b*****d 发帖数: 61690 | 1 预算已经下来了。所以在payline内,应该是给的。问问PO吧。 |
|
|
|
|
f*******7 发帖数: 1019 | 5 niaid is strict in following pay line. I think you can start to celebrate! |
|
b*****d 发帖数: 61690 | 6 那肯定没有问题了。恭喜。等着6月份开完council拿钱吧。NIAID是hard pay line. |
|
h*****u 发帖数: 201 | 7 呵呵,谢谢!不过我是postdoc,找到职位要走了(非美国大学)。这个项目本来是计划
支持我一个人的,我之前的项目去年断了几个月经费,于是到处找钱申fellowship找教
职。现在钱来了反而不好办了。。。 |
|
h*****u 发帖数: 201 | 8 谢谢!不过情况有点复杂,请看楼上我给firefox77的回复 |
|
m********a 发帖数: 239 | 9 At this time, it is up to the PO to make a decision. You cannot do much. I
guess if there is some extra fund left, yours will be picked up. R03 or R21? |
|
c*******i 发帖数: 6 | 10 说说我的今年申请情况, 你可以参考一下:
paper: 25+, most in top engineering journals, no CNS
PhD from rank 50 public school, postdoc in around rank 30 university
Superstar boss
one current NIH R21 grant. One past postdoc grant
Research areas are relatively hot.
English is not great but ok.
Apply 50+ positions in universities with national rank
What I got so far: 6 phone interviews, 2 onsite. No offer. |
|
|
t****t 发帖数: 610 | 12 Are you the PI of this R21, or just a CO-PI? |
|
c*******i 发帖数: 6 | 13 Sorry for the confusion. I am not a postdoc now and got the R21 in the first
year as a research scientist in a superstar professor lab. |
|
|
|
|
f*******7 发帖数: 1019 | 17 looks like you'll get one of the two. Still very nice! |
|
h*****w 发帖数: 8561 | 18 其实主要不是看你投几个,是看你能中几个,我去年9月开始,到现在一共投了4个,没
有一个中的,通通悲剧。我之前待的学校雇的一个明星AP,第一年投了大概5个吧,中
了3个,现在他第二年,大概又中了一个NIH的R21和NSF CAREER,钱多得根本花不完。
另外我说的是正式的大钱,小的基金会不算。 |
|
l********n 发帖数: 804 | 19 想找一个本领域的大牛帮忙写一个R21的suppor letter
不是合作关系,就是想让他帮忙support一下我
和他有过一次电话,写过几次email
所以不算关系多密切
请问这种情况应该怎么approach?直接写信附上自己的proposal,问可否写letter?
谢谢 |
|
r********x 发帖数: 116 | 20 不知道study section 有个关系很好的grant reviewer 会不会有些帮助.
谢谢. |
|
s********n 发帖数: 1124 | 21 当然会有帮助,但是你不确定他在你那一轮会不会上会,也不能确定他是不是主审人。
如果不是,则帮助不会很大。 |
|
|
|
|
a*****9 发帖数: 199 | 25 有人申过么? 貌似和R03比是要方法上更突破,还有别的要注意的吗 |
|
|
|
p****l 发帖数: 175 | 28 It list Cycle I, Cycle II, Cycle III, 3 due dates, does it mean that each
year, there are 3 chances to apply? thanks! |
|
|
J***b 发帖数: 76 | 30 谢谢brihand. 话虽然这么说. 但内部消息透露最差也有R21,中间是K99. 不知有没有在
search committee的前辈说说applicant pool的情况?谢谢 |
|
b*****d 发帖数: 61690 | 31 是什么? R01 or R21.
要看哪个institute了,这个分数可能在borderline. |
|
b*****d 发帖数: 61690 | 32 一般R01, R21会给percentile,其他有可能不给.在Commons里,impact score上面或者下
面,有一条叫percentile. |
|
w******e 发帖数: 953 | 33 Congratulation.
100+ usually could not afford more than 300k. but start-up are not charged
for over-head. so it is a R21. |
|
A******y 发帖数: 2041 | 34 Non-sense. My post-doc boss showed us his R01 grant score. Several of them
has 10th of percentile. One of his is 1.6 (NCI) and the other is 0.67 (
NINDS). When I was with him, he has 3 R01s, 1 R21, and a DOD. Also, as I
mentioned before, my socre although is even but it give 3.0 not 3!
. |
|
e****g 发帖数: 4434 | 35 我得学你了,第三年了,R21正在写,
R01还没有谱。 |
|
G*****h 发帖数: 320 | 36 是我记错了。我参加的那个study section 多年前 NI 的 R01 一般都讨论(那时评审
人和天数都多些)。现在也不是了,但比例稍微多点。
下面是我从 email 里面能找到的相对不久前的一次情况(记得收到的申请不是特多)
,供参考:
Applications 1-## New Investigators 60% discussed
Applications ##-## All other R01s 50% discussed
Applications ##-## R21s/R03s/R15s 50% discussed
不同的时候,不同的 study sections 会不同的。
% |
|
h****u 发帖数: 618 | 37 应该不会有问题,我们组同一个概念,一个投了r21,一个投了r33,一个投了r01,基本
平台一样,就是应用不同。没听老板说有什么问题。不同的Program。 |
|
|
h*****i 发帖数: 9112 | 39 写了一个R03 Small self-contained research projects
主要是test一个hypothesis,所以我在specific aim page列了三个aim。 有人告诉我
说,R03的aim最好只有一个,R21两个,R01才3-4个。有这个说法吗? |
|
p**********0 发帖数: 9 | 40 At first my supervisor asked for a R01. I told him there was little chance
for me to get a R01 because right now he has one active R01. Also, I am
afraid it will be even harder for me to leave if I get a R01. One of our
former postdoc who had a R01 finally had to leave for the industry. That's
why I applied for a R21. But from the reviewers' comments, the proposal is
good enough for a R01. |
|
e****g 发帖数: 4434 | 41 牛,
我的R21 proposal刚刚收到消息,挂了
for |
|
n****g 发帖数: 1063 | 42 you maynot be eligible for k99 because you can apply r01.
you may mot get good letter from your boss
like
R21.
R03.
. |
|
s****7 发帖数: 15 | 43 感谢sunneyday!
第一年直接申请经费,应该是基于薄厚时的数据。这时对于非top 20 school 的 PI,
应该target NIH (little chance with R01, so maybe R21, R03) , NSF 还是
private agencies ?
再次感谢各位前辈!
grant? |
|
p*l 发帖数: 1359 | 44 Co-BSO...
六年前写了平生第一个proposal,五年间写了八个,中了四个。去年休息了一年
,只参与了一个multi-PI R21。这个夏天又开始写了。 |
|
q******g 发帖数: 390 | 45 即使老李也要撞墙啊,一个R21就顶老李所有的几个NSF了。游兵散勇就更不用说了。 |
|
l*******l 发帖数: 385 | 46 R21有这么多么?一个NSF一般200k以上吧。
From NIH website:
The combined budget for direct costs for the two year project period may not
exceed $275,000. No more than $200,000 may be requested in any single year. |
|
l*******l 发帖数: 385 | 47 这我知道,275k的NIH相当于400k的NSF grant (assuming 50% overhead)。所以R21也
就抵得上一个半到两个NSF。结论是老李还是很有钱的。 |
|
|
l********n 发帖数: 62 | 49 祝贺!!! 如果你看NIH公布的success rate, R21是最低的。主要是它不需要
preliminary data,申请的人多。而R01是需要convincing的preliminary data to
support your research objectives.
申请NIH课题是要耐得住寂寞,需要时间和经验的积累。尽快payline在10%上下,有的
人很高,有的人很低。我的感觉是如果你自己都感觉你的proposal is not ready,就
不要递交,因为只有两次机会。并不是说,我们递交的多,拿到的几率就大。对于刚入
职的申请者,最好请你周围的一个大牛作Co-I,或consultant。 |
|
l********n 发帖数: 804 | 50 cong
是r21?也不像啊
★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 7.8 |
|