f*******n
发帖数: 12623 | 1 I-94期间内和申请延期期间内都不积累unlawful presence。要积累1年的unlawful
presence跟着离开美国才有10年ban。如果积累180天的unlawful presence跟着离开美
国有3年ban。 |
|
f*******n
发帖数: 12623 | 2 首先，按时递交（就是有身份的时候递交；你的身份到DS-2019结束后30天）的申请，
pending时候永远不会积累unlawful presence，无论pending多久。
其次，要逗留超过I-94上的日期才开始积累unlawful presence。J1入境时的I-94是给
“D/S”的，不是某个日期。所以结束后你一直留下来多久也不自动开始积累unlawful
presence。 |
|
f*******n
发帖数: 12623 | 3 不会产生“unlawful presence”，因为要超过I-94的日期才开始积累“unlawful
presence”，而F1学生的I-94是给“D/S”的，不是日期的，所以无论留多久都不会自
动开始积累“unlawful presence”。 |
|
z****g
发帖数: 3509 | 4 out of status不代表开始累积unlawful presence. 开始累积unlawful presence有2
种情况（假设合法入境）：停留超过I94上明确写的有效期，或移民局明确通知你你out
of status（后者从通知你那刻才开始累积）。停留期为D/S的身份，即使实际out of
status，只要移民局尚未明确通知你，给你定性，都不累积unlawful presence。
presence.
for- |
|
发帖数: 1 | 5
2
out
of
累积unlawful presence实际上有多种情况，我前面的链接里有。
我前面提过F1学生逃课非法工作等造成OUT OF STATUS时不会自动开始计算unlawful
presence，但是过了I-94的对应期限即grace period是否自动开始计算unlawful
presence，是个模糊地带，有不同说法。建议应该慎重对待。 |
|
z****g
发帖数: 3509 | 6 换句话说，unlawful presence可以理解成一个变量的名字，这个变量的值满足某些条
件时会有对应的法律后果，同时这个变量的计算方法也是法律规定好的，至于这个变量
叫unlawful presence还是叫foobar无关紧要，现在叫unlawful presence只是直观好记
。你是把这个变量名字的字面意思和变量的实际计算方法定义混淆了。
开始
for- |
|
z****g
发帖数: 3509 | 7 新公司帮你file H1B transfer和你自己file COS to B2是一样的(当然前提是现I94过
期前移民局收到相关申请)，都不会积累unlawful presence。你那个网页没有说清楚，
他那个例子里面人的H1B extension是被拒了的，于是被拒后out of status视作从原
I94过期之日开始，导致他不能在境内转为绿卡，但是没有unlawful presence。如果
transfer/extension/COS批准，则既没有out of status也没有unlawful presence。 |
|
z****g
发帖数: 3509 | 8 没事，D/S的身份没有收到过移民局正式通知out of status的情况下不积累unlawful
presence，所以没有bar。
单纯的unlawful employment不构成拒绝非移民签证的理由。有unlawful employment经
历只是强烈表明有移民倾向，会造成申请大多数非移民签证很困难。但是H1B和H4是允
许移民倾向的，所以去签H1B也没有问题。
倒是雇主非法雇佣外国人问题比较大。你老公本身没事。 |
|
发帖数: 1 | 9 谢谢！
你知道有任何方法可以境内转身份的吗？谢谢！
: 没事，D/S的身份没有收到过移民局正式通知out of status的情况下不积累
unlawful
: presence，所以没有bar。
: 单纯的unlawful employment不构成拒绝非移民签证的理由。有unlawful
employment经
: 历只是强烈表明有移民倾向，会造成申请大多数非移民签证很困难。但是H1B和
H4是允
: 许移民倾向的，所以去签H1B也没有问题。
: 倒是雇主非法雇佣外国人问题比较大。你老公本身没事。
|
|
f****b
发帖数: 376 | 10 我和领导都收到REF, 居然内容还不一样。
我以前是F1 (2003/09-2009/05) 中间只在2005/01回国一次也签证啦,现在H1B.求大家
帮忙。原文
"you were physically present in the united states prior to your last
admission.Submit evidence to establish that you did not accrue unlawful
presence beginning on Sept 2004 to July 2009.The evidence may include the
following:
a)Proof of lawful status or as a parole.
b)Proof that you did not accrue unlawful presence because of statute
c)Proof that you did not accrue unlawful presence because of USCIS policy"
Sept 2... 阅读全帖 |
|
f****b
发帖数: 376 | 11 求教REF首次寄到以后，今天又变成又要新东西？请教是这个意思吗？
Request for Evidence Response Review
On November 29, 2012, your notice I485, APPLICATION TO REGISTER PERMANENT
RESIDENCE OR TO ADJUST STATUS was processed and mailed to the address on
record. If you have not received it within 30 days of November 29, 2012,
contact customer service at 1-800-375-5283. If you move NGLISH
Once a timely response to the request for evidence is received by USCIS, we
review the evidence or information you submitted. If you submitted the
... 阅读全帖 |
|
s******r
发帖数: 45 | 12 我的情况是这样的：07年９月份f1转h4，10月份通过律师递交了绿卡申请, based on
ld的EB2（PD：2006年11月）。09年６月份H4到期没有续。2010年１月份485被拒，这时
才知道当时的排期倒退了，所以绿卡不是properly filed case。这样unlawful
presence dates back to 09年6月份,迄今已经超过180天，如果出国的话，会trigger
3-year bar，所以律师不让出境。
我们采取的措施有：1-今年4月，LD申请了EB1,重新递交了我的485，但刚知道我的485
又一次被拒，正式通知还未收到；
2-重新申请了h4,但是也被拒了，原因就是h4到期时没有续；
3-现在雇主给我申请了h1,批了，但是需要回北京签证才行。
我们找到了移民局的一个memo，说如果可以证明不是我们的错的话，09年6月到2010年1
月的这段时间不算是unlawful presence。但是现在律师说，如果回国签H1的话，可能
这条memo不会被DHS考虑，即他们认为unlawful presence仍存在。另外，在上面的两个
措施中，我们都附 |
|
s********n
发帖数: 52 | 13 辛辛苦苦等了3个多月,等来了485的RFE.内容如下:
"A review of your file and USCIS records indicates that you were physically
present in the US prior to your last admission. Submit evidence to establish
that you did not accrue unlawful presence beginning on February 14, 2005
and ending on January 1, 2006, and a second period of January 27, 2007 to
April 25, 2009. This evidence may include the following:
a) Proof of lawful status or as a parolee;
b) Proof that you did not accrue unlawful presence because of statute;
c... 阅读全帖 |
|
f****b
发帖数: 376 | 14 我和领导都收到REF, 居然内容还不一样。
更新时间段细节
我以前是F1 (2003/09-2009/05) 中间只在2005/01回国一次也签证啦,然后2009/06 OPT
知道H1B 2009/10开始.上班以后经常短期出境开会，都有H1签证，USCIS也没觉得有问
题，反而以前做学生乖乖待美国被怀疑身份。求大家帮忙。
我的PD 2010/01，这次大潮在2012/3月份交上去的485,交485之前最近一次入境今年
2012/1月底。求大家
帮忙。原文
"you were physically present in the united states prior to your last
admission.Submit evidence to establish that you did not accrue unlawful
presence beginning on Sept 2004 to July 2009.The evidence may include the
following:
a)Proof of lawful status or as a parole.
b... 阅读全帖 |
|
f****b
发帖数: 376 | 15 求教REF首次寄到以后，今天又变成又要新东西？请教是这个意思吗？
Request for Evidence Response Review
On November 29, 2012, your notice I485, APPLICATION TO REGISTER PERMANENT
RESIDENCE OR TO ADJUST STATUS was processed and mailed to the address on
record. If you have not received it within 30 days of November 29, 2012,
contact customer service at 1-800-375-5283. If you move NGLISH
Once a timely response to the request for evidence is received by USCIS, we
review the evidence or information you submitted. If you submitted the
... 阅读全帖 |
|
f*******n
发帖数: 12623 | 16 “签证”只是给进入美国的。进入美国之后“签证”有效期没有什么意义。在美国的逗
留期和身份是由I-94决定的。在美国不能申请美国签证，所以你说的延期肯定是延期身
份，而不是延期签证。延期通过之后应该给一张新的I-94，有新的逗留期。你先要把这
个日期搞清楚。
在美国逗留超过那个日期就开始积累unlawful presence。如果有起码180天的unlawful
presence，跟着离开美国，就有3年不能进入美国。如果有起码1年的unlawful
presence，跟着离开美国，就有10年不能进入美国。对申请绿卡本身没有影响，但是那
个禁令过了之前他们是不能得到美国签证的，所以在那段时间申请绿卡的话会失败，因
为他们拿不到移民签证。 |
|
l*******n
发帖数: 8388 | 17 【 以下文字转载自 EB23 讨论区 】
发信人: xiaoyugod (ohmygod), 信区: EB23
标 题: EB1 REF proof of lawful status
关键字: I485 REF Proof Lawful
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Apr 1 12:28:41 2014, 美东)
申请485时收到移民局的REF了：
a review of your file and USCIS records indicates that you were physically
present in the united states prior to your last admission. submit evidence
that establish that you did not accrue unlawful presence beginning on August
1, 2010 and ending on november 21, 2013. the evidence may include the
following:
a) proo... 阅读全帖 |
|
f*****s
发帖数: 115 | 18 要求两个evidence.
1. 说结婚证公证不够，要求 evidence that the marriage took place and that the
marriage was registered. 当初在国内结婚的，除了结婚证公证和一些当时的照片，
还能用啥作evidence？
2. 要求submit evidence to establish that you did not accrue unlawful
presence 从 200x年某月某日 到 200x年某月某日。
a) proof of lawful status or as a parolee;
b) proof that you did not accrue unlawful presence because of statute
c) proof that you did not accrue unlawful presence because of USCIS policy
这段时间内主申请人是OPT，副申请人应该一直是F2，但是不记得申请OPT时有没有要求
给副申请人重新申请F2，印象里不需要阿。不懂... 阅读全帖 |
|
A**********n
发帖数: 824 | 19 我在9楼给了你链接，听谁说都不如自己直接看。
我对那个链接的理解是：递交I485了，你就可以合法待美国，不一定要等到I140批准后
的COS。换句话说，一旦你concurrent了，在等待期间你都是合法的。不知你为什么想
着要PP？I140被拒是最糟糕的情况，EB1A的140也真难说。所以，“等”对你是最保险
，有利的。
原文在这里，注意这句话：“By filing I-485, some applicants will be able to
stop running of unlawful presence 。”
The USCIS accepts the I-485 adjustment of status applications filed
concurrently with the I-140 employment-based (EB) immigrant visa petitions
from immigrant visa beneficiaries in the EB-1, EB-2 and EB-3 categories
whose priority dates are... 阅读全帖 |
|
发帖数: 1 | 20 rt --
a review of your file and USCIS records indicates that you were physically
present in the US prior to your last admission. Submit evidence to establis
that you didn't accrue unlawful presence beginning on 6/2009 and end ending
on 2/1/2012/. This evidence may include the following --
a. proof of lawful status or as a parolee
b. proof that you did not accrue unlawful presence becasue of statute.
c. Proof that you did not accrue unlawful presence because of USCIS policy
我是2009年6月持f1签证来美国上学，然后... 阅读全帖 |
|
f*******n
发帖数: 12623 | 21 这个跟245(k)的180天无关，因为反正她已经离境又入境了。245(k)只看最后一次入境
之后的。
这里的问题应该是9B ban，就是积累了180天的unlawful presence，跟着离开美国，就
引起3年的ban。这个ban应该2015年4月开始，所以2018年4月结束。
unlawful presence一般是过了I-94上的日期开始积累，但是有些例外，譬如及时申请
的（就是还有身份的时候申请的）COS或EOS申请pending期间（无论最后批不批），不
积累unlawful presence。问题是她当时算不算有pending 的COS申请。她当时的确有
pending的H1b petition申请。而且H1b petition申请上选了COS。但是一般COS
pending期间离境一般被认为自动放弃申请，因为离开美国之后就没有身份了，也没有
身份可以change了。所以她回来之后，虽然H1b petition申请还是pending，是不是COS
申请就已经不pending了？问题就是在这里。
很好奇的是，如果她真的有这个ban，那2015年6月为什么让她入境。她进得来已... 阅读全帖 |
|
发帖数: 1 | 22 额这个地方有疑问。“tolling”是推迟的意思吗？推迟的是计算哪个时间？
如果COS being abandon在申请人unlawful Precense 之前120天发生，那这个good
cause不就不能提供任何保护了么？
比如我太太她是2014年6月2日离境的，abandon了COS，往后数120天刚好是2014年9月30
日，可她的i94给到10月10日，所以这个good cause没有任何帮助？
我原来的理解是，只要good cause，之前申请了COS，则这120天推迟期是从unlawful
presence的第一天开始数，这样推迟120天计算unlawful 180天。。。。
COS
not |
|
G******e
发帖数: 9567 | 23
An extension of stay denial cannot be appealed. A Motion to Reconsider could
be filed. You may want to speak with an attorney regarding the chances that
such a motion would have in your parent case.
Remember, your parent is now accumulating unlawful presence. As such, if
they remain in the United States greater than 180 days unlawfully and then
depart, they will not be able to come back to the US for three years. If the
period of unlawful presence becomes greater than 1 year, the bar increases
... 阅读全帖 |
|
c******n
发帖数: 2439 | 24 收到要求补充材料，证明h1之前的身份合法。之前我是f1/opt,而且i20都寄给他了。还
有其它材料可以证明我身份合法吗？是不是uscis本身就是没事找事。
谢谢大家的建议。
原文如下：
A review of your file and USCIS records indicates that you were physically
present in the United States prior to your last admission. You entered the
United States on August 10, 2005 and January 05,2006 in F1 status. Submit
evidence to establish that you did not accrue unlawful presence beginning on
August 10, 2005 until you applied to change your status on April 08, 2009.
This evidence may include the ... 阅读全帖 |
|
f****b
发帖数: 376 | 25 我和领导都收到REF, 居然内容还不一样。
更新时间段细节
我以前是F1 (2003/09-2009/05) 中间只在2005/01回国一次也签证啦,然后2009/06 OPT
知道H1B 2009/10开始.上班以后经常短期出境开会，都有H1签证，USCIS也没觉得有问
题，反而以前做学生乖乖待美国被怀疑身份。求大家帮忙。
我的PD 2010/01，这次大潮在2012/3月份交上去的485,交485之前最近一次入境今年
2012/1月底。
"you were physically present in the united states prior to your last
admission.Submit evidence to establish that you did not accrue unlawful
presence beginning on Sept 2004 to July 2009.The evidence may include the
following:
a)Proof of lawful status or as a parole.
b)Proof th... 阅读全帖 |
|
f****b
发帖数: 376 | 26 求教REF首次寄到以后，今天又变成又要新东西？请教是这个意思吗？
Request for Evidence Response Review
On November 29, 2012, your notice I485, APPLICATION TO REGISTER PERMANENT
RESIDENCE OR TO ADJUST STATUS was processed and mailed to the address on
record. If you have not received it within 30 days of November 29, 2012,
contact customer service at 1-800-375-5283. If you move NGLISH
Once a timely response to the request for evidence is received by USCIS, we
review the evidence or information you submitted. If you submitted the
... 阅读全帖 |
|
d*********y
发帖数: 748 | 27 从OH LAW网站上找的。你以后要多注意看新闻哟。
Under the shadow of the visible Senate CIR 'Gang of 8,' reportedly the House
CIR group of 8 has developed a very interesting proposal for the CIR
component of "legalization of undocumented immigrants." Reportedly, the
proposal lays out three different groups with different legalization relief:
Group I: DREAMers & Low-Skilled Farm Workers: Expedited road to legal status
in order not to punish those who were brought illegally to the country by
their parents, and agricultu... 阅读全帖 |
|
F*********u
发帖数: 12190 | 28 EAD在I-485被拒以前都是有效的，并不像延期失败那样，属于在有效期外居留
比如这里http://abroad123.blogspot.com/2008/12/i-485.html就提到
在 INA 212(a)(9)(B) 中，根据 (ii) 条的说法，authorized stay 是不算
unlawfully present 的 (an alien is deemed to be unlawfully present ... after
the expiration of the period of stay authorized)。因而，I-485 的被拒，其后
的 unlawfully present 不会追溯到被拒之前的进入 AOS 之时。
当然I-485被拒后立刻out of status这一点我俩没有争议 |
|
c****n
发帖数: 1630 | 29 我一直的理解是，转身份申请pending期间，是out of status + authorized stay，
无论最后结果是否批准。如果被拒，从被拒之日期才算unlawful presense。
你认为out of status第一天起就计入unlawful presence，有出处吗？
B2
unlawful |
|
l***a
发帖数: 2677 | 30 可不可以跟你们以抬杠为乐的说不清。没玩过枪的说起来不当回事，玩枪的一般在屋里
或车库里擦枪，不让别人看到，没有几个拿院子里得瑟的。你想想如果邻居没事在院子
里摆弄枪，你但不担心走火伤人。
In addition, individuals generally may not possess firearms in certain
places, such as public buildings (PC § 171b), airport and passenger vessel
terminal "sterile areas" (PC § 171.5), or on the grounds or within 1000
feet of a public or private school, or on a college campus or property. (PC
§ 626.9) Possession during specified crimes increases the punishment. (Exs:
PC §§ 12021.5, 12022, 12022.3, 12022... 阅读全帖 |
|
D*****E
发帖数: 9352 | 31 查了下wiki，加州是31个城堡法州啊
Section 198.5 of the state penal code reads:
198.5. Any person using force intended or likely to cause death or
great bodily injury within his or her residence shall be presumed to
have held a reasonable fear of imminent peril of death or great
bodily injury to self, family, or a member of the household when that
force is used against another person, not a member of the family or
household, who unlawfully and forcibly enters or has unlawfully and
forcibly entered the residenc... 阅读全帖 |
|
n**********1
发帖数: 206 | 32 Pardon me, NOT FUNNY， 我个人从来不觉得种族主义的笑话Funny。 这个是我自己写
的， 有些法律概念我解释的不够清楚，语言能力也实在不强。
Class Action is a legal action where a legal service provider represents a
group of people who are similarly situated to challenge a wrongdoer and
request damages.
About a year ago, I received a class action judgment check resulting from a
settlement with Chase bank. Although I have never sued chase bank personally
, I was represented by a group of lawyers to sue chase bank for its unlawful
business practices, speci... 阅读全帖 |
|
o******e
发帖数: 1761 | 33 二。美国枪支管理现状及有关规定
感谢MITBBS各位网友的辛勤工作，本文引用自 O编辑总结： MITBBS网友谈美国枪支管
理现状及有关规定 （链接：http://blog.renren.com/blog/241551763/892007824?bfrom=01020110200）并进行部分补充
首先声明，我个人是支持严格枪支管理的。如果能真的保证罪犯的枪也被没收，我也支
持禁枪。但绝对不支持现行民主党挂羊头卖狗肉的，只许州官放火的哗众取宠的假禁枪
（如：只追究即禁枪法案颁布日之后的枪支，对以前枪支既往不咎--笑话，旧枪就不能
杀人么？）要禁就宣布回收政策，过期出动军队，挨家挨户搜，搜到者严处！并严守
边境，打击贩毒枪支相连之犯罪。如果做不到上面的，我则支持合法理智的公民拥枪，
包括加强学校，商场等公共场合警力，或许可CCW。
亦强调枪非万能，望海外华人无论支持或是反对禁枪者，均能时时警醒，be aware of
our surroundings,不沦为暴力犯罪之牺牲。
望大家在外还是能携程一致，必竟争论之始皆为大家安全。
问：美国现在的枪支管理严格吗？
答：在人口密度较大的州（如MA... 阅读全帖 |
|
l**********r
发帖数: 4612 | 34 【 以下文字转载自 WaterWorld 讨论区 】
发信人: StephenKing (金博士), 信区: WaterWorld
标 题: 在家里开枪自卫合法吗？
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sun Dec 30 11:20:57 2012, 美东)
简单的回答是不一定。我不是学法律的，下面的信息都是网上扒来的，如有谬误，请大
家指出。
一般的刑事民事法律在美国是州法，所以不同州的具体标准不同。使用枪械自卫在不同
州大致遵循三种不同的原则：1，Duty to Retreat; 2,Castle Doctrine; 3, Stand
Your Ground.
解释一下这三种原则：
1.Duty to Retreat。 面对侵害，首先要后退回避，屋子外的可以退到屋子里，屋子里
的可以退到屋子外，只有在确实没有安全退路的情况下才可以使用枪械自卫。应用这种
原则的地方，开枪自卫者需要举证说明自己开枪前已经退却了，如果可以回避侵害没有
做而直接开枪自卫，则会被视作攻击行为。
2.Castle Doctrine。城堡法是目前应用最广泛的自卫原则，已经有31个州通过了这类
法案，大同小异。城... 阅读全帖 |
|
l*******e
发帖数: 6436 | 35 It is unlawful to buy or sell any fish taken by angling from any water area
in the state where a Fishing License is required.
It is unlawful to transport and introduce any aquatic species (fish,
invertebrate, plant) from one body of water to another.
It is unlawful for the public to tag and release fish into any public water
area.
合法范围内的选择是到pay lake或者养殖场买鱼放回pay lake或者养殖场 |
|
c******n
发帖数: 4965 | 36 I think the best approach for maintainers of this board is to say
nothing except
"look for the authoritative sources"
for example
http://law.onecle.com/california/penal/198.5.html
Any person using force intended or likely to cause death or
great bodily injury within his or her residence shall be presumed to
have held a reasonable fear of imminent peril of death or great
bodily injury to self, family, or a member of the household when that
force is used against another person, not a member of the... 阅读全帖 |
|
d*******1
发帖数: 104 | 37 California California Penal Code § 198.5 sets forth that "Any person using
force intended or likely to cause death or great bodily injury within his or
her residence shall be presumed to have held a reasonable fear of imminent
peril of death or great bodily injury to self, family, or a member of the
household when that force is used against another person, not a member of
the family or household, who unlawfully and forcibly enters or has
unlawfully and forcibly entered the residence and the pers... 阅读全帖 |
|
p*********e
发帖数: 32207 | 38 你可以参考一下florida statute 776
justifiable use of force这一章
首先仅有如下情况才可以使用deadly force:
776.012?Use of force in defense of person.—A person is justified in using
force, except deadly force, against another when and to the extent that the
person reasonably believes that such conduct is necessary to defend himself
or herself or another against the other’s imminent use of unlawful force.
However, a person is justified in the use of deadly force and does not have
a duty to retreat if:
(1)?He or she reason... 阅读全帖 |
|
d****e
发帖数: 2856 | 39 http://www.georgiapacking.org/law.php
There are 3 code sections that govern when lethal or deadly force may
lawfully be used.
1) Defense from a forcible felony: A person is justified in using threats or
force to the degree they reasonably believe it is necessary to stop another
person's imminent use of unlawful force. A person is justified in using
deadly force which may harm or kill only if he or she reasonably believes
that such force is necessary to prevent death or great bodily injury to
him... 阅读全帖 |
|
f***a
发帖数: 1434 | 40 你只看了（1），还有（2）
(2) The presumption set forth in subsection (1) does not apply if:
(4) A person who unlawfully and by force enters or attempts to enter a
person’s dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle is presumed to be doing
so with the intent to commit an unlawful act involving force or violence.
http://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2011/776.013
break in + intent of unlawful act，是intent，而不必是imminent。这时候intent
这个点是可以argue的，好律师可以找出来。举个例子，律师可以说他是往回跑找掩体
——对方到底为什么往回跑已经没有人知道，还不是靠一张嘴。
再次... 阅读全帖 |
|
p*********e
发帖数: 32207 | 41 http://www.texasgunlaws.org/chap9.htm
SUBCHAPTER D. PROTECTION OF PROPERTY
Sec. 9.41. PROTECTION OF ONE'S OWN PROPERTY.
(a) A person in lawful possession of land or tangible, movable property is
justified in using force against another when and to the degree the actor
reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to prevent or
terminate the other's trespass on the land or unlawful interference with the
property.
(b) A person unlawfully dispossessed of land or tangible, movable property
... 阅读全帖 |
|
p*********e
发帖数: 32207 | 42 http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/Docs/PE/htm/PE.9.htm#9.41
这是texas statutes,官网链接.
SUBCHAPTER D. PROTECTION OF PROPERTY
Sec. 9.41. PROTECTION OF ONE'S OWN PROPERTY. (a) A person in lawful
possession of land or tangible, movable property is justified in using force
against another when and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the
force is immediately necessary to prevent or terminate the other's trespass
on the land or unlawful interference with the property.
(b) A person unlawfull... 阅读全帖 |
|
p*********e
发帖数: 32207 | 43 http://www.texasgunlaws.org/chap9.htm
SUBCHAPTER D. PROTECTION OF PROPERTY
Sec. 9.41. PROTECTION OF ONE'S OWN PROPERTY.
(a) A person in lawful possession of land or tangible, movable property is
justified in using force against another when and to the degree the actor
reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to prevent or
terminate the other's trespass on the land or unlawful interference with the
property.
(b) A person unlawfully dispossessed of land or tangible, movable property
... 阅读全帖 |
|
p*********e
发帖数: 32207 | 44 http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/Docs/PE/htm/PE.9.htm#9.41
这是texas statutes,官网链接.
SUBCHAPTER D. PROTECTION OF PROPERTY
Sec. 9.41. PROTECTION OF ONE'S OWN PROPERTY. (a) A person in lawful
possession of land or tangible, movable property is justified in using force
against another when and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the
force is immediately necessary to prevent or terminate the other's trespass
on the land or unlawful interference with the property.
(b) A person unlawfull... 阅读全帖 |
|
w***w
发帖数: 6301 | 45 Underground poker is poker played in a venue that is not operating in
accordance with the gaming laws of its jurisdiction.
What exactly constitutes "underground" poker depends on the laws of the
locality in question. In many (but not all) jurisdictions, an unlicensed
poker game may nevertheless be legal so long as the game is played in a
dwelling house, the host is not profiting from hosting the game and/or the
entry fees do not exceed a certain threshold. Even if a game itself is
unlawful, in s... 阅读全帖 |
|
a**y
发帖数: 118 | 46 156个人中其中一个署名的叫甘任远，早就被方舟子揭露过了。
http://it.sohu.com/s2004/mgt.shtml
方舟子·
《美国政治老太太和华人“美国通”》一文发表后，招来许多人的攻击，那是在预
料之中的。好比说，许多人美滋滋买了赝品在那里欣赏、赞叹不已，我偏要大煞风景说
那是假货，自然会有人恼羞成怒，更何况还有的人的脑袋是被屁股决定了的，自以为与
林达夫妇（丁林）是坐同一条板凳的，明知有假也要拼着老命为其辩护。在这些攻击者
中，有一位勇敢地署了真名“甘任远”，而且还公布了电子邮址。此人自称现在在美国
南加州，和我在同一个城市生活，上网就是为了骂方舟子、打方舟子的假，贴了几张大
字报质疑我的打假动机和留美身份问题，老掉了牙的攻击法，没有反响，改而替丁林辩
护，连写几篇《方舟子驳倒丁林了吗？——打假方舟子》，声称美国的确有法律“禁止
民众在国会表达自己的政见”，并非丁林的虚构，像丁林说的那样是“为了让立法者的
表达不承受压力”。甘任远大段大段引用美国法律条文和判例，虽然他自己其实看不懂
那些引文，但自称在南加州的法学院教法律，已足以吓倒同样看不懂那些引文的读者了
。据说... 阅读全帖 |
|
a**y
发帖数: 118 | 47 156个人中其中一个署名的叫甘任远，早就被方舟子揭露过了。
http://it.sohu.com/s2004/mgt.shtml
方舟子·
《美国政治老太太和华人“美国通”》一文发表后，招来许多人的攻击，那是在预
料之中的。好比说，许多人美滋滋买了赝品在那里欣赏、赞叹不已，我偏要大煞风景说
那是假货，自然会有人恼羞成怒，更何况还有的人的脑袋是被屁股决定了的，自以为与
林达夫妇（丁林）是坐同一条板凳的，明知有假也要拼着老命为其辩护。在这些攻击者
中，有一位勇敢地署了真名“甘任远”，而且还公布了电子邮址。此人自称现在在美国
南加州，和我在同一个城市生活，上网就是为了骂方舟子、打方舟子的假，贴了几张大
字报质疑我的打假动机和留美身份问题，老掉了牙的攻击法，没有反响，改而替丁林辩
护，连写几篇《方舟子驳倒丁林了吗？——打假方舟子》，声称美国的确有法律“禁止
民众在国会表达自己的政见”，并非丁林的虚构，像丁林说的那样是“为了让立法者的
表达不承受压力”。甘任远大段大段引用美国法律条文和判例，虽然他自己其实看不懂
那些引文，但自称在南加州的法学院教法律，已足以吓倒同样看不懂那些引文的读者了
。据说... 阅读全帖 |
|
w*l
发帖数: 2550 | 48 方舟子打甘任远是假打。
先攻击别人的身份，这个虽然不太高尚，但这里不作更多评价。
其次，方舟子对美国国会大厦有关政治示威的理解是不正确的：
甘任远的反驳方舟子上一篇文章的文章写的：
“ 方舟子又说: “不仅是美国国会大厦，像美国最高法院、美国国会图书馆，也
都是禁止政治示威的，有关法律条文的措辞都一模一样.” 关于禁止在国会大厦内部示
威的法律, 是国会专门的立法,叫做STATUATE. 美国国会警察委员会的具体规定
REGULATIONS和相应的解释 INTERPRETATIONS. 都是针对国会建筑物的具体情况作出的.
方舟子说的 “一模一样”是指国会的立法呢, 还是指那些具体规定和解释? ”
甘文举了下面的判例：
“As the seat of the legislative branch of the federal government, the
inside of the Capitol might well be considered to be the heart of the nation
’s expressive activity and exchange o... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
t****v
发帖数: 9235 | 50 骗子甘任远事迹介绍
标 题: Re: 海内外156位学人就刘菊花硕士论文涉嫌抄袭事件致中国社会科学
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Wed Feb 29 18:36:29 2012, 美东)
156个人中其中一个署名的叫甘任远，早就被方舟子揭露过了。
http://it.sohu.com/s2004/mgt.shtml
方舟子·
《美国政治老太太和华人“美国通”》一文发表后，招来许多人的攻击，那是在预
料之中的。好比说，许多人美滋滋买了赝品在那里欣赏、赞叹不已，我偏要大煞风景说
那是假货，自然会有人恼羞成怒，更何况还有的人的脑袋是被屁股决定了的，自以为与
林达夫妇（丁林）是坐同一条板凳的，明知有假也要拼着老命为其辩护。在这些攻击者
中，有一位勇敢地署了真名“甘任远”，而且还公布了电子邮址。此人自称现在在美国
南加州，和我在同一个城市生活，上网就是为了骂方舟子、打方舟子的假，贴了几张大
字报质疑我的打假动机和留美身份问题，老掉了牙的攻击法，没有反响，改而替丁林辩
护，连写几篇《方舟子驳倒丁林了吗？——打假方舟子》，声称美国的确有法律“禁止
民众在国会表达自己的政见”，并非丁林的虚构，像... 阅读全帖 |
|
