由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Biology版 - 大部分cancer research结果都不能重复
相关主题
现在生物学研究的几个突出的问题.[转帖]千万别成为科学家 (转载)
难怪NIH得cut funding给我推荐一个长的快的mouse细胞吧
现在有关癌症方面的研究越来越胡扯饶毅又憋屈的不行了
有没有剽窃的嫌疑?老鼠的这种行为是焦虑吗?
你们怎么看前瞻性造假(结论对,实验不真)有谁了解Laurie Glimcher实验室?
Science上没有让读者做comment的地方?调查一下,一般大家博士毕业的时候都有几篇一作的文章?
Re: 这个版完了搞不明白为什么这么多postdoc要求涨工资
Don't Become a Scientist!请所有EB2, EB3 绿卡还在排队的朋友们都去下面两个link去签一下 (转载)
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: science话题: research话题: cancer话题: funding话题: nih
进入Biology版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
k*****r
发帖数: 21039
D******9
发帖数: 2665
2
都是发文章, 弄钱给害的。
m******5
发帖数: 1383
3
我觉得cancer research上的文章都很不好看
m********a
发帖数: 239
4
sad

【在 k*****r 的大作中提到】
: 生物里面骗子可真不少
: http://news.yahoo.com/cancer-science-many-discoveries-dont-hold

c**k
发帖数: 1228
5
i want say something controversial.
even those that can be repeated, it is still clinically useless in many case
. So it makes no difference whether it can be repeated or not.
just read these papers for fun, that is it.

【在 k*****r 的大作中提到】
: 生物里面骗子可真不少
: http://news.yahoo.com/cancer-science-many-discoveries-dont-hold

O******e
发帖数: 4845
6
临床应用只是咱们做研究的目的之一。这个基本事实一万年也不会变。

case

【在 c**k 的大作中提到】
: i want say something controversial.
: even those that can be repeated, it is still clinically useless in many case
: . So it makes no difference whether it can be repeated or not.
: just read these papers for fun, that is it.

d***d
发帖数: 133
7

Claiming that doing science is for the sake of science or curiosity is
indeed very honorable and glorious, but honestly, can be very pretentious,
too.
Let's face it: where do we receive our research funding, and what are the
funding agencies' expectations? Regardless of whether it's tax payers' money
or some private foundation, eventually the beneficiaries would like to see
something tangible in return. Recall Econ101: there is no free lunch.

【在 O******e 的大作中提到】
: 临床应用只是咱们做研究的目的之一。这个基本事实一万年也不会变。
:
: case

m****n
发帖数: 1066
8
Most papers in biomedical science are SHUI HUO. Cancer research is not an
exception
y**********n
发帖数: 478
9
照你这么说那些做数学,理论物理的是不是对science的亵渎?

money
see

【在 d***d 的大作中提到】
:
: Claiming that doing science is for the sake of science or curiosity is
: indeed very honorable and glorious, but honestly, can be very pretentious,
: too.
: Let's face it: where do we receive our research funding, and what are the
: funding agencies' expectations? Regardless of whether it's tax payers' money
: or some private foundation, eventually the beneficiaries would like to see
: something tangible in return. Recall Econ101: there is no free lunch.

d***d
发帖数: 133
10

This is biology board and we are talking about research in the biological
field, funded mostly by NIH and other medical foundations. These
beneficiaries have a common mission to "uncover new knowledge that will lead
to better health for everyone", a.k.a., clinical applications. Science for
the sake of curiosity is, unfortunately, not their mission, and will be
frowned upon if put into a grant proposal. The politically correct way to
write an NIH grant proposal is to relate your research to some kind of
disease, and more recently, translational research.
Math and theoretical physics, on the other hand, get the majority of their
funding from NSF, which states in its mission "To promote the progress of
science". So there's nothing wrong or hypocritical for them to claim '
science for the sake of science'.
Simply put: we get paid by our funding agency and therefore have to abide by
their rules. Like it or not, you have to live with it.

【在 y**********n 的大作中提到】
: 照你这么说那些做数学,理论物理的是不是对science的亵渎?
:
: money
: see

相关主题
Science上没有让读者做comment的地方?[转帖]千万别成为科学家 (转载)
Re: 这个版完了给我推荐一个长的快的mouse细胞吧
Don't Become a Scientist!饶毅又憋屈的不行了
进入Biology版参与讨论
k****o
发帖数: 589
11
"We went through the paper line by line, figure by figure," said Begley. "I
explained that we re-did their experiment 50 times and never got their
result. He said they'd done it six times and got this result once, but put
it in the paper because it made the best story. It's very disillusioning."
这人居然有脸当面那样说
d*******j
发帖数: 64
12
应该把NIH内部的lab都改造成专门重复试验结果的机构,随机重复发表论文中的重要结
果,重复的效果登到公开的数据库里,作为申请/renew funding的参考。同时把学生,
博后的工资涨一倍,迫使一半的lab关门或者少雇人,剩下的人有个好点的前途,就没
人愿意冒险作弊了。现在造数据的这么多还不是生存太艰难给逼的
d*******r
发帖数: 3299
13
强烈顶这个,我老早就跟同学说过,美国政府就是需要拨大钱专门建立和运行这种lab
,才能建立起“结果验证机制”和“错误、夸大结果的责任回溯机制”。不然根本改变
不了学术界污浊的现状。

【在 d*******j 的大作中提到】
: 应该把NIH内部的lab都改造成专门重复试验结果的机构,随机重复发表论文中的重要结
: 果,重复的效果登到公开的数据库里,作为申请/renew funding的参考。同时把学生,
: 博后的工资涨一倍,迫使一半的lab关门或者少雇人,剩下的人有个好点的前途,就没
: 人愿意冒险作弊了。现在造数据的这么多还不是生存太艰难给逼的

k*****r
发帖数: 21039
14
凡是米犹dominate的行业,都是骗子横行,比如生物,比如金融。

【在 d*******j 的大作中提到】
: 应该把NIH内部的lab都改造成专门重复试验结果的机构,随机重复发表论文中的重要结
: 果,重复的效果登到公开的数据库里,作为申请/renew funding的参考。同时把学生,
: 博后的工资涨一倍,迫使一半的lab关门或者少雇人,剩下的人有个好点的前途,就没
: 人愿意冒险作弊了。现在造数据的这么多还不是生存太艰难给逼的

k****a
发帖数: 7077
15
比如电影四皮鹁鸽,比如伍嗲伦?

【在 k*****r 的大作中提到】
: 凡是米犹dominate的行业,都是骗子横行,比如生物,比如金融。
k*****r
发帖数: 21039
16
还有搞13岁少女的破烂斯基。

【在 k****a 的大作中提到】
: 比如电影四皮鹁鸽,比如伍嗲伦?
1 (共1页)
进入Biology版参与讨论
相关主题
请所有EB2, EB3 绿卡还在排队的朋友们都去下面两个link去签一下 (转载)你们怎么看前瞻性造假(结论对,实验不真)
药厂找机会可以空了 (转载)Science上没有让读者做comment的地方?
我所认识的美国国立卫生研究院院长-鲁白Re: 这个版完了
Re: grant applicationDon't Become a Scientist!
现在生物学研究的几个突出的问题.[转帖]千万别成为科学家 (转载)
难怪NIH得cut funding给我推荐一个长的快的mouse细胞吧
现在有关癌症方面的研究越来越胡扯饶毅又憋屈的不行了
有没有剽窃的嫌疑?老鼠的这种行为是焦虑吗?
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: science话题: research话题: cancer话题: funding话题: nih