由买买提看人间百态

topics

全部话题 - 话题: roadtest
首页 上页 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 下页 末页 (共7页)
f******t
发帖数: 7283
1
来自主题: Automobile版 - Volvo 要火阿。
你是在跟motortrend的编辑说话吗?我已经把你这些话转给他们了,附加这个链接作为
参考(注明请他们留意倒数第三段):
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/suvs/1312_2014_volvo_xc90_f
m*****s
发帖数: 2449
2
来自主题: Automobile版 - Volvo 要火阿。

按照你的说法,这破车一无是处。
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/oneyear/suvs/1402_2014_suba
The bads: Well, it doesn't like direct sunlight, and usually flashes errors
and sounds alarms indicating that it's not functioning properly. In this
case, the cruise control function will work, but the adaptive part of the
equation won't. I've found that EyeSight is slow to react when traffic moves
in and out beyond my nose. I haven't needed the pre-collision warning/
braking while EyeSight was being finicky on acco... 阅读全帖
T*********s
发帖数: 20444
3
来自主题: Automobile版 - Volvo 要火阿。
烤肉辣早就标配LED了好吗
Even on rental-car-grade 2014 Corollas, LED low-beam headlights are standard
Read more: http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/sedans/1308_2014_toyota_corolla_first_drive/#ixzz2xfcWeeSV
D***0
发帖数: 5214
4
来自主题: Automobile版 - 有人喜欢2015 WRX没?
"The acceleration run from 0-60 mph takes 5.8 seconds, which is 0.3 second
slower than the manual-equipped 2015 WRX. Though still under 6 seconds, the
CVT-equipped WRX's 0-60 mph run is among the slowest we've ever recorded in
a WRX, matching the original 227-hp 2002 Subaru Impreza WRX Wagon's run to
60 mph.
Read more: http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/sedans/1402_2015_subaru_wrx_cvt_first_test/#ixzz2xgr55QTt"
D***0
发帖数: 5214
5
来自主题: Automobile版 - 2015 subaru outback 发布
MT的报道更详细。很多细节改变。顶配应该更贵了
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/suvs/1404_2015_subaru_outba

★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 8.2.2
m****7
发帖数: 208
6
.......passat 就是用了同一個1.8T 的mid size sedan 了. passat比beetle 省油的
即使大家都是一個引擎
Quick google search.........
2014 beetle drag coefficient = 0.37
2014 accord drag coefficient = 0.3
2014 mazda6 drag coefficient = 0.26
2014 passat drag coefficient = 0.29
再比beetle 跟passat 的gear ratio, beetle 的gear ratio 比較高, 就是說在同一速
度下, beetle 引擎轉數比較高. 齿轮高, 加速性高; 齿轮低, 比較省油.
accord 和 mazda 是用gear ratio 來省油的, 用大一點的displacement 給他們多一點
power 來拼加速.
passat 0-60 = 7.8s
accord 0-60 = 7.6s (thanks to the wide range of ratio of t... 阅读全帖
f******t
发帖数: 7283
7
来自主题: Automobile版 - 刚才路上跟Infiniti G37S干上了
这个我觉得是坊间传言,来源自很久以前可能某几家租车公司公司干过类似的事情。我
多次问过租车公司的staff,到底他们租的这种“大马力”车(实际上像GL450 5500磅
才300多马力,算啥大马力)有没有被做过手脚,得到的回答都是真的没改过。
并且MT也做过实测,从租车公司现场租来几辆车测试加速,测试结果都跟之前车厂提供
的量产车结果吻合:
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/convertibles/1110_top_down_
从租车公司角度来看,把改动过ECU的车子当作商业出租有很大法律风险,比如说顾客
开租来的车出事故了,车子被改过的因素就很容易被牵涉进来;并且有的州法律禁止改
动原厂车的设计,或者需要把改动过ECU的车子重新审核一遍。比如说加州法律规定,
任何对车子发动机控制和排放相关的改动,都需要当作一个新车型把修改方案提交给
CARB重新申请和审核一次。这些过程太麻烦花费太大,租车公司是不会这样去干的。
进一步,租车公司每一辆车子其实都有保险的。万一车子撞了顾客耍赖不赔,他们也有
办法来处理。所以租车公司给自己车队的车改ECU,真是自己... 阅读全帖
A***n
发帖数: 8859
8
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/hatchbacks/1407_comparison_
MT是不是被VW收买了,GTi从来没丢过第一
T*********s
发帖数: 20444
9
来自主题: Automobile版 - C&D测了2014 Odyssey
2014 Volvo XC90 AWD 0-60 9.0秒!
QUARTER MILE 16.9 sec @ 84.0 mph
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/suvs/1312_2014_volvo_xc90_f
f****t
发帖数: 15913
10
来自主题: Automobile版 - New XC90 Interior Release
" When the 2016 Volvo XC90 hits showrooms early next year, it appears ready
to take the fight to upscale German competitors. For that advantage, it will
also likely cost a good chunk more than the $40,000 starting price of the
outgoing model. With any luck, Volvo’s effort will be rewarded. We’ll know
more when we get a chance to drive the all-new XC90 by the end of this year.
Read more: http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/suvs/1404_2016_volvo_xc90_first_ride/#ixzz38P9BLZia"
--from motor trend
ba... 阅读全帖
m********2
发帖数: 3732
11
来自主题: Automobile版 - 2015 Volvo XC90 安全介绍
lol。motor trend测的,你去投诉好了。
"the XC90 needed 9 seconds to reach 60 mph。"
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/suvs/1312_2014_volvo_xc90_f
D***0
发帖数: 5214
12
来自主题: Automobile版 - i8定价是12W+吗?
看看MT上的评测吧
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/alternative/1408_2014_tesla
s*********0
发帖数: 2045
13
来自主题: Automobile版 - 2015 xc90 谍照 review 都有了
MT4月份就有了http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/suvs/1404_2016_volvo_xc90_first_ride/
而且话说新款应该是2016 XC90吧。
s*********0
发帖数: 2045
14
来自主题: Automobile版 - 新XC90最大的问题可能是
XC90用的Drive-E twin-charged T6发动机早就出来了,外面试开这款发动机的S60和
XC60的帖子一大堆。XC60从静止启动0-60才6.1秒,没有推背感才怪呢。不过autoblog
的review说在高速上开70的时候想突然加速超车的话推背感不够强,估计是
supercharger没起作用的原因。
http://www.autoblog.com/2014/04/23/2015-volvo-s60-t6-drive-e-re
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/sedans/1404_2015_volvo_s60_
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/2015-volvo-xc60-t6-drive-e-
A********h
发帖数: 2789
G*****h
发帖数: 33134
16
来自主题: Automobile版 - XC60 T6 Drive-E 30mpg
高速。local 22
有评测出来了,动力澎湃。
XC90 T6 没有意外的话应该差不多
http://m.motortrend.com/roadtests/suvs/1410_2015_volvo_xc60_t6_
i****a
发帖数: 36252
17
来自主题: Automobile版 - 2015 MB GLA250 新车报价 + 图
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/sedans/1304_2014_lexus_is_2
不是 7.2秒么. 怎么算快8秒了?
j******o
发帖数: 1788
18
来自主题: Automobile版 - 2015 MB GLA250 新车报价 + 图
你这是f-sport?屌丝版7.7s好像

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/sedans/1304_2014_lexus_is_2" x-apple-data-d........
q**d
发帖数: 1470
19
来自主题: Automobile版 - Acura TLX or MB GLA
日托最典型的特征就是随口捏来、胡编乱造,且厚颜无耻、扰乱视听。
实际上阿烤得 "Sport" 比GLA轻了整整200磅,但0-60还是慢了0.6秒。
自己看图吧。
GLA数据图来源:
http://www.motortrend.com/oftheyear/suv/2015_suv_of_the_year_co
阿烤得 "Sport"数据图来源:
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/oneyear/sedans/1310_2013_ho

0-60都跑不过accord sport
W********i
发帖数: 1115
20
来自主题: Automobile版 - 今天入了ML350, 报价格
在驾驶座和付驾之间没有么?
如图:
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/suvs/1405_2014_mercedes_ben
这个应该是没有off road package的样子
B*Z
发帖数: 7062
21
帮你google了。就是玩命不换档
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/oneyear/suvs/1405_2014_acur
update_2/
what's even better: While the transmission's in S, pulling a paddle on the
wheel puts you in a redline hanging manual mode, where pulling a paddle in D
gives you manual, but it will eventually upshift automatically.
l***j
发帖数: 3977
22
来自主题: Automobile版 - 烤肉啦还真是刹车距离比较长
With the 2014 Corolla S' 10.8-inch front disc and 10.2-inch rear disc brakes
, the Toyota came to a halt from 60 mph in 135 feet. That's longer than the
as-tested 2011 Corolla's 129-foot distance and all five cars in our Big Test
, again including the high-volume Civic (119 feet) and Sentra (124 feet).
Read more: http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/sedans/1309_2014_toyota_corolla_s_first_test/#ixzz3KIkWNuji
这还是 Corolla S 一般的烤肉不知道是不是更烂
顺便查了一下Focus Titanium 106 ft 考虑到focus比烤肉重150磅 烤肉的刹车还真是
烂啊
f******t
发帖数: 7283
23
你自己睁大眼睛看看,是6.2秒还是6.7秒?连这个最基本的常识都不懂,你说的其余基
本都是废话没啥可信度了。
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/suvs/112_0804_2008_toyota_s
m**c
发帖数: 2103
f******t
发帖数: 7283
25
来自主题: Automobile版 - 这里有开LR4的吗
首先车不是越重就越好,主要还是看结构强度怎样。比如说range rover V6版的curb
weight连5000磅都不到呢,难道说LR4比range rover更厉害?
要跟GX460比,不少杂志都有测评,C&D是一个;不过你也不妨看看这个也是有名的媒体:
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/suvs/1007_2010_land_rover_l
纸面上来讲LR4是每马力负责推15.3磅,GX460是要推17磅。按理说GX460应该慢不少对
吧,结果实测两者0-60都是6.9秒......当然有人或许会说这个测的不准那个测得准之
类的。这个就无谓争执了,大家心里有数。
再给你看看LR4动力上的差距:比LR4大不止一号的full size的Sequoia,重了将近300
磅(纠正一下一个误区,LR4不是跟full size SUV同一个重量等级的,LR4只能算5000
多磅这个级别,而full size的那些都是超过6000磅的),更大的迎风面积(风阻),
发动机也仅仅多了6马力,结果人家0-60是6.2秒,比LR4还快了0.7秒。更甚的是,
Se... 阅读全帖
e*t
发帖数: 130
26
来自主题: Automobile版 - SUV with manual transmission?
谢谢分享,很高兴知道你在开这款车。我研究了Forester Manual很久了,有几个问题
想请教一下:
1. 耗油真的是 22 City / 25 Combined / 29 Highway?
2. 烧机油真的很严重吗?你大约开多少英里后需要加机油?
3. 手排档的性能如何?是像网上说的那样吗?"The six-speed manual is geared
well enough so that getting going isn't a problem, but passing maneuvers at
highway speeds require a six-three downshift in order to avoid holding up
traffic in the fast lane, since the engine doesn't seem to make any real
power until it's revved above 3000 rpm. The shifter itself is your typical
notchy Subaru shifter... 阅读全帖
g*****o
发帖数: 5955
27
来自主题: Automobile版 - 3 缸 turbo 要成小车热门了
BMW/Mini, Audi, Opel 都搞 3 缸小 turbo,
窝窝也有一个,以后给 S40 V40 用,甚至 60 也能用
peak power output of between 104 and 178 horsepower
跟 BMW 的油耗一样,更轻小,便宜
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/hatchbacks/1412_volvo_v40_t
s*m
发帖数: 1896
28
来自主题: Automobile版 - Bmw 528/535 vs Lexus GS350
质量毫无疑问是lexus,consumer report排名第一多少年都没变过了
驾驶感最新一代GS350也有超越535的趋势,这是Motor trend最近的比较评测:http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/sedans/1206_six_cylinder_midsize_luxury_sedans/viewall.html
s*m
发帖数: 1896
29
来自主题: Automobile版 - Bmw 528/535 vs Lexus GS350
质量毫无疑问是lexus,consumer report排名第一多少年都没变过了
驾驶感最新一代GS350也有超越535的趋势,这是Motor trend最近的比较评测:http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/sedans/1206_six_cylinder_midsize_luxury_sedans/viewall.html
l*******g
发帖数: 27064
30
来自主题: Automobile版 - 对于车,我只有三个要求
lol
用完过时的再用车托的数据
我来给你几个吧
2012 focus 在Edmunds测试是110 feet
http://www.edmunds.com/ford/focus/2012/road-test-specs.html
2014年的corolla在Edmunds测试是130 feet
http://www.edmunds.com/toyota/corolla/2014/road-test-specs1.htm
2013 mkz在edmuns测试是108 feet
http://www.edmunds.com/lincoln/mkz/2013/road-test-specs.html
2012 camry edmunds测试是129
Braking is a wash. The Toyota has a firmer pedal, which we like, but its 129
-foot 60-0-mph stopping distance is long for this class. So is the Accord's
128-foot braking dist... 阅读全帖
D***0
发帖数: 5214
31
正好MT有long term test这款。
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/oneyear/suvs/1501_2014_jeep
如果想买小切,看看这个评测,会扫清不少顾虑。

with
D***0
发帖数: 5214
32
需要。具体看mt的long term update。这里是part3。
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/oneyear/suvs/1501_2014_jeep
D***0
发帖数: 5214
33
回头率小切>森林人。如果是顾虑transmission,就是个软件更新,看这个:
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/oneyear/suvs/1501_2014_jeep
B*Z
发帖数: 7062
34
来自主题: Automobile版 - motortrends评点minivan
mb也要卖新的minivan了。
The Ford Transit Connect isn't the only Euro van making waves in the minivan
market. Mercedes-Benz recently announced that its Vito van -- a familiar si
te in London as a black cab -- is making its way to the United States. Dubbe
d the Mercedes-Benz Metris for the American market, the Metris will be avail
able in both cargo and passenger versions. The Metris is slated to be a twee
ner in size, meaning it will be larger than a Transit Connect but smaller th
an full-size commercia... 阅读全帖
B*Z
发帖数: 7062
35
你说谎不眨眼么?这个是motortrends的review,基本上所有方面Caravan都是倒数第一
。请问你有什么比motortrends更高明的本事?
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/minivans-vans/1501_the_big_
5_minivans/viewall.html
m**c
发帖数: 2103
36
你读了那么多年phd干了那么多年博后不知道 引用文献时候要全面么?
最少最少也要把几大主流的评测排名都列上来取个平均吧? 随便给你补充两个。
http://usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/cars-trucks/rankings/used/
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/sedans/1212_2012_2013_midsi
S*******W
发帖数: 1352
37
撑了7年,终于换代了。
也算比较成功的一款车了。
几年年底想要换车的索南又多了一个选项。
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/suvs/1502_2016_chevrolet_eq
延续了之前的设计风格。
发动机没有大的提升,2.4L的数据和油耗都不算亮眼。
目前还没有小兄弟GMC terrain的图片出来。
S*******W
发帖数: 1352
38
撑了7年,终于换代了。
也算比较成功的一款车了。
几年年底想要换车的索南又多了一个选项。
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/suvs/1502_2016_chevrolet_eq
延续了之前的设计风格。
发动机没有大的提升,2.4L的数据和油耗都不算亮眼。
目前还没有小兄弟GMC terrain的图片出来。
B*Z
发帖数: 7062
39
来自主题: Automobile版 - Motortrends新XC90试驾
看看专家怎么说。
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/suvs/1502_2016_volvo_xc90_f
eta_mid=SOLK_1070074&zeta_rid=10201997911
B*Z
发帖数: 7062
40
The MDX didn't just do everything well -- it did everything great. And I mea
n everything. There is nothing the MDX wasn't used for during its time with
us. My mind-numbing commute, an hour and a half each way, was actually enjoy
able in the MDX. The seats were perfect for the extended time stuck in traff
ic, ride quality and NVH were more than up to par, performance was always wh
at I wanted, when I wanted it -- it was perfect for me and both my wants and
needs.
Read more: http://www.motortrend... 阅读全帖
D***n
发帖数: 6804
41
来自主题: Automobile版 - 柴油车vs汽油车
http://www.trucktrend.com/roadtests/van/163_1308_2013_mercedes_
什么都不弄零下10 摄氏度,用加热器零下40度也能启动。
s*****a
发帖数: 1269
42
来自主题: Automobile版 - BMW X4真是丑
从欧洲到美国,众口一词的评价。X6也好不到哪里去。BMW的设计主管脑子让驴踢了。
路上刚巧看到一辆,发此感慨。
http://www.wheelsonedge.com/Article/64/The-new-X4...BMWs-ugly-o
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/motoring/cars/398263/Car-Review-BMW-
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/suvs/1403_2015_bmw_x4_first
公道话,X5外形还是不错的,尤其是新版,质量如何暂且不提。
m**c
发帖数: 2103
43
油耗为什么不看官方而看c/d的测试呢。
官方chevy 5.3 2wd是 16/23/19
chevy 6.2 2wd是15/21/17
ford 3.5 2wd是17/24/20
ecoboost油耗还是明显好一点的。
至于c/d的测试,c/d能把6.2的chevy测出综合油耗16,MT也能把5.3的chevy测出综合油
耗15: http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/trucks/1501_comparison_2015_ford_f_150_vs_ram_1500_chevrolet_silverado/specs.html
你说听谁的好呢?
m********2
发帖数: 3732
44
来自主题: Automobile版 - 丰田 Scion FRS 怎么样?
我靠,人家专业杂志测的0-60都是6秒出头,到你这就变7.9秒了,你菲力猫二代啊?
The Scion accelerates from 0-60 mph in 6.2 seconds and the Mazda in 6.1
seconds
http://m.motortrend.com/roadtests/coupes/1305_2013_mazda_mx_5_m
M*******e
发帖数: 303
45
interesting opinion. This really reflects that fact that there are more
badge whores than enthusiasts:
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/coupes/112_0708_infiniti_g3
The verdict: "neither demonstrates a clear edge in handling"
Your feel more authoritative than Motortrend's?
D*******0
发帖数: 2523
46
来自主题: Automobile版 - 购买mini van求建议
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/minivans-vans/1501_the_big_
1. Sedona
2. Odyssey
3. Sienna
4. Quest
5. TC
Based on the article, #1 and #2 are very close.
m******r
发帖数: 265
47
看看汽车杂志的测评,排除法,先把Town & Country和 Quest剔除掉,原因见内。
Kia Sedona和Honda Odyssey 值得考虑
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/minivans-vans/1501_the_big_
d*****r
发帖数: 409
D***0
发帖数: 5214
49
http://m.motortrend.com/roadtests/sedans/1302_2013_mazda_6_gran
不都是7秒多么

★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 1.0.2
e****l
发帖数: 3319
50
来自主题: Automobile版 - 说说4万以内0-60在5s以内的车吧
focus rs好像还没有实测0-60在5s以下,motortrend的估计是5.4s。
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/hatchbacks/1005_ford_focus_
首页 上页 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 下页 末页 (共7页)