d***p
发帖数: 937 | 1 2013新款Fusion使用了Ford大肆吹捧的Ecoboost Engine (Turbo charge + direct
injection) .结果还不如老款Fusion 省油。也不如Altima和Accord with I4 engine省
油。
实际MPG远小于Ford号称的EPA。
Boost起来的Horsepower 也不如自然吸气的更平滑有力。
新款Escape 也有这样的问题。
看来Ford在向现代学习，全面夸大EPA 数字。
http://usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/cars-trucks/best-cars-blog
Small Turbocharged Engines Fall Short of Consumer Reports' Expectations
By Jim Sharifi
12:00PM Feb 06, 2013
While some automakers have made a move toward smaller, turbocharged engines
to improve fuel economy in cars like the Chevrolet Cruze and Ford Fusion, a
new Consumer Reports study finds that these types of engines miss the mark
in real world tests.
“We put the cars through our standard fuel economy tests, with both city
driving and highway speeds,” says Tom Mutchler, Automotive Engineer at
Consumer Reports. Among affordable midsize cars, the Ford Fusion with the
turbocharged 1.6-liter EcoBoost engine got 25 mpg in Consumer Reports
testing, while cars with larger, conventional four-cylinder engines like the
Nissan Altima and Honda Accord delivered 31 and 30 mpg, respectively.
Mutchler says that the Altima and Accord “are also quicker and have
smoother power delivery than the Fusion.” The Altima and Accord matched
their combined fuel economy ratings from the EPA in Consumer Reports’ tests
, but the Fusion fell short of the EPA’s 29 mpg estimate.
The trend carries over to affordable compact SUVs as well. Despite similar
fuel economy ratings of 26 mpg combined from the EPA, Consumer Reports found
that the naturally-aspirated Honda CR-V accelerated more quickly and
delivered better fuel economy than the Ford Escape with the 1.6-liter
EcoBoost engine. The CR-V averaged 23 mpg in Consumer Reports tests, while
the Ford Escape delivered 22 mpg. In the affordable small car class,
Consumer Reports notes that the turbocharged Chevrolet Cruze Eco came in
lower than its combined EPA rating of 31 mpg, earning 27 mpg in the
publication’s study.
While this isn’t the first time Consumer Reports has called fuel economy
into question, some members of the automotive press are unsurprised by the
test results. “Turbocharged and naturally aspirated engines vary little in
combustion efficiency, so both powertrains require about the same amount of
fuel to produce the same number of ponies,” writes Popular Mechanics. “As
a result, bolting on a turbo to a slightly smaller engine doesn't instantly
translate into better performance; it just lets the driver tap into an extra
boost at higher RPM's.”
Consumer Reports’ tests come at a time when Americans are spending more of
their pretax income on fuel than they have in the last 30 years. The U.S.
Energy Information Administration reports that four percent of the average
household's income was spent on gasoline in 2012, which equates to $2,912.
If you’re shopping for a new car, Mutchler says that “what’s important
are the actual fuel economy numbers, not necessarily the size of the engine
under the hood.” |
d***p
发帖数: 937 | 2 fulley.com里的用户实际体验也与CR 报告相符。 |
Y****a
发帖数: 17170 | |
g********d
发帖数: 19244 | 4 taigong春节休长假
福特宣传部只剩liujj一人值班
没人陪你玩了
【在 d***p 的大作中提到】
: 2013新款Fusion使用了Ford大肆吹捧的Ecoboost Engine (Turbo charge + direct
: injection) .结果还不如老款Fusion 省油。也不如Altima和Accord with I4 engine省
: 油。
: 实际MPG远小于Ford号称的EPA。
: Boost起来的Horsepower 也不如自然吸气的更平滑有力。
: 新款Escape 也有这样的问题。
: 看来Ford在向现代学习，全面夸大EPA 数字。
: http://usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/cars-trucks/best-cars-blog
: Small Turbocharged Engines Fall Short of Consumer Reports' Expectations
: By Jim Sharifi
|
d*f
发帖数: 118 | 5 新款是哪一年到哪一年的？正在看一个2011的fusion |
d***p
发帖数: 937 | 6 2013
【在 d*f 的大作中提到】
: 新款是哪一年到哪一年的？正在看一个2011的fusion
|
L**S
发帖数: 7833 | 7 鼻祖在此
Fifty miles per gallon? That’s what Honda claimed. But Heather Peters’
2006 Civic Hybrid never did better than 41, maybe 42 mpg. And when Honda “
fixed” her battery, the car dropped below 30 mpg. Instead of agreeing to
take part in a class-action suit against Honda, which would have made trial
lawyers rich while giving car owners minimal payback, Peters took the
automaker to small claims court—where she was just awarded $9,867.
Read more: http://business.time.com/2012/02/02/woman-gets-nearly-10k-suing-honda-for-misleading-about-civic-hybrids-mpg/#ixzz2Kdf29rfH |
l***j
发帖数: 3977 | 8 我就纳闷了 两个月前你就来这里说这事 现在还说
你是发帖有钱挣还是怎么着？
【在 d***p 的大作中提到】
: 2013新款Fusion使用了Ford大肆吹捧的Ecoboost Engine (Turbo charge + direct
: injection) .结果还不如老款Fusion 省油。也不如Altima和Accord with I4 engine省
: 油。
: 实际MPG远小于Ford号称的EPA。
: Boost起来的Horsepower 也不如自然吸气的更平滑有力。
: 新款Escape 也有这样的问题。
: 看来Ford在向现代学习，全面夸大EPA 数字。
: http://usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/cars-trucks/best-cars-blog
: Small Turbocharged Engines Fall Short of Consumer Reports' Expectations
: By Jim Sharifi
|
t*****g
发帖数: 7455 | 9 白痴，休假了不是更有闲暇时间了
出差了3天，刚回来
【在 g********d 的大作中提到】
: taigong春节休长假
: 福特宣传部只剩liujj一人值班
: 没人陪你玩了
|
g********d
发帖数: 19244 | 10 看来是回老家探亲完了
【在 t*****g 的大作中提到】
: 白痴，休假了不是更有闲暇时间了
: 出差了3天，刚回来
|
|
|
x*********n
发帖数: 28013 | |
f*******7
发帖数: 943 | |
y***g
发帖数: 10422 | 13 别JB装逼了。
别人休7天你丫休3天，五毛不好挣吧？
注：JB是语气词，不算脏话，不算PA。（仅对taigong有效）
【在 t*****g 的大作中提到】
: 白痴，休假了不是更有闲暇时间了
: 出差了3天，刚回来
|
d***p
发帖数: 937 | 14 你才拿钱发帖呢。
我两个月前说什么了？
这是几天前的新闻，两个月前还没有关于这个涡轮增压的CR Report。
几个月前Ford大肆夸大Hybird 的Fusion和C-Max 到是被CR和许多其它媒体揭露，包括
Detroit的一些媒体。
你既然是拿钱发帖就应该敬业些。
【在 l***j 的大作中提到】
: 我就纳闷了 两个月前你就来这里说这事 现在还说
: 你是发帖有钱挣还是怎么着？
|
y***g
发帖数: 10422 | 15 哈哈。周五出差，周一回来。taigong的从事的工作相当特殊嘛。
【在 t*****g 的大作中提到】
: 白痴，休假了不是更有闲暇时间了
: 出差了3天，刚回来
|
T*****e
发帖数: 799 | 16 You lose if you get serious to those gays.
【在 d***p 的大作中提到】
: 你才拿钱发帖呢。
: 我两个月前说什么了？
: 这是几天前的新闻，两个月前还没有关于这个涡轮增压的CR Report。
: 几个月前Ford大肆夸大Hybird 的Fusion和C-Max 到是被CR和许多其它媒体揭露，包括
: Detroit的一些媒体。
: 你既然是拿钱发帖就应该敬业些。
|
d***p
发帖数: 937 | 17 The Fusion with a 2-liter, turbocharged engine got 22 miles per gallon and
accelerated to 60 miles per hour in 7.4 seconds.
By contrast, the Honda Accord sedan with a 3.5-liter, six-cylinder engine
got 26 miles per gallon and accelerated in 6.3 seconds, according to
Consumer Reports.
Ford's 1.6-liter, turbocharged Fusion achieved 25 miles per gallon and
accelerated to 60 miles per hour in 8.9 seconds, Consumer Reports said. This
compares to the 2.5-liter, four-cylinder Toyota Camry, which got 27 miles
per gallon and accelerated in 7.7 seconds.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/02/05/engines-study-idUSL1N |
