由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Biology版 - retracted Cell-- 这么烂的quality咋发出来的
相关主题
Nature Reviews Genetics 论文由于剽窃一段论文被撤稿也说说Nature这期的retraction
这个哈佛stem cell 图造假和当年肖恩的类似了Science 消息两名中国博士后的关于基因治疗文章作假, Li Chen 和 Zhiyu Li
这篇cell 为什么撤稿,真实的原因是什么linda buck 有点猛啊
The Top 10 Retractions of 2015(zz)《Nature》: 研究称美科学家更倾向于造假
国自然基金委对方舟子的实名举报有反应么?触目惊心啊
无标题Paper help! Thanks!
[合集] 中兴 cell paper retracted.这篇纽约时报文章值得一读:A Sharp Rise in Retractions Prompts Calls for Reform
another case of a Chinese guy's paper retracted...未经老板许可发文章,这回全是老中
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: reviewers话题: retracted话题: cell话题: xmea话题: myopathy
进入Biology版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
j**********k
发帖数: 296
1
按说data quality差些无所谓,但这篇真算是极品了。editor该被fire掉,天雷滚滚的谬误竟然也可以送出去给reviewers?reviewers也是吃屎了,即使print out都该能看出一堆问题。
RETRACTED: VMA21 Deficiency Causes an Autophagic Myopathy by Compromising V-
ATPase Activity and Lysosomal Acidification
Reason: Our paper reported the identification of mutations in the
gene VMA21 in patients with X-linked Myopathy with Excessive Autophagy (XMEA
) and characterized the molecular mechanisms underlying the disease
phenotype. Many of the figure panels in the paper summ
b******n
发帖数: 4225
2
第一作者疑似三哥(姐)

的谬误竟然也可以送出去给reviewers?reviewers也是吃屎了,即使print out都该能
看出一堆问题。
V-
XMEA

【在 j**********k 的大作中提到】
: 按说data quality差些无所谓,但这篇真算是极品了。editor该被fire掉,天雷滚滚的谬误竟然也可以送出去给reviewers?reviewers也是吃屎了,即使print out都该能看出一堆问题。
: RETRACTED: VMA21 Deficiency Causes an Autophagic Myopathy by Compromising V-
: ATPase Activity and Lysosomal Acidification
: Reason: Our paper reported the identification of mutations in the
: gene VMA21 in patients with X-linked Myopathy with Excessive Autophagy (XMEA
: ) and characterized the molecular mechanisms underlying the disease
: phenotype. Many of the figure panels in the paper summ

p****n
发帖数: 9263
3
肯定是三哥(姐),疑似名门之后

【在 b******n 的大作中提到】
: 第一作者疑似三哥(姐)
:
: 的谬误竟然也可以送出去给reviewers?reviewers也是吃屎了,即使print out都该能
: 看出一堆问题。
: V-
: XMEA

H*********1
发帖数: 56
4
能具体说说啥错误吗?

的谬误竟然也可以送出去给reviewers?reviewers也是吃屎了,即使print out都该能
看出一堆问题。
V-
XMEA

【在 j**********k 的大作中提到】
: 按说data quality差些无所谓,但这篇真算是极品了。editor该被fire掉,天雷滚滚的谬误竟然也可以送出去给reviewers?reviewers也是吃屎了,即使print out都该能看出一堆问题。
: RETRACTED: VMA21 Deficiency Causes an Autophagic Myopathy by Compromising V-
: ATPase Activity and Lysosomal Acidification
: Reason: Our paper reported the identification of mutations in the
: gene VMA21 in patients with X-linked Myopathy with Excessive Autophagy (XMEA
: ) and characterized the molecular mechanisms underlying the disease
: phenotype. Many of the figure panels in the paper summ

C*********m
发帖数: 213
5
还有一篇同期的preview,是不是也要retract?
http://www.cell.com/abstract/S0092-8674(09)00387-0

的谬误竟然也可以送出去给reviewers?reviewers也是吃屎了,即使print out都该能
看出一堆问题。
V-
XMEA

【在 j**********k 的大作中提到】
: 按说data quality差些无所谓,但这篇真算是极品了。editor该被fire掉,天雷滚滚的谬误竟然也可以送出去给reviewers?reviewers也是吃屎了,即使print out都该能看出一堆问题。
: RETRACTED: VMA21 Deficiency Causes an Autophagic Myopathy by Compromising V-
: ATPase Activity and Lysosomal Acidification
: Reason: Our paper reported the identification of mutations in the
: gene VMA21 in patients with X-linked Myopathy with Excessive Autophagy (XMEA
: ) and characterized the molecular mechanisms underlying the disease
: phenotype. Many of the figure panels in the paper summ

P****d
发帖数: 564
6
Hoho, Retracted Cell, 以为Cell出了新的子刊。
w******y
发帖数: 8040
7
"While we stand by the validity of our conclusions, we believe that
the most responsible course of action is to retract our paper."
perfect excuse for 大牛实验室前瞻性作假啊

的谬误竟然也可以送出去给reviewers?reviewers也是吃屎了,即使print out都该能
看出一堆问题。
V-
XMEA

【在 j**********k 的大作中提到】
: 按说data quality差些无所谓,但这篇真算是极品了。editor该被fire掉,天雷滚滚的谬误竟然也可以送出去给reviewers?reviewers也是吃屎了,即使print out都该能看出一堆问题。
: RETRACTED: VMA21 Deficiency Causes an Autophagic Myopathy by Compromising V-
: ATPase Activity and Lysosomal Acidification
: Reason: Our paper reported the identification of mutations in the
: gene VMA21 in patients with X-linked Myopathy with Excessive Autophagy (XMEA
: ) and characterized the molecular mechanisms underlying the disease
: phenotype. Many of the figure panels in the paper summ

1 (共1页)
进入Biology版参与讨论
相关主题
未经老板许可发文章,这回全是老中国自然基金委对方舟子的实名举报有反应么?
问个老鼠实验的问题无标题
日本人造假[合集] 中兴 cell paper retracted.
谁能找出来去年nature上土耳其学生造假最后轻易过关的帖子?another case of a Chinese guy's paper retracted...
Nature Reviews Genetics 论文由于剽窃一段论文被撤稿也说说Nature这期的retraction
这个哈佛stem cell 图造假和当年肖恩的类似了Science 消息两名中国博士后的关于基因治疗文章作假, Li Chen 和 Zhiyu Li
这篇cell 为什么撤稿,真实的原因是什么linda buck 有点猛啊
The Top 10 Retractions of 2015(zz)《Nature》: 研究称美科学家更倾向于造假
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: reviewers话题: retracted话题: cell话题: xmea话题: myopathy