w******0
发帖数: 1404 | 1 还有很多重要的脚注。愿意进一步了解请看
http://www.amazon.com/Grammar-Beyond-Basics-Daniel-Wallace/dp/0310218950
这里就是本书266－69的内容。
John 1:1 states: )En a)rxh==| h)=n oJ lo/gov, kai\ oJ lo/gov h)=n pro\v to\n
qeo/n, kai\ qeo\v h)=n oJ lo/gov. In the last part of the verse, the clause
kai\ qeo\v h)=n oJ lo/gov (John 1:1c), qeo/v is the PN. It is anarthrous
and comes before the verb. Therefore, it fits Colwell’s construction,
though it might not fit the rule (for the rule states that definiteness is
determined or indic | S*********o
发帖数: 1334 | | s******g
发帖数: 5074 | |
|
