care about politics that much.
滑雪
难免 |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 24 Compare 60 years ago, ppl are much richer la.
Not many ppl wants go back Mao times ah. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 25 The US government still elected by its ppl ah. 70% of those debt are lend by
American ppl to US government. They won't all the government to do that. |
|
K******S
发帖数: 10109 | 26 LOL, as I mentioned in another thread. I know ppl is going to blame little
bush.
One fact you guys forgot is that since last mid term (2007?), both house and
senate were controlled by democrats.
Is there any agency/funds that run by government has good outcome? Take a
look at current status of social security, medicare, medicaid etc. I can't
believe ppl will let government run health care system.
Talk about European, LMAO, just take a look at what a mess there. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 27 There are also some ppl who are not young ppl at all. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 28 Don't know any very rich ppl.
Just some ordinary rich ppl, some of them use power, some of them use their
minds and some of them do work very hard ah. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 29 All those ppl from China la. The trend in China is that more and more ppl
become Laojiang. |
|
y*h
发帖数: 25423 | 30
is
Ppl throw away ipad and Jobs puts ipad2 in the market not because ipad is
not good enough for most ppl, just because Jobs wants to sell more products
(to make more money). This is how capitalism works. |
|
p********a
发帖数: 6437 | 31 illiterate!
关是个district commander,
林冲是 a coach of military training.
of coz 关 rocks
there may be only 20 ppl with same rank as 关 in whole china
there may be 1000 ppl with same profession as 林 in whole china |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 32 I don't think ppl of Soviet Union lived any better lives than Chinese ppl
even during those years. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 33 Yes. American ppl will think they are now poorer than Chinese ppl la.
Otherwise, why American government needs borrow money from Chinese
government ah. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 34 The ppl can be changed.
If you teach them the western thinking for a long time, ppl will change.
神。 |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 35 What we argue here ah.
I did not say American killing Indian was correct.
Now you also said what Hitler did was wrong.
What you seem to say was each time we condemn Hitler, we should condemn all
the crime ppl committed in the world, otherwise if I only single out Hitler,
it is not fair to him.
But ppl commited so many crimes, how can I list them all ah. |
|
f*****g
发帖数: 3197 | 36 Do you think the Board of CN is free?
When you want to plunge into other ppls' circle, you talk about freedom.
When you want to drive other ppls away, you don't care freedom at all. Hehe.
|
|
f*****g
发帖数: 3197 | 37 Yes, this board may be dominated by some (not necessarily all) Xiaojiangs.
But this board runs well. It is not because there are more surporting "IDs" but because the monitors are close to Xiaojiang's. If counting the number of IDs, some professional guys can create as many as they want. So it does not make sense at all. Most ppl (!= IDs) do not create many Majia IDs. BBS is not a place to work but a place to read news and play.
At least, Xiaojiangs do not make up much faked and disgusting infor... 阅读全帖 |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 38 Most ppl form their opinions from their own interests la.
I never blame the desire of the poor who want the share some rich's wealth.
or the desire the rich who want keep their wealth as much as possible.
I just don't want to see just for that, ppl use violence la.
The poor and the rich both can sit down, and see whether they can resolve
the difference without using the force. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 39 Of course ah.
Most of American are religious ppl.
The communist abadoning all kinds of religion will create a lot of fears
among American ppl.
socialism? |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 40 The poor ppl overthrew the rich ppl la.
The poor Chinese definitely did not want to fight for the rich Chinese. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 41 Not many ppl la.
If there were tens of thousands ppl, the US also needs an army. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 42 I don't think ppl are thinking like me.
I just want to see how many young ppl in BJU really are Maoists ah. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 43 A democracy is also good for TG ah.
The sooner TG adopts, it will stay in power longer.
Now no other parties can compete with TG, even TG allows ppl to vote,
ppl have no other choices, only can elect TG ah. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 44 we just ask TG allow ppl to vote ah.
Whoever gets most of vote, they can make policy for next 4 years.
If Maosists win, let China adopt Mao's policy for 4 years and see whether
ppl will elect them again in 4 years. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 45 It is really the economy. If the ppl is happy, ppl won't care whether it is
a democracy or a dictatorship. If the economy is bad, the dictatorship
system will have a lot of troubles. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 46 That is why China need a democracy system ah.
Let ppl decide how to spend the tax money.
Now when rightists in power, they say that they are representives of the ppl. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 47 That explains that the ppl inside China hate TG, the ppl here hates
US government. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 48 Do those trains stop at NJ?
If they do, then NJ ppl are also happy.
A democracy is really about the fairness, all the tax payers have a say.
If the central government do not collect taxes from all the ppl,
you can use the money whatever they want. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 49 But ppl agrees ah.
That the democracy is rule-based means that ppl write down rules, everyone
should follow.
In the ruler-based system, there is no rules for the rulers. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 50 It is essentially the same ah.
If a system decides to let the ppl to set rules, there are several ways to
do it.
Let everyone have a say, that is called referedum. Some rules in US, like
constitiution, need referedum to pass.
Some rules, ppl can let their representives who elected by them to set. |
|
